Adopting the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) classification for reporting: the experience of Italian clinical laboratories.

The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) is still considered the reference method to detect anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) because of its high sensitivity and represents a relevant tool for the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. During the last decade, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative promoted harmonization and understanding of HEp-2 IFA staining pattern nomenclature, as well as promoting their use in patient care by providing interpretation for HEp-2 IFA test results. In conjunction with a nationwide survey on the evolution of autoantibody diagnostics in autoimmune rheumatic diseases, we focused on the adherence of the Italian laboratories to the ICAP nomenclature analyzing its lights and shadows. The recent ICAP-oriented report, largely used today among Italian laboratories, also represents a further step in harmonizing and improving communication with the clinicians, adding value to laboratory findings and helping with critical clinical decisions.

Autoantibody status according to multiparametric assay accurately estimates connective tissue disease classification and identifies clinically relevant disease clusters.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of circulating autoantibodies represents one of the earliest diagnostic procedures in patients with suspected connective tissue disease (CTD), providing important information for disease diagnosis, identification and prediction of potential clinical manifestations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of multiparametric assay to correctly classify patients with multiple CTDs and healthy controls (HC), independent of clinical features, and to evaluate whether serological status could identify clusters of patients with similar clinical features. METHODS: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjogren's syndrome (SjS), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and HC were enrolled. Serum was tested for 29 autoantibodies. An XGBoost model, exclusively based on autoantibody titres was built and classification accuracy was evaluated. A hierarchical clustering model was subsequently developed and clinical/laboratory features compared among clusters. RESULTS: 908 subjects were enrolled. The classification model showed a mean accuracy of 60.84±4.05% and a mean area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 88.99±2.50%, with significant discrepancies among groups. Cluster analysis identified four clusters (CL). CL1 included patients with typical features of SLE. CL2 included most patients with SjS, along with some SLE and UCTD patients with SjS-like features. CL4 included anti-Jo1 patients only. CL3 was the largest and most heterogeneous, including all the remaining subjects, overall characterised by low titre or lower-prevalence autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: Extended multiparametric autoantibody assay allowed an accurate classification of CTD patients, independently of clinical features. Clustering according to autoantibody titres is able to identify clusters of CTD subjects with similar clinical features, independently of their final diagnosis.

Rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis and prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The first biomarker associated with the rheumatoid arthritis is rheumatoid factor (RF) and since the earliest reports a role has been proposed in the diagnosis and in the prediction of clinical features and outcome. The study of RF isotypes has further attempted to improve diagnostic accuracy and identify specific subgroups of patients. The main objective of this study is to provide an analysis of the literature on the role of RF isotypes in the diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the role of RF isotypes in RA (only in English, from PubMed, search terms: "rheumatoid factor isotypes", "diagnosis", "prognosis" and "rheumatoid arthritis", last search 31 July 2022, two independent assessment of quality and biases, results included in tables and in the meta-analysis). RESULTS: Thirty-six articles were examined (7517 patients). Testing all RF isotypes with latex test or nephelometry allows for the highest sensitivity (68.6%, 95% CI 66.2% to 71.0%); nonetheless, the determination of IgA isotype provides the highest specificity (91.4%, 95% CI 90.8% to 92.0%) and the highest positive likelihood ratio (7.7, 95% CI 5.7 to 10.4). When testing IgM isotype the highest diagnostic OR (21.7, 95% CI 16.1 to 29.3) is reached. When analysing anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, RF isotype determination increases diagnostic accuracy. On the other hand, these do not provide relevant prognostic information, as results are conflicting. CONCLUSIONS: Testing RF allows the highest sensitivity, while IgA isotype the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio for RA diagnosis. On the other hand, determination of RF isotypes dose not allow prognostic information, as data are limited and heterogeneous.

An Italian nationwide survey on the evolution of autoantibody diagnostics in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The advent of new technologies and the discovery of new antigenic targets of autoantibodies has led to significant changes in autoimmune diagnostics worldwide. To address the extent to which autoimmunology laboratories adhere to such innovation in testing and reporting practices, the Italian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine launched a national survey to assess the current status of autoimmune diagnostics and to provide direction for further harmonisation. METHODS: A questionnaire covering topics related to the diagnosis of autoimmune systemic rheumatic diseases was distributed to 152 Italian autoimmunology laboratories. The 59 closed-answer questions were subdivided into four main sections: 1. the setting (university, hospital or private laboratory) and the number of tests carried out; 2. the technologies used and their level of automation; 3. the analytical phase (antibody tests and methods), including awareness of the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative; 4. reporting of results and clinician relations. RESULTS: A total of 121 laboratories (79.6%) responded to the survey (15% universities, 70 hospitals, and 15% private laboratories). Indirect immunofluorescence is used by 94.8% of respondents, chemiluminescence by 78.4%, fluoro-immuno-enzymatic assays by 67.5%, immunodot by 52.6%, line-immunoassay by 47.4%, addressable laser bead immunoassay by 10.3% and radioimmunological methods by 10.2%. The great majority of respondents implemented complete automation of the listed methodologies. 65% of participants state that they add an interpretative comment in the report. 45% of participants enjoy a collaborative relationship with clinicians; counselling activities are provided by almost half of participants. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results indicated that almost all respondent laboratories have broadened their antibody panel and that high-throughput technologies have been widely introduced. Gaps identified by the survey include a still incomplete compliance with guidelines in antibody profiles (e.g. in antiphospholipid syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis and reporting of test results. Awareness of these differences provides insights that may further contribute to achieving harmonisation in autoimmune diagnostics.

Testing for isotypes does not help differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from other rheumatoid factor positive diseases.

Rheumatoid factors (RFs) are useful for diagnosis and classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nephelometric and turbidimetric techniques, which detect total RF but do not reveal the antibody isotype, are common diagnostic methods in clinical routine. Given the recent development of isotype-specific immunoassays, the detection of IgG, IgM, and IgA RFs represents an interesting challenge. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether specific RF tests performed as a second step after traditional nephelometry could help differentiating RA from other RF-positive diseases. We tested 117 consecutive serum samples that were RF-positive at nephelometry (BNII nephelometric analyzer, Siemens) for IgA, IgG, and IgM RF isotypes by a fluoroimmunoenzymatic assay (FEIA) on the Phadia 250 instrument (ThermoFisher). Fifty-five subjects had RA and 62 presented non-RA diagnoses. Eighteen sera (15.4%) were positive only by nephelometry, two were positive only for IgA RF, and the remaining 97 sera were all positive for IgM RF isotype (with or without IgG and IgA RF). Positive findings did not correlate with RA or non-RA diagnosis. Spearman rho correlation coefficient between nephelometric total RF and IgM isotype was moderate (0.657), and weak between total RF and IgA (0.396) and IgG (0.360) isotypes. Despite its low specificity, measurement of total RF by nephelometry still seems to be the method that performs best. As IgM, IgA, and IgG RF isotypes showed only a moderate correlation with total RF measurement, their diagnostic use as a second level test remains controversial.

Autoantibodies testing in autoimmunity: Diagnostic, prognostic and classification value.

Diagnosis of autoimmune diseases is in most cases challenging for clinicians as there is not a single specific laboratory or histological marker to diagnose or exclude the presence of the conditions. This review focused on the current knowledge of the role of autoantibodies' testing in various diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, undifferentiated connective tissues disease, primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Similarly, the prognostic and diagnostic values of autoantibodies testing in patients with interstitial lung disease have been reviewed. In-depth research on the molecular action of these autoantibodies on immune regulation and diseases pathogenesis has been explored beyond their correlation with disease phenotypes, highlighting the impact of autoantibodies targeting on disease outcomes and etiopathogenesis.

Lack of comparability of immunoassays for rheumatoid factor isotypes.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of autoantibodies that are used for classification of the disease. Though routine diagnostics is commonly restricted to measuring rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, detection of RF IgM, IgG and IgA isotypes, may increase the power of RA serodiagnosis by reducing the number of seronegative patients as well as provide prognostic information. The agglutination-based RF assays, such as nephelometry or turbidimetry, are unable to differentiate isotypes. We compared three different immunoassays used in current laboratory practice to detect RF isotypes. METHODS: We tested 117 consecutive serum samples that were positive for total RF at nephelometry, from 55 RA and 62 non-RA subjects. IgA, IgG, and IgM isotypes of RF were tested by immunoenzymatic (ELISA, Technogenetics), fluoroenzymatic (FEIA, ThermoFisher) and chemiluminescence (CLIA, YHLO Biotech Co.) immunoassays. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance differed considerably between the assays, especially with regard to RF IgG isotype. Agreement among methods by Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.05 (RF IgG CLIA vs. FEIA) to 0.846 (RF IgM CLIA vs. FEIA). CONCLUSIONS: The poor agreement observed in this study indicates substantial lack of comparability among assays for RF isotypes. Harmonization of these tests requires further efforts before their measurement can be used in clinical practice.

Analytical aspects of the antinuclear antibody test by HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence: EFLM report on an international survey.

OBJECTIVES: Detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay using HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) is used to screen for various autoimmune diseases. HEp-2 IFA suffers from variability, which hampers harmonization. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on HEp-2 IFA methodology, computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems, training, inter-observer variability, quality assessment, reagent lot change control, and method verification. The questionnaire was distributed to laboratories by Sciensano (Belgium), national EASI groups (Italy, Croatia, Portugal, Estonia, Greece) and ICAP (worldwide). Answers were obtained by 414 laboratories. The results were analysed in the framework of the recent EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations (companion paper). RESULTS: Laboratories used either HEp-2, HEp-2000, or HEp-20-10 cells and most laboratories (80%) applied the same screening dilution for children and adults. The conjugate used varied between laboratories [IgG-specific (in 57% of laboratories) vs. polyvalent]. Sixty-nine percent of CAD users reviewed the automatic nuclear pattern and 53% of CAD users did not fully exploit the fluorescence intensity for quality assurance. Internal quality control was performed by 96% of the laboratories, in 52% of the laboratories only with strongly positive samples. Interobserver variation was controlled by 79% of the laboratories. Limited lot-to-lot evaluation was performed by 68% of the laboratories. Method verification was done by 80% of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Even though many laboratories embrace high-quality HEp-2 IFA, substantial differences in how HEp-2 IFA is performed and controlled remain. Acting according to the EFLM/EASI/ICAP ANA recommendations can improve the global performance and quality of HEp-2 IFA and nurture harmonization.

The Nuclear Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Immunofluorescence Pattern: Not All Roads Lead to DFS70/LEDGFp75.

The monospecific dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) pattern is considered a potential marker to aid in exclusion of antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). This pattern is typically produced by autoantibodies against transcription co-activator DFS70/LEDGFp75, which are frequently found in healthy individuals and patients with miscellaneous inflammatory conditions. In AARD patients, these antibodies usually co-exist with disease-associated ANAs. Previous studies reported the occurrence of monospecific autoantibodies that generate a DFS-like or pseudo-DFS IFA pattern but do not react with DFS70/LEDGFp75. We characterized this pattern using confocal microscopy and immunoblotting. The target antigen associated with this pattern partially co-localized with DFS70/LEDGFp75 and its interacting partners H3K36me2, an active chromatin marker, and MLL, a transcription factor, in HEp-2 cells, suggesting a role in transcription. Immunoblotting did not reveal a common protein band immunoreactive with antibodies producing the pseudo-DFS pattern, suggesting they may recognize diverse proteins or conformational epitopes. Given the subjectivity of the HEp-2 IFA test, the awareness of pseudo-DFS autoantibodies reinforces recommendations for confirmatory testing when reporting patient antibodies producing a putative DFS pattern in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on defining the potential diagnostic utility of the pseudo-DFS pattern and its associated antigen(s).

Multiparametric autoantibody analysis: a new paradigm for the diagnosis of connective tissue diseases.

BACKGROUND: In patients affected by connective tissue diseases (CTDs), the identification of wide autoantibody profiles may prove useful in early diagnosis, in the evaluation of prognosis (risk stratification), and in predicting response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of multiparametric autoantibody analysis performed by a new fully automated particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) digital system in a large multicenter cohort of CTD patients and controls. METHODS: Serum samples from 787 patients with CTD (166 systemic lupus erythematosus; 133 systemic sclerosis; 279 Sjögren's syndrome; 106 idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; 103 undifferentiated CTD), 339 patients with other disorders (disease controls) (118 infectious diseases, 110 organ-specific autoimmune diseases, 111 other rheumatic diseases), and 121 healthy subjects were collected in 13 rheumatologic centers of the FIRMA group. Sera were analyzed with the Aptiva-PMAT instrument (Inova Diagnostics) for a panel of 29 autoantibodies. RESULTS: Multiparametric logistic regression showed that enlarged antibody profiles have a higher diagnostic efficiency than that of individual antibodies or of antibodies that constitute classification criteria for a given disease and that probability of disease increases with multiple positive autoantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that analyzes the clinical and diagnostic impact of autoantibody profiling in CTD. The results obtained with the new Aptiva-PMAT method may open interesting perspectives in the diagnosis and sub-classification of patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Comparison of current methods for anti-dsDNA antibody detection and reshaping diagnostic strategies.

Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (anti-dsDNA) are considered a specific marker for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Though the Farr technique was once the reference method for their detection, it has been almost entirely replaced by more recently developed assays. However, there is still no solid evidence of the commutability of these methods in terms of diagnostic accuracy and their correlation with the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). Anti-dsDNA antibody levels were measured in 80 subjects: 24 patients with SLE, 36 disease controls drawn from different autoimmune rheumatic diseases (14 systemic sclerosis, 10 Sjögren's syndrome, nine autoimmune myositis, three mixed connective tissue disease), 10 inflammatory arthritis and 10 apparently healthy blood donors by eight different methods: fluorescence enzyme immunoassay, microdot array, chemiluminescent immunoassay (two assays), multiplex flow immunoassay, particle multi-analyte technology immunoassay and two CLIFT. At the recommended manufacturer cut-off, the sensitivity varied from 67% to 92%, while the specificity ranged from 84% to 98%. Positive agreement among CLIFT and the other assays was higher than negative agreement. Mean agreement among methods assessed by the Cohen's kappa was 0.715, ranging from moderate (0.588) to almost perfect (0.888). Evaluation of the concordance among quantitative values by regression analysis showed a poor correlation index (mean r2, 0.66). The present study shows that current technologies for anti-dsDNA antibody detection are not fully comparable. In particular, their different correlation with CLIFT influences their positioning in the diagnostic algorithm for SLE (either in association or sequentially). Considering the high intermethod variability, harmonization and commutability of anti-dsDNA antibody testing remains an unachieved goal.

Gastric Th17 Cells Specific for H+/K+-ATPase and Serum IL-17 Signature in Gastric Autoimmunity.

Human gastric autoimmunity [autoimmune gastritis (AIG)] is characterized by inflammation of the gastric mucosa and parietal cell loss. The gastric parietal cell proton pump H+/K+-adenosine triphosphatase (H+/K+-ATPase) is the major autoantigen in AIG. Our work aimed to investigate the gastric H+/K+-ATPase-specific T helper 17 (Th17) responses in AIG and serum interleukin (IL)-17 cytokine subfamily in AIG patients, in healthy subjects [healthy controls (HCs)], and in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) without AIG. We analyzed the activation of gastric lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs) by H+/K+-ATPase and the IL-17A and IL-17F cytokine production in eight patients with AIG and four HCs. Furthermore, we compared serum levels of IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-17E, IL-22, and IL-23 in 43 AIG patients, in 47 HCs, and in 20 IDA patients without AIG. Gastric LPMCs from all AIG patients, but not those from HCs, were activated by H+/K+-ATPase and were able to proliferate and produce high levels of IL-17A and IL-17F. AIG patients have significantly higher serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-17E (393.3 ± 410.02 pg/ml, 394.0 ± 378.03 pg/ml, 300.46 ± 303.45 pg/ml, 34.92 ± 32.56 pg/ml, respectively) than those in HCs (222.99 ± 361.24 pg/ml, 217.49 ± 312.1 pg/ml, 147.43 ± 259.17 pg/ml, 8.69 ± 8.98 pg/ml, respectively) and those in IDA patients without AIG (58.06 ± 107.49 pg/ml, 74.26 ± 178.50 pg/ml, 96.86 ± 177.46 pg/ml, 10.64 ± 17.70 pg/ml, respectively). Altogether, our results indicate that IL-17A and IL-17F are produced in vivo in the stomach of AIG patients following activation with H+/K+-ATPase and that serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-17E levels are significantly elevated in AIG patients but not in patients without AIG. These data suggest a Th17 signature in AIG and that IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, and IL-17E may represent a relevant tool for AIG management.

Repository of intra- and inter-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays: a European multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: No reference data are available on repositories to measure precision of autoantibody assays. The scope of this study was to document inter- and intra-run variations of quantitative autoantibody assays based on a real-world large international data set. METHODS: Members of the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) group collected the data of intra- and inter-run variability obtained with assays quantifying 15 different autoantibodies in voluntary participating laboratories from their country. We analyzed the impact on the assay performances of the type of immunoassay, the number of measurements used to calculate the coefficient of variation (CVs), the nature and the autoantibody level of the internal quality control (IQC). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 64 laboratories from 15 European countries between February and October 2021. We analyzed 686 and 1,331 values of intra- and inter-run CVs, respectively. Both CVs were significantly dependent on: the method of immunoassay, the level of IQC with higher imprecision observed when the antibody levels were lower than 2-fold the threshold for positivity, and the nature of the IQC with commercial IQCs having lower CVs than patients-derived IQCs. Our analyses also show that the type of autoantibody has low impact on the assay' performances and that 15 measurements are sufficient to establish reliable intra- and inter-run variations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides for the first time an international repository yielding values of intra- and inter-run variation for quantitative autoantibody assays. These data could be useful for ISO 15189 accreditation requirements and will allow clinical diagnostic laboratories to assure quality of patient results.

Current technologies for anti-ENA antibody detection: State-of-the-art of diagnostic immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Autoantibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and classification of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). In recent years, newly developed methods have enabled the simultaneous and quantitative detection of multiple anti-ENA reactivities. However, data regarding the comparability of results obtained using different technologies across different platforms are scarce. In this study we compared eight different immunoassays, commonly used in current laboratory practice for detection of anti-ENA antibodies. METHODS: Sixty patients suffering from different SARD, 10 inflammatory arthritis patients (disease controls) and 10 healthy blood donors were included in this comparative study. Sera were collected in 15 centers belonging to the Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases of the Italian Society of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. We evaluated the analytical sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each method for antibodies to Sm, RNP, Ro60, Ro52, Scl70, CENP-B and Jo1. Cohen's kappa was used to analyze the agreement among methods. RESULTS: Average agreement among methods was 0.82, ranging from substantial (k = 0.72) to almost perfect (k = 0.92). However, while the specificity was very good for all methods, some differences emerged regarding the analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance of current technologies for anti-ENA antibody detection showed good comparability. However, as some differences exist among methods, laboratory scientists and clinicians must be aware of the diagnostic accuracy of the testing method in use.

Elevated IL-19 Serum Levels in Patients With Pernicious Anemia and Autoimmune Gastritis.

Pernicious anemia (PA) is a megaloblastic anemia consisting of hematological, gastric and immunological alterations. The immunopathogenesis of PA is sustained by both autoantibodies (e.g. intrinsic factor (IFA) antibodies and anti parietal cell (PCA) antibodies and autoreactive T cells specific for IFA and the parietal cell proton pump ATPase. Iron deficient anemia (IDA) is a microcytic anemia and represents the most common cause of anemia worldwide. Our work aimed to investigate serum levels of several interleukins (IL) of the IL-20 cytokine subfamily in patients with PA, with IDA and in healthy subjects (HC). We compared serum levels of IL-19, IL-20, IL-26, IL-28A and IL-29 in 43 patients with PA and autoimmune gastritis, in 20 patients with IDA and no autoimmune gastritis, and in 47 HC. Furthermore, we analyzed the IL-19 cytokine production by gastric lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC) in eight patients with PA and four HC. We found that patients with PA have significantly higher serum levels of IL-19 (163.68 ± 75.96 pg/ml) than patients with IDA (35.49 ± 40.97 pg/ml; p<0.001) and healthy subjects (55.68 ± 36.75 pg/ml; p<0.001). Gastric LPMC from all PA patients were able to produce significantly higher levels of IL-19 (420.67 ± 68.14 pg/ml) than HC (53.69 ± 10.92 pg/ml) (p<0.01). Altogether, our results indicate that IL-19 serum levels are significantly increased in patients with PA but not with IDA and that IL-19 is produced in vivo in the stomach of PA patients. These data open a new perspective on PA pathogenesis and suggest that IL-19 may represent a novel important tool for the management of patients with PA.

Anti-dsDNA antibodies in the classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies play an important role in the diagnosis, classification and management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and a wide range of autoantibodies, which makes the diagnosis quite challenging. In the absence of diagnostic criteria, classification criteria have been used for many decades. The first classification criteria for SLE were formulated in 1971 by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), followed by two revisions in 1982 and 1997. In order to improve their clinical performance and to reflect new knowledge on autoantibodies, new classification criteria for SLE were issued in 2012 by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC). These criteria proposed to classify only patients that have at least one immunologic criterion, overcoming SLE classification based solely on clinical manifestations. In 2019, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR proposed new criteria that aimed to maintain the high specificity of the ACR criteria with a sensitivity close to the SLICC 2012 criteria. These 2019 criteria reinforced the importance of autoantibodies in SLE diagnosis, assigning the highest score (6 points) to anti-dsDNA antibodies in the fully weighted scoring of the disease. The current criteria require the use of an anti-dsDNA assay with at least 90% specificity, such as the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) or FARR assay. However, the criteria do not comment on all the tests currently widely used in clinical laboratories. Neither do they consider the technological evolutions, nor standardization issues. Since strict adherence to any of the classification criteria, including the serological items, could lead to possible misclassification of SLE and/or delayed diagnosis, test characteristics of the distinct immunoassays should be taken into consideration.

Detecting Autoantibodies by Multiparametric Assays: Impact on Prevention, Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Personalized Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of multiparametric autoantibody tests has been proposed to improve the accuracy of the immunological diagnosis of autoimmune diseases (AID) and to accelerate time for completing the diagnostic process. Multiplex tests are capable of detecting many autoantibodies in a single run whereas a traditional immunoassay uses a single antigen to detect only a single specificity of autoantibodies. The reasons why multiplex tests could replace conventional immunoassays lie in the evidence that they allow for more efficient handling of large numbers of samples by the laboratory, while ensuring greater diagnostic sensitivity in AID screening. CONTENT: This review aims to highlight the important role that multiparametric tests could assume when designed for defined profiles they are used not only for diagnostic purposes but also to predict the onset of AID to identify clinical phenotypes and to define prognosis. Furthermore, differences in the antibody profile could identify which subjects will be responsive or not to a specific pharmacological treatment. SUMMARY: The use of autoantibody profiles, when specifically requested and performed with clinically validated technologies, can represent a significant step toward personalized medicine in autoimmunology.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on autoimmune diagnostics in Europe: A lesson to be learned.

INTRODUCTION: The first wave of COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted almost all areas of the health care services to some extent throughout the world. Although the negative impact of COVID-19 on patients with autoimmune diseases has also been recognized, available data in this regard are limited. In the current study of the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI) we aimed to provide reliable data on the extent of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on test requests for different autoantibodies in European countries. METHODS: Data on test numbers and on the number of positive results were collected in 97 clinical laboratories from 15 European countries on a monthly basis for the year before (2019) and the year during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A reduction in the number of autoantibody tests was observed in all European countries in the year 2020 compared to 2019. The reduction affected all autoantibody tests with an overall decrease of 13%, ranging from 1.4% (Switzerland) to 25.5% (Greece). In all countries, the decrease was most pronounced during the first wave of the pandemic (March-May 2020) with an overall decrease in those three months of 45.2%. The most affected autoantibodies were those commonly requested by general practitioners (anti-tTG IgA (-71%), RF IgM (-66%) and ACPA (-61%)). In the second wave of the pandemic (October-December 2020) the decrease was less pronounced (6.8%). With respect to the rate of positive results, subtle differences were observed for distinct autoantibodies during the pandemic, but the total rate of positive results was similar in both years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a strong decrease in autoantibody requests during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 15 European countries. The second wave was characterized by a less pronounced impact, with some participating countries hardly affected, while some other countries experienced a second decline. The decrease was clearly associated with the level of lock-down and with the required adjustments in the health care systems in different countries, supporting the importance of an effective strategy for the coordination of autoimmune testing in challenging situations as the COVID-19 pandemic.