Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT).

BACKGROUND: Implementation science comprises a large set of theories suggesting interacting factors at different organisational levels. Development of literature syntheses and frameworks for implementation have contributed to comprehensive descriptions of implementation. However, corresponding instruments for measuring these comprehensive descriptions are currently lacking. The present study aimed to develop an instrument measuring care providers' perceptions of an implementation effort, and to explore the instrument's psychometric properties. METHODS: Based on existing implementation literature, a questionnaire was designed with items on individual and team factors and on stages of change in an implementation process. The instrument was tested in a Norwegian study on implementation of evidence based practices for psychosis. Item analysis, factor structure, and internal consistency at baseline were examined. RESULTS: The 27-item Implementation Process Assessment Tool (IPAT) revealed large variation between mean score of the items. The total scale scores were widely dispersed across respondents. Internal consistency for the total scale was high (Cronbach's alpha: .962), and all but one item contributed positively to the construct. The results indicated four underlying constructs: individual stages for behavioural change, individual activities and perceived support, collective readiness and support, and individual perceptions of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The IPAT appears to be a feasible instrument for investigating the implementation process from the perspective of those making the change. It can enable examination of the relative importance of factors thought to be essential for implementation outcomes. It may also provide ongoing feedback for leaders tailoring support for teams to improve implementation. However, further research is needed to detect the instrument's properties later in the implementation process and in different contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov code NCT03271242 (retrospective registered September 5, 2017).

Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) Predicts Institutionalisation in an Intermediate Post-Acute Care Setting.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether nutritional status as measured by the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) predicts level of care of the discharge destination after post-acute care in a nursing home. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Post-acute intermediate care nursing home, 19-bed unit with increased multidisciplinary staff. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥70 years in post-acute care (N=900) following an acute admission to the hospital. MEASUREMENTS: The predictive value of nutritional status, as measured by the MNA-SF, on discharge destination was analysed by means of a multinomial logistic regression model with the MNA-SF as the independent variable, discharge destination as the dependent variable and age and living situation as co-variates. The participants were grouped into three categories according to their discharge destination: home, other institution or readmitted to the hospital. RESULTS: A higher score on the MNA-SF significantly predicted a reduced risk of discharge to institution (adjusted OR=0.90 (95% CI=0.84;0.97), p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Nutritional status, as measured by the MNA-SF, predicted discharge destination from an intermediate care nursing home following acute hospitalisation. The findings underscore the value of nutritional assessment as part of overall clinical assessment and care planning prior to discharge. The findings may also imply that interventions to improve nutritional status could increase patients' ability to return home, as opposed to further institutionalisation, after hospitalisation.