Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Behav Brain Res ; 468: 115024, 2024 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705283

RESUMEN

Motor adaptations are responsible for recalibrating actions and facilitating the achievement of goals in a constantly changing environment. Once consolidated, the decay of motor adaptation is a process affected by available sensory information during deadaptation. However, the cortical response to task error feedback during the deadaptation phase has received little attention. Here, we explored changes in brain cortical responses due to feedback of task-related error during deadaptation. Twelve healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. Right hand movement and EEG were recorded during repetitive trials of a hand reaching movement. A visuomotor rotation of 30° was introduced to induce motor adaptation. Volunteers participated in two experimental sessions organized in baseline, adaptation, and deadaptation blocks. In the deadaptation block, the visuomotor rotation was removed, and visual feedback was only provided in one session. Performance was quantified using angle end-point error, averaged speed, and movement onset time. A non-parametric spatiotemporal cluster-level permutation test was used to analyze the EEG recordings. During deadaptation, participants experienced a greater error reduction when feedback of the cursor was provided. The EEG responses showed larger activity in the left centro-frontal parietal areas during the deadaptation block when participants received feedback, as opposed to when they did not receive feedback. Centrally distributed clusters were found for the adaptation and deadaptation blocks in the absence of visual feedback. The results suggest that visual feedback of the task-related error activates cortical areas related to performance monitoring, depending on the accessible sensory information.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Fisiológica , Electroencefalografía , Retroalimentación Sensorial , Desempeño Psicomotor , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Adaptación Fisiológica/fisiología , Adulto Joven , Retroalimentación Sensorial/fisiología , Corteza Cerebral/fisiología , Mano/fisiología , Movimiento/fisiología , Actividad Motora/fisiología
3.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 47(3): 311-8, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24445083

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the intra- and inter-observer variation in laser Doppler flowmetry curve reading for measurement of toe and ankle pressures. METHODS: A prospective single blinded diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on 200 patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease (PAD), with a total of 760 curve sets produced. The first curve reading for this study was performed by laboratory technologists blinded to clinical clues and previous readings at least 3 months after the primary data sampling. The pressure curves were later reassessed following another period of at least 3 months. Observer agreement in diagnostic classification according to TASC-II criteria was quantified using Cohen's kappa. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficients, coefficients of variance, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The overall agreement in diagnostic classification (PAD/not PAD) was 173/200 (87%) for intra-observer (κ = .858) and 175/200 (88%) for inter-observer data (κ = .787). Reliability analysis confirmed excellent correlation for both intra- and inter-observer data (ICC all ≥.931). The coefficients of variance ranged from 2.27% to 6.44% for intra-observer and 2.39% to 8.42% for inter-observer data. Subgroup analysis showed lower observer-variation for reading of toe pressures in patients with diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease than patients not diagnosed with these conditions. Bland-Altman plots showed higher variation in toe pressure readings than ankle pressure readings. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows substantial intra- and inter-observer agreement in diagnostic classification and reading of absolute pressures when using laboratory technologists as observers. The study emphasises that observer variation for curve reading is an important factor concerning the overall reproducibility of the method. Our data suggest diabetes and chronic kidney disease have an influence on toe pressure reproducibility.


Asunto(s)
Índice Tobillo Braquial/métodos , Flujometría por Láser-Doppler , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Angiopatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
4.
Physiol Meas ; 34(10): 1351-62, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24045425

RESUMEN

We examine the reliability of single and repeated blood pressure measurements at ankle, toe, and arm levels for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) by laser Doppler flowmetry. Segmental pressures were measured in 200 patients with known or suspected PAD. Segmental indices were calculated using (1) one measurement [M-1], two measurements [M-2], or by a predefined reproducibility criterion (RC) as well as (2) by using one brachial blood-pressure (BBP-one) or correspondent to each segmental pressure (BBP-all) as reference. The agreement in diagnosis of PAD by Cohen's Kappa was κ = 0.930 when comparing RC to M-1, and κ = 0.977 when comparing RC to M-2. The same comparison showed excellent relative reliability for segmental indices (all intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) ≥ 0.980). Diagnostic classification agreement for BBP-all versus BBP-one were κ = 0.831 for RC, κ = 0.804 for M-1, and κ = 0.847 for M-2. The relative reliability analysis showed excellent correlation in segmental indices (all ICC ≥ 0.957). The study shows minimal difference in segmental indices and diagnostic classification when comparing calculations based on the listed strategies. However, the study indicated that it is important to measure BBPs correspondent to each segmental pressure.


Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Flujometría por Láser-Doppler/métodos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Dedos del Pie , Presión Sanguínea , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...