Resolution of left atrial appendage thrombi: No difference between phenprocoumon and non-vitamin K-dependent oral antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is the most important risk factor for left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi, a potentially life-threatening condition. Thrombus resolution may prevent embolic events and allow rhythm-control strategies, which have been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications. HYPOTHESIS: There is no significant difference between phenprocoumon and non-Vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the resolution of LAA-thrombi in a real-world setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients with LAA-thrombi from June 2013 to June 2017 were included in an observational single-center analysis. The primary endpoint was defined as the resolution of the thrombus. The observational period was 1 year. Resolutions rates in patients on phenprocoumon or NOACs were compared and the time to resolution was analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 114 patients with LAA-thrombi. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of resolution between phenprocoumon and NOACs (p = .499) at the time of first control which took place after a mean of 58 ± 42.2 (median 48) days. At first control most thrombi were dissolved (74.6%). The analysis after set-time intervals revealed a resolution rate of 2/3 of LAA-thrombi after 8-10 weeks in the phenprocoumon and NOAC groups. After 12 weeks a higher number of thrombi had resolved in the presence of NOAC (89.3%) whereas in the presence of phenprocoumon 68.3% had resolved (p = .046). CONCLUSION: In this large observational study NOACs were found to be potent drugs for the resolution of LAA-thrombi. In addition, the resolution of LAA-thrombi was found to be faster in the presence of NOAC as compared to phenprocoumon.

[New developments in leadless pacing systems]. / Neue Entwicklungen bei kabellosen Schrittmachersystemen.

Leadless pacing systems, especially the Micra™ TPS system, deliver an effective and safe alternative to the previous conventional transvenous systems in patients with impossible transvenous access and seem to be compatible with other implantable devices (S-ICD, deep brain stimulators) with no limitations in efficacy or safety. Also, new outlooks on leadless resynchronization therapy seem promising and could prevent future patients from lead- or operation-associated complications. Current limits to the implementation in everyday clinical practice are mostly the unavailability of the devices or cost issues through lack of health insurance reimbursement. However, more promising data through further studies and rising implantation rates are expected based on the positive current clinical data.