Percutaneous Aspiration (AngioVac) of a Mitral Valve Vegetation followed by a Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Intervention.

The AngioVac transcatheter aspiration system (Angiodynamics) is used to percutaneously extract thrombi as well as vegetations typically growing from the right heart. We report a case of a failed mitral stented bioprosthesis due to a large vegetation that was treated successfully with AngioVac evacuation through a transseptal puncture followed by valve-in-valve intervention in the same setting.

Ex Vivo Expanded Donor Alloreactive Regulatory T Cells Lose Immunoregulatory, Proliferation, and Antiapoptotic Markers After Infusion Into ATG-lymphodepleted, Nonhuman Primate Heart Allograft Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy is a promising approach to amelioration of allograft rejection and promotion of organ transplant tolerance. However, the fate of infused Treg, and how this relates to their therapeutic efficacy using different immunosuppressive regimens is poorly understood. Our aim was to analyze the tissue distribution, persistence, replicative activity and phenotypic stability of autologous, donor antigen alloreactive Treg (darTreg) in anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-lymphodepleted, heart-allografted cynomolgus monkeys. METHODS: darTreg were expanded ex vivo from flow-sorted, circulating Treg using activated donor B cells and infused posttransplant into recipients of major histocompatibility complex-mismatched heart allografts. Fluorochrome-labeled darTreg were identified and characterized in peripheral blood, lymphoid, and nonlymphoid tissues and the graft by flow cytometric analysis. RESULTS: darTreg selectively suppressed autologous T cell responses to donor antigens in vitro. However, following their adoptive transfer after transplantation, graft survival was not prolonged. Early (within 2 wk posttransplant; under ATG, tacrolimus, and anti-IL-6R) or delayed (6-8 wk posttransplant; under rapamycin) darTreg infusion resulted in a rapid decline in transferred darTreg in peripheral blood. Following their early or delayed infusion, labeled cells were evident in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs and the graft at low percentages (<4% CD4+ T cells). Notably, infused darTreg showed reduced expression of immunoregulatory molecules (Foxp3 and CTLA4), Helios, the proliferative marker Ki67 and antiapoptotic Bcl2, compared with preinfusion darTreg and endogenous CD4+CD25hi Treg. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of therapeutic efficacy of infused darTreg in lymphodepleted heart graft recipients appears to reflect loss of a regulatory signature and proliferative and survival capacity shortly after infusion.

Preoperative Vitamin K Reduces Blood Transfusions at Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure patients have hepatic congestion and abnormal coagulation profiles, increasing perioperative bleeding at time of ventricular assist device implantation. This study examined the impact of the preoperative administration of vitamin K on perioperative blood transfusion requirements. METHODS: Retrospectively, 190 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients received no vitamin K (n = 62) or two 10-mg doses of intravenous vitamin K (n = 128) in the 24 hours before assist device implantation. Primary end points included transfusion requirements and reexploration rates for bleeding. Secondary outcomes were pump thrombosis and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups, with slight differences (not statistically significant) noted in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile and total bilirubin levels. The only significant difference noted was the year of implantation (P < .001). Blood product usage was significantly lower in the vitamin K group compared to the no vitamin K group (P < .001). Higher rates of reexploration for bleeding (29.7% vs 13.6%, P = .023) and death at hospital discharge (16.2% vs 2.8%, P = .004) were noted for the no vitamin K group compared with the vitamin K group. After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile, total bilirubin, surgeon, and year of operation, reexploration rates and death did not achieve statistical significance. No statistically significant difference was observed in stroke and pump thrombosis rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative vitamin K administration may help reduce blood product use without any increased risk for strokes or pump thrombosis.

Right Heart Failure in Different Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Single-Center Experience.

Background: Right heart failure (RHF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation increases morbidity and mortality for those who develop this complication. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in incidence of RHF and outcomes between 2 types of continuous-flow LVADs at a single center. Methods: From January 2012 through June 2016, 184 patients were implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD (161 patients with the HeartMate II and 23 patients with the HeartWare device) either as a bridge to transplant or as destination therapy. Preoperative demographics, medical history, laboratory values, hemodynamics, and device type were analyzed to determine the variables associated with RHF and mortality. Results: Preoperative variables between the 2 groups were homogeneous. Most patients were Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 or 2 (92%) and New York Heart Association class IV (81%). More patients in the HeartMate II group had the indication of destination therapy (54% vs 30%), while more patients in the HeartWare group were implanted as bridge to transplant (70% vs 46%). RHF occurred in 57% of HeartWare patients compared to 16% of patients who received the HeartMate II (P=0.0001). After propensity score analysis, patients receiving the HeartWare device had increased odds for RHF (P=0.0013) and renal failure requiring dialysis (P=0.0135). The HeartMate II patient survival rate exceeded the HeartWare patient survival rate at 1 year (82.1% vs 67.2%) and at 2 years (74.6% vs 61.7%), but this difference did not achieve statistical significance (log-rank P=0.087). Conclusion: These results indicate that device type may affect RHF incidence and mortality. Studies at other centers are needed to replicate these findings.

Effect of Hospital Ownership on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effects of hospital ownership, classified into three tiers (nonfederal government, not-for-profit, and for-profit hospitals), on in-hospital outcomes after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) in the United States from 2009 to 2014. METHODS: Data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to calculate annual national estimates in utilization, in-hospital mortality, major complications, lengths of stay, cost of hospitalization, and disposition at discharge for years 2009 to 2014. Complications were calculated using patient safety indicators and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. RESULTS: Of the 3,571 patients (weighted, 17,547) with LVAD implants in the United States between 2009 and 2014, 82.1% were in not-for-profit hospitals, 15.6% in nonfederal government hospitals, and 2.3% in for-profit hospitals. In-hospital mortality significantly decreased over time only in not-for-profit hospitals by average annual change of -7.4% (p = 0.001) and was higher in for-profit hospitals than other tiers of hospital ownership. Our analysis did not suggest any differences in postoperative complications among different hospital ownership types. LVAD implantation in nonfederal government hospitals was associated with the highest cost ($227,930; interquartile range [IQR], $173,259 to $301,566) and implantation in for-profit hospitals was associated with lower cost ($148,406; IQR, $133,149 to $199,317; p = 0.03). The length of stay was similar across the three tiers of hospital ownership. Nonroutine discharge was significantly more frequent in not-for-profit hospitals (73.6%; IQR 69.5% to 77.7%) compared with nonfederal government (48.8%; IQR, 42.4% to 55.1%) and for-profit (59.8%; IQR, 43.0% to 76.6%) hospitals (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in in-hospital mortality, cost, and disposition exist between various hospital ownerships during admission for LVAD implant.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on clinical outcome in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is currently not well understood. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis with an intention to summarize all published clinical evidence. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through March 2018 for studies that compared the outcomes in patients with LVAD and CRT. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model, inverse variance method. The between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I2. A total of seven studies that included 1157 (575 CRT; 582 non-CRT) patients were identified. Our meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in the risk of mortality (pooled OR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.90-1.63, P = 0.21), ventricular arrhythmia incidence (pooled OR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.99-1.86, P = 0.06), hospitalization (pooled OR = 1.36, 95% CI 0.59-3.14, P = 0.48), or implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies (pooled OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.51-2.30, P = 0.84) among the CRT group compared with the non-CRT group. There was high heterogeneity with an I2 of 75% for ICD therapies. Among LVAD patients, CRT combined did not significantly affect mortality, re-hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmia incidence, and ICD therapies.

Distal landing zone optimization before endovascular repair of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The general goals of endovascular management in chronic distal thoracic aortic dissection are optimizing the true lumen, maintaining branch patency, and promoting false lumen (FL) thrombosis. Distal seal can be challenging in chronic distal thoracic aortic dissection due to the well-established secondary fenestrations and fibrotic septum. We describe our approach of distal landing zone optimization (DLZO) to enable full-diameter contact of the distal endoprosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our experience includes 19 procedures in 16 patients (12 male, age 68 ± 8 years) between May 2014 and November 2017. A history of previous ascending repair for type A dissection was present in 8 patients. Treatment indication was enlarging aneurysm in all subjects, and 4 patients had associated chronic visceral or distal ischemia. Point septal fenestrations were expanded by serial balloon dilation and/or wire-pull approaches. Balloon molding was used to ensure complete endograft apposition and FL collapse. RESULTS: One death occurred due to aortic perforation during wire-pull fenestration in a patient with heavily calcified and angulated aorta. The remaining procedures were accomplished safely and successfully. Balloon fenestration was used in 16 procedures, alone or in combination with a limited wire pull component. Adjunct procedures for distal seal included surgeon-modified fenestrated stent graft (3), iliac branch device (3), parallel superior mesenteric artery stent-graft (1), renal artery or superior mesenteric artery stent-graft (4), iliac stent (3), and plug obliteration of FL (5). Reintervention was required in 3 patients due to delayed loss of seal after the initial procedure (3, 8, and 12 months). Two were managed by repeat DLZO and distal extension. The third had distal extension via a surgeon-modified fenestrated stent-graft component. Follow-up imaging was available in 14 patients (16.0 ± 12.5 months, range: 1-33), with stable or regressed sac diameter with complete or near-complete thrombosis of the FL in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: DLZO enabled creation of a distal seal zone in all patients. Residual retrograde filling of the FL is a marker of procedure failure, especially when seal segment length or feasible endoprosthesis oversizing are marginal. Insufficient landing segment can be circumvented with the use of a fenestrated or branched device to accomplish seal in the visceral aorta or iliac bifurcation. Adjunct FL ablation is also a valuable technique to promote FL thrombosis.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Inflow Cannula Position May Contribute to the Development of HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Pump thrombosis (PT) is a dreaded complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Problems with inflow cannula (IC) position may precipitate thrombus development. We sought to determine if IC position contributes to the development of PT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 76 HeartMate II LVAD implants. The angle of the IC (AIC) to the horizontal plane was measured on chest x-rays. Patients who developed PT (PT group) were compared to the remaining patients (control group). RESULTS: The mean age at implantation was 56 ± 14 years, and 82% of the patients were male. Ten patients (13%) developed PT. Six (60%) required device exchange, and 4 (40%) were managed with anticoagulation and/or thrombolysis. The median AIC for all patients at implantation was 59° (range, 38°-98°; 25th-75th interquartile range, 50°-75°). In the PT group, the median AIC was larger at the time of PT diagnosis compared to implantation (70° vs 60°, P = 0.005). In the control group, the median AIC was also larger at follow-up compared to implantation (61° vs 58°, P < 0.001) although to a lesser degree than in the PT group. No difference was seen in the median AIC between the PT group and the control group at implantation (60° vs 58°, respectively; P = 0.668) or at follow-up (70° vs 61°, respectively; P = 0.309). However, the median AIC at follow-up in the PT group was significantly larger than the median AIC at implantation in the control group (70° vs 58°, respectively; P = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The HeartMate II LVAD IC position contributes to the development of PT. Regular monitoring of cannula position may help identify patients at risk for this problem.

Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if indication for support affects the outcomes after temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support after postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, cardiac transplant, or left ventricular assist device placement. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 80 patients receiving a right ventricular assist device. Data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare survival between groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for failure to wean from support. RESULTS: The indication for support was postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 13 patients (16%), cardiac transplant in 25 patients (31%), and left ventricular assist device in 42 patients (53%). Median support time was 6 days. Device was successfully weaned in 6 postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock cases (46%), 21 cardiac transplant cases (84%), and 35 left ventricular assist device cases (83%). Survival was worse for patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock compared with patients with a left ventricular assist device. Survival up to 3 months was better for patients who received immediate (n = 43) versus delayed (n = 37) support (79% vs 46%, P = .003). Weaning and survival remained static across implant era. Risk factor analysis identified postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock indication (odds ratio, 0.161; P = .007; confidence interval, 0.043-0.600) as an independent negative predictor of weaning from mechanical support. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary right ventricular mechanical support remains an effective treatment strategy after left ventricular assist device placement with immediate support resulting in superior short-term survival. Caution should be applied in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock when weaning and survival are poor. Overall survival outcomes have remained relatively static over time.

Regional Variation in Mortality, Major Complications, and Cost After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in the United States (2009 to 2014).

The objective of this analysis was to provide evidence on regional differences in outcomes, cost and disposition among patients who undergo continuous-flow LVAD implantation. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample and US Census Bureau, annual national estimates in utilization, in-hospital mortality, major complications, cost, length of stay (LOS), and disposition were estimated for years 2009 to 2014. Main outcomes and complications were identified using patient safety indicators and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We analyzed a total of 3,572 (weighted = 17,552) patients with LVAD implants among the 4 Census regions of the United States. The patient population in the Southern region was younger with higher percentage of African-Americans. Overall, the comorbidity burden was higher in the Midwest. The risk-adjusted rate of in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly among the geographical regions (p = 0.8). With the exception of cardiac tamponade rates which were higher in the Northeast and West, all other post-operative complications did not differ between regions. LOS was higher in the Northeast (median 32 days) and lower in the South (median 27 days). The cost analysis suggested higher median cost in the West (median $246,292) and lowest in the Northeast region (median $192,604). Finally, higher percentages of patients were transferred to an extended care facility in the Northeast, whereas more patients were discharged to home in the Western region. We identified region disparities in LOS, cost and disposition but not in-hospital mortality and complications, among patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2009 and 2014.