RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Awake intubation is the preferred method for securing difficult airways. We compared intravenous (IV) propofol and dexmedetomidine for C-MAC® D-blade-guided anticipated difficult nasotracheal intubation under conscious sedation. Methods: This randomised study included 60 patients with difficult airway (El-Ganzouri Score 4-9). After adequate airway preparation with IV midazolam 0.03 mg/kg and IV fentanyl 1 µg/kg, in Group P, propofol was infused at 250 µg/kg/min and in Group D, dexmedetomidine was infused at 1 µg/kg over 10 min, then at 0.5 µg/kg/h till a bispectral index (BIS) value 65-70 was achieved. Patients underwent C-MAC® D-blade video laryngoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation. The intubation score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included haemodynamic parameters, intubation time, number of attempts, the incidence of failed awake intubation, glottic view, time to achieve desired BIS, complications, study drug consumption and patient-reported satisfaction with the awake intubation technique. Quantitative variables were compared between groups using unpaired t-test/Welsch test/Mann-Whitney Test. Qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The intubation score was significantly higher in Group D versus Group P (P = 0.007). Patient reaction to intubation, haemodynamic parameters and percentage of glottis opening score were more favourable in Group P. Coughing and vocal cord movement were comparable between the groups (P > 0.05). The time to target BIS was four times longer, and the time to intubate was 6 seconds longer in Group D. Conclusion: Successful awake C-MAC® D-blade video laryngoscopic intubation can be performed under dexmedetomidine/propofol conscious sedation, with propofol giving a better intubation score.
RESUMEN
Introduction The administration of anti-cancer drugs and major abdominal surgeries have been independently identified to have a negative effect on renal function. The objectives of the study are to determine the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery following chemotherapy and identify the independent predictors of postoperative AKI among such cancer patients in a tertiary care cancer institute in North India. Methods The prospective observational study included 149 patients aged 18 years or more, scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Based on the administration of preoperative chemotherapy, the participants were divided into two study cohorts (Group 1: received preoperative chemotherapy; Group 2: did not receive preoperative chemotherapy). Patients' preoperative characteristics, including the use of preoperative chemotherapeutic agents and intraoperative factors, were evaluated for associations with the development of AKI postoperatively using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify the factors after adjusting for potential confounders. Results The overall incidence of postoperative AKI in major abdominal oncosurgery was 24.2% among our study participants, which was significantly higher among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (32.4%) as compared to those who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy (16%) (p=0.019). Besides preoperative chemotherapy, the present study also noted that high levels of preoperative urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) and intraoperative use of vasopressors were significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI development in the final model, after adjustment for all potential confounders. A preoperative UPCR≥0.345 predicted the development of postoperative AKI with 77.8% sensitivity and 83.2% specificity. Conclusion Considering the magnitude of the problem, identification of determinants of postoperative AKI in major abdominal surgeries in cancer patients may help anesthetists and surgeons in early detection of AKI, so that prompt precautionary measures can be put in place that can potentially impact prognosis.