Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 152: e17, 2024 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204341

RESUMEN

Enteric bacterial infections are common among people who travel internationally. During 2017-2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigated 41 multistate outbreaks of nontyphoidal Salmonella and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli linked to international travel. Resistance to one or more antimicrobial agents was detected in at least 10% of isolates in 16 of 30 (53%) nontyphoidal Salmonella outbreaks and 8 of 11 (73%) Shiga toxin-producing E. coli outbreaks evaluated by the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. At least 10% of the isolates in 14 nontyphoidal Salmonella outbreaks conferred resistance to one or more of the clinically significant antimicrobials used in human medicine. This report describes the epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance patterns of these travel-associated multistate outbreaks. Investigating illnesses among returned travellers and collaboration with international partners could result in the implementation of public health interventions to improve hygiene practices and food safety standards and to prevent illness and spread of multidrug-resistant organisms domestically and internationally.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Viaje , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Salmonella , Brotes de Enfermedades
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(45): 1225-1229, 2023 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37943708

RESUMEN

In 2016, CDC identified a multidrug-resistant (MDR) strain of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport that is now monitored as a persisting strain (REPJJP01). Isolates have been obtained from U.S. residents in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, linked to travel to Mexico, consumption of beef products obtained in the United States, or cheese obtained in Mexico. In 2021, the number of isolates of this strain approximately doubled compared with the 2018-2020 baseline and remained high in 2022. During January 1, 2021- December 31, 2022, a total of 1,308 isolates were obtained from patients, cattle, and sheep; 86% were MDR, most with decreased susceptibility to azithromycin. Approximately one half of patients were Hispanic or Latino; nearly one half reported travel to Mexico during the month preceding illness, and one third were hospitalized. Two multistate outbreak investigations implicated beef products obtained in the United States. This highly resistant strain might spread through travelers, animals, imported foods, domestic foods, or other sources. Isolates from domestic and imported cattle slaughtered in the United States suggests a possible source of contamination. Safe food and drink consumption practices while traveling and interventions across the food production chain to ensure beef safety are necessary in preventing illness.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Salmonella enterica , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Bovinos , Animales , Ovinos , México/epidemiología , Salmonella , District of Columbia
3.
J Food Prot ; 86(5): 100071, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37028195

RESUMEN

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified nontyphoidal Salmonella as one of the top five pathogens contributing to foodborne illnesses in the United States. Beef continues to be a common source of Salmonella outbreaks, despite the implementation of interventions at slaughter and processing facilities to reduce contamination of beef. We described Salmonella outbreaks linked to beef in the United States during 2012-2019, examined trends, and identified potential targets for intervention and prevention strategies. We queried CDC's Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS) for all foodborne nontyphoidal Salmonella outbreaks linked to beef as the single contaminated ingredient or implicated food, with the date of first illness onset from 2012 to 2019. Information on antimicrobial resistance (AR) for outbreak-related isolates was obtained from CDC's National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS). We calculated the number of outbreaks, outbreak-related illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths overall, by beef processing category and Salmonella serotype. During 2012-2019, 27 Salmonella outbreaks were linked to beef consumption, resulting in 1103 illnesses, 254 hospitalizations, and two deaths. The most common category of beef implicated was nonintact raw, ground beef (12 outbreaks, 44%), followed by intact raw (six outbreaks, 22%). Ground beef was responsible for the most illnesses (800, 73%), both of the reported deaths, and was the source of the largest outbreak. AR data were available for 717 isolates from 25 (93%) outbreaks. Nine (36%) of these outbreaks had isolates resistant to one or more of the antibiotics tested by NARMS, of which eight (89%) contained multidrug-resistant isolates. Several outbreaks reported highlight challenges faced during investigations, areas where further research may be warranted, and opportunities to prevent future outbreaks along the farm-to-fork continuum.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos , Animales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Bovinos , Salmonella , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/epidemiología , Contaminación de Alimentos , Brotes de Enfermedades
4.
Microbiol Resour Announc ; 11(5): e0011822, 2022 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416692

RESUMEN

In the United States, reports of Salmonella enterica carrying mcr-1 remain rare in humans, but when observed, the infection is often associated with travel. Here, we report 14 mcr-1-positive Salmonella enterica isolates from patients in the United States that reported travel to the Dominican Republic within the 12 months before illness.

5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e645-e652, 2022 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35092677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are highly efficacious, but severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections do occur after vaccination. We characterized COVID-19 cases among fully vaccinated persons with an outcome of death. METHODS: We analyzed COVID-19 cases voluntarily reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by US health departments from 1 January to 30 April 2021. We included cases among US residents with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result ≥14 days after completion of an authorized primary vaccine series and who had a known outcome (alive or dead) as of 31 May 2021. When available, specimens were sequenced for viral lineage and death certificates were reviewed for cause(s) of death. RESULTS: Of 8084 fully vaccinated persons with reported COVID-19 during the surveillance period, 245 (3.0%) died. Compared with patients who remained alive, those who died were older (median age, 82 vs 57 years;), more likely to reside in a long-term care facility (51% vs 18%), and more likely to have ≥1 underlying health condition associated with risk for severe disease (64% vs 24%) (all P < .01). Among 245 deaths, 191 (78%) were classified as COVID-19 related. Of 106 deaths with available death certificates, COVID-19 was listed for 81 deaths (77%). There were no differences in the type of vaccine administered or the most common viral lineage (B.1.1.7). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 deaths are rare in fully vaccinated persons, occurring most commonly in those with risk factors for severe disease, including older age and underlying health conditions. All eligible persons should be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and follow other prevention measures to mitigate exposure risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación
6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(12): ofab572, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34917695

RESUMEN

Cases of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) typhoid fever have been reported in the United States among patients who did not travel internationally. Clinicians should consider if and where the patient traveled when selecting empiric treatment for typhoid fever. XDR typhoid fever should be treated with a carbapenem, azithromycin, or both.

7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(20): 618-622, 2020 May 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437343

RESUMEN

Ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (Typhi), the bacterium that causes typhoid fever, is a growing public health threat. Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Typhi is resistant to ceftriaxone and other antibiotics used for treatment, including ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1). In March 2018, CDC began enhanced surveillance for ceftriaxone-resistant Typhi in response to an ongoing outbreak of XDR typhoid fever in Pakistan. CDC had previously reported the first five cases of XDR Typhi in the United States among patients who had spent time in Pakistan (2). These illnesses represented the first cases of ceftriaxone-resistant Typhi documented in the United States (3). This report provides an update on U.S. cases of XDR typhoid fever linked to Pakistan and describes a new, unrelated cluster of ceftriaxone-resistant Typhi infections linked to Iraq. Travelers to areas with endemic Typhi should receive typhoid vaccination before traveling and adhere to safe food and water precautions (4). Treatment of patients with typhoid fever should be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing whenever possible (5), and clinicians should consider travel history when selecting empiric therapy.


Asunto(s)
Ceftriaxona/farmacología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Salmonella typhi/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Irak/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pakistán/epidemiología , Fiebre Tifoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(4): ofaa113, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32341933

RESUMEN

In 2017, state health departments notified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about 4 patients with shigellosis who experienced persistent illness after treatment with oral third-generation cephalosporins. Given increasing antibiotic resistance among Shigella, these cases highlight the need to evaluate the efficacy of oral cephalosporins for shigellosis.

9.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 250(10): 1117-1130, 2017 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28467751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE To describe rabies and rabies-related events occurring during 2015 in the United States. DESIGN Observational study based on passive surveillance data. ANIMALS All animals submitted for rabies testing in the United States during 2015. PROCEDURES State and territorial public health programs provided data on animals submitted for rabies testing in 2015. Data were analyzed temporally and geographically to assess trends in domestic and sylvatic animal rabies cases. RESULTS During 2015, 50 states and Puerto Rico reported 5,508 rabid animals to the CDC, representing an 8.7% decrease from the 6,033 rabid animals reported in 2014. Of the 5,508 cases of animal rabies, 5,088 (92.4%) involved wildlife. Relative contributions by the major animal groups were as follows: 1,704 (30.9%) bats, 1,619 (29.4%) raccoons, 1,365 (24.8%) skunks, 325 (5.9%) foxes, 244 (4.4%) cats, 85 (1.5%) cattle, and 67 (1.2%) dogs. There was a 4.1% decrease in the number of samples submitted for testing in 2015, compared with the number submitted in 2014. Three human rabies deaths were reported in 2015, compared with only 1 in 2014. A 65-year-old man in Massachusetts was bitten by a rabid dog while abroad. A 77-year-old woman in Wyoming had contact with a bat. A 54-year-old man in Puerto Rico was bitten by a mongoose. The only connection among these 3 cases was that none received postexposure prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Laboratory testing of animals suspected to be rabid remains a critical public health function and continues to be a cost-effective method to directly influence human rabies postexposure prophylaxis recommendations. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017;250:1117-1130).


Asunto(s)
Rabia/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Animales Domésticos , Animales Salvajes , Niño , Quirópteros , Femenino , Zorros , Herpestidae , Humanos , Masculino , Mephitidae , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Rabia/prevención & control , Mapaches , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
10.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 10(3): e0004486, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26999021

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Philippines is one of the developing countries highly affected by rabies. Dog vaccination campaigns implemented through collaborative effort between the government and NGOs have played an important role in successfully reducing the burden of disease within the country. Nevertheless, rabies vaccination of the domestic animal population requires continuous commitment not only from governments and NGOs, but also from local communities that are directly affected by such efforts. To create such long-term sustained programs, the introduction of affordable dog vaccination and registration fees is essential and has been shown to be an important strategy in Bohol, Philippines. The aim of this study, therefore, was to estimate the average amount of money that individuals were willing to pay for dog vaccination and registration in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. This study also investigated some of the determinants of individuals' willingness to pay (WTP). METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to 300 households in 17 municipalities (out of a total of 21) selected through a multi-stage cluster survey technique. At the time of the survey, Ilocos Norte had a population of approximately 568,017 and was predominantly rural. The Contingent Valuation Method was used to elicit WTP for dog rabies vaccination and registration. A 'bidding game' elicitation strategy that aims to find the maximum amount of money individuals were willing to pay was also employed. Data were collected using paper-based questionnaires. Linear regression was used to examine factors influencing participants' WTP for dog rabies vaccination and registration. KEY RESULTS: On average, Ilocos Norte residents were willing to pay 69.65 Philippine Pesos (PHP) (equivalent to 1.67 USD in 2012) for dog vaccination and 29.13PHP (0.70 USD) for dog registration. Eighty-six per cent of respondents were willing to pay the stated amount to vaccinate each of their dogs, annually. This study also found that WTP was influenced by demographic and knowledge factors. Among these, we found that age, income, participants' willingness to commit to pay each year, municipality of residency, knowledge of the signs of rabies in dogs, and number of dogs owed significantly predicted WTP.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/prevención & control , Vacunas Antirrábicas/inmunología , Rabia/veterinaria , Animales , Recolección de Datos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades de los Perros/epidemiología , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Propiedad , Filipinas/epidemiología , Rabia/epidemiología , Rabia/prevención & control , Vacunas Antirrábicas/economía , Vacunación/veterinaria , Zoonosis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...