Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury Management, a French TraumaBase Analytic Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) in severe trauma patients is rare but potentially lethal. The aim of this work was to perform a current epidemiological analysis of the clinical and surgical management of these patients in a European country. METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective study using prospectively collected data from the French National Trauma Registry and the National Uniform Hospital Discharge Database from 10 trauma centres in France. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of BTAI. The secondary endpoints focused chronologically on injury characteristics, management, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: 209 patients were included with a mean age of 43 ± 19 years and 168 (80%) were men. The calculated prevalence of BTAI at hospital admission was 1% (162/15 094) (BTAI admissions/all trauma). The time to diagnosis increased with the severity of aortic injury and the clinical severity of the patients (grade 1: 94 [74, 143] minutes to grade 4: 154 [112, 202] minutes, p = .020). This delay seemed to be associated with the intensity of the required resuscitation. Sixty seven patients (32%) received no surgical treatment. Among those treated, 130 (92%) received endovascular treatment, 14 (10%) open surgery (two were combined), and 123 (85%) were treated within the first 24 hours. Overall mortality was 20% and the attributed cause of death was haemorrhagic shock (69%). Mortality was increased according to aortic injury severity, from 6% for grade 1 to 65% for grade 4 (p < .001). Twenty-six (18.3%) patients treated by endovascular aortic repair had complications. CONCLUSION: BTAI prevalence at hospital admission was low but occurred in severe high velocity trauma patients and in those with a high clinical suspicion of severe haemorrhage. The association of shock with high grade aortic injury and increasing time to diagnosis suggests a need to optimise early resuscitation to minimise the time to treatment. Endovascular treatment has been established as the reference treatment, accounting for more than 90% of interventional treatment options for BTAI.

Important Issues to Severe Trauma Survivors: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Identify issues that are important to severe trauma survivors up to 3 years after the trauma. BACKGROUND: Severe trauma is the first cause of disability-adjusted life years worldwide, yet most attention has focused on acute care and the impact on long-term health is poorly evaluated. METHOD: We conducted a large-scale qualitative study based on semi-structured phone interviews. Qualitative research methods involve the systematic collection, organization, and interpretation of conversations or textual data with patients to explore the meaning of a phenomenon experienced by individuals themselves. We randomly selected severe trauma survivors (abbreviated injury score ≥3 in at least 1 body region) who were receiving care in 6 urban academic level-I trauma centers in France between March 2015 and March 2018. We conducted double independent thematic analysis. Issues reported by patients were grouped into overarching domains by a panel of 5 experts in trauma care. Point of data saturation was estimated with a mathematical model. RESULTS: We included 340 participants from 3 months to 3 years after the trauma [median age: 41 years (Q1-Q3 24-54), median injury severity score: 17 (Q1-Q3 11-22)]. We identified 97 common issues that we grouped into 5 overarching domains: body and neurological issues (29 issues elicited by 277 participants), biographical disruption (23 issues, 210 participants), psychological and personality issues (21 issues, 147 participants), burden of treatment (14 issues, 145 participants), and altered relationships (10 issues, 87 participants). Time elapsed because the trauma, injury location, or in-hospital trauma severity did not affect the distribution of these domains across participants' answers. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study explored trauma survivors' experiences of the long-term effect of their injury and allowed for identifying a set of issues that they consider important, including dimensions that seem overlooked in trauma research. Our findings confirm that trauma is a chronic medical condition that demands new approaches to post-discharge and long-term care.

Durability of antimicrobial activity of antibiotic-impregnated external ventricular drains: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-impregnated external ventricular drains (AI-EVDs) have a debated efficacy in clinical studies. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to assess the durability of antimicrobial activity of AI-EVDs used in clinical settings. METHODS: From April 2017 to January 2018, all consecutive AI-EVDs (Bactiseal™) inserted in adult patients were prospectively included. After removal, each AI-EVD was cultured and assessed for antimicrobial activity on both internal and external sides of AI-EVDs. Catheters were each challenged with a single Staphylococcus strain [MSSA, MRSA or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE)]. MS was used to measure residual concentrations of rifampicin and clindamycin. RESULTS: Sixty-five AI-EVDs were included (56 patients). Among these, 21 were challenged with MSSA, 23 with MRSA and 21 with MRSE. Five ventriculostomy-related colonizations (9%) and two ventriculostomy-related infections (4%) occurred. Staphylococcus was the main bacterium responsible for colonization (4/5). AI-EVD inhibition decreased significantly against MRSA and MRSE according to duration of catheterization (for external and internal sides, P < 0.02) and overall volume of CSF drained (P < 0.005 for both sides against MRSE, P < 0.005 for external side against MRSA), but not against MSSA. Clindamycin concentration was not correlated with duration of catheterization or CSF volume drained, but <20% of initial concentration was recovered even after 5 days of AI-EVD dwelling. Conversely, rifampicin concentration showed a rapid and significant decline correlated to duration and CSF volume (P < 0.001 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial activity of AI-EVDs dropped quickly in vivo. Antimicrobial impregnation did not prevent AI-EVD colonization by susceptible strains in 9% of the cases.

Prediction of Early Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the reliability of clinical features, noninvasive transcranial Doppler-related pulsatility index (PI) calculation, and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) and initial computed tomography (CT) scan (Marshall CT scan classification) in predicting the occurrence of early (<24 hours) high intracranial pressure (EHICP) (>20 mm Hg) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective study in a level 1 trauma center. Patients were measured simultaneously for PI and US ONSD in the triage zone. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who had EHICP after TBI (EHICP+) and those who did not (EHICP-). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included; 32 were categorized as EHICP+ and 22 as EHICP-. PI >1.4 did not correlate with EHICP+ patients (69% vs. 46%, P = 0.09). US ONSD measurement was higher in the EHICP+ group (6.25; range, 6-6.95 vs. 5.7; range, 5.2-6.4; P = 0.005). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for US ONSD as a predictor of developing EHICP was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.86). CT ONSD measurement was higher in the EHICP+ group (6.71; range, 6.35-7.87 vs. 6.25; range, 5.8-6.93; P = 0.04). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for CT ONSD measurement as a predictor for EHICP+ was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.53-0.81). The diffuse injury III and IV categories in the Marshall CT scan classification were associated with the occurrence of EHICP (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: None of the clinical features or noninvasive tools assessed in this study enabled clinicians to strictly ascertain EHICP. Further studies are needed to establish their potential role before intracranial pressure probe insertion.

The multistep road to ventilator-associated lung abscess: A retrospective study of S.aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECT: We observed some cases of lung abscess (LA) in ICU patients suffering S.aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia (S.aureus-VAP). We aimed to assess which of the host and/or bacteria-related features are associated with LA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2009 to July 2013 in a trauma surgical ICU within a teaching hospital. All adult patients presenting with S.aureus-VAP were included. We compared two groups of patients according to the formation or not of LA concomitantly to S.aureus-VAP. RESULTS: Seventy-nine S.aureus-VAP patients, predominantly males (85%) of rather young age (mean [SD]: 35yr [21-64]) with severe trauma (initial Simplified Acute Score II = 42 [32-52]) related-ICU admission, were included. Among them, 10 (14%) developed LA. Patient's characteristics significantly associated with LA development were: a younger age (p = 0.003), road traffic accidents admission (p = 0.017), head injury (p = 0.002), lower Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.009), blunt chest trauma (p = 0.01) pneumothorax (p = 0.01) and lung contusions (p = 0.002). No microbiological factors were significantly associated with LA formation. Abscesses were mostly bilateral, ≥5 cm of diameter and with a posterior location. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not favor a specific virulence of S.aureus, but rather highlight the role of multiple insults to the lung, promoting LA formation. Despite a similar severity score, patients with LA had more serious trauma, combining severe both chest and head insults.

[NSAIDs and risk of anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery]. / AINS et risque de fistule digestive postopératoire.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most popular analgesics administered after open or laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. By blocking the cyclooxygenase, they are likely to inhibit fibroblastic response to tissue injury and therefore to impair the healing process. Recent publications, based on large cohorts of patients, have highlighted the significant association between AINS administration and the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic complications. Even if not yet supported by high level methodological proofs, cautions should be placed on the use of this pharmaceutical class in this setting. Many questions remain unresolved, especially concerning the influence of NSAIDs cox-2 selectivity, or administration duration.