Responsiveness and meaningful thresholds of PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, and physical function forms in adults with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Report from the OMERACT Myositis Working Group.

BACKGROUND: A series of qualitative studies conducted by the OMERACT Myositis Working Group identified pain interference, fatigue, and physical function as highly important life impact domains for adults with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). In this study, our goal was to assess the responsiveness and minimal important difference of PROMIS pain interference (6a), fatigue (7a), and physical function (8b). METHODS: Adults with IIM from USA, Netherlands, Korea, Sweden, and Australia with two "clinical" visits were enrolled in this prospective study. Anchor questions on a Likert scale were collected at baseline, and manual muscle testing (MMT), physician and patient reported global disease activity, and PROMIS instruments were collected at both visits. Responsiveness was assessed with i) ANOVA, ii) paired t-test, effect size and standardized response mean, and iii) Pearson correlation. Minimal important difference (MID), minimal important change (MIC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) values were calculated. RESULTS: 114 patients with IIM (median age 60, 60 % female) completed both visits. Changes in PROMIS instruments were significantly different among anchor categories. Patients who reported improvement had a significant improvement in their PROMIS scores with at least medium effect size, while patients who reported worsening and stability did not show a significant change with weak effect size. PROMIS instruments had weak to moderate correlations with MMT, patient and physician global disease activity. MID was approximately 2-3 points for Pain Interference and 3-4 points for Fatigue and Physical Function forms based on the method used. MIC was approximately 4-5 for improvement of all the instruments, while MDC was 1.7-2 points for Pain Interference and Physical Function and 3.2-3.9 for Fatigue. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence towards the responsiveness of the PROMIS instruments in a large international prospective cohort of adults with IIM supporting their use as PROMs in adult myositis.

Combining online and in-person methods to evaluate the content validity of PROMIS fatigue short forms in rheumatoid arthritis.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is frequent and often severe and disabling in RA, and there is no consensus on how to measure it. We used online surveys and in-person interviews to evaluate PROMIS Fatigue 7a and 8a short forms (SFs) in people with RA. METHODS: We recruited people with RA from an online patient community (n = 200) and three academic medical centers (n = 84) in the US. Participants completed both SFs then rated the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the items to their fatigue experience. Cognitive debriefing of items was conducted in a subset of 32 clinic patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Mean SF scores were similar (p ≥ .61) among clinic patients reflecting mild fatigue (i.e., 54.5-55.9), but were significantly higher (p < .001) in online participants. SF Fatigue scores correlated highly (r ≥ 0.82; p < .000) and moderately with patient assessments of disease activity (r ≥ 0.62; p = .000). Most (70-92%) reported that the items "completely" or "mostly" reflected their experience. Almost all (≥ 94%) could distinguish general fatigue from RA fatigue. Most (≥ 85%) rated individual items questions as "somewhat" or "very relevant" to their fatigue experience, averaged their fatigue over the past 7 days (58%), and rated fatigue impact versus severity (72 vs. 19%). 99% rated fatigue as an important symptom they considered when deciding how well their current treatment was controlling their RA. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that items in the single-score PROMIS Fatigue SFs demonstrate content validity and can adequately capture the wide range of fatigue experiences of people with RA.

Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group.

Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of cancer. However, increasing use of immune-based therapies, including the widely used class of agents known as immune checkpoint inhibitors, has exposed a discrete group of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Many of these are driven by the same immunologic mechanisms responsible for the drugs' therapeutic effects, namely blockade of inhibitory mechanisms that suppress the immune system and protect body tissues from an unconstrained acute or chronic immune response. Skin, gut, endocrine, lung and musculoskeletal irAEs are relatively common, whereas cardiovascular, hematologic, renal, neurologic and ophthalmologic irAEs occur much less frequently. The majority of irAEs are mild to moderate in severity; however, serious and occasionally life-threatening irAEs are reported in the literature, and treatment-related deaths occur in up to 2% of patients, varying by ICI. Immunotherapy-related irAEs typically have a delayed onset and prolonged duration compared to adverse events from chemotherapy, and effective management depends on early recognition and prompt intervention with immune suppression and/or immunomodulatory strategies. There is an urgent need for multidisciplinary guidance reflecting broad-based perspectives on how to recognize, report and manage organ-specific toxicities until evidence-based data are available to inform clinical decision-making. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) established a multidisciplinary Toxicity Management Working Group, which met for a full-day workshop to develop recommendations to standardize management of irAEs. Here we present their consensus recommendations on managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Certolizumab pegol in combination with dose-optimised methotrexate in DMARD-naïve patients with early, active rheumatoid arthritis with poor prognostic factors: 1-year results from C-EARLY, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP)+dose-optimised methotrexate (MTX) versus placebo (PBO)+dose-optimised MTX in inducing and sustaining clinical remission in DMARD-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe, active, progressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with poor prognostic factors over 52 weeks. METHODS: DMARD-naïve patients with ≤1 year of active RA were randomised (3:1) in a double-blind manner to CZP (400 mg Weeks 0, 2, 4, then 200 mg Q2W to Week 52)+MTX or PBO+MTX (the mean optimised-MTX dose=21 and 22 mg/week, respectively). Sustained remission (sREM) and sustained low disease activity (sLDA; DAS28(ESR)<2.6 and DAS28(ESR)≤3.2, respectively, at both Weeks 40 and 52) were the primary and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Patients were randomised to CZP+MTX (n=660) and PBO+MTX (n=219). At Week 52, significantly more patients assigned to CZP+MTX compared with PBO+MTX achieved sREM (28.9% vs 15.0%, p<0.001) and sLDA (43.8% vs 28.6%, p<0.001). Inhibition of radiographic progression and improvements in physical functioning were significantly greater for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS) mean absolute change from baseline (CFB): 0.2 vs 1.8, p<0.001, rate of mTSS non-progressors: 70.3% vs 49.7%, p<0.001; least squares (LS) mean CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI): -1.00 vs -0.82, p<0.001). Incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar between treatment groups. Infection was the most frequent AE, with higher incidence for CZP+MTX (71.8/100 patient-years (PY)) versus PBO+MTX (52.7/100 PY); the rate of serious infection was similar between CZP+MTX (3.3/100 PY) and PBO+MTX (3.7/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: CZP+dose-optimised MTX treatment of DMARD-naïve early RA resulted in significantly more patients achieving sREM and sLDA, improved physical function and inhibited structural damage compared with PBO+dose-optimised MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01519791.

Determining the Minimally Important Difference in the Clinical Disease Activity Index for Improvement and Worsening in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Simplified measures to quantify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity are increasingly used. The minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for some measures, such as the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), have not been well-defined in real-world clinic settings, especially for early RA patients with low/moderate disease activity. METHODS: Data from Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort patients were used to examine absolute change in CDAI in the first year after enrollment, stratified by disease activity. MCID cut points were derived to optimize the sum of sensitivity and specificity versus the gold standard of patient self-reported improvement or worsening. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated against patient self-reported improvement (gold standard) and for change in pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) improvement. Discrimination was examined using the area under receiver operator curves. Similar methods were used to evaluate MCIDs for worsening for patients who achieved low disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 578 patients (mean ± SD age 54.1 ± 15.3 years, 75% women, median [interquartile range] disease duration 5.3 [3.3, 8.0] months) contributed 1,169 visit pairs to the improvement analysis. The MCID cut points for improvement were 12 (patients starting in high disease activity: CDAI >22), 6 (moderate: CDAI 10-22), and 1 (low disease activity: CDAI <10). Performance characteristics were acceptable using these cut points for pain, HAQ, and DAS28. The MCID for CDAI worsening among patients who achieved low disease activity was 2 units. CONCLUSION: These minimum important absolute differences in CDAI can be used to evaluate improvement and worsening and increase the utility of CDAI in clinical practice.

Peripheral Quantitative CT (pQCT) Using a Dedicated Extremity Cone-Beam CT Scanner.

PURPOSE: We describe the initial assessment of the peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) imaging capabilities of a cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanner dedicated to musculoskeletal extremity imaging. The aim is to accurately measure and quantify bone and joint morphology using information automatically acquired with each CBCT scan, thereby reducing the need for a separate pQCT exam. METHODS: A prototype CBCT scanner providing isotropic, sub-millimeter spatial resolution and soft-tissue contrast resolution comparable or superior to standard multi-detector CT (MDCT) has been developed for extremity imaging, including the capability for weight-bearing exams and multi-mode (radiography, fluoroscopy, and volumetric) imaging. Assessment of pQCT performance included measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), morphometric parameters of subchondral bone architecture, and joint space analysis. Measurements employed phantoms, cadavers, and patients from an ongoing pilot study imaged with the CBCT prototype (at various acquisition, calibration, and reconstruction techniques) in comparison to MDCT (using pQCT protocols for analysis of BMD) and micro-CT (for analysis of subchondral morphometry). RESULTS: The CBCT extremity scanner yielded BMD measurement within ±2-3% error in both phantom studies and cadaver extremity specimens. Subchondral bone architecture (bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, degree of anisotropy, and structure model index) exhibited good correlation with gold standard micro-CT (error ~5%), surpassing the conventional limitations of spatial resolution in clinical MDCT scanners. Joint space analysis demonstrated the potential for sensitive 3D joint space mapping beyond that of qualitative radiographic scores in application to non-weight-bearing versus weight-bearing lower extremities and assessment of phalangeal joint space integrity in the upper extremities. CONCLUSION: The CBCT extremity scanner demonstrated promising initial results in accurate pQCT analysis from images acquired with each CBCT scan. Future studies will include improved x-ray scatter correction and image reconstruction techniques to further improve accuracy and to correlate pQCT metrics with known pathology.

Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to at least one tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: results of a forty-eight­week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab plus methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LEF) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study that continued over 48 weeks. Patients receiving stable doses of MTX or LEF were randomized to receive 2 infusions of placebo (n = 277), ocrelizumab 200 mg (n = 278), or ocrelizumab 500 mg (n = 285) on days 1 and 15 as well as at weeks 24 and 26. Coprimary end points were the proportion of patients with response according to the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at weeks 24 and 48. Secondary end points included the change from baseline in the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) and the ACR50/70 responses. RESULTS: ACR20 responses were 22.0% in the placebo group, 42.2% in the ocrelizumab 200 mg group, and 47.9% in the ocrelizumab 500 mg group at 24 weeks and 19.5%, 48.7%, and 50.7%, respectively, at 48 weeks (P < 0.0001 versus placebo for each comparison at each time point). At 48 weeks, patients receiving both doses of ocrelizumab showed significantly improved ACR50 and ACR70 responses of ~3-fold versus placebo. Only those in the ocrelizumab 500 mg group showed statistically significant (P = 0.0017) inhibition of joint damage progression (mean change in the SHS) relative to placebo (61% inhibition) at 48 weeks. Overall adverse events and infections during the 48 weeks of study were comparable in all treatment groups. Serious infections were observed more frequently in patients taking ocrelizumab (5.1% and 4.3%) than in those taking placebo (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Patients in both of the ocrelizumab groups met the clinical primary efficacy end points. Inhibition of change in the SHS was statistically significant at 48 weeks for those in the ocrelizumab 500 mg group. The rate of serious infections in this trial was higher for both ocrelizumab doses as compared with placebo.

OARSI-OMERACT initiative: defining thresholds for symptomatic severity and structural changes in disease modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Total joint replacement has been proposed as an endpoint in disease modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); however, disparities have generated concerns regarding this outcome. A combined Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI)/Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative was launched in 2004 to develop a composite index ['virtual total joint replacement' (VJR)] as a surrogate outcome for osteoarthritis (OA) progression in DMOAD RCTs. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of patients fulfilling different thresholds of sustained pain, reduced function, and X-ray change in existing DMOAD RCTs. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of summary data from the placebo arm of eight DMOAD RCTs. RESULTS: Eight OA RCTs representing 1379 patients were included. Pain was assessed by WOMAC and/or VAS and function by WOMAC and/or Lequesne. Among six knee and two hip studies, 248 (22%) and 132 (51%) patients respectively had X-ray progression [decrease joint space width (JSW) ≥0.5 mm]. The prevalence of patients fulfilling clinical and radiographic criteria was highest (n = 163, 12%) in the least stringent scenario (pain + function ≥80 at ≥2 visits); with few patients (n = 129, 2%) in the most stringent scenario (pain + function ≥80 at ≥4 visits). Using these prevalence data, a sample size of 352-2144 per group would be needed to demonstrate a 50% difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of patients with sustained symptomatic OA of at least a moderate degree with X-ray progression is low. Even using lenient criteria to define VJR, large patient numbers would be required to detect differences between groups in DMOAD RCTs. Investigation of the optimal cutoff threshold and combination of symptoms and radiographic change should be pursued.

Responder analysis and correlation of outcome measures: pooled results from two identical studies comparing etoricoxib, celecoxib, and placebo in osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of responders in two identical osteoarthritis (OA) trials using Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria and to assess the comparability and correlation of individual component measurements. METHODS: Data were pooled from two identical 26-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel, multicenter trials comparing once daily etoricoxib 30 mg (N=475), celecoxib 200 mg (N=488), and placebo (N=244) in patients with OA of the knee or hip. OMERACT-OARSI criteria were (1) improvement in pain or physical function > or =50% and an absolute change > or =20 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS); or (2) improvement of > or =20% and with an absolute change > or =10 mm in at least two of the following three categories: pain, physical function, and patient's global assessment. Correlations were assessed between endpoints measured as time-weighted average change from baseline over 12 weeks using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: There were significantly greater proportions of responders in the etoricoxib (66.2%) and celecoxib (63.5%) groups compared with the placebo group (43.0%; P<0.001). There was no difference between the two active treatment groups. There was high correlation between pain and physical function (r=0.903), pain and global assessment (r=0.778), and physical function and global assessment (r=0.820). There was high sensitivity (75-87%) and specificity (80-96%) for changes in individual component measurements to predict OMERACT-OARSI responders. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more patients receiving etoricoxib or celecoxib than placebo were OMERACT-OARSI responders. The high correlation between individual scales composing this composite response measurement suggests some redundancies between individual components, particularly between pain and physical function.

Evaluating the adequacy of disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a RAND appropriateness panel.

OBJECTIVES: There is a lack of agreement on assessing disease activity in patients with RA and determining when the RA treatment should be changed or continued. A panel of rheumatologists was convened to develop guidelines to assess adequacy of disease control, focusing on the use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. METHODS: The Research and Development/University of California in Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method was used to evaluate disease control adequacy. After a literature review, 108 scenarios were developed to simulate situations most likely to be encountered in clinical practice and rated on a 9-point scale by a 10-member expert panel. RESULTS: Final appropriateness rankings for the scenarios were as follows: 37% 'appropriate', 48% 'inappropriate', and 16% 'neutral'. The panelists felt that patients with disease control in the 'appropriate' range have adequate control with their current therapy, whereas those in the 'inappropriate' range should be considered for a change in therapy. Those in 'neutral' areas should have their therapy reviewed carefully. The panelists recommended that the clinically active joint count should be considered the most important decision factor. In patients with no clinically active joints, regardless of other factors no change in therapy was felt to be warranted. Patients with five or more active joints should be considered inadequately treated, and in patients with one to four active joints other variables must be considered in the decision to change therapy. CONCLUSION: These preliminary guidelines will assist the clinician in determining when a patient's clinical situation warrants therapy escalation and when continuing the current regimen would be appropriate.

Methotrexate combined with isoniazid treatment for latent tuberculosis is well tolerated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience from an urban arthritis clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Reactivation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a significant problem with all available tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists when used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and other inflammatory diseases. Concerns have been raised regarding the appropriate management of patients with latent TB (LTB) exposure (or active TB infection) before initiating TNF antagonists as the safety data of combined treatment with two potentially hepatotoxic medications, methotrexate (MTX) and isoniazid (INH), is lacking. The goal of this study was to investigate the toxicity of MTX and INH treatment in patients with RA before initiating TNF antagonists. METHODS: To investigate the toxicity of MTX and INH treatment in patients with RA we performed a retrospective chart review of patients seen at the Bellevue Hospital Arthritis Clinic in New York City between 2002 and 2006. Forty-four patients who were concomitantly treated with both drugs were included. The primary outcome investigated was increase in liver function tests (LFT). RESULTS: Transient increases in LFT were seen in 11% of patients, but in no case was this more than twice the upper limit of normal values. All abnormal LFT resolved spontaneously without intervention. In addition, no patient has developed signs or symptoms of TB reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of INH for LTB was well tolerated in patients with RA on a background regimen of MTX. While the risks and benefits of all treatment must always be considered, in our experience the additive risk of INH to MTX in terms of hepatotoxicity was low. None the less it is prudent to follow LFT closely on patients taking this combination.

Relationships between biochemical markers of bone and cartilage degradation with radiological progression in patients with knee osteoarthritis receiving risedronate: the Knee Osteoarthritis Structural Arthritis randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether early changes in biochemical markers of bone (NTX-I) and cartilage (CTX-II [C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type II collagen]) degradation are associated with radiological progression in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) receiving risedronate. DESIGN: Two thousand four hundred and eighty three patients with medial compartment knee OA were randomized in two 24-month studies in North America (NA) and European Union (EU). Studies evaluated risedronate 5 mg/day, 35 mg/week (EU), 50 mg/week (NA), and 15 mg/day (NA and EU), compared to placebo in reducing signs and symptoms and in slowing radiographic progression. One thousand eight hundred and eighty five patients from the pooled EU and NA studies with available NTX-I/CTX-II at both baseline and 6 months and radiographs at baseline and at 24 months were analyzed. RESULTS: Risedronate produced a dose-dependent reduction of NTX-I and CTX-II observed at 6 months which continued up to 24 months. Patients who had CTX-II levels returned to low levels (<150 ng/mmol creatinine) at 6 months had a lower risk of radiographic progression at 24 months than patients whose CTX-II levels were increased both at baseline and 6 months [odds-ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.57 (0.39-0.85) after adjustment for demographics and joint space width]. The lowest risk of progression was observed in patients who had low CTX-II levels both at baseline and at 6 months [odds-ratio 0.36 (0.21-0.63)]. No significant association between NTX-I levels and radiological progression was observed. CONCLUSION: CTX-II decreased with risedronate in patients with knee OA and levels reached after 6 months were associated with radiological progression at 24 months. Monitoring a marker of cartilage degradation 6 months after initiating treatment may be instructive in identifying patients with low progression.

A 2 yr longitudinal radiographic study examining the effect of a bisphosphonate (risedronate) upon subchondral bone loss in osteoarthritic knee patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether risedronate (RIS) slows down trabecular bone loss in the medial compartment of the proximal tibia, a characteristic of patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Initially, 100 patients were randomly selected from each treatment group (each N approximately 300) comprising placebo and RIS 5 mg/day, 15 mg/day and 50 mg/week from a double blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, 2 yr investigation of OA knee patients in North America. Using fluoroscopic semi-flexed standard radiography, baseline and exit knee radiographs were digitized by laser scanner. Following computerized measurement of minimum medial compartment joint space width, each group was subdivided into joint space narrowing (JSN) non-progressor or JSN-progressor (JSN >or=0.6 mm measured at any point post-baseline). Computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) quantified longitudinal changes separately in horizontal and vertical trabeculae in region of interest (three-fourth width of tibial compartment x 6 mm height) in the medial compartment. Following the initial study, all JSN-progressor knees within the entire patient cohort (N = 1232) were similarly analysed. RESULTS: OA knees in JSN non-progressor group had a slight decrease in FSA for vertical and horizontal trabeculae and showed no drug effect. In JSN-progressor knees, bone loss was greater in both placebo and RIS 5 mg/day groups compared with those in RIS 15 mg/day group in which trabeculae were retained, and in the RIS 50 mg/week group in which the vertical trabecular number increased significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study showed that patients with marked cartilage loss (JSN>or=0.6 mm) receiving RIS 15 mg/day retained vertical trabecular structure, and those receiving RIS 50 mg/week increased vertical trabecular number, thereby preserving the structural integrity of subchondral bone in knee OA.

Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of etoricoxib 30 mg with the generally maximum recommended dose of celecoxib, 200 mg, in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in two identically designed studies. METHODS: Two multi-centre, 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority studies were conducted, enrolling patients who were prior non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or acetaminophen users. There were 599 patients in study 1 and 608 patients in study 2 randomized 4:4:1:1 to etoricoxib 30 mg qd, celecoxib 200 mg qd or one of two placebo groups for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, placebo patients were evenly distributed to etoricoxib or celecoxib based on their initial enrollment randomization schedule. The primary hypothesis was that etoricoxib 30 mg would be at least as effective as celecoxib 200 mg for the time-weighted average change from baseline over 12 weeks for Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Pain Subscale, WOMAC Physical Function Subscale and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status. Active treatments were also assessed over the full 26 weeks. Adverse experiences were collected for safety assessment. RESULTS: In both studies, etoricoxib was non-inferior to celecoxib for all three efficacy outcomes over 12 and 26 weeks; both were superior to placebo (P < 0.001) for all three outcomes in each study over 12 weeks. The safety and tolerability of etoricoxib 30 mg qd and celecoxib 200 mg qd were similar over 12 and 26 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Etoricoxib 30 mg qd was at least as effective as celecoxib 200 mg qd and had similar safety in the treatment of knee and hip OA; both were superior to placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00092768; NCT00092791.

Overview of benefit/risk of biological agents.

Targeted tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, first approved by the FDA in 1998, have had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In general, the benefit/ risk ratio for these agents and the IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, has been quite favorable. However, infrequent adverse events can be serious and require continued pharmacovigilance. Infections, particularly tuberculosis and less commonly fungal infections, are among the most serious adverse events, especially given delays in diagnosis due to subtle or atypical presentations. Questions have also arisen regarding whether anti-TNF-alpha agents increase the risk of lymphoma, a complicated issue confounded by the multiple risk factors for lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low observed incidence rates of lymphoma, requiring prolonged monitoring. Additional rare reported complications include systemic lupus erythematosus-like syndromes, congestive heart failure and demyelinating syndromes (including cases resembling progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy). Ongoing post-marketing surveillance of these and other serious adverse events is necessary to determine the true incidence rates, and whether a reassessment of the overall risk-benefit of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists will be required.

A novel group of phospholipase A2s preferentially expressed in type 2 helper T cells.

We report a novel phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), group XII (GXII) PLA(2), distinct from other cysteine-rich groups with a catalytic histidine motif, by its 20-kDa size and distribution of the 14 cysteine residues within the protein. Alternative spliced forms with distinct subcellular localization, designated GXII-1 and GXII-2, were identified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Importantly, GXII PLA(2)s, in particular GXII-2 PLA(2), and group V PLA(2), but not group X PLA(2), were selectively expressed in murine type 2 helper T (Th2) clones and in vitro differentiated mouse CD4 Th2 cells as compared with type 1 helper T clones and cells. Stimulation with anti-CD3 appreciably up-regulated expression of GXII PLA(2)s and group V PLA(2) by steady state analysis of the Th2 cells as compared with type 1 helper T cells. These results suggest that group XII and group V PLA(2)s might participate in helper T cell immune response through release of immediate second signals and generation of downstream eicosanoids.

Mast-cell responses in the development of asthma.

Many cells participate in the pathogenesis of asthmatic inflammation. The mast cell is localized at the interface of the internal and external environment within the lung where it may respond to allergens and other exogenous stimuli. The activation of mast cells leads to the release of mediators that contribute to the early phase of asthmatic inflammation. Mast-cell-derived products may also contribute to the late-phase asthmatic response. This review summarizes the developmental biologic features of the mast cell, its receptor-mediated activation, and its range of preformed, newly synthesized, and induced mediators that contribute to asthmatic inflammation.

Phospholipase A2 enzymes in eicosanoid generation.

Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) enzymes cleave esterified fatty acids from membrane glycerophospholipids. The 20-carbon polyunsaturated fatty acid, arachidonic acid, is used as substrate by intermediate enzymes for the generation of eicosanoids, including leukotrienes and prostanoid products. An expanding number of PLA2 enzymes has now been identified that may participate in arachidonic acid release and thus serve a rate-limiting role in eicosanoid biosynthesis. Cellular PLA2 function for various members is regulated by constitutive or elicited expression, as well as by posttranslational events such as phosphorylation. In addition, the function of some cellular PLA2 enzymes is regulated by a requirement for calcium or by localization to a particular subcellular compartment. Finally, some PLA2 enzymes are secreted from the cell where they may directly interact with plasma membrane or transmembrane receptors to function as autocrine or paracrine mediators. Evaluating the roles of a number of these functionally similar PLA2 enzymes in the biosynthesis of leukotrienes and other eicosanoids is the focus of this review.

Low molecular weight group IIA and group V phospholipase A(2) enzymes have different intracellular locations in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells.

The subcellular location of the enzymes of eicosanoid biosynthesis is critical for their co-ordinate action in the generation of leukotrienes and prostaglandins. This activity is thought to occur predominantly at a perinuclear location. Whereas the subcellular locations of cytosolic phospholipase (PL) A(2) and each of the pathway enzymes of eicosanoid generation have been defined, the distribution of the low molecular weight species of PLA(2) has remained elusive because of the lack of antibodies that distinguish among homologous family members. We have prepared affinity-purified rabbit antipeptide IgG antibodies that distinguish mouse group IIA PLA(2) and group V PLA(2). Immunofluorescence staining and immunogold electron microscopy reveal different subcellular locations for the enzymes. Group IIA(2) PLA(2) is present in the secretory granules of mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells, consistent with its putative role in facilitating secretory granule exocytosis and its consequent extracellular action. In contrast, group V PLA(2) is associated with various membranous organelles including the Golgi apparatus, nuclear envelope, and plasma membrane. The perinuclear location of group V PLA(2) is consistent with a putative interaction with translocated cytosolic PLA(2) in supplying arachidonic acid for generation of eicosanoid products, while the location in Golgi cisternae may also reflect its action as a secreted enzyme. The spatial segregation of group IIA PLA(2) and group V PLA(2) implies that these enzymes are not functionally redundant.