Does the Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide Differ by Sex, Race or across Regions/Countries? An Analysis of 152,233 Patients from Four Observational Studies and the Company's Pharmacovigilance Database.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the potential impact of patients' sex, race and region/country on the risk of hypersensitivity reactions after intra-venous or intra-arterial administration of iopromide. METHODS: Two analyses were performed. 1.) The "Phase-IV-Analysis" evaluated an integrated pooled database of 4 non-interventional studies. 2.) The "GPV-Analysis" evaluated case reports from the company's pharmacovigilance database.The Phase-IV-Analysis was a nested case-control analysis of patients who received an injection of iopromide 300/370 mg iodine/mL. Cases had typical/unequivocal HSRs as defined by the ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media 2018.The GPV-Analysis was based on HSR case reports in the company database. Exposure estimates were derived from sales/market research data. RESULTS: The Phase-IV-Analysis comprised 152,233 patients from 37 countries. In the full-analysis-set 145,033, 59,412 and146,649 patients were included in the sex, race and region/country cohort, respectively. The GPV-Analysis was based on 78.72 million administrations for sex and 118.56 million administrations for region/country. No GPV exposure data by race was available. SEX: Phase-IV-Analysis: The HSR-incidence was significantly higher for women (0.72%) vs. men (0.55%) (p ≤ 0.0001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.3 (CI 1.154; 1.499), the adjusted OR was 1.156 (CI 1.006; 1.328) (p = 0.04).GPV-Analysis: Reporting rates were 0.0102% for women and 0.0075% for men (p < 0.0001). OR: 1.36 (CI 1.3; 1.43). RACE: Phase-IV-Analysis: No significantly different HSR incidences for white (0.70%) and Asian (0.61%) patients (p = 0.3094) were detected. REGION/COUNTRY: Phase-IV-Analysis: The overall world HSR-incidence was 0.62%. Europe: 0.52%, Asia: 0.70%, USA: 0.75%, Germany: 0.51%, China: 0.41%, South Korea: 0.76%.GPV-Analysis: The overall world HSR-reporting rate was 0.015%, varying across regions/countries. CONCLUSION: Women showed a slightly higher risk for HSRs than men. Impact of race was not found. HSR-reporting varied by region/country. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Risk for HSRs was increased by female sex but not by race or region/country.

Clinical Safety of Gadobutrol: Review of Over 25 Years of Use Exceeding 100 Million Administrations.

BACKGROUND: The macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol was introduced to the market in February 1998. Over the last 25 years, gadobutrol has been administered more than 100 million times worldwide providing a wealth of data related to safety. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a thorough review and status update on gadobutrol's safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Safety data from the clinical phase II-IV program and postmarketing surveillance were descriptively analyzed from February 1998 until December 31, 2022. Literature on special at-risk populations and specific safety aspects was critically summarized. RESULTS: Forty-five clinical phase II-IV studies recruited 7856 patients receiving gadobutrol. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3.4% and serious AEs in <0.1% of patients. Nausea (0.7%) and dysgeusia (0.4%) were the most reported AEs. All other drug-related AEs occurred ≤0.3%. After more than 100 million gadobutrol administrations, overall adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from postmarketing surveillance (including clinical trials) were rare with an overall reporting rate of 0.0356%, hypersensitivity reactions (0.0147%), nausea (0.0032%), vomiting (0.0025%), and dyspnea (0.0010%). All other ADRs were <0.001%. No trend for higher rates of AEs was found in patients with reduced renal or liver function. Seven clinical studies reported safety findings in 7292 children ≤18 years, thereof 112 newborns/toddlers younger than 2 years. Overall, 61 ADRs (0.84%) were reported, including 3 serious ones. Adverse events in patients ≥65 years of age ("elderly") were significantly less frequent than in younger patients. A total of 4 reports diagnostic of or consistent with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis have been received. No causal relationship has been established between clinical signs and symptoms and the presence of small amounts of gadolinium in the body in patients with normal renal function after use of gadobutrol. CONCLUSIONS: More than 100 million administrations worldwide have shown gadobutrol's well-established benefit-risk profile in any approved indication and populations.

Clinical Efficacy of Gadobutrol: Review of Over 25 Years of Use Exceeding 100 Million Administrations.

BACKGROUND: Gadobutrol has been administered more than 100 million times worldwide, since February 1998, that is, over the last 25 years. Numerous clinical studies in a broad range of indications document the long-term experience with gadobutrol. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a literature-based overview on gadobutrol's efficacy in 9 approved indications and use in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Efficacy results in patients of all age groups including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive/negative predictive values were identified by a systematic literature search on Embase until December 31, 2022. Nine approved indications were considered: central nervous system (CNS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), breast, heart, prostate, kidney, liver, musculoskeletal, whole body, and various indications in children. RESULTS: Sixty-five publications (10 phase III, 2 phase IV, 53 investigator-initiated studies) reported diagnostic efficacy results obtained from 7806 patients including 271 children, at 369 centers worldwide. Indication-specific sensitivity ranges were 59%-98% (CNS), 53%-100% (MRA), 80%-100% (breast), 64%-90% (heart), 64%-96% (prostate), 71-85 (kidney), 79%-100% (liver), 53%-98% (musculoskeletal), and 78%-100% (children). Indication-specific specificity ranges were 75%-100% (CNS), 64%-99% (MRA), 58%-98% (breast), and 47%-100% (heart). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated body of evidence, consisting of 65 studies with 7806 patients, including 271 children and 7535 adults, showed that gadobutrol is an efficacious magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for all age groups in various approved indications throughout the whole body.

Iopromide for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pertinent Literature.

Background: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging modality. Clinical data is scarce. Objectives: To summarize clinical evidence on the use of iopromide in CEM for the detection or by systematically analyzing the available literature on efficacy and safety. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods: Iopromide-specific publications reporting its use in CEM were identified by a systematic search within Bayer's Product Literature Information (PLI) database and by levering a recent review publication. The literature search in PLI was performed up to January 2023. The confirmatory-supporting review publication was based on a MEDLINE/EMBASE + full text search for publications issued between September 2003 and January 2019. Relevant literature was selected based on pre-defined criteria by 2 reviewers. The comparison of CEM vs traditional mammography (XRM) was performed on published results of sensitivity and specificity. Differences in diagnostic parameters were assessed within a meta-analysis. Results: Literature search: A total of 31 studies were identified reporting data on 5194 patients. Thereof, 19 studies on efficacy and 3 studies on safety. Efficacy: in 11 studies comparing iopromide CEM vs XRM, sensitivity was up to 43% higher (range 1%-43%) for CEM. Differences in specificity were found to be in a range of -4% to 46% for CEM compared with XRM. The overall gain in sensitivity for CEM vs XRM was 7% (95% CI [4%, 11%]) with no statistically significant loss in specificity in any study assessed. In most studies, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were found to be in favor of CEM. In 2 studies comparing CEM with breast magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI), both imaging modalities performed either equally well or CEM tended to show better results with respect to sensitivity and specificity. Safety: eight cases of iopromide-related adverse drug reactions were reported in 1022 patients (0.8%). Conclusions: Pertinent literature provides evidence for clinical utility of iopromide in CEM for the detection or confirmation of breast cancer. The overall gain in sensitivity for iopromide CEM vs XRM was 7% with no statistically significant loss in specificity.

Supervised Machine Learning-Based Decision Support for Signal Validation Classification.

INTRODUCTION: Signal validation in pharmacovigilance is the process of evaluating data to decide whether evidence is sufficient to justify further assessment of a detected signal. During the signal validation process, safety experts in our organization are required to review signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) and classify them into one of six predefined categories. OBJECTIVE: This experiment explored the extent to which predictive machine learning (ML) models can support the decision making of safety experts by accurately identifying the most appropriate predefined signal validation category. METHODS: We extracted cumulative data for six medicinal products, consisting of historic SDR validations and Individual Case Safety Reports, from the company's safety database for training and testing of the ML model. We implemented a decision tree-based supervised multiclass classifier model termed Gradient Boosted Trees followed by a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to mitigate the "black box" effect of the ensemble model by identifying the key predicting features in the model. Following a retrospective analysis, a prospective experiment was conducted to test the model accuracy and user acceptance in a real-life setting. RESULTS: The prediction accuracy of our ML model ranged from 83 to 86% over 3 months for the six medicinal products. The applicability of the model was confirmed by the company's safety experts. Additionally, the systematic predictions provided valuable information to the safety experts and assisted them in reviewing the SDRs efficiently and consistently. CONCLUSIONS: This experiment demonstrated that it is possible to train a multiclass classification model to accurately predict signal validation categories for SDRs. More importantly, the transparency of the predictions provided by the SHAP analysis led to high acceptance by the safety experts.

Risk of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iopromide in Children and Elderly: An Analysis of 132,850 Patients From 4 Observational Studies and Pharmacovigilance Covering >288 Million Administrations.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to iopromide in children and elderly patients in comparison to adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four observational studies were pooled and analyzed (analysis I). In addition, spontaneous reports from 1985 to 2020 from the pharmacovigilance database were evaluated (analysis II). All patients received iopromide for angiographic procedures or contrast-enhanced computed tomography in various indications. In analysis I, a nested case-control analysis, including a multivariable logistic regression model, based on pooled observational study data, was performed. Cases were defined as patients with a typical and unequivocal HSR; controls were patients without any recorded reaction. In analysis II, all spontaneous reports on HSRs after iopromide administration recorded in the pharmacovigilance database were descriptively analyzed. Exposure estimates on the size of the exposed age groups were derived from sales data and data from market research. The primary target variable was the risk of HSR to iopromide in children (<18 years) and elderly patients (≥65 years) compared with adults (≥18 to <65 years). RESULTS: In analysis I, a total of 132,850 patients were included (2978 children, 43,209 elderly, and 86,663 adults). Hypersensitivity reactions were significantly less frequent in children (0.47%) and elderly (0.38%) compared with adults (0.74%). The adjusted odds ratio (vs adults) for children was 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.98; P < 0.043), and that for the elderly was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.61; P < 0.001), indicating a lower risk for both subpopulations as compared with adults. In analysis II, of the overall >288 million iopromide administrations, 5.87, 114.18, and 167.97 million administrations were administered to children, elderly, and adults, respectively. The reporting rate for HSRs in children (0.0114%) and elderly (0.0071%) was significantly lower as compared with adults (0.0143%) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide were significantly less frequent in children and elderly compared with adults.

Pregnancy outcomes from the global pharmacovigilance database on interferon beta-1b exposure.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the present cohort study was to review outcomes of patients exposed to interferon beta-1b during pregnancy. METHODS: Pregnancy cases with exposure to interferon beta-1b reported to Bayer's pharmacovigilance (PV) database from worldwide sources from January 1995 through February 2018 were retrieved for evaluation. Only cases where pregnancy outcomes were unknown at the time of reporting (i.e. prospective cases) were included in the analysis of this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: As of February 2018, 2581 prospective pregnancies exposed to interferon beta-1b were retrieved from the database; 1348 pregnancies had documented outcomes. The majority of outcomes [1106 cases (82.0%)] were live births. Health status was known for 981 live births (no known health status for 125). Most of the prospective pregnancies with known outcomes corresponded to live births with no congenital anomalies [896 cases (91.3%)]. Spontaneous abortion occurred in 160 cases (11.9%). Congenital birth defects were observed in 14/981 live births with known health status [1.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-2.38]. No consistent pattern in the type of birth defect was identified. Rates of both spontaneous abortion and birth defects were not higher than the general population. CONCLUSIONS: These PV data, the largest sample of interferon beta-1b-exposed patients reported to date, suggest no increase in risk of spontaneous abortion or congenital anomalies in women exposed during pregnancy.