Two Cases of Sitosterolemia Falsely Diagnosed as Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Could Digging Deeper Have Avoided Harm?

Sitosterolemia is a rare monogenic lipid disease characterized by the excessive uptake of phytosterols and their accumulation in blood and tissues. Clinically, it can present with hypercholesterolemia and xanthomas, often causing it to be misdiagnosed as familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The diagnosis of sitosterolemia can easily be confirmed and distinguished from FH with a sterol profile and genetic investigations. Here, we report a sibship of 2 sisters with sitosterolemia initially misdiagnosed as FH. This case report illustrates the importance of considering rare conditions, such as sitosterolemia, as a differential diagnosis in patients with hypercholesterolemia, xanthomas, and hematologic anomalies. It also emphasizes the underdiagnosis of sitosterolemia and the benefits of using sterol profiles and genetic testing in the diagnostic process to initiate the appropriate therapy and avoid harm to patients.

High hsCRP concentration is associated with acute pancreatitis in multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) is a severe form of hypertriglyceridemia (hyperTG) associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). However, the risk of AP is very heterogenous in MCS. Previous studies suggested that inflammation might promote disease progression in hyperTG-induced AP. OBJECTIVE: To determine if low-grade inflammation is associated with AP in MCS. METHODS: This study included 102 subjects with MCS for which high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration was measured at their first visit at the Montreal Clinical Research Institute. RESULTS: MCS subjects with a previous history of AP had a significant higher hsCRP concentration (4.62 mg/L vs. 2.61 mg/L; p=0.003) and high hsCRP concentration (≥3mg/L) was independently associated with AP prevalence (p<0.05). Up to 64% of the variability in AP prevalence was explained by the maximal TG concentration, hsCRP concentration, the presence of rare variants in TG-related genes, and fructose intake based on a stepwise multivariate regression model (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study showed for the first time that hsCRP concentration is strongly associated with AP prevalence in MCS. It also suggests that low-grade inflammation may be a driver of AP in severe hypertriglyceridemia. Prospective studies could help determine the causality of this association and assess whether medication known to reduce low-grade inflammation could help prevent AP in individuals with severe hypertriglyceridemia.

Dietary recommendations for dysbetalipoproteinemia: A need for better evidence.

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is well documented and is associated with the dysfunctional metabolism of remnant lipoproteins. Although these patients are known to respond well to lipid-lowering medication including statins and fibrates, the best dietary approach to lower remnant lipoprotein accumulation and to prevent cardiovascular outcomes remain unclear. Indeed, current evidence is based on studies published mainly in the 1970s, which comprise small sample sizes and methodological limitations. This review aims to summarize nutritional studies performed in DBL patients to date and to discuss potential avenues in this field and future areas of research.

Both low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets reduce triglyceride concentration in subjects with multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome: a randomized crossover study.

Multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) is a complex disease including a genetic component and the presence of lifestyle-related risk factors. We hypothesized that, in subjects with MCS, there would be a greater decrease in plasma triglycerides (TG) with a low-fat (F) diet than with a low-carbohydrate (C) diet. In secondary analyses, we tested the effect of both diets on TG concentration according to the presence or absence of a rare variant in the LPL gene. This randomized crossover dietary intervention included 12 adult subjects with MCS. Subjects followed 2 isocaloric diets, low-C (C, 35%; F, 45%) and low-F (F, 20%; C, 60%), in random order. Each diet lasted 3 weeks, followed by a 6-hour test meal. Diets were separated by a 2-week washout period. TG concentration in fasting subjects decreased by 55% during low-F diet (P = .002) and by 48% during low-C diet (P = .005). The difference between the 2 diets was not significant. However, we observed a more pronounced decrease in TG concentration (65% ± 17%) with the low-F diet compared with the low-C diet (46% ± 31%) (P = .06) in subjects carrying a rare variant in the LPL gene. This is the first study to show that dietary intervention is effective in MCS subjects. In addition, we highlighted the importance of the genetic profile in the choice of treatment by suggesting that subjects with a rare variant of the LPL gene have a greater reduction of TG concentration with a low-F diet than with a low-C diet.

Randomized controlled trial on the long-term efficacy of a multifaceted, interdisciplinary lifestyle intervention in reducing cardiovascular risk and improving lifestyle in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary intervention known as Educoeur in reducing cardiovascular risk and improving health behaviors in people without evidence of cardiovascular disease and to compare the Educoeur program to interventions in a specialized clinic and in usual care family practice. In a parallel, randomized, controlled trial of 185 adults with at least two modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, patients were randomly assigned to either Educoeur, specialized clinic or usual care. Cardiovascular risk, biological and lifestyle measures were assessed at baseline and at 2 years. In Educoeur, measurements were also taken before and after the lifestyle group treatment program. In 12 weeks, patients in Educoeur significantly lowered their cardiovascular risk, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, kilocalories intake and improved their VO2 Max and mental health. Changes remained significant at 2 years. Between group comparisons at 2 years demonstrated that Educoeur was significantly better in reducing cardiovascular risk than interventions in usual care. Together, these results highlight the importance of providing interdisciplinary programs that optimize cardiovascular risk reduction and promote active lifestyles in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.