Anchor placement and subsequent movement in a mesh kit with self-fixating tips: 6-month follow-up of a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the initial placement of Elevate single-incision mesh kit device tips relative to the sacrospinous ligament, and to measure tip movement over a 6-month period from initial placement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary care urogynaecology centre in Calgary, Canada. POPULATION: Women electing for surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. METHODS: Ten women underwent anterior prolapse repair using the Elevate single-incision mesh kit with a metallic fiducial marker attached to the tips of the surgical device. Women were imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 48 hours of surgery, and again 6 months later to investigate the position of the device tips and change ≥4 mm over the 6-month postoperative period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Position of self-fixating tips within 48 hours of surgery, and at six months post-operative. RESULTS: Anchor insertion was directly into the sacrospinous ligament in 10 of 20 insertion points (50%, 95% CI 27-73%). Movement was most often noted in the cranial-caudal direction: a change in location of ≥4 mm was observed for 8/20 anchors (40%, 95% CI 19-64%). Cranial-caudal movement was observed less frequently among sacrospinous anchors than among anchors inserted into other pelvic structures (1/10 versus 7/10, P = 0.020, difference in proportion -60%, 95% CI -94 to -26%). PFDI-20 scores improved statistically significantly by 6 months (P = 0.008, mean change -62.9%, 95% CI -105.1 to -20.7%), but PFIQ-7 scores did not change statistically significantly over the same time period (P = 0.523, mean change -12.4%, 95% CI -54.5 to 29.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The novel self-fixating anchoring tips of this single-incision mesh kit do not reliably anchor into the sacrospinous ligament. The tips have been shown to move with time, although not all cases of anchor movement were associated with recurrent prolapse.

The prevalence of incidental findings in multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Incidental findings arising from imaging research have important implications for patient safety. Magnetic resonance imaging is widespread in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies and care, yet the prevalence rate of incidental findings in MS is poorly defined. The absence of such reports in the MS literature suggests that such findings may be deemed inappropriate for documentation in research publications, or possibly, not fully reported at all. OBJECTIVE: We sought to document incidental findings from a study designed to detect features of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in MS patients and control subjects. METHODS: Magnetic resonance images were obtained as part of a prospective study conducted between October 2010 and September 2012. Patients with MS (relapsing-remitting, primary progressive, secondary progressive), clinically isolated syndromes, and neuromyelitis optica and age/sex-matched healthy controls were included. All images were reviewed by neuro-radiologists for quality-control purposes. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging was successfully obtained in 166 participants (110 patients, 56 controls). Incidental abnormalities (n = 33) were detected in 15% of patients (n = 17) and 27% of controls (n = 15), comprising 19% overall (n = 32). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of incidental findings from the MS population was not significantly different from the control population. However, the overall prevalence was high and warrants a careful management strategy for future imaging studies.Prévalence des découvertes fortuites chez les patients atteints de sclérose en plaques.