A Conceptual Thematic Framework of Psychological Adjustment in Caregivers of Children with Craniofacial Microsomia.

OBJECTIVE: Children with craniofacial microsomia (CFM) have complex healthcare needs, resulting in evaluations and interventions from infancy onward. Yet, little is understood about families' treatment experiences or the impact of CFM on caregivers' well-being. To address this gap, the NIH-funded 'Craniofacial microsomia: Accelerating Research and Education (CARE)' program sought to develop a conceptual thematic framework of caregiver adjustment to CFM. DESIGN: Caregivers reported on their child's medical and surgical history. Narrative interviews were conducted with US caregivers (n = 62) of children aged 3-17 years with CFM. Transcripts were inductively coded and final themes and subthemes were identified. RESULTS: Components of the framework included: 1) Diagnostic Experiences, including pregnancy and birth, initial emotional responses, communication about the diagnosis by healthcare providers, and information-seeking behaviors; 2) Child Health and Healthcare Experiences, including feeding, the child's physical health, burden of care, medical decision-making, surgical experiences, and the perceived quality of care; 3) Child Development, including cognition and behavior, educational provision, social experiences, and emotional well-being; and 4) Family Functioning, including parental well-being, relationships, coping strategies, and personal growth. Participants also identified a series of "high" and "low" points throughout their journey and shared their priorities for future research. CONCLUSIONS: Narrative interviews provided rich insight into caregivers' experiences of having a child with CFM and enabled the development of a conceptual thematic framework to guide clinical care and future research. Information gathered from this study demonstrates the need to incorporate evidence-based psychological support for families into the CFM pathway from birth onward.

Experiences of appearance conversations among young people living with a visible difference.

Stigmatisation surrounding having a visible difference to the face or body may have a marked impact on how young people communicate about appearance. The aim of our study was therefore to explore the experiences of appearance conversations among young people living with a visible difference. Interviews were conducted with 32 young people (mean age 14.1 years; 67.7% girls), with a condition resulting in a visible difference (e.g., craniofacial condition or scarring). Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified three themes. Importance of Safety and Understanding reflects the importance of feeling safe in order to be able to talk about appearance. Participants described appearance conversations as often originating in their need for emotional support or practical assistance when encountering difficulties (Conversations When in Need of Support), but appearance was also experienced as a sensitive topic that was difficult to talk about (Avoiding Appearance Conversations). Our results highlight the importance of creating spaces where young people with a visible difference feel safe to bring up the topic of appearance when in need of support. Elements that facilitate such conversations include others having knowledge about the condition and having one's feelings and experiences validated instead of minimised.

Parents' Perception of the Benefit of Receiving a Patient Information Leaflet Prior to Attending a Craniofacial Multidisciplinary Team Appointment.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how a patient information leaflet describing what to expect during a craniofacial multidisciplinary team (MDT) appointment is experienced by parents of children with craniofacial anomalies (CFAs) and whether it helps with preparation for the appointment. DESIGN: Combination of qualitative and quantitative design. SETTING: Norwegian National Unit for Craniofacial Surgery. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three parents of children with CFAs completed the questionnaire and fourteen were subsequently interviewed. INTERVENTIONS: A patient information leaflet, sent to all parents before their MDT appointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive questionnaire data and interview data. RESULTS: All parents (N = 33, 100%) found the leaflet easy to understand, while 31 (93.9%) found it provided helpful information. However, many first-time attendees still found the MDT setting overwhelming. CONCLUSIONS: A leaflet may be helpful for parents when preparing for their child's MDT appointment. However, some parents may need additional support and information related to their child's treatment pathway.

Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) to families of infants with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Prospective inclusion of a control group, which received standard care alone, followed by an intervention group, which in addition received early SCN follow-up. SETTING: The cleft lip and palate team at a University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 70 families (69 mothers and 57 fathers); control group (n = 38); intervention group (n = 32). INTERVENTION: SCNs offered a consultation at the maternity ward and follow-ups by phone or face-to-face at one, three, eight weeks and six months after birth. OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of Internet-Questionnaire, Quality of discharge teaching scale (QDTS), Post discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS), Response on follow-up by health professionals. RESULTS: Infants in the intervention group were admitted less frequently to a Neonatal Intensive Care unit (NICU); 21.9% vs 51.4%, P = .012. Parents in the intervention group used internet for cleft-related reasons less frequently (74.6% vs 85.9%), P = .112 and the mothers benefitted less from cleft-related activity on the internet (P = .013). The intervention group reported higher mean score for satisfaction with total cleft care (P = .001). There were no significant group differences regarding mean total score for discharge teaching (P = .315) and coping difficulties (P = .919). CONCLUSION: Early follow-up by a SCN with expertise in cleft care is highly valued by parents. Closer cooperation between the cleft team and health professionals at birth hospitals and Child health centers is necessary for optimal follow-up.

Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades.

This paper describes 20 years of microtia and craniofacial microsomia (CFM) psychosocial and healthcare studies and suggests directions for clinical care and research.A narrative review of papers January 2000 to July 2021 related to psychosocial and healthcare experiences of individuals with microtia and CFM and their families.Studies (N = 64) were mainly cross-sectional (69%), included a range of standardized measures (64%), and were with European (31%), American (27%), or multinational (23%) samples. Data were generally collected from both patients and caregivers (38%) or patient self-report (35%). Sample sizes were 11 to 25 (21%), 26 to 50 (19%), 51 to 100 (22%), or over 100 (38%). Studies addressed 5 primary topics: (1) Healthcare Experiences, including Medical Care, Hearing Loss/Amplification, Diagnostic Experiences, and Information Preferences; (2) Psychosocial Experiences, including Teasing, Behavioral Adjustment, Psychosocial Support, and Public Perception; (3) Neurocognitive Functioning and Academic Assistance; (4) Pre- and Post-Operative Psychosocial Outcomes of Ear Reconstruction/Canaloplasty; and (5) Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction.Care involved multiple specialties and was often experienced as stressful starting at diagnosis. Psychosocial and neurocognitive functioning were generally in the average range, with possible risk for social and language concerns. Coping and resiliency were described into adulthood. Satisfaction and positive benefit of ear reconstruction/canaloplasty were high. Care recommendations include increasing: hearing amplification use, microtia and CFM knowledge among providers, efficient treatment coordination, psychosocial support, academic assistance, and advances to minimize surgical scarring. This broad literature overview informs clinical practice and research to improve psychosocial outcomes.

Microtia and craniofacial microsomia: Content analysis of facebook groups.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of patients use social media for health-related information and social support. This study's objective was to describe the content posted on Facebook groups for individuals with microtia and/or craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and their families in order for providers to gain insight into patient and family needs and experiences to inform clinical care. METHODS: Two months of posts, images, comments, and "like" responses from two Facebook groups in the US and the UK were recorded and analyzed using content analysis. A secondary analysis identified statements of emotion. RESULTS: Posts (N = 254) had a total of 7912 "like" responses, 2245 comments, and 153 images. There were three categories of posts: seeking guidance (43%; 9 themes), promoting events/news (33%; 5 themes), and sharing experiences (24%; 3 themes). Across categories, 16% of posts had emotional content. Most comments were responding to posts seeking guidance, including medical care (20%), surgical care (9%), and hearing aids (5%). Promotional posts often aimed to increase CFM awareness. Posts sharing experiences were generally positive, with the highest number of "likes". CONCLUSIONS: Facebook groups members frequently exchanged health-related information, suggesting value placed on input from other families and the convenience of seeking information online. Posts also promoted awareness and shared experiences. Clinical care implications include the need for easily accessible accurate and tailored CFM-related health education. Additionally, providers should demonstrate awareness of health information on social media and may address the potential emotional impact of CFM by facilitating access to resources for social support.

"Exposed and Vulnerable": Parent Reports of Their Child's Experience of Multidisciplinary Craniofacial Consultations.

OBJECTIVE: Childhood is a period of extensive socioemotional development, which can be impacted by the presence of a congenital craniofacial anomaly (CFA). Complex multidisciplinary treatment and long-term follow-up are normally required, yet understanding of children's treatment experiences is limited. The objective of this study was to investigate children's experiences of multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultations from the perspective of their parents. DESIGN: Thirty-eight parents of children with a rare CFA were interviewed in person or over the telephone. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated into English, and explored using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Background factors influencing the child's experience of the consultation included age, developmental stage, personality, and prior treatment experiences. Participants tried to prepare their child for meeting the MDT, but did not fully understand what to expect themselves. During consultations, participants were acutely focused on their child's emotional state, making it difficult to balance their desire to protect the child from potentially negative experiences, and the need to engage in a constructive dialogue with health professionals. Participants believed that health professionals' conduct could considerably influence the child's well-being and subsequent treatment decisions. Finally, participants highlighted the need to debrief their child to help them adjust positively. CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate goal of craniofacial care is to help children develop into confident adults who are able to cope with the challenges associated with their condition. Multidisciplinary teams play a vital role in creating a safe and supportive environment in which children feel genuinely informed and involved in key aspects of their care.

Quality of life in adults with lymphedema cholestasis syndrome 1.

BACKGROUND: LCS1 (Lymphedema Cholestasis Syndrome 1/Aagenaes syndrome) is a rare, hereditary disorder, where the highest known prevalence is in Norway. The disorder is characterized by lymphedema and periodic cholestasis from birth or the neonatal period. This study aimed to examine internal reliability of the SF-36, in addition to the group's overall- and health related quality of life (OQoL and HRQoL) and psychosocial well-being. METHODS: Twenty adults (aged 18-65) in Norway have been diagnosed with LSC1. Eighteen of these patients were included in the study and completed four questionnaires on overall and health related quality of life and psychosocial well-being: Cantril's Ladder (CL), The Kaasa Test, the SF-36, and a lymphedema anamnesis questionnaire. Demographic data were registered, and 15 of the patients underwent a physical examination of the lymphedema. SF-36 scores were compared with those of 360 age and gender matched controls drawn from an earlier survey of the Norwegian general population. The Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square (χ2) test were used to test internal differences in the patient group. RESULTS: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was significantly reduced in patients with LSC1 compared to controls, in three out of eight areas, role physical, general health and mental health. Females scored significantly better than males in the patient group in two areas of SF-36, in CL, and in one of three scales of The Kaasa Test. Severe lymphedema was found to be significantly correlated to bodily pain and reduced mental health. The level of education was positively correlated to mental health. CONCLUSION: Overall quality of life (OQoL), health related quality of life (HRQoL) and psycho-social well-being were good in the patient group, but some dimensions of HRQoL were reduced. More severe extent of lymphedema was associated with poorer HRQoL.