Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: association between nodule size, histopathological characteristics and clinical outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas - a multicenter retrospective cohort study on 761 patients.

A great number of surgical diagnostic procedures are performed every year for thyroid nodules that are included in undetermined cytological classes that reveal to be malignant thyroid carcinomas in one-third of cases. In the most recent guidelines, lobectomy is the most recommended surgical approach for this classes of nodules, but total thyroidectomy is the recommended treatment for undetermined nodules larger than 4 cm. The main study aim is to support or question the dimensional criteria as an independent clinical decision element for undetermined thyroid nodules management. We examined data regarding 761 patients undergoing thyroid surgery for undetermined thyroid nodules at two high-volume endocrine surgery units in Italy. Patients were divided into three groups based on the preoperative size of the nodules (N < 1, 1 < N < 4, N > 4 cm). Among the patients belonging to the different groups, we analyzed: differences in malignancy rate, histological characteristics of invasiveness and neoplastic aggressiveness, rates of recurrence and response to therapy. Nodule size (evaluated as a categorical variable and as a continuous variable) did not show any statistically significant correlation with the rate of malignancy, histopathological characteristics of tumor aggressiveness and the patient's clinical outcome. Most of the tumors found were included in the low risk class (79.2%) and only one was classified as high risk. Follow up of cancer cases showed excellent results in terms of survival, response to therapy and disease recurrence. Malignant thyroid tumors of any size resulting from a nodule identified as cytologically indeterminate are usually characterized by a low risk follicular pattern, well-differentiated and with an excellent outcome. As a result, preferring an extended surgical attitude for undetermined nodules based on tumor size, in absence of other risk factors, can lead to overtreatment in a significant percentage of cases.

The analgesic efficacy of continuous elastomeric pump ropivacaine wound instillation after appendectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ropivacaine 0.2% when administered continuously via elastomeric pump after appendectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Surgical ward of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 96 ASA physical status I and II patients of at least 14 years of age, undergoing appendectomy through a McBurney incision. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: 500 mg of ropivacaine in 48 hours (10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine 20 mg, starter dose plus 5 mL/h continuous wound infusion via elastomeric pump device; n = 48) in the experimental group and 250 mL of normal saline, as placebo, in the control group. MEASUREMENTS: Postappendectomy pain, measured either with a simple verbal scale or with a visual analog scale, parenteral analgesic consumption, and global satisfaction were all measured. MAIN RESULTS: A reduction in postoperative pain was observed in the ropivacaine group. Degree of pain, with a simple verbal scale measurement of severe and unbearable, was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group than in the normal saline group from time 0 to 24 hours at rest and from time 0 to 36 hours on coughing. A significant lower pain intensity (visual analog scale) was found in the ropivacaine group both at rest and on coughing, beginning at three hours and continuing to 36 hours postoperatively. The mean number of rescue analgesic doses was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% is a useful, practical, and safe method for management of postoperative pain after appendectomy.