RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have focused on the first waves of the pandemic until early 2021. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to extend these data from the onset of the pandemic to the global coverage by vaccination in summer 2022. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed COVISEP registry data on reported COVID-19 cases in pwMS between January 2020 and July 2022. Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalization or higher severity. RESULTS: Among 2584 pwMS with confirmed/highly suspected COVID-19, severe infection rates declined from 14.6% preomicron wave to 5.7% during omicron wave (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.25-1.64] per 10 years), male sex (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.51-2.67]), obesity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.52-3.68]), cardiac comorbidities (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.46-3.83]), higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = [1.43-3.06] for EDSS 3-5.5 and OR = 4.53, 95% CI = [3.04-6.75] for EDSS ⩾6), and anti-CD20 therapies (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = [1.85-3.87]) as risk factors for COVID-19 severity. Vaccinated individuals experienced less severe COVID-19, whether on (risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.60-0.69]) or off (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.30-0.33]) anti-CD20. DISCUSSION: In pwMS, consistent risk factors were anti-CD20 therapies and neurological disability, emerging as vital drivers of COVID-19 severity regardless of wave, period, or vaccination status.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Corazón , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
Recent studies in adults suggested that extended-interval dosing of rituximab/ocrelizumab (RTX/OCR) larger than 12 months was safe and could improve safety. This was an observational cohort study of very active pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (PoMS) (median (range) age, 16 (12-17) years) treated with RTX/OCR with 6 month standard-interval dosing (n = 9) or early extended-interval dosing (n = 12, median (range) interval 18 months (12-25)). Within a median (range) follow-up of 31 (12-63) months after RTX/OCR onset, one patient (standard-interval) experienced relapse and no patient showed disability worsening or new T2-weighted lesions. This study suggests that the effectiveness of RTX/OCR is maintained with a median extended-interval dosing of 18 months in patients with very active PoMS.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Adulto , Niño , Adolescente , Rituximab , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Importance: In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), factors associated with severe COVID-19 include anti-CD20 therapies and neurologic disability, but it is still unclear whether these 2 variables are independently associated with severe COVID-19 or whether the association depends on MS clinical course. Objective: To assess the association between anti-CD20 therapies and COVID-19 severity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS (PMS). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study used data from the COVISEP study, which included patients with MS and COVID-19 from February 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, at 46 French MS expert centers, general hospitals, and private neurology practices. Eligible patients with RRMS were those treated with high-efficacy MS therapy (ie, anti-CD20, fingolimod, or natalizumab), and eligible patients with PMS were those younger than 70 years with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 8 or lower. Patients were monitored from COVID-19 symptom onset until recovery or death. Exposures: Current anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab or rituximab). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was severe COVID-19 (ie, hospitalization with any mode of oxygenation or death). All analyses were conducted separately in patients with RRMS and PMS using propensity score-weighted logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to COVID-19 vaccine status, sex, EDSS score, and age. Results: A total of 1400 patients, 971 with RRMS (median age, 39.14 years [IQR, 31.38-46.80 years]; 737 [76.1%] female) and 429 with PMS (median age, 54.21 years [IQR, 48.42-60.14 years]; 250 [58.3%] female) were included in the study. A total of 418 patients with RRMS (43.0%) and 226 with PMS (52.7%) were treated with anti-CD20 therapies. In weighted analysis, 13.4% and 2.9% of patients with RRMS treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR], 5.20; 95% CI, 2.78-9.71); this association persisted among vaccinated patients (7.0% vs 0.9%; OR, 8.85; 95% CI, 1.26-62.12). Among patients with PMS, 19.0% and 15.5% of patients treated and not treated with anti-CD20 had severe COVID-19, respectively, and there was no association between anti-CD20 treatment and severe COVID-19 (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.76-2.16). In PMS subgroup analysis, anti-CD20 exposure interacted negatively with EDSS score (P = .009 for interaction) and age (P = .03 for interaction); anti-CD20 therapies were associated with risk of severe COVID-19 only in patients with less neurologic disability and younger patients with PMS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, risk of severe COVID-19 was higher in patients with PMS than in those with RRMS. Use of anti-CD20 therapies was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 among patients with RRMS. In patients with PMS, there was no association between anti-CD20 therapies and risk of severe COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19RESUMEN
We conducted a single-centre retrospective cohort study in a French University Hospital between 2010 and 2018 to describe the risk of severe infectious event (SIE) within 2 years after the date of first rituximab infusion (T0) prescribed after the evidence of acquired hypogammaglobulinemia (gamma globulins [GG] ≤ 6 g/L) in the setting of autoimmune diseases (AID) other than rheumatoid arthritis. SIE occurred in 26 out of 121 included patients. Two years cumulative incidence rates were 12.7 % (95 % CI 5.1-23.9) in the multiple sclerosis/neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder group (n = 48), 27.6 % (95 % CI 15.7-40.9) in the ANCA-associated vasculitis group (n = 48) and 30.6 % (95 % CI 13.1-50.3) in the 'other AID' group (n = 25). Median GG level at T0 was 5.3 g/l (IQR 4.1-5.6) in the 'SIE' group and 5.6 g/l (IQR 4.7-5.8) in the 'no SIE' group (p = 0.04). In regression analysis, risk of SIE increased with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR 2.77; 95 % CI 1.01-7.57), lung disease (OR 3.20; 95 % CI 1.27-7.99), GG < 4 g/L (OR 3.39; 95 % CI 1.02-11.19), concomitant corticosteroid therapy (OR 4.13; 95 % CI 1.63-10.44), previous cyclophosphamide exposure (OR 2.69; 95 % CI 1.10-6.61), a lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/µL (OR 2.86; 95 % CI 1.12-7.21) and absence of pneumococcal vaccination (OR 3.50; 95 % CI 1.41-8.70). These results may help to inform clinical decision when considering a treatment by rituximab in immunosuppressed AID patients with hypogammaglobulinemia.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia , Artritis Reumatoide , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Infecciones , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Agammaglobulinemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Agammaglobulinemia/epidemiología , Agammaglobulinemia/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inducido químicamente , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
The immune system plays a significant role in multiple sclerosis. While MS was historically thought to be T cell-mediated, multiple pieces of evidence now support the view that B cells are essential players in multiple sclerosis pathogenic processes. High-efficacy disease-modifying therapies that target the immune system have emerged over the past two decades. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies selectively deplete CD20+ B and CD20+ T cells and efficiently suppress inflammatory disease activity. These monotherapies prevent relapses, reduce new or active magnetic resonance imaging brain lesions, and lessen disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab are currently used in clinical practice, while phase III clinical trials for ublituximab have been recently completed. In this review, we compare the four anti-CD20 antibodies in terms of their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, immunological targets, and pharmacokinetic properties. A deeper understanding of the individual properties of these molecules in relation to their efficacy and safety profiles is critical for their use in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD20 , Factores Inmunológicos , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Antígenos CD20/inmunología , Linfocitos B/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/inmunología , Recurrencia , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/farmacología , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T/inmunologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent. CONCLUSION: These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab. CLINICAL TRIALS: gov identifier (NCT04580381).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rituximab (RTX) is largely used as a long-term maintenance therapy in various inflammatory neurological diseases. Reducing the dose of maintenance therapy of RTX from 2 grams every 6 months (traditional regimen) to 1 gram every 6 months (reduced regimen) is a widely applied practice, with the assumption that it decreases the risk of side effects while maintaining efficacy. METHODS: In order to better describe the biological consequences of this strategy, we retrospectively compared, in a single center, the B-cell count after the traditional regimen and after the reduced regimen in patients who underwent both (n = 161). RESULTS: The rate of patients with B-cell repopulation was not significantly different between traditional and reduced regimens (9.9% vs 15.6%, p = 0.18). Among the 145 patients who did not have B-cell repopulation following the traditional regimen, B-cell repopulation following the reduced regimen occurred in only 16 cases (11.0%) and was usually slight: 11/16 patients had only 1% of CD19+ cells. CONCLUSION: These data emphasize the relevance of 1 g of RTX as maintenance therapy and the fact that 2 g of RTX is generally an overtreatment in inflammatory neurological diseases.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuromielitis Óptica , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuromielitis Óptica/inducido químicamente , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/inducido químicamente , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2020, the French Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (SFSEP) decided to develop a national evidence-based consensus on pregnancy in MS. As neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) shares a series of commonalities with MS, but also some significant differences, specific recommendations had to be developed. OBJECTIVES: To establish recommendations on pregnancy in women with NMOSD. METHODS: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and universities databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics, was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A sub-group of nine NMOSD experts was dedicated to analysing available data on NMOSD. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence. RESULTS: A strong agreement was reached for all 66 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, loco-regional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses, and disease-modifying treatments. CONCLUSION: Physicians and patients should be aware of the new and specific evidence-based recommendations of the French MS Society for pregnancy in women with NMOSD. They should help harmonise counselling and treatment practise, allowing for better individualised choices.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuromielitis Óptica , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico , Neuromielitis Óptica/terapia , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Vacunación , Periodo Posparto , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations on pregnancy management for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). BACKGROUND: MS typically affects young women in their childbearing years. Increasing evidence is available to inform questions raised by MS patients and health professionals about pregnancy issues. METHODS: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and university databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on healthcare topics; it was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence. RESULTS: A strong agreement was reached for all 104 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses and disease-modifying treatments. CONCLUSION: The 2022 recommendations of the French MS society should be helpful to harmonise counselling and treatment practice for pregnancy in persons with MS, allowing for better and individualised choices.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Periodo Posparto , Vacunación , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Kappa free light chains (KFLC) seem to efficiently diagnose MS. However, extensive cohort studies are lacking to establish consensus cut-offs, notably to rule out non-MS autoimmune CNS disorders. Our objectives were to (1) determine diagnostic performances of CSF KFLC, KFLC index, and KFLC intrathecal fraction (IF) threshold values that allow us to separate MS from different CNS disorder control populations and compare them with oligoclonal bands' (OCB) performances and (2) to identify independent factors associated with KFLC quantification in MS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 13 French MS centers. Patients were included if they had a noninfectious and nontumoral CNS disorder, eligible data concerning CSF and serum KFLC, albumin, and OCB. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to their diagnosis: MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), other inflammatory CNS disorders (OIND), and noninflammatory CNS disorder controls (NINDC). RESULTS: One thousand six hundred twenty-one patients were analyzed (675 MS, 90 CIS, 297 OIND, and 559 NINDC). KFLC index and KFLC IF had similar performances in diagnosing MS from nonselected controls and OIND (p = 0.123 and p = 0.991 for area under the curve [AUC] comparisons) and performed better than CSF KFLC (p < 0.001 for all AUC comparisons). A KFLC index of 8.92 best separated MS/CIS from the entire nonselected control population, with better performances than OCB (p < 0.001 for AUC comparison). A KFLC index of 11.56 best separated MS from OIND, with similar performances than OCB (p = 0.065). In the multivariate analysis model, female gender (p = 0.003), young age (p = 0.013), and evidence of disease activity (p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with high KFLC index values in patients with MS, whereas MS phenotype, immune-modifying treatment use at sampling, and the FLC analyzer type did not influence KFLC index. DISCUSSION: KFLC biomarkers are efficient tools to separate patients with MS from controls, even when compared with other patients with CNS autoimmune disorder. Given these results, we suggest using KFLC index or KFLC IF as a criterion to diagnose MS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that KFLC index or IF can be used to differentiate patients with MS from nonselected controls and from patients with other autoimmune CNS disorders.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Esclerosis Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Cadenas kappa de Inmunoglobulina , Bandas Oligoclonales , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
There is no consensus regarding the classification of optic neuritis, and precise diagnostic criteria are not available. This reality means that the diagnosis of disorders that have optic neuritis as the first manifestation can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis at presentation can facilitate the timely treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epidemiological data show that, cumulatively, optic neuritis is most frequently caused by many conditions other than multiple sclerosis. Worldwide, the cause and management of optic neuritis varies with geographical location, treatment availability, and ethnic background. We have developed diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis and a classification of optic neuritis subgroups. Our diagnostic criteria are based on clinical features that permit a diagnosis of possible optic neuritis; further paraclinical tests, utilising brain, orbital, and retinal imaging, together with antibody and other protein biomarker data, can lead to a diagnosis of definite optic neuritis. Paraclinical tests can also be applied retrospectively on stored samples and historical brain or retinal scans, which will be useful for future validation studies. Our criteria have the potential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, provide information on optic neuritis disease course that can guide future treatment trial design, and enable physicians to judge the likelihood of a need for long-term pharmacological management, which might differ according to optic neuritis subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuromielitis Óptica , Neuritis Óptica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuritis Óptica/diagnóstico , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Autoanticuerpos , Acuaporina 4RESUMEN
Disease modifying therapies compromise immune response to SARS-Cov2 or its vaccine in patients with immune system diseases (ISD). Therefore, analysis of the humoral and cellular responses against Spike is of utmost importance to manage ISD patients. A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 immunization in 87 ISD patients and 81 healthy controls. We performed a whole blood interferon gamma release assay using SARS-Cov2 Spike and Nucleocapsid recombinant proteins in order to evaluate T-cell memory response, and an IgG anti-Spike ELISA to evaluate humoral response. Cellular (26.4%) and humoral (44.8%) responses were negative against Spike in ISD patients following COVID-19 immunization. In univariate analysis, an anti-Spike T cell defective response was associated with the use of glucocorticoids (Odds ratio [OR] = 10.0; p < 10-4), serum albumin level ≤40 g/L (OR = 18.9; p < 10-4), age over 55 years old (OR = 3.9, p = 0.009) and ≤2 vaccine injections (OR = 4.9; p = 0.001). The impact of glucocorticoids persisted after adjustment for age and number of vaccine injections (OR = 8.38, p < 0.001). In contrast, the humoral response was impacted by the use of anti-CD20 mAb (OR = 24.8, p < 10-4), and an extended time since immunization (≥75 days; OR = 4.3, p = 0.002). Double defective cellular/humoral responses (6.9%) were typically encountered in glucocorticoids and/or anti-CD20 mAb treated ISD with a serum albumin level ≤40 g/L (OR = 17.5; p = 0.002). Glucocorticoid usage, B cell depleting therapies, and a low serum albumin level were the main factors associated with a non-response to COVID-19 immunization in ISD patients. These results need further confirmation in larger studies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , ARN Viral , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos , Inmunidad , Albúmina SéricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown whether early B cell reconstitution (EBR) in MS patients under rituximab is associated with a risk of relapse or progression. OBJECTIVES: Analyzing EBR in rituximab-treated patients and its putative association with clinical findings. METHODS: Prospective lymphocytes immunophenotyping was performed in a monocentric cohort of MS patients treated by rituximab for 2 years. EBR was defined when B cells concentration was > 5 cells/mm3. B cell subsets were retrospectively associated with clinical data. Clinical and radiological monitoring included relapses, EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale), SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and MRI. RESULTS: 182 patients were analyzed (61 remitting-relapsing and 121 progressive-active). 38.5% experienced EBR at least once, but very few (7/182) showed systematic reconstitution. Most patients remained stable upon treatment, regardless of the occurrence of EBR. Dynamics of B cell reconstitution featured increased naïve/transitional B cells, and decreased memory subsets. Homeostasis of the B cell compartment differed at baseline between patients experiencing or not EBR upon treatment. In patients with EBR, reciprocal dynamics of transitional and pro-inflammatory double-negative B cell subsets was associated with better response to rituximab treatment. CONCLUSION: EBR is common in rituximab-treated MS patients and is not associated with clinical disease activity. EBR in the peripheral blood may reflect regulatory immunological phenomena in subgroup of patients.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/inducido químicamente , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The intrathecal production of oligoclonal immunoglobulin bands (OCB) is a prognostic factor for multiple sclerosis (MS) evolution in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients and a diagnostic factor for MS. The kappa free light chain (K)-index represents a quantitative automated alternative to OCB. We retrospectively evaluated OCB and K-index results in 274 patients with MS (n = 48) or CIS (n = 29) at diagnosis, non-MS inflammatory central nervous diseases (n = 35), and non-inflammatory central/peripheral nervous diseases (n = 162). Several cut-offs were established: a pathophysiological cut-off (K-index: 3.3) useful for differential diagnosis (negative predictive value for MS >99%), an optimised cut-off (K-index: 9.1) with better sensitivity and equivalent specificity than OCB for the diagnosis of MS, and a high-risk cut-off (K-index: >55.0) allowing prediction of MS (specificity 100%). We developed a scaled interpretation of the K-index and we discuss the usefulness of testing OCB only when the K-index is positive >3.3 to obtain a better specificity.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Desmielinizantes , Esclerosis Múltiple , Biomarcadores , Enfermedades Desmielinizantes/diagnóstico , Humanos , Cadenas Ligeras de Inmunoglobulina , Cadenas kappa de Inmunoglobulina , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytic disorder, recently recognized to be neoplastic. The clinical phenotype of the disease is extremely heterogeneous, and depends on the affected organs, with the most frequently reported manifestations being bone pain, diabetes insipidus and neurological disorders including ataxia. In this article, we report on a case of a 48-year-old woman, whose initial symptom of gait instability was isolated. This was associated with positional nystagmus with central features: nystagmus occurring without latency, clinically present with only mild symptoms, and resistant to repositioning maneuvers. The cerebral MRI showed bilateral intra-orbital retro-ocular mass lesions surrounding the optic nerves and T2 hyperintensities in the pons and middle cerebellar peduncles. A subsequent CT scan of the chest abdomen and pelvis found a left "hairy kidney", while 18 F-FDG PET-CT imaging disclosed symmetric 18F-FDG avidity predominant at the diametaphyseal half of both femurs. Percutaneous US-guided biopsy of perinephric infiltrates and the kidney showed infiltration by CD68(+), CD1a(-), Langerin(-), PS100(-) foamy histiocytes with BRAF V600E mutation. The combination of the different radiological abnormalities and the result of the biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of ECD. Many clinical and radiological descriptions are available in the literature, but few authors describe vestibulo-ocular abnormalities in patients with ECD. Here, we report on a case of ECD and provide a precise description of the instability related to central positional nystagmus, which led to the diagnosis of ECD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a disabling neurologic disorder resulting from the infection of the CNS by JC polyomavirus in immunocompromised individuals. For the last 2 decades, increasing use of immunotherapies leads to iatrogenic PML. Iatrogenic PML is often associated with signs of inflammation at onset (inflammatory PML) and/or after treatment withdrawal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (PML-IRIS). Although immune reconstitution is a key element for viral clearance, it may also be harmful and induce clinical worsening. A C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist (maraviroc) has been proposed to prevent and/or limit the deleterious immune responses underlying PML-IRIS. However, the data to support its use remain scarce and disputed. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at 8 university hospitals in France and Switzerland by collecting clinical, biological, and radiologic data of patients who developed inflammatory PML (iPML) or PML-IRIS related to immunosuppressive therapies used for chronic inflammatory diseases between 2010 and 2020. We added to this cohort, a meta-analysis of individual case reports of patients with iPML/PML-IRIS treated with maraviroc published up to 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 27 cases were identified in the cohort and 9 from the literature. Among them, 27 met the inclusion criteria: 16 treated with maraviroc and 11 with standard of care (including corticosteroids use). Most cases were related to MS (92.6%) and natalizumab (88%). Inflammatory features (iPML) were present at onset in 12 patients (44.4%), and most patients (92.6%) received corticosteroids within the course of PML. Aggravation due to PML-IRIS was not prevented by maraviroc compared with patients who received only corticosteroids (adjusted odds ratio: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.06-2.63). Similarly, maraviroc did not influence time to clinical worsening due to PML-IRIS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.529, 95% CI: 0.14-2.0) or disability at the last follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 2, 95% CI: 0.23-17.3). DISCUSSION: The use of CCR5 blockade did not help to keep deleterious immune reconstitution in check even when associated with corticosteroids. Despite maraviroc's reassuring safety profile, this study does not support its use in iPML/PML-IRIS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence showing that adding maraviroc to the management of iatrogenic iPML/PML-IRIS does not improve the outcome.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores CCR5/farmacología , Síndrome Inflamatorio de Reconstitución Inmune/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Inflamatorio de Reconstitución Inmune/prevención & control , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/prevención & control , Maraviroc/farmacología , Adulto , Antagonistas de los Receptores CCR5/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome Inflamatorio de Reconstitución Inmune/inducido químicamente , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Maraviroc/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG-associated disease (MOGAD) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: Annualized relapse rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale score, MRI, autoantibody titers, pain, and adverse events were retrospectively evaluated in 57 patients with MOGAD (n = 14), aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG seropositive (n = 36), and seronegative NMOSD (n = 7; 12%), switched to TCZ from previous immunotherapies, particularly rituximab. RESULTS: Patients received TCZ for 23.8 months (median; interquartile range 13.0-51.1 months), with an IV dose of 8.0 mg/kg (median; range 6-12 mg/kg) every 31.6 days (mean; range 26-44 days). For MOGAD, the median ARR decreased from 1.75 (range 0.5-5) to 0 (range 0-0.9; p = 0.0011) under TCZ. A similar effect was seen for AQP4-IgG+ (ARR reduction from 1.5 [range 0-5] to 0 [range 0-4.2]; p < 0.001) and for seronegative NMOSD (from 3.0 [range 1.0-3.0] to 0.2 [range 0-2.0]; p = 0.031). During TCZ, 60% of all patients were relapse free (79% for MOGAD, 56% for AQP4-IgG+, and 43% for seronegative NMOSD). Disability follow-up indicated stabilization. MRI inflammatory activity decreased in MOGAD (p = 0.04; for the brain) and in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD (p < 0.001; for the spinal cord). Chronic pain was unchanged. Regarding only patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months (n = 44), ARR reductions were confirmed, including the subgroups of MOGAD (n = 11) and AQP4-IgG+ patients (n = 28). Similarly, in the group of patients treated with TCZ for at least 12 months, 59% of them were relapse free, with 73% for MOGAD, 57% for AQP4-IgG+, and 40% for patients with seronegative NMOSD. No severe or unexpected safety signals were observed. Add-on therapy showed no advantage compared with TCZ monotherapy. DISCUSSION: This study provides Class III evidence that long-term TCZ therapy is safe and reduces relapse probability in MOGAD and AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Acuaporina 4/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes Desmielinizantes SNC/tratamiento farmacológico , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito/inmunología , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Autoinmunes Desmielinizantes SNC/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuromielitis Óptica/inmunología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Prevención Secundaria , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) is a key feature of Susac syndrome (SuS) but is only occasionally depicted on post-contrast T1-weighted images (T1-WI). OBJECTIVE: As post-contrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) may be more sensitive, our aim was to assess LME in SuS on this sequence. METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, 20 patients with definite SuS diagnosis were retrospectively enrolled in this multicentre study. Two radiologists independently assessed the number of LME on post-contrast FLAIR and T1-WI acquisitions performed before any treatment. A chi-square test was used to compare both sequences and the interrater agreement was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-five magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) were performed before treatment, including 19 post-contrast FLAIR images in 17 patients and 25 post-contrast T1-WI in 19 patients. In terms of patients, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (17/17 (100%) vs. 15/19 (79%), p < 0.05). In terms of sequences, LME was observed on all post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (19/19 (100%) vs. 16/25 (64%), p < 0.005). LME was disseminated at both supratentorial (19/19) and infratentorial (18/19) levels on post-contrast FLAIR, contrary to post-contrast T1-WI (3/25 and 9/25, respectively). Interrater agreement was excellent for post-contrast FLAIR (κ = 0.95) but only moderate for post-contrast T1-WI (κ = 0.61). CONCLUSION: LME was always observed and easily visible on post-contrast FLAIR images prior to SuS treatment. In association with other MRI features, it is highly indicative of SuS.