Patients with Primary and Secondary Bile Duct Stones Harbor Distinct Biliary Microbial Composition and Metabolic Potential.

Introduction: Cholelithiasis has a high incidence worldwide and limited treatment options due to its poorly understood pathogenesis. Furthermore, the role of biliary microbiota in cholelithiasis remains understudied. To address these questions, we performed microbial sequencing from biliary samples from primary bile duct stone (PBDS) and secondary bile duct stone (SBDS) patients. Results: We analyzed in total 45 biliary samples, including those from cholelithiasis patients with PBDS or SBDS and people with other digestive diseases. 16S rRNA sequencing showed the bacteria family Alcaligenaceae increased in relative abundance in the lithiasis group compared with the non-lithiasis group. In addition, the PBDS group showed significantly lower bacterial diversity than SBDS, with Propionibacteriaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, and Lactobacillaceae as the most significant bacteria families decreased in relative abundance. We further performed whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing (wMGS) and found increased ability of biofilm synthesis and the ability to sense external stimuli in PBDS based on functional annotation of mapped reads. From genome-resolved analysis of the samples, we identified 36 high-quality draft bacterial genome sequences with completion ≥70% and contamination ≤10%. Most of these genomes were classified into Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, or Actinobacteria. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that there is a subtle impact on biliary microbiome from cholelithiasis while the difference is more pronounced between the PBDS and SBDS. It was revealed that the diversity of biliary microbiota in PBDS is lower, while some metabolic pathways are up-regulated, including those linked to higher incidence of different types of cancer, providing new insights for the understanding of cholelithiasis with different origin.

Endoscopic treatment for pancreatic diseases: Needle-knife-guided cannulation via the minor papilla.

AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of meticulous cannulation by needle-knife. METHODS: Three needle-knife procedures were used to facilitate cannulation in cases when standard cannulation techniques failed. A total of 104 cannulations via the minor papilla attempted in 74 patients at our center between January 2008 and June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Standard methods were successful in 79 cannulations. Of the 25 cannulations that could not be performed by standard methods, 19 were performed by needle-knife, while 17 (89.5%) were successful. Needle-knife use improved the success rate of cannulation [76.0%, 79/104 vs 92.3%, (79 + 17)/104; P = 0.001]. When the 6 cases not appropriate for needle-knife cannulation were excluded, the success rate was improved further (80.6%, 79/98 vs 98.0%, 96/98; P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in the rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography adverse events between the group using standard methods alone and the group using needle-knife after failure of standard methods (4.7% vs 10.5%, P = 0.301). CONCLUSION: The needle-knife procedure may be an alternative method for improving the success rate of cannulation via the minor papilla, particularly when standard cannulation has failed.