Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatrics ; 134(5): e1378-86, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25332503

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence to compare the effectiveness of large collaborative quality improvement versus individual local projects. METHODS: This was a prospective pre-post intervention study of neonatal resuscitation practice, comparing 3 groups of nonrandomized hospitals in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative: (1) collaborative, hospitals working together through face-to-face meetings, webcasts, electronic mailing list, and data sharing; (2) individual, hospitals working independently; and (3) nonparticipant hospitals. The collaborative and individual arms participated in improvement activities, focusing on reducing hypothermia and invasive ventilatory support. RESULTS: There were 20 collaborative, 31 individual, and 44 nonparticipant hospitals caring for 12,528 eligible infants. Each group had reduced hypothermia from baseline to postintervention. The collaborative group had the most significant decrease in hypothermia, from 39% to 21%, compared with individual hospital efforts of 38% to 33%, and nonparticipants of 42% to 34%. After risk adjustment, the collaborative group had twice the magnitude of decrease in rates of newborns with hypothermia compared with the other groups. Collaborative improvement also led to greater decreases in delivery room intubation (53% to 40%) and surfactant administration (37% to 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative efforts resulted in larger improvements in delivery room outcomes and processes than individual efforts or nonparticipation. These findings have implications for planning quality improvement projects for implementation of evidence-based practices.


Asunto(s)
Salas de Parto/normas , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Salas de Parto/tendencias , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias
2.
J Perinatol ; 23(5): 387-91, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12847534

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if nitric oxide (NO) therapy can be reliably administered during high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) using the INOvent delivery system. STUDY DESIGN: NO concentrations were measured just proximal to the endotracheal (ET) tube and at the distal tip of the ET tube during a bench evaluation. Measurements were taken over a wide range of airway pressure settings and NO concentrations with both high- and low- resistance lung models. Percent changes in set versus proximal and proximal versus distal iNO concentrations were tabulated. RESULTS: Differences between proximal and distal NO concentrations were 10% or less. In the therapeutic range of up to 20 p.p.m., differences in concentration were 1 p.p.m. or less. There was no consistent effect on NO concentration when airway resistance was increased by 500%. CONCLUSION: Nitric oxide therapy can be reliably administered during HFJV with the INOvent delivery system when NO is injected exclusively via the HFJV circuit.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación con Chorro de Alta Frecuencia/métodos , Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/terapia , Administración por Inhalación , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Pronóstico , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA