Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 18(4): 606-612, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026887

RESUMEN

Rationale: Patients with malignant or paramalignant pleural effusions (MPEs or PMPEs) may have tunneled pleural catheter (TPC) management withheld because of infection concerns from immunosuppression associated with antineoplastic therapy.Objectives: To determine the rate of infections related to TPC use and to determine the relationship to antineoplastic therapy, immune system competency, and overall survival (OS).Methods: We performed an international, multiinstitutional study of patients with MPEs or PMPEs undergoing TPC management from 2008 to 2016. Patients were stratified by whether or not they underwent antineoplastic therapy and/or whether or not they were immunocompromised. Cumulative incidence functions and multivariable competing risk regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of TPC-related infection. Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed to examine for independent effects on OS.Results: A total of 1,408 TPCs were placed in 1,318 patients. Patients had a high frequency of overlap between antineoplastic therapy and an immunocompromised state (75-83%). No difference in the overall (6-7%), deep pleural (3-5%), or superficial (3-4%) TPC-related infection rates between subsets of patients stratified by antineoplastic therapy or immune status was observed. The median time to infection was 41 (interquartile range, 19-87) days after TPC insertion. Multivariable competing risk analyses demonstrated that longer TPC duration was associated with a higher risk of TPC-related infection (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.06; P = 0.028). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed antineoplastic therapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = 0.015).Conclusions: The risk of TPC-related infection does not appear to be increased by antineoplastic therapy use or an immunocompromised state. The overall rates of infection are low and comparable with those of immunocompetent patients with no relevant antineoplastic therapy. These results support TPC palliation for MPE or PMPEs regardless of plans for antineoplastic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Derrame Pleural Maligno , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Drenaje , Humanos , Pleurodesia
3.
Chest ; 157(6): 1656-1664, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31978428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy is commonly used to evaluate suspicious lung lesions. The yield is likely dependent on patient, radiographic, and bronchoscopic factors. Few studies have assessed these factors simultaneously while also including the preprocedure physician-assessed probability of cancer (pCA) when assessing yield. METHODS: This study is a secondary data analysis from a prospective multicenter trial. Diagnostic yield of standard bronchoscopy with biopsy ± fluoroscopy, endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), electromagnetic navigation, and combination bronchoscopies was assessed. Definitions for diagnostic and nondiagnostic bronchoscopies were rigorously predefined. The association of diagnostic yield with individual variables was examined by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 687 patients were included from 28 sites. Overall diagnostic yield was 69%; 80% for EBUS, 55% for bronchoscopy with biopsy ± fluoroscopy, 57% for electromagnetic navigation, and 74% for combination procedures (P < .001). Patients with larger, central lesions with adenopathy were significantly more likely to undergo a diagnostic bronchoscopy. Patients with pCA < 10% and 10% to 60% had lower yields (44% and 42%, respectively), whereas pCA > 60% yielded a positive result in 77% (P < .001). In multivariate logistic regression, the use of EBUS-TBNA, larger sized lesions, and central location were significantly associated with a diagnostic bronchoscopy. Seventeen percent of those with a malignant diagnosis and 28% of those with a benign diagnosis required secondary procedures to establish a diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to assess the yield of bronchoscopy according to physician-assessed pCA in a large, prospective multicenter trial. The yield of bronchoscopy varied greatly according to physician suspicion that cancer is present, the patients' clinical/radiographic features, and the type of procedure performed. Of the procedures performed, EBUS-TBNA was the most likely to provide a diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía/métodos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Endosonografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 17(3): 921-927, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29900753

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Physical activity (PA) is a potential therapy to improve quality of life in patients with advanced-stage lung cancer (LC), but no PA regimen has been shown to be beneficial, clinically practical, and sustainable. We sought to test the hypothesis that a patient-centered activity regimen (PCAR) will improve patient participation and PA more effectively than weekly phone calls. METHODS: In patients with advanced-stage LC, we implemented a walking-based activity regimen and motivated patients via either weekly phone calls (n = 29; FitBit Zip accelerometer) or PCAR (n = 15; FitBit Flex, an educational session, and twice-daily gain-framed text messages). Data collection over a 4-week period was compared, and a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model for activity level was constructed. RESULTS: Subjects receiving PCAR more frequently used the device (100% vs 79%) and less frequently had missing data (11% vs 38%). "More active" and "less active" groups were created based on mean step count in the first week. "Less active" patients in the PCAR group increased their PA level, whereas PA level fell in the "more active" group. Most subjects found PCAR helpful (92%) and would participate in another activity study (85%). DISCUSSION: Compared with weekly phone calls, PCAR has higher patient participation, is more likely to improve PA in "less active" subjects, and has high patient satisfaction. A multifaceted PA regimen may be a more efficacious mechanism to study PA in advanced LC. PCAR should be used in a randomized controlled trial to evaluate for improvements in symptom burden, quality of life, and mood.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Ejercicio Físico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Acelerometría , Anciano , Uso del Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Motivación , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/psicología , Refuerzo Social , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricos , Caminata
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA