Prophylactic antibodies inhibit spike-specific T and B cell responses after COVID-19 vaccination.

Active and passive immunization is used in high-risk patients to prevent severe courses of COVID-19, but the impact of prophylactic neutralizing antibodies on the immune reaction to the mRNA vaccines has remained enigmatic. Here we show that CD4 T and B cell responses to Spikevax booster immunization are suppressed by the therapeutic antibodies Casirivimab and Imdevimab. B cell and T cell responses were significantly induced in controls but not in antibody-treated patients. The data indicates that humoral immunity, i. e. high levels of antibodies, negatively impacts reactive immunity, resulting in blunted cellular responses upon boosting. This argues for temporal separation of vaccination efforts; with active vaccination preferably applied before prophylactic therapeutic antibody treatment.

Learning imaging in axial spondyloarthritis: more than just a matter of experience.

OBJECTIVE: Reliable interpretation of imaging findings is essential for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and requires a high level of experience. We investigated experience-dependent differences in diagnostic accuracies using X-ray (XR), MRI and CT. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 163 subjects with low back pain. Eighty-nine patients had axSpA, and 74 patients had other conditions (mechanical, degenerative or non-specific low back pain). Final diagnoses were established by an experienced rheumatologist before the reading sessions. Nine blinded readers (divided into three groups with different levels of experience) scored the XR, CT and MRI of the sacroiliac joints for the presence versus absence of axSpA. Parameters for diagnostic performance were calculated using contingency tables. Differences in diagnostic performance between the reader groups were assessed using the McNemar test. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance was highest for the most experienced reader group, except for XR. In the inexperienced and semi-experienced group, diagnostic performance was highest for CT&MRI (78.5% and 85.3%, respectively). In the experienced group, MRI showed the highest performance (85.9%). The greatest difference in diagnostic performance was found for MRI between the inexperienced and experienced group (76.1% vs 85.9%, p=0.001). Inter-rater agreement was best for CT in the experienced group with κ=0.87. CONCLUSION: Differences exist in the learnability of the imaging modalities for axSpA diagnosis. MRI requires more experience, while CT is more suitable for inexperienced radiologists. However, diagnosis relies on both clinical and imaging information.

[Autoantibody diagnostics in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy]. / Autoantikörperdiagnostik bei idiopathisch inflammatorischen Myopathien.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is a group of rare and heterogeneous systemic diseases that manifest not only in the muscles but also in the skin, joints, and lungs. Initial symptoms can be isolated and variable and thus the diagnosis poses challenges to various specialist groups. As autoantibodies are sometimes the only specific findings that lead to the diagnosis and appropriate treatment, basic knowledge of them is essential. This article explains the available test systems, names the clinical indications necessary for the initiation of autoantibody diagnostics, provides information on the etymology, antigens, synonyms, and first descriptors, describes indirect immunofluorescence on HEp­2 cells induced by myositis antibodies, and provides clinical-serological associations. The comparison of the autoantibody findings with the clinical symptoms and laboratory findings enables the identification of false positive or false negative laboratory findings in the sense of a plausibility check.