Validity of "Sepsis-3" criteria in identifying patients with community-onset sepsis in Internal Medicine wards; a prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the validity of "Sepsis-3" criteria in identifying patients with sepsis in internal medicine wards (IMWs). Real-life data about this topic and on the prevalence of sepsis in IMWs could be useful for improving hospital organization. OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of "Sepsis-3" criteria in identifying patients with community-onset sepsis in IMWs. Secondary objectives: to evaluate the prevalence of these patients in IMWs and to compare "Sepsis-3" and "Sepsis-1" criteria. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study, carried out in 22 IMWs of Tuscany (Italy). All patients admitted to each of the study centers over a period of 21-31 days were evaluated within 48 hours; those with clinical signs of infection were enrolled. The main outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 2,839 patients were evaluated and 938 (33%) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with sepsis diagnosed according to "Sepsis-3" were 522, representing 55.6% of patients with infection and 18.4% of all patients hospitalized; they were older than those without sepsis (79.4±12.5 vs 74.6±15.2 years, p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with sepsis compared to others (13.8% vs 4.6%; p<0.001). "Sepsis-3" criteria showed greater predictive validity for in-hospital mortality than "Sepsis-1" criteria (AUROC=0.71; 95%CI, 0.66-0.77 vs 0.60; 95%CI 0.54-0.66; p=0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: "Sepsis-3" criteria are able to identify patients with community-onset sepsis in IMWs, whose prevalence and in-hospital mortality are remarkably high. Medical departments should adapt their organization to the needs for care of these complex patients.

Yield and clinical impact of blood cultures in patients admitted to an internal medicine ward.

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the yield and clinical impact of blood cultures in a 78-bed Internal Medicine ward of a medium-sized Italian acute care hospital. During a two-month study period, 154 (mean age: 75.2 ++ 12.2 years; 94 males) out of 620 (24.8%) hospitalized patients underwent 174 blood cultures and were enrolled in the study. The rate of true-positive cultures was 11.5% (20/174) and the rate of false-positive (contaminants) was 5.7% (10/174). A total of 23 microorganisms (5 multidrug resistant strains), most frequently Escherichia coli (n = 10), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 3) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), were isolated. The positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with urinary tract infection (31%) and abdomen infection (26.1%) than in patients with pneumonia (4.9%; p<0.01). Although the positivity rate in patients exposed to antibiotics was lower than in those not exposed, the difference was not statistically significant. Therapy changes due to blood culture positivity were observed in 7.1% of the patients overall. In-hospital death was observed in nine of the 136 patients with negative blood cultures (6.6%) and in none of the 18 patients with positive blood cultures. These results indicate that the yield and clinical impact of blood cultures is quite low in patients admitted to an Internal Medicine ward and suggest the need to improve the adequacy of the indications to perform the test.