Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Stem Cells Dev ; 30(5): 234-246, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33446053

RESUMEN

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Alternative treatment options are often insufficient. Several studies have proven the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in the treatment of therapy-refractory acute GvHD in adult and pediatric patients. Long-term data in pediatric patients are scarce. In this retrospective analysis, a total of 25 patients with a median age of 10.6 years (range 0.6-22.1 years) who received bone marrow-derived MSCs after alloHSCT for the treatment of steroid-refractory III and IV GvHD were analyzed. The median observation period of the surviving patients was 9.3 years (1.3-12.7 years) after HSCT. Among the 25 patients, 10 (40.0%) died [relapse (n = 3), multiorgan failure (n = 6), cardiorespiratory failure (n = 1)] at median 0.5 years (0.2-2.3 years) after HSCT. Partial response and complete remission (PR, CR) of the GvHD were achieved in 76.0% and 24.0% of the patients, respectively. Transplant-related mortality was 0% in the patients who achieved CR after MSC treatment and 26.3% for those with PR. A median improvement by one intestinal or liver GvHD stage (range 1-4) could be achieved after MSC application. No potentially MSC-related long-term adverse effects, for example, secondary malignancy, were identified. In conclusion, the intravenous application of allogeneic MSCs was safe and proved effective for the treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD. However, larger, prospective, and randomized trials are needed to evaluate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/métodos , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/citología , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Supervivencia Celular , Células Cultivadas , Niño , Preescolar , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Lactante , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esteroides/farmacología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Front Immunol ; 11: 628, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32362894

RESUMEN

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in childhood and adolescence is a rare malignancy that can successfully be treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib. According to the current experience, treatment is necessary for years and, in the majority of cases, a lifelong approach is required to control the malignant disease. To what extent imatinib causes immunosuppression in different age cohorts is a controversial discussion. According to general medical recommendations, live vaccines are contraindicated in individuals treated with imatinib. However, a recent increase in the number of globally reported cases of measles has been observed and continues to rise. Due to the high contagiousness of the virus, near-perfect vaccination coverage (herd immunity of 93 to 95%) is required to effectively protect against measles resurgence-a scenario that is not realistic in many countries. When four teenagers with CML (median age 13 years, range 12-15) who were enrolled into pediatric trial CML-paed II while on imatinib treatment (median treatment duration 36 months, range 11-84) were identified without protective measles and/or varicella titers, we carefully balanced the risks of a live vaccination under immunosuppressive TKI medication against the benefit of being protected. The patients underwent live vaccination with the live attenuated vaccines M-M-RVAX Pro® and Varivax® simultaneously (Patient #1), Priorix® and Varilix® consecutively (Patient #2), and Priorix® (Patients #3 and #4). While the first three patients were vaccinated while receiving TKI therapy, treatment with imatinib was interrupted in patient #4 for 1 week prior and 2 weeks after vaccination. Patients #1 and #3 reacted with stable long-term seroconversion. In Patient #2, serum titer conversion against measles and varicella could not be demonstrated and thus revaccination with Priorix® and Varilix® was performed 3 years later. However, protective titers did not develop or were lost again. Patient #4 also lost protective titers against measles when assessed 10 months after vaccination, but revaccination resulted in stable seroprotective titers over 12 months after the last vaccination during ongoing imatinib treatment. We conclude that in all patients, the safety of live vaccines could be documented, as no acute or late adverse events were observed. However, in line with observations that memory B-cells are lost under exposure to imatinib, revaccination may become necessary (two out of four patients in this small series lost their seroprotection). Considering that the number of cases is very small, we also suggest some criteria for decision-making regarding live vaccinations of CML patients treated with imatinib.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/terapia , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología , Adolescente , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Memoria Inmunológica , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Masculino , Seroconversión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA