Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Med Microbiol ; 67(7): 976-981, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29863458

RESUMEN

Increasing evidence suggests that asymptomatic carriers are an important source of healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection. However, it is not known which test for the detection of C. difficile colonization is most sensitive in patients with haematological malignancies. We performed a prospective cohort study of 101 patients with haematological malignancies who had been admitted to the hospital for scheduled chemotherapy or haematopoietic cell transplantation. Each patient provided a formed stool sample. We compared the performance of five different commercially available assays, using toxigenic culture as the reference method. The prevalence of toxigenic C. difficile colonization as determined by toxigenic culture was 14/101 (14 %). The Cepheid Xpert PCR C. difficile/Epi was the most sensitive test for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile colonization, with 93 % sensitivity and 99 % negative predictive value. Our findings suggest that the Xpert PCR C. difficile/Epi could be used to rule out toxigenic C. difficile colonization in this population.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Portador Sano/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA