Incidence and surgical treatment of synthetic mesh-related infectious complications after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic-related infection and erosion occurring after a laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) are rare complications, and their importance is often underestimated. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence rate and surgical management of these complications in LVR patients with polyester (PE) or polypropylene (PP) prostheses. METHODS: From January 2004 to June 2012, 149 patients underwent LVR with PE and 176 underwent LVR with PP. Surgical management and rate of infectious and erosive prosthesis-related complications, depending on the type of prosthesis, were described and compared. Functional results after complications were assessed. RESULTS: Five patients from the PE prosthesis group (3.3 %), compared with two patients from the PP prosthesis group (1.1 %), experienced prosthesis-related infection or erosion (p = 0.16). The rate of erosion alone was 3.3 % in patients with a PE prosthesis, and 0.55 % in patients with a PP prosthesis (p = 0.06). The average time until clinical diagnosis of a prosthesis-related complication was identical for both groups: 31 months (range 3-62 months). All patients underwent surgical removal of the prosthesis: For the five patients from the PE group, complete removal was performed by laparoscopy associated with a transanal procedure. For the two patients in the PP mesh group, laparoscopy was ineffective in removing the mesh which was partially removed through a subsequent transanal procedure. None of the patients had a protective stoma, and in all patients the complication had resolved 12 months after removal. Only one patient had worsening functional symptoms (fecal incontinence) after prosthesis removal. CONCLUSIONS: When a prosthesis-related infection or erosion occurs, treatment consists in the surgical removal of the prosthesis by laparoscopy/and/or a transanal procedure. Functional symptoms do not routinely recur after prosthesis removal.

[Does bevacizumab have a protective effect on hepatotoxicity induced by chemotherapy?]. / Le bévacizumab a-t-il un effet protecteur sur l'hépatotoxicité induite par la chimiothérapie ?

Although the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has improved dramatically with oxaliplatin and irinotecan, the enthusiasm for the preoperative use of these cytotoxic agents is being tempered by concerns about their impact on the nontumoral liver parenchyma. Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent that specifically targets the vascular endothelial growth factor, exerts an antitumor effect by inhibiting the development of the vascular network that is promoted by the tumor and mandatory for its growth. Yet angiogenesis is also a physiologic event contributing to wound healing and tissue regeneration. To date, it is well documented that the use of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic agents greatly improves pathologic response. Also well described is the protective effect of bevacizumab against sinusoidal injuries induced by oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Up to now, no side effects related to the perioperative use of bevacizumab have been reported in the setting of liver resection for CLM, and bevacizumab was shown not to impair liver regeneration following portal vein embolization. The clinical consequences of the protective effect of bevacizumab against sinusoidal injuries are hard to evaluate as patient selection and preparation have improved and these improvements contribute greatly to the favorable outcomes following liver resection for CLM. Indeed, patient safety in the setting of hepatic resection for CLM mainly depends on a careful preoperative evaluation of liver volumes and a limited use of cytotoxic agents followed by a delay of at least 5 weeks before the surgery.

[Intermittent fever: rare expression of an adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater]. / Fièvre intermittente: expression rare d'un adénocarcinome de l'ampoule de Vater.

PURPOSE: Prolonged intermittent fevers are frequently seen in internal medicine and they constitute a real diagnosis challenge. Infection, auto-immune disease and neoplasy are the most common causes. EXEGESIS: We report here a 48 year-old man with a prolonged intermittent fever. At first, all his assessments were negative and it's only secondary, as clinical and biological disturbances occur that the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla has been done. CONCLUSION: Neoplasms represent a rare cause of intermittent prolonged fever, but we must always keep them in mind. In this case, any specific symptom was initially present to end up quickly to the solution.

[Videolaparoscopic excision of insulinoma. A study of 5 cases]. / Exérèse vidéolaparoscopique des insulinomes. Etude de cinq observations.

STUDY AIM: Evaluation of the feasibility of the videolaparoscopic resection in pancreatic insulinomas, and reporting of five cases. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 1996 to 1998, a videolaparoscopic resection was attempted in five patients with sporadic, unique and benign insulinoma. The insulinoma was recognised and localised by preoperative ultrasonography in the pancreatic head (n = 1), body (n = 3) or tail (n = 1). For the videolaparoscopic procedure, three to five trocars were necessary. Cephalic and corporeal insulinomas were approached through an opening of the gastrocolic ligament and caudal insulinoma required mobilisation of the splenic flexure of the colon and dissection of the splenic pedicle. Peroperative ultrasonography was not used. RESULTS: Four resections were exclusively performed with videolaparoscopy: three enucelations and one distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. The cephalic insulinoma could not be found by laparoscopic exploration and required a laparotomy to be recognised and enucleated; it was located further down than expected. There were no postoperative complications in four patients. One enucleation was complicated by a pancreatic fistula that required reoperation. All the patients were cured with a 6- to 16-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Selected insulinomas may be operated on with videolaparoscopy. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography is necessary for this selection. Videolaparoscopic approach is contraindicated in multiple insulinomas, in insulinomas located on the posterior wall or deeply located in the head of the pancreas, and in malignant tumors. Videolaparoscopic resection is mainly indicated in unique and benign insulinomas, superficially located on the anterior wall of the pancreas, to be resected by enucleation or distal pancreatectomy. Disadvantage of laparoscopic approach compared to conventional approach is the absence of palpation and difficulty to explore the whole pancreas; advantage is the lack of parietal incision and the good postoperative comfort.