Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(5): e0003122, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728269

RESUMEN

Injury causes 4.4 million deaths worldwide annually. 90% of all injury-related deaths occur in low-and-middle income countries. Findings from expert-led trauma death reviews can inform strategies to reduce trauma deaths. A cohort of trauma decedents was identified from an on-going study in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. For each case, demographics, injury characteristics, time and location of death and postmortem findings were collected. An expert multidisciplinary panel of reviewed each case, determined preventability and made recommendations for improvement. Analysis of preventable and non-preventable cases was performed using Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A rapid qualitative analysis of recommendations was conducted and descriptively summarized. 138 deaths (48 deceased-on-scene and 90 pre- or in-hospital deaths) were presented to 23 panelists. Overall, 46 (33%) of deaths reviewed were considered preventable or potentially preventable. Of all pre- and in-hospital deaths, late deaths (>24 hours) were more frequently preventable (22, 56%) and due to multi-organ failure and sepsis, compared to early deaths (≤24 hours) with 32 (63%) that were non-preventable and due to central nervous system injury and haemorrhage. 45% of pre and in-hospital deaths were preventable or potentially preventable. The expert panel recommended strengthening community based primary prevention strategies for reducing interpersonal violence alongside health system improvements to facilitate high quality care. For the health system the panel's key recommendations included improving team-based care, adherence to trauma protocols, timely access to radiology, trauma specialists, operative and critical care.

2.
Transfusion ; 64 Suppl 2: S155-S166, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Blood products form the cornerstone of contemporary hemorrhage control but are limited resources. Freeze-dried plasma (FDP), which contains coagulation factors, is a promising adjunct in hemostatic resuscitation. We explore the association between FDP alone or in combination with other blood products on 24-h mortality. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis from a cross-sectional prospective observational multicenter study of adult trauma patients in the Western Cape of South Africa. We compare mortality among trauma patients at risk of hemorrhage in three treatment groups: Blood Products only, FDP + Blood Products, and FDP only. We apply inverse probability of treatment weighting and fit a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to assess the hazard of 24-h mortality. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-eight patients were included, and 55 (12.2%) died within 24 h of hospital arrival. Compared to the Blood Products only group, we found no difference in 24-h mortality for the FDP + Blood Product group (p = .40) and a lower hazard of death for the FDP only group (hazard = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-1.00; p = .05). However, sensitivity analyses showed no difference in 24-h mortality across treatments in subgroups with moderate and severe shock, early blood product administration, and accounting for immortal time bias. CONCLUSION: We found insufficient evidence to conclude there is a difference in relative 24-h mortality among trauma patients at risk for hemorrhage who received FDP alone, blood products alone, or blood products with FDP. There may be an adjunctive role for FDP in hemorrhagic shock resuscitation in settings with significantly restricted access to blood products.


Asunto(s)
Liofilización , Hemorragia , Plasma , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemorragia/etiología , Adulto , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos , Resucitación/métodos
3.
World J Surg ; 48(2): 320-330, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Injuries account for 8% or 4.4 million deaths annually worldwide, with 90% of injury deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Inter-personal violence and road traffic injuries account for most injury deaths in South Africa, with rates among the highest globally. Understanding the location, timing, and factors of trauma deaths can identify opportunities to strengthen care. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional secondary analysis of trauma deaths from 2021 to 2022 in the Western Cape of South Africa. Healthcare system trauma deaths were identified from a multicenter study paired with a dataset for on-scene (i.e., prior to ambulance or hospital) trauma deaths in the same jurisdictions. We describe locations, timing, injury factors, and cause of death. We assess associations between those factors. RESULTS: There were 2418 deaths, predominantly young men, with most (2274, 94.0%) occurring on-scene. The most frequent mechanism of injury for all deaths was firearms (32.6%), followed by road traffic collisions (17.8%). On-scene deaths (33.2%) were significantly more likely to be injured by firearms compared to healthcare system deaths (23.6%) (p-value <0.01). Most healthcare system deaths within 4-24 h of injury occurred in a hospital emergency center. Among healthcare system decedents, half died in the emergency unit. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a large burden of deaths from interpersonal violence and road traffic collisions, mostly on-scene. In addition to primary prevention, shortening delays to care can improve mortality outcomes especially for deaths occurring within 4-24 h in emergency centers.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Heridas y Lesiones , Masculino , Humanos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Accidentes de Tránsito , Atención a la Salud , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
4.
Afr J Emerg Med ; 14(1): 11-18, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173687

RESUMEN

Background: The new injury severity score (NISS) is widely used within trauma outcomes research. NISS is a composite anatomic severity score derived from the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) protocol. It has been postulated that NISS underestimates trauma severity in resource-constrained settings, which may contribute to erroneous research conclusions. We formally compare NISS to an expert panel's assessment of injury severity in South Africa. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients seen in a tertiary trauma center. Randomly selected medical records were reviewed by an AIS-certified rater who assigned an AIS severity score for each anatomic injury. A panel of five South African trauma experts independently reviewed the same charts and assigned consensus severity scores using a similar scale for comparability. NISS was calculated as the sum of the squares of the three highest assigned severity scores per patient. The difference in average NISS between rater and expert panel was assessed using a multivariable linear mixed effects regression adjusted for patient demographics, injury mechanism and type. Results: Of 49 patients with 190 anatomic injuries, the majority were male (n = 38), the average age was 36 (range 18-80), with either a penetrating (n = 23) or blunt (n = 26) injury, resulting in 4 deaths. Mean NISS was 16 (SD 15) for the AIS rater compared to 28 (SD 20) for the expert panel. Adjusted for potential confounders, AIS rater NISS was on average 11 points (95 % CI: 7, 15) lower than the expert panel NISS (p < 0.001). Injury type was an effect modifier, with the difference between the AIS rater and expert panel being greater in penetrating versus blunt injury (16 vs. 7; p = 0.04). Crush injury was not well-captured by AIS protocol. Conclusion: NISS may under-estimate the 'true' injury severity in a middle-income country trauma hospital, particularly for patients with penetrating injury.

5.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (Per 23-1/2/3): 34-40, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36607296

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 1.7 million people sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBI) annually in the US. To reduce morbidity and mortality, management strategies aim to control progressive intracranial bleeding. This study analyzes the association between Tranexamic Acid (TXA) administration and mortality among casualties within the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, specifically focusing on subsets of patients with varying degree of head injury severities. METHODS: Besides descriptive statistics, we used inverse probability weighted (for age, military service category, mechanism of injury, total units of blood units administered), and injury severity (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head score adjusted generalized linear models to analyze the association between TXA and mortality. Specific subgroups of interest were increasing severities of head injury and further stratifying these by Glasgow Coma Score of 3-8 and severe overall bodily injuries (ISS>=15). RESULTS: 25,866 patients were included in the analysis. 2,352 (9.1%) received TXA and 23,514 (90.9%) did not receive TXA. Among those with ISS>=15 (n=6,420), 21.2% received TXA. Among those with any head injury (AIS head injury severity score>=1; n=9,153), 7.2% received TXA. The median ISS scores were greater in the TXA versus no-TXA group (17 versus 6). Weighted and adjusted models showed overall, there was 25% lower mortality risk between those who received TXA at any point and those who did not (OR:0.75, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.95). Further, as the AIS severity score increased from >=1 (1.08; 0.80, 1.47) to >=5 (0.56; 0.33, 0.97), the odds of mortality decreased. CONCLUSIONS: TXA may potentially be beneficial in patients with severe head injuries, especially those with severe overall injury profiles. There is a need of definitive studies to confirm this association.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Ácido Tranexámico , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragias Intracraneales
6.
Acad Radiol ; 30(3): 492-498, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35654657

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Recent decades have seen a steady increase in noncontrast head CT utilization in the emergency department with a concurrent rise in the practice of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). The goal of this study was to identify ordering and patient characteristics predictive of positive noncontrast head CTs in the ED. We hypothesized NP/PAs would have lower positivity rates compared to physicians, suggestive of relative overutilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified ED patients who underwent noncontrast head CTs at a single institution: a nonlevel 1 trauma center, during a 7-year period, recording examination positivity, ordering provider training/experience, and multiple additional ordering/patient attributes. Exam positivity was defined as any intracranial abnormality necessitating a change in acute management, such as acute hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, herniation, or worsening prior findings. RESULTS: 6624 patients met inclusion criteria. 4.6% (280/6107) of physician exams were positive while 3.7% (19/517) of NP/PA exams were positive; however, differences were not significant. Increasing provider experience was not associated with positivity. Attributes with increased positivity were patient age (p < 0.001), daytime exam (p < 0.05), and indications regarding malignancy (p < 0.001) or focal neurologic deficit (p = 0.001). Attributes with decreased positivity were indications of trauma (p < 0.001) or vertigo/dizziness (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in rates of exam positivity between physicians and NP/PAs, even accounting for years of experience. This suggests increasing utilization of head CTs in the ED is not due to the increasing presence of NP/PAs, and may be reflective of general practice trends and clear diagnostic algorithms leading to head CT.


Asunto(s)
Cabeza , Médicos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
7.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 30(1): 32, 2022 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35477474

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate triage of the undifferentiated patient is a critical task in prehospital emergency care. However, there is a paucity of literature synthesizing currently available prehospital triage tools. This scoping review aims to identify published tools used for prehospital triage globally and describe their performance characteristics. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed of primary literature in English-language journals from 2009 to 2019. Papers included focused on emergency medical services (EMS) triage of single patients. Two blinded reviewers and a third adjudicator performed independent title and abstract screening and subsequent full-text reviews. RESULTS: Of 1521 unique articles, 55 (3.6%) were included in the final synthesis. The majority of prehospital triage tools focused on stroke (n = 19; 35%), trauma (19; 35%), and general undifferentiated patients (15; 27%). All studies were performed in high income countries, with the majority in North America (23, 42%) and Europe (22, 40%). 4 (7%) articles focused on the pediatric population. General triage tools aggregate prehospital vital signs, mental status assessments, history, exam, and anticipated resource need, to categorize patients by level of acuity. Studies assessed the tools' ability to accurately predict emergency department triage assignment, hospitalization and short-term mortality. Stroke triage tools promote rapid identification of patients with acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke to trigger timely transport to diagnostically- and therapeutically-capable hospitals. Studies evaluated tools' diagnostic performance, impact on tissue plasminogen activator administration rates, and correlation with in-hospital stroke scales. Trauma triage tools identify patients that require immediate transport to trauma centers with emergency surgery capability. Studies evaluated tools' prediction of trauma center need, under-triage and over-triage rates for major trauma, and survival to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature on prehospital triage tools predominantly derive from high-income health systems and mostly focus on adult stroke and trauma populations. Most studies sought to further simplify existing triage tools without sacrificing triage accuracy, or assessed the predictive capability of the triage tool. There was no clear 'gold-standard' singular prehospital triage tool for acute undifferentiated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Centros Traumatológicos , Triaje
8.
Qual Health Res ; 29(8): 1145-1160, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30547727

RESUMEN

Tobacco cessation is an important intervention to reduce mortality from ischemic heart disease, the leading cause of death in India. In this study, we explored facilitators, barriers, and cultural context to tobacco cessation among acute coronary syndrome (ACS, or heart attack) patients and providers in a tertiary care institution in the south Indian state of Kerala, with a focus on patient trajectories. Patients who quit tobacco after ACS expressed greater understanding about the link between tobacco and ACS, exerted more willpower at the time of discharge, and held less fatalistic beliefs about their health compared to those who continued tobacco use. The former were motivated by the fear of recurrent ACS, strong advice to quit from providers, and determination to survive and financially provide for their families. Systemic barriers included inadequate training, infrequent prescription of cessation pharmacotherapy, lack of ancillary staff to deliver counseling, and stigma against mental health services.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud/etnología , Pacientes/psicología , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/psicología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etnología , Adulto , Instituciones Cardiológicas , Consejo , Características Culturales , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud/etnología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Motivación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Investigación Cualitativa , Estigma Social , Uso de Tabaco/etnología , Uso de Tabaco/psicología , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/etnología
9.
Med Educ Online ; 23(1): 1505401, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30343644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The continuity provided by longitudinal clerkships has documented benefits to medical student education. Yet, little quantitative data exist on the association between longitudinal clerkships and patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study compares screening metrics of a longitudinal clerkship called the education-centered medical home (ECMH) with the standard clinical model at a student-volunteer free clinic (SVFC). In the ECMH model, the same attending physician staffs one half-day of clinic with same group of students weekly for 4 years. Standard clinical models are staffed with students and physicians who come to the SVFC based on availability. DESIGN: ECMH students aimed to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening rates in their patient panel as part of a quality improvement project. Students prepared individualized care plans prior to patient visits that included whether screening had been performed. They were also reminded to confirm completion of testing. Percentages of patients screened for HIV before and after establishment of the ECMH were compared with four standard clinical models. Screening rates for breast, colon, and cervical cancer, as well as hepatitis C, served as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: While screening rates were initially similar between models (43.2% and 34.8% for the ECMH and standard clinical panels, respectively, p = 0.32), HIV screening rates increased from 43.2% to 95.0% in the ECMH compared with a significantly smaller increase from 35.0% to 50.0% in the standard clinical panel (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the ECMH resulted in statistically significantly increased screening rates for cervical cancer (p < 0.001) and hepatitis C (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between a longitudinal ECMH clerkship and improved quality metrics at an SVFC. Even measures not targeted for intervention, such as colorectal cancer and hepatitis C, showed significant improvement in screening rates when compared with the standard clinical model.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas/organización & administración , Modelos Educacionales , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes/organización & administración , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...