Extrafine beclomethasone/formoterol compared to fluticasone/salmeterol combination therapy in COPD.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) extrafine combination versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/S) combination in COPD patients. METHODS: The trial was a 12-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double dummy study; 419 patients with moderate/severe COPD were randomised to BDP/FF 200/12 µg or FP/S 500/50 µg twice daily. The primary objective was to demonstrate the equivalence between treatments in terms of Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) score and the superiority of BDP/FF in terms of change from pre-dose in the first 30 minutes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). Secondary endpoints included lung function, symptom scores, symptom-free days and use of rescue medication, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, six minute walking test and COPD exacerbations. RESULTS: BDP/FF was equivalent to FP/S in terms of TDI score and superior in terms of FEV1 change from pre-dose (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between treatments in secondary outcome measures, confirming overall comparability in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Moreover, a clinically relevant improvement (>4 units) in SGRQ was detected in the BDP/FF group only. CONCLUSION: BDP/FF extrafine combination provides COPD patients with an equivalent improvement of dyspnoea and a faster bronchodilation in comparison to FP/S. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01245569.

Relief of methacholine-induced bronchospasm with extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol in comparison with salbutamol in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Short-acting beta2-agonists like salbutamol and terbutaline are used as rescue medications for acute bronchoconstriction and relief of symptoms due to their rapid onset of action. The aim of this study was to assess whether inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP)/formoterol fumarate (FF) combination in extrafine formulation is non-inferior to salbutamol in the speed of reverting methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-six asthmatic patients were examined in a multicentre, randomised, double blind, double dummy, active treatment and placebo controlled three period cross-over study. On three different days, a single dose of BDP/FF 100/6 µg in pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) extrafine formulation or salbutamol 200 µg pMDI or placebo was inhaled after FEV(1) had dropped by 30-45% with methacholine challenge. RESULTS: The median time to recovery of FEV(1) to 85% of baseline was similar for BDP/FF and salbutamol (3.66 and 2.15 min, respectively), but significantly longer for placebo (21.1 min). The planned analysis on adjusted mean time to recovery showed that the difference from methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction between BDP/FF and salbutamol was 3.82 min (95% confidence interval: -0.85 to 8.5), therefore greater than 3 min supposed in the study design. The difference between BDP/FF and salbutamol was not clinically significant. The two active treatments were also comparable in terms of the relief of symptoms (as assessed by the Borg dyspnoea scale). CONCLUSIONS: BDP/FF combination has a fast onset of action, similar to that of salbutamol, and may represent a good alternative as rescue medication in asthmatic patients.