Assessment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Care.

Study Objectives: Observational studies link untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The first step in addressing OSA is a clinical assessment. However, given competing demands and a lack of high-quality evidence, it is unclear how often such assessments occur. We explored the documentation of OSA assessment among patients with COPD in primary care, and the patient and provider characteristics associated with these assessments. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with clinically diagnosed COPD at 2 primary care practices. We abstracted charts to determine whether providers assessed OSA, defined as documentation of symptoms, treatment, or a referral to sleep medicine. We performed multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the associations of patient and provider characteristics with OSA assessment. Results: Among 641 patients with clinically diagnosed COPD, 146 (23%) had OSA assessed over a 1-year period. Positive associations with OSA assessment included body mass index ≥ 30 (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-7.0), pulmonary subspecialist visits (OR 3.9, 95%CI 2.4-6.3), and a prior sleep study demonstrating OSA documented within the electronic medical record (OR 18.0, 95%CI 9.0-35.8). Notably, patients identifying as Black were less likely to have OSA assessed than those identifying as White (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.2-0.9). Conclusions: Providers document an assessment of OSA among a quarter of patients with COPD. Our findings highlight the importance of future work to rigorously test the impact of assessment on important health outcomes. Our findings also reinforce that additional strategies are needed to improve the equitable delivery of care.

Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary.

This multisociety commentary critically examines the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) final report and systematic review on long-term health outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea. The AHRQ report was commissioned by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and particularly focused on the long-term patient-centered outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure, the variability of sleep-disordered breathing metrics, and the validity of these metrics as surrogate outcomes. This commentary raises concerns regarding the AHRQ report conclusions and their potential implications for policy decisions. A major concern expressed in this commentary is that the AHRQ report inadequately acknowledges the benefits of continuous positive airway pressure for several established, long-term clinically important outcomes including excessive sleepiness, motor vehicle accidents, and blood pressure. While acknowledging the limited evidence for the long-term benefits of continuous positive airway pressure treatment, especially cardiovascular outcomes, as summarized by the AHRQ report, this commentary reviews the limitations of recent randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies and the challenges of conducting future randomized controlled trials. A research agenda to address these challenges is proposed including study designs that may include both high quality randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled studies. This commentary concludes by highlighting implications for the safety and quality of life for the millions of people living with obstructive sleep apnea if the AHRQ report alone was used by payers to limit coverage for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea while not considering the totality of available evidence. CITATION: Patil SP, Billings ME, Bourjeily G, et al. Long-term health outcomes for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: placing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report in context-a multisociety commentary. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):135-149.

Moving toward Equitable Care for Sleep Apnea in the United States: Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Thresholds: An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Background: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is a highly effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence limits its efficacy. In addition, coverage of PAP by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and other insurers in the United States depends on adherence. This leaves many beneficiaries without PAP, disproportionally impacting non-white and low socioeconomic position patients with OSA and exacerbating sleep health disparities. Methods: An inter-professional, multidisciplinary, international committee with various stakeholders was formed. Three working groups (the historical policy origins, impact of current policy, and international PAP coverage models) met and performed literature reviews and discussions. Using surveys and an iterative discussion-based consensus process, the policy statement recommendations were created. Results: In this position paper, we advocate for policy change to CMS PAP coverage requirements to reduce inequities and align with patient-centered goals. We specifically call for eradicating repeat polysomnography, eliminating the 4-hour rule, and focusing on patient-oriented outcomes such as improved sleepiness and sleep quality. Conclusions: Modifications to the current policies for PAP insurance coverage could improve health disparities.

Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Sleep Quality in COPD.

Rationale: Ambient air pollution exposure is associated with respiratory morbidity among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly among those with concomitant obesity. Although people with COPD report high incidence of poor sleep quality, no studies have evaluated the association between air pollution exposure, obesity, and sleep disturbances in COPD. Methods: We analyzed data collected from current and former smokers with COPD enrolled in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD -Air Pollution ancillary study (SPIROMICS AIR). Socio-demographics and anthropometric measurements were collected, and 1-year mean historical ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone concentrations at participants' residences were estimated by cohort-specific spatiotemporal modeling. Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and regression models were constructed to determine the association of 1-year PM2.5 (1Yr-PM2.5) and 1-year ozone (1Yr-ozone) with the PSQI score, and whether obesity modified the association. Results: In 1308 participants (age: 65.8±7.8 years, 42% women), results of regression analyses suggest that each 10µg/m3 increase in 1Yr-PM2.5 was associated with a 2.1-point increase in PSQI (P=0.03). Obesity modified the association between 1Yr-PM2.5 and PSQI (P=0.03). In obese and overweight participants, a 10µg/m3 increase in 1Yr-PM2.5 was associated with a higher PSQI (4.0 points, P<0.01, and 3.4 points, P<0.01, respectively); but no association in lean-normal weight participants (P=0.51). There was no association between 1 Yr-ozone and PSQI. Conclusions: Overweight and obese individuals with COPD appear to be susceptible to the effects of ambient PM2.5 on sleep quality. In COPD, weight and ambient PM2.5 may be modifiable risk factors to improve sleep quality.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). METHODS: Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS: The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. CONCLUSION: This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Racial Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea.

Although data are limited, studies suggest on average lower positive airway pressure use in Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) compared with Whites in most but not all studies. Most of these observational studies are certainly limited by confounding by socioeconomic status and other unmeasured factors that likely contribute to differences. The etiology of these observed disparities is likely multifactorial, due in part to financial limitations, differences in sleep opportunity, poor sleep quality due to environmental disruptions, and so forth. These disparities in sleep health are likely related to chronic inequities, including experiences of racism, neighborhood features, structural, and contextual factors. Dedicated studies focusing on understanding adherence in BIPOC are lacking. Further research is needed to understand determinants of PAP use in BIPOC subjects and identify feasible interventions to improve sleep health and reduce sleep apnea treatment disparities.

Novel and modifiable factors associated with adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy initiated during stroke rehabilitation: An exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of sleep apnea may improve stroke recovery but is limited by poor adherence. We evaluated baseline features and psychosocial factors associated with CPAP adherence among stroke patients enrolled in a pilot study of an intensive CPAP adherence protocol initiated during inpatient rehabilitation. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, we compared participants adherent to CPAP (≥4 h for ≥70% of nights over 3 months) to non-adherent participants. Using mixed methods, we quantitatively compared baseline demographic and stroke-related factors associated with adherence and qualitatively compared facilitators and barriers to adherence. RESULTS: There were 32 adherent and 20 non-adherent participants. Quantitative analysis revealed more severe stroke, aphasia and white race were associated with adherence. Adherent compared to non-adherent participants also had fewer early CPAP complaints, especially claustrophobia. In a thematic qualitative analysis, facilitators of adherence included improvement in sleep and stroke symptoms, confidence in CPAP use, and positive treatment expectations. Conversely, barriers to adherence included both potentially modifiable factors (lack of confidence in CPAP use, discomfort with a new health technology, and common CPAP-related complaints), and less modifiable factors (social stressors, sleep disturbance, and lack of home social support). DISCUSSION: Adherence programs for CPAP use after stroke should address modifiable barriers, with early desensitization to improve CPAP-related complaints and claustrophobia, and training to address perceived self-efficacy with CPAP. Future studies should explore individual goals and barriers associated with CPAP use among stroke survivors to improve long-term CPAP adherence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02809430.

Dose-response relationship between positive airway pressure therapy and excessive daytime sleepiness: the HomePAP study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The clinical benefits of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea are assumed to require adherent PAP usage, defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services as ≥ 4 hours of use ≥ 70% of nights. However, this definition is based on early data and does not necessarily capture improvements at subthreshold adherence. We explored dose-response relationships between PAP adherence measures and excessive daytime sleepiness from the HomePAP randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Participants aged ≥ 18 years with an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h and baseline sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] ≥ 12) received PAP therapy. Data were collected at baseline, 1-month follow-up, and 3-months follow-up. Regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated PAP measures as predictors of ESS change and normalization (ESS < 10). RESULTS: In 119 participants (aged 49.4 ± 12.6 years, 66.4% male, 72.3% White), > 50% were PAP nonadherent per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services criteria at 3 months. The percentage of nights with PAP use ≥ 4 hours predicted ESS change (P = .023), but not when controlling for the apnea-hypopnea index. The percentage of nights with ≥ 4 hours and average PAP use provided the best discrimination for predicting ESS normalization; each 10% increase in PAP use ≥ 4 hours increased the odds of ESS normalization by 22% (P = .007); those using PAP ≥ 4 hours had a nearly 3-fold greater odds of ESS normalization (P = .025). PAP use for at least 4 hours and on 70% of nights provided the best balance between specificity (0.50) and sensitivity (0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Although subadherent PAP usage may still confer some benefit for patients with obstructive sleep apnea, adherence to current criteria confers the highest likelihood for ESS change and normalization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Portable Monitoring for Diagnosis and Management of Sleep Apnea (HomePAP); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00642486; Identifier: NCT00642486. CITATION: Pascoe M, Bena J, Andrews ND, et al. Dose-response relationship between positive airway pressure therapy and excessive daytime sleepiness: the HomePAP study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(4):1027-1034.

Alternative Care Pathways for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and the Impact on Positive Airway Pressure Adherence: Unraveling the Puzzle of Adherence.

The high burden of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), combined with inadequate supply of sleep specialists and constraints on polysomnography resources, has prompted interest in alternative models of care to improve access and treatment effectiveness. In appropriately selected patients, ambulatory clinical pathways and use of nonphysicians or primary care providers to manage OSA can improve timely access and costs without compromising adherence or other clinical outcomes. Although initial studies show promising results, there are several potential barriers that must be considered before broad implementation, and further implementation research and economic evaluation studies are required.

Disparities in Sleep Health and Potential Intervention Models: A Focused Review.

Disparities in sleep health are important but underrecognized contributors to health disparities. Understanding the factors contributing to sleep heath disparities and developing effective interventions are critical to improving all aspects of heath. Sleep heath disparities are impacted by socioeconomic status, racism, discrimination, neighborhood segregation, geography, social patterns, and access to health care as well as by cultural beliefs, necessitating a cultural appropriateness component in any intervention devised for reducing sleep health disparities. Pediatric sleep disparities require innovative and urgent intervention to establish a foundation of lifelong healthy sleep. Tapping the vast potential of technology in improving sleep health access may be an underutilized tool to reduce sleep heath disparities. Identifying, implementing, replicating, and disseminating successful interventions to address sleep disparities have the potential to reduce overall disparities in health and quality of life.

Physical and Social Environment Relationship With Sleep Health and Disorders.

Sleep health is a multidimensional construct that includes adequate duration, quality, and appropriately timed sleep that may be influenced by environmental factors. In this review, we focus on how an individual's living and sleeping environment, both the surrounding neighborhood physical and social features and the atmosphere around them, may impact their sleep health. We explore the associations of the physical environment (urban density, recreational facilities, green space, mixed land use, and healthy food stores), neighborhood deprivation (disadvantage and disorder), and the social environment (social cohesion, safety, and stigma) with sleep in both adult and pediatric populations. We investigate how physical and social environmental features may lead to alterations in the timing, duration, and quality of sleep and contribute to the most prevalent sleep disorders: insomnia, sleep apnea, and circadian rhythm disorders. We also review how ambient factors such as artificial light, environmental noise, and air pollution may contribute to sleep pathology. We have included key studies and recent emerging data regarding how the differential distribution of environmental factors that may affect sleep health may contribute to sleep health disparities.

The Association of Ambient Air Pollution with Sleep Apnea: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

RATIONALE: Air pollution may influence sleep through airway inflammation or autonomic nervous system pathway alterations. Epidemiological studies may provide evidence of relationships between chronic air pollution exposure and sleep apnea. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ambient-derived pollution exposure is associated with obstructive sleep apnea and objective sleep disruption. METHODS: We analyzed data from a sample of participants in MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) who participated in both the Sleep and Air studies. Mean annual and 5-year exposure levels to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter ≤ 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) were estimated at participants' homes using spatiotemporal models based on cohort-specific monitoring. Participants completed in-home full polysomnography and 7 days of wrist actigraphy. We used multivariate models, adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and site, to assess whether air pollution was associated with sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15) and actigraphy-measured sleep efficiency. RESULTS: The participants (n = 1,974) were an average age of 68 (±9) years, 46% male, 36% white, 24% Hispanic, 28% black, and 12% Asian; 48% had sleep apnea and 25% had a sleep efficiency of ≤88%. A 10 ppb annual increase in NO2 exposure was associated with 39% greater adjusted odds of sleep apnea (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.87). A 5 µg/m3 greater annual PM2.5 exposure was also associated with 60% greater odds of sleep apnea (95% CI, 0.98-2.62). Sleep efficiency was not associated with air pollution levels in fully adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with higher annual NO2 and PM2.5 exposure levels had a greater odds of sleep apnea. These data suggest that in addition to individual risk factors, environmental factors also contribute to the variation of sleep disorders across groups, possibly contributing to health disparities.

Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Related to Smoking Is Greater Among Women With Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although both sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and smoking are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), the potential for an interactive effect on CVD risk has not been explored. Our objective was to determine if smoking-related risk for CVD rises with greater SDB severity. METHODS: Polysomnography and smoking history were obtained in 3,852 men and women in the Sleep Heart Health Study without baseline CVD. Fine-Gray proportional hazard models accounting for competing risk were used to calculate risk of incident CVD associated with SDB severity (defined by clinical cutoffs of the apnea-hypopnea index), smoking status (never, former, and current) and their interaction adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Over a mean (standard deviation) follow-up period of 10.3 (3.4) years, there were 694 incident CVD events. We found a significant three-way interaction of sex, current smoking, and moderate to severe SDB (P = .039) in the adjusted proportional hazards model. In adjusted analyses, women who were current smokers with moderate to severe SDB had a hazard ratio for incident CVD of 3.5 (95% confidence interval 1.6-8.0) relative to women who were nonsmokers without SDB. No such difference in CVD risk was observed in men or women of other strata of smoking and SDB. CONCLUSIONS: In women, smoking-related risk for CVD is significantly higher among individuals with moderate to severe SDB.