RESUMEN
Background Wearable wrist-monitors offer an unobtrusive way to acquire heart rate data in an efficient manner. Previous work in this field has focused on studying healthy subjects during exercise but has yet to assess the efficacy of these devices in patients suffering from common cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. Objective The objective of this pilot study was to assess the accuracy of the Apple Watch heart rate monitor in fifty patients experiencing atrial fibrillation compared to telemetry. Results Results from this pilot clinical study demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.7 between all readings on the Apple Watch and telemetry. Furthermore, the Apple Watch assessed heart rate more accurately in patients who were in atrial fibrillation than in those that were not (rc = 0.86, patients in AF, vs. rc = 0.64, patients not in AF). Clinical Impact The presented data from this pilot study suggests that caution should be noted before using the Apple Watch 4 wearable wrist monitor to monitor heart rate in patients with cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine nurses' knowledge of heart failure (HF) self-management education principles. DESIGN: The study was exploratory and descriptive and included a convenience sample. SETTING: Research took place in a large midwestern health care system that included a university-based hospital, community hospitals, and home or palliative care. SUBJECTS: Subjects included 300 nurses who provide care to patients with HF. OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome measures included overall and topic specific perceptions of basic information important to HF self-management. Topics included diet, fluids or weight, signs or symptoms of worsening condition, medications, and exercise. INTERVENTION: A 20-item, true or false written survey was administered between February 2000 and April 2000. RESULTS: Of the 300 nurses surveyed, 92% were registered nurses and 8% were licensed practical nurses; 38% worked in a large university-based hospital; 44% were employed at 5 community hospitals; and 18% worked in home or hospice-palliative care. Mean HF self-management knowledge score was 15.2 +/- 2.0. Registered nurses scored significantly higher than licensed practical nurses (15.3 vs 14.1; P =.004). Individual questions with overall scores <30% were related to dry or ideal weight in daily weight monitoring (24%), nonsymptomatic, low blood pressure (26%), and short-term dizziness when rising (19%). Individual question scores >30% and < or =75% were related to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory inhibitor use (49%), potassium-based salt substitute use (52%), rest vs activity (72%), and lean delicatessen meat use in a low sodium diet (75%). In questions with scores <30%, nurses requested more information only 5% to 8% of the time. Overall analysis of variance indicated differences by work experience. HF nurses (primary population) scored higher than critical-care, medical-surgical, or telemetry floor nurses (16.2 +/- 1.7; 15.1 +/- 1.8; and 14.7 +/- 2.0, respectively; P <.001); home care nurses scored higher than hospital or palliative care nurses (15.9 +/- 1.5; 15.1 +/- 2.0; and 14.0 +/- 1.5, respectively; P =.006). CONCLUSION: Nurses may not be properly educated in HF self-management principles and must be provided with the right information so they can improve the quality and amount of information they offer to patients. Nurses who are better prepared to educate patients with HF may be more likely to carry out this nursing function as a part of their daily job role.
