Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 17(4): 561-571, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27761677

RESUMEN

For successful transplantation, allografts should be free of microorganisms that may cause harm to the allograft recipient. Before or during recovery and subsequent processing, tissues can become contaminated. Effective tissue recovery methods, such as minimizing recovery times (<24 h after death) and the number of experienced personnel performing recovery, are examples of factors that can affect the rate of tissue contamination at recovery. Additional factors, such as minimizing the time after asystole to recovery and the total time it takes to perform recovery, the type of recovery site, the efficacy of the skin prep performed immediately prior to recovery of tissue, and certain technical recovery procedures may also result in control of the rate of contamination. Due to the heterogeneity of reported recovery practices and experiences, it cannot be concluded if the use of other barriers and/or hygienic precautions to avoid contamination have had an effect on bioburden detected after tissue recovery. Qualified studies are lacking which indicates a need exists for evidence-based data to support methods that reduce or control bioburden.


Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos/microbiología , Aloinjertos/virología , Descontaminación/métodos , Esterilización/métodos , Bancos de Tejidos , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/métodos , Humanos , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Trasplante Homólogo
2.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 17(4): 573-584, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27665294

RESUMEN

Musculoskeletal allografts are typically disinfected using antibiotics, irradiation or chemical methods but protocols vary significantly between tissue banks. It is likely that different disinfection protocols will not have the same level of microorganism kill; they may also have varying effects on the structural integrity of the tissue, which could lead to significant differences in terms of clinical outcome in recipients. Ideally, a disinfection protocol should achieve the greatest bioburden reduction with the lowest possible impact on tissue integrity. A systematic review of three databases found 68 laboratory and clinical studies that analyzed the microbial bioburden or contamination rates of musculoskeletal allografts. The use of peracetic acid-ethanol or ionizing radiation was found to be most effective for disinfection of tissues. The use of irradiation is the most frequently published method for the terminal sterilization of musculoskeletal allografts; it is widely used and its efficacy is well documented in the literature. However, effective disinfection results were still observed using the BioCleanse™ Tissue Sterilization process, pulsatile lavage with antibiotics, ethylene oxide, and chlorhexidine. The variety of effective methods to reduce contamination rate or bioburden, in conjunction with limited high quality evidence provides little support for the recommendation of a single bioburden reduction method.


Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos/microbiología , Aloinjertos/virología , Trasplante Óseo , Desinfección/métodos , Músculos/trasplante , Esterilización/métodos , Trasplante Óseo/efectos adversos , Huesos/microbiología , Huesos/virología , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula/métodos , Humanos , Músculos/microbiología , Músculos/virología , Bancos de Tejidos , Trasplante Homólogo
3.
JAMA ; 210(5): 905, 1969 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5394486
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...