Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Sports Med ; 51(2): 367-378, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36661257

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are limited randomized controlled trials with long-term outcomes comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) versus alternative forms of surgical cartilage management within the knee. PURPOSE: To determine at 5 years after surgery whether ACI was superior to alternative forms of cartilage management in patients after a failed previous treatment for chondral or osteochondral defects in the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: In total, 390 participants were randomly assigned to receive either ACI or alternative management. Patients aged 18 to 55 years with one or two symptomatic cartilage defects who had failed 1 previous therapeutic surgical procedure in excess of 6 months prior were included. Dual primary outcome measures were used: (1) patient-completed Lysholm knee score and (2) time from surgery to cessation of treatment benefit. Secondary outcome measures included International Knee Documentation Committee and Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores, as well as number of serious adverse events. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Lysholm scores were improved by 1 year in both groups (15.4 points [95% CI, 11.9 to 18.8] and 15.2 points [95% CI, 11.6 to 18.9]) for ACI and alternative, with this improvement sustained over the duration of the trial. However, no evidence of a difference was found between the groups at 5 years (2.9 points; 95% CI, -1.8 to 7.5; P = .46). Approximately half of the participants (55%; 95% CI, 47% to 64% with ACI) were still experiencing benefit at 5 years, with time to cessation of treatment benefit similar in both groups (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.32; P > .99). There was a differential effect on Lysholm scores in patients without previous marrow stimulation compared with those with marrow stimulation (P = .03; 6.4 points in favor of ACI; 95% CI, -0.4 to 13.1). More participants experienced a serious adverse event with ACI (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Over 5 years, there was no evidence of a difference in Lysholm scores between ACI and alternative management in patients who had previously failed treatment. Previous marrow stimulation had a detrimental effect on the outcome of ACI. REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: 48911177.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Humanos , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Condrocitos/trasplante , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos
2.
Am J Sports Med ; 39(6): 1270-4, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21335346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sterile surgical marker pens are commonly used in cartilage repair surgery to aid in the placement of periosteal patches or collagen membranes in autologous chondrocyte implantation. PURPOSE: To investigate the effects that methylene blue and crystal violet marker pen ink have on human chondrocytes when cultured on collagen membranes in vitro. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Human chondrocytes were applied to Chondro-Gide collagen membranes at a volume of 12 million cells. In the first experiment, 2 sterile marker pens, one containing methylene blue and the other crystal violet inks, were used to mark membranes immediately before the addition of cells. In the second experiment, the same marker pens marked the membranes after 7 days of cell culture. In each experiment, 3 groups of membrane were tested for each pen. Group A consisted of no ink mark, group B had only the uppermost "smooth" layer marked, and group C had the lower "porous" layer marked. All membranes were then cultured in standard growth media for 24 hours. Cell viability was assessed at 24 hours on all membranes using a live/dead-cell viability assay. Cell viability was quantified with florescent microscopy with mean percentage of live cells in each marker pen group compared with control membranes using the Student t test (P < .05). RESULTS: Control membranes (group A) with no ink showed cell viability approaching 100%. A statistically significant reduction in cell viability with both methylene blue (23.1%; P < .0001) and crystal violet (18.9%; P < .0001) was found adjacent to the ink mark on the smooth side (group B) and on the porous side remote from the ink (group C) in both experiments (<30%; P < .0001). A reduction in cell viability was noted on the smooth side remote from the ink mark but did not reach statistical significance. Marked cell death was seen with both dyes (<15%; P < .0001) adjacent to the ink on the porous side. CONCLUSION: Chondrocyte viability is significantly reduced when cells are cultured in vitro on collagen membranes marked with methylene blue and crystal violet pen ink. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be aware of the potential negative effect of marker pens in cell-based therapies.


Asunto(s)
Condrocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Colorantes/efectos adversos , Violeta de Genciana/efectos adversos , Azul de Metileno/efectos adversos , Animales , Recuento de Células , Supervivencia Celular , Células Cultivadas , Colágeno Tipo I , Colágeno Tipo III , Humanos , Membranas Artificiales , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...