Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children's Hospital.

There is limited evidence to support pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in children. We conducted a retrospective review of PGx testing among 452 patients at an academic children's hospital to determine the potential utility of PGx in diseases of childhood and to identify targets for future pediatric pharmacogenetic research. An actionable gene-drug pair associated with the 28 genes tested (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) level A or B, Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base (PharmGKB) level 1A or B, or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendation and a PharmGKB level) was present in 98.7% of patients. We identified 203 actionable gene-drug-diagnosis groups based on the indications for each actionable drug listed in Lexicomp. Among patients with an actionable gene-drug-diagnosis group, 49.3% had a diagnosis where the drug was a therapeutic option and PGx could be used to guide treatment selection. Among patients with an associated diagnosis, 30.9% had a prescription for the actionable drug allowing PGx guided dosing. Three genes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5) accounted for all the gene-drug-diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions. The most common gene-drug-diagnosis groups with matching diagnoses and prescriptions were CYP2C19-citalopram-escitalopram-depression 3.3% of patients tested; CYP2C19-dexlansoprazole-gastritis-esophagitis 3.1%; CYP2C19-omeprazole-gastritis-esophagitis 2.4%; CYP2D6-atomoxetine-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder 2.2%; and CYP2C19-citalopram-escitalopram-obsessive-compulsive disorder 1.5%. PGx could be used to guide selection of current treatment options or medication dosing in almost half (48.7%) of pediatric patients tested. Mood disorders and gastritis/esophagitis are promising targets for future study of PGx testing because of the high prevalence of these diagnoses and associated actionable gene-drug pairs in the pediatric population.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Considerations for Guanfacine Use in Very Young Children.

OBJECTIVE: Guanfacine, in the immediate release form, remains a commonly used medication for the treatment of clinically significant hyperactivity, impulsivity, or disruptive behaviors. This article reviews the available literature regarding guanfacine use in very young children (<6 years of age), and explores some of the factors that may uniquely impact the clinical pharmacology of guanfacine in very young children and that deserve consideration when it is used in this patient population. METHODS: The authors performed electronic literature searches in PubMed through October 2015 using the terms attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, guanfacine, and alpha agonists. We also performed an informal review of the literature and used selected articles from relevant reference lists. The result was a broad, qualitative review of the literature, with a focus on specific factors regarding guanfacine use in very young children. RESULTS: Despite the fact that guanfacine is commonly used in very young children, there is a paucity of published studies that looked specifically at its use in this population. In reviewing the pharmacology of guanfacine, there are specific factors that may play a unique role in its disposition in very young children. CONCLUSIONS: Guanfacine is an important medication option in very young children; however, there is a significant pharmacologic "information gap," and further research is needed to help establish appropriate, safe, and effective dosing of guanfacine in this population.

Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele increases risk for psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.

The apolipoprotein E (ApoE) epsilon4 allele is a well-documented genetic risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Its association with psychopathology among AD patients has been the subject of discrepant reports. We aimed to determine whether ApoE epsilon4+ and epsilon4- AD patients exhibit a different risk profile for psychotic symptoms and other behavioral disturbances. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was administered to determine the frequency and severity of psychotic and other behavioral symptoms in a sample of n=266 AD patients who had been genotyped for ApoE. Multiple logistic regression models were used to calculate the association between the ApoE epsilon4 allele and the presence of psychotic symptoms (delusions or hallucinations). Exploratory analyses were also conducted to determine the impact of disease severity on epsilon4 effects and to examine the association between epsilon4 and other behavioral symptoms. ApoE epsilon4 was significantly associated with psychotic symptoms (odds ratio (OR)=1.87, 95% CI=1.07-3.29, P=0.029), adjusting for age, sex, education, and MMSE score. More stringent definitions of clinically significant psychosis yielded similar results. Exploratory analyses suggested that this effect accrued specifically from patients with severe-stage AD and primarily from an association between epsilon4 and delusions. The epsilon4 allele did not appear to influence the development of most other behavioral symptoms in our sample. In conclusion, AD patients who carry the ApoE epsilon4 allele are at greater risk than noncarriers for developing psychotic symptoms, particularly as the severity of their dementia progresses.