RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of aging on the effectiveness and tolerance of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) among hypertensive patients complicated with heart failure in a real-world setting. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients (≥18 years old) admitted with a diagnosis of hypertension and heart failure, starting sac/val therapy between January 2020 and December 2021 from 3 medical centers. Patients were grouped by the cutoff age of 65 years. Outcomes were collected 31-365 days after the initiation of sac/val and were compared in a matched cohort after 1: 1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 794 patients were finally analyzed. Blood pressure and cardiac functions improved significantly compared with values at baseline. There were 269 patients in each cohort (<65 years and ≥65 years) after PSM. After PSM, the incidence of hyperuricemia and hypotension in the elderly patients (≥65 years) was significantly higher than in those <65 years of age. Kaplan-Meier estimate suggested that the cumulative incidence of new or recurrent cardiovascular events increased significantly at the age of ≥65 years after the point of 3 months (log-rank P =.00087). CONCLUSION: Sac/val benefited patients in both cohorts by improving blood pressure and cardiac function. Elderly patients (≥65 years) were susceptible to hypotension, low diastolic blood pressure, hyperuricemia, and underwent cardiac-related readmissions more frequently.
RESUMEN
Background: Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) is a common immune-related adverse event (irAE) related to camrelizumab. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of RCCEP and its association with patients' survival. Methods: This retrospective study collected the data of consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received camrelizumab between January 2019 and December 2021. Baseline characteristics and peripheral blood biomarkers were collected. The outcomes were the occurrence of RCCEP and progression-free survival (PFS). The factors associated with RCCEP were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The association between PFS and RCCEP occurrence was analyzed by the log-rank test. Results: Among the 80 patients included, 24 (30.0%) developed RCCEP, and 56 did not. Among the patients with RCCEP, only four reported the occurrence of grade 3-4 RCCEP. The multivariable analysis revealed that a percentage of eosinophil (EOS%) >1.75% was significantly associated with a higher risk of RCCEP [odds ratio (OR) =4.484; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.139-17.651] and camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic agent was significantly associated with a lower risk of RCCEP (OR =0.188; 95% CI: 0.055-0.639). The median PFS was numerically longer in patients with RCCEP than in those who did not (17 vs. 9 months, P=0.069). Patients who had baseline EOS% >1.75% and received camrelizumab without an anti-angiogenic agent had a longer median PFS than those who did not (17 vs. 9 months, P=0.011). Conclusions: Baseline EOS% >1.75% and camrelizumab without an anti-angiogenic agent were risk factors of RCCEP and might be associated with better survival in patients with NSCLC.