Thoracic motion-compensated cone-beam computed tomography in under 20 seconds on a fast-rotating linac: A simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans are achievable in under 20 s on select linear accelerator systems to generate volumetric images in three dimensions (3D). Daily pre-treatment four-dimensional CBCT (4DCBCT) is recommended in image-guided lung radiotherapy to mitigate the detrimental effects of respiratory motion on treatment quality. PURPOSE: To demonstrate the potential for thoracic 4DCBCT reconstruction using projection data that was simulated using a clinical rapid 3DCBCT acquisition protocol. METHODS: We simulated conventional (1320 projections over 4 min) and rapid (491 projections over 16.6 s) CBCT acquisitions using 4D computed tomography (CT) volumes of 14 lung cancer patients. Conventional acquisition data were reconstructed using the 4D Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK) algorithm. Rapid acquisition data were reconstructed using 3DFDK, 4DFDK, and Motion-Compensated FDK (MCFDK). Image quality was evaluated using Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR), Tissue Interface Width (TIW), Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE), and Structural SIMilarity (SSIM). RESULTS: The conventional acquisition 4DFDK reconstructions had median phase averaged CNR, TIW, RMSE, and SSIM of 2.96, 8.02 mm, 83.5, and 0.54, respectively. The rapid acquisition 3DFDK reconstructions had median CNR, TIW, RMSE, and SSIM of 2.99, 13.6 mm, 112, and 0.44 respectively. The rapid acquisition MCFDK reconstructions had median phase averaged CNR, TIW, RMSE, and SSIM of 2.98, 10.2 mm, 103, and 0.46, respectively. Rapid acquisition 4DFDK reconstruction quality was insufficient for any practical use due to sparse angular projection sampling. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that 4D motion-compensated reconstruction of rapid acquisition thoracic CBCT data are feasible with image quality approaching conventional acquisition CBCT data reconstructed using standard 4DFDK.

A high DQE water-equivalent EPID employing an array of plastic-scintillating fibers for simultaneous imaging and dosimetry in radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: First measurements of the imaging performance of a novel prototype water-equivalent electronic portal imaging device (EPID) designed for simultaneous imaging and dose verification in radiotherapy and previously characterized by our group for dosimetry are reported. Experiments were conducted to characterize the prototype's imaging performance relative to a standard commercial EPID and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to quantify the impact of several detector parameters on image quality and to inform the design of a proposed next-generation prototype. METHODS: The prototype EPID utilizes an array of 3 cm long plastic-scintillating fibers in place of the metal plate/phosphor screen in standard EPIDs. Using a clinical 6 MV photon beam, the prototype's modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured and compared to measurements taken using a standard commercial EPID. A sensitivity analysis was then performed using the MC model by quantifying these metrics while varying the values of several geometrical and optical transport parameters that were unspecified by the prototype manufacturer. Finally, the MC model was used to quantify the imaging performance of a proposed next-generation prototype incorporating 1.5 cm long fibers that is better suited for integration with clinical portal imaging and dosimetry systems. RESULTS: The prototype EPID's zero spatial frequency DQE exceeded 3%, more than doubling that measured with the standard EPID (1.25%). This increased DQE was a consequence of using a prototype array detector with a greater equivalent thickness than the combined copper plate and phosphor screen in a standard EPID. The increased thickness of our prototype decreased spatial resolution relative to the standard EPID; however, the prototype EPID NPS was also lower than that measured with the standard EPID across all spatial frequencies. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the NPS was strongly affected by the roughness of the boundaries between fiber core and cladding regions. By comparison, the MTF was most sensitive to beam divergence and the presence of air between the fiber array and underlying photodiode panel. Simulations demonstrated that by optimizing these parameters, DQE(0) >4% may be achievable with the proposed next-generation prototype design. CONCLUSIONS: The first measurements characterizing the imaging performance of a novel water-equivalent EPID for imaging and dosimetry in radiotherapy demonstrated a DQE(0) more than double that of a standard EPID. MC simulations further demonstrated the potential for developing a next-generation prototype better suited for clinical translation with even higher DQE.

Investigating the impact of treatment delivery uncertainties on treatment effectiveness for lung SABR.

To quantify the impact of treatment delivery uncertainties on lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) plans for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ssIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Baseline ssIMRT and VMAT treatment plans were generated for a cohort of 18 lung SABR patients. Modified plans were generated for each baseline plan by systematically varying gantry and collimator angles between - 5 and + 5 degrees, as well as multi-leaf collimator (MLC) leaf position errors of magnitude between 1 and 5 mm in both directions (i.e. leaf banks shifted either in the same (Type 1) or opposite (Type 2) directions). Planning target volume (PTV), spinal cord and healthy lung dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics were compared between the modified and baseline plans. Collimator and gantry angle uncertainties did not significantly impact any of the PTV DVH metrics considered. MLC shifts of 5 mm resulted in average V95% changes of [Formula: see text] (Type 1) and [Formula: see text] (Type 2) and average [Formula: see text] changes of [Formula: see text] (Type 1) and [Formula: see text] (Type 2) for ssIMRT and VMAT plans. Comparatively, MLC shifts of - 2 mm resulted in average [Formula: see text] changes of [Formula: see text] (Type 1) and [Formula: see text] (Type 2) and average [Formula: see text] changes of [Formula: see text] (Type 1) and [Formula: see text] (Type 2) for ssIMRT and VMAT plans. ssIMRT gantry angle uncertainties impacted spinal cord DVH metrics the most, with increases in [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] occurring for a 1 degree shift. Type 2 MLC modifications impacted all OAR DVH metrics substantially with differences in spinal cord [Formula: see text] (ssIMRT) and healthy lung [Formula: see text] (VMAT) exceeding [Formula: see text] for 5 mm shifts. Uncertainties in MLC leaf positions affected target and OAR DVH metrics more than collimator or gantry angle uncertainties for lung SABR plans. Less patient-to-patient variation occurred from delivery uncertainties in VMAT than ssIMRT.

Multi-institutional comparison of simulated treatment delivery errors in ssIMRT, manually planned VMAT and autoplan-VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To quantify the impact of simulated errors for nasopharynx radiotherapy across multiple institutions and planning techniques (auto-plan generated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (ap-VMAT), manually planned VMAT (mp-VMAT) and manually planned step and shoot Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (mp-ssIMRT)). METHODS: Ten patients were retrospectively planned with VMAT according to three institution's protocols. Within one institution two further treatment plans were generated using differing treatment planning techniques. This resulted in mp-ssIMRT, mp-VMAT, and ap-VMAT plans. Introduced treatment errors included Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) shifts, MLC field size (MLCfs), gantry and collimator errors. A change of more than 5% in most selected dose metrics was considered to have potential clinical impact. The original patient plan total Monitor Units (MUs) were correlated to the total number of dose metrics exceeded. RESULTS: The impact of different errors was consistent, with ap-VMAT plans (two institutions) showing larger dose deviations than mp-VMAT created plans (one institution). Across all institutions' VMAT plans the significant errors included; ±5° for the collimator angle, ±5mm for the MLC shift and +1, ±2 and ±5mm for the MLC field size. The total number of dose metrics exceeding tolerance was positively correlated to the VMAT total plan MUs (r=0.51, p<0.001), across all institutions and techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in VMAT robustness to simulated errors across institutions occurred due to planning method differences. Whilst ap-VMAT was most sensitive to MLC errors, it also produced the best quality treatment plans. Mp-ssIMRT was most robust to errors. Higher VMAT treatment plan complexity led to less robust plans.

In silico investigation of factors affecting the MV imaging performance of a novel water-equivalent EPID.

PURPOSE: A Geant4 model of a novel, water-equivalent electronic portal imaging device (EPID) prototype for radiotherapy imaging and dosimetry utilising an array of plastic scintillating fibres (PSFs) has been developed. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to quantify the PSF-EPID imaging performance and to investigate design aspects affecting performance for optimisation. METHODS: Using the Geant4 model, the PSF-EPID's imaging performance for 6 MV photon beams was quantified in terms of its modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Model parameters, including fibre dimensions, optical cladding reflectivity and scintillation yield, were varied to investigate impact on imaging performance. RESULTS: The MC-calculated DQE(0) for the reference PSF-EPID geometry employing 30mm fibres was approximately nine times greater than values reported for commercial EPIDs. When using 10mm long fibres, the PSF-EPID DQE(0) was still approximately three times greater than that of a commercial EPID. Increased fibre length, cladding reflectivity and scintillation yield produced the greatest decreases in NPS and increases in DQE. CONCLUSIONS: The potential to develop an optimised next-generation water-equivalent EPID with MV imaging performance at least comparable to commercial EPIDs has been demonstrated. Factors most important for optimising prototype design include fibre length, cladding reflectivity and scintillation yield.

Characterization of a novel EPID designed for simultaneous imaging and dose verification in radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Standard amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) are x-ray imagers used frequently in radiotherapy that indirectly detect incident x-rays using a metal plate and phosphor screen. These detectors may also be used as two-dimensional dosimeters; however, they have a well-characterized nonwater-equivalent dosimetric response. Plastic scintillating (PS) fibers, on the other hand, have been shown to respond in a water-equivalent manner to x-rays in the energy range typically encountered during radiotherapy. In this study, the authors report on the first experimental measurements taken with a novel prototype PS a-Si EPID developed for the purpose of performing simultaneous imaging and dosimetry in radiotherapy. This prototype employs an array of PS fibers in place of the standard metal plate and phosphor screen. The imaging performance and dosimetric response of the prototype EPID were evaluated experimentally and compared to that of the standard EPID. METHODS: Clinical 6 MV photon beams were used to first measure the detector sensitivity, linearity of dose response, and pixel noise characteristics of the prototype and standard EPIDs. Second, the dosimetric response of each EPID was evaluated relative to a reference water-equivalent dosimeter by measuring the off-axis and field size response in a nontransit configuration, along with the off-axis, field size, and transmission response in a transit configuration using solid water blocks. Finally, the imaging performance of the prototype and standard EPIDs was evaluated quantitatively by using an image quality phantom to measure the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and spatial resolution of images acquired with each detector, and qualitatively by using an anthropomorphic phantom to acquire images representative of human anatomy. RESULTS: The prototype EPID's sensitivity was 0.37 times that of the standard EPID. Both EPIDs exhibited responses that were linear with delivered dose over a range of 1-100 monitor units. Over this range, the prototype and standard EPID central axis responses agreed to within 1.6%. Images taken with the prototype EPID were noisier than those taken with the standard EPID, with fractional uncertainties of 0.2% and 0.05% within the central 1 cm(2), respectively. For all dosimetry measurements, the prototype EPID exhibited a near water-equivalent response whereas the standard EPID did not. The CNR and spatial resolution of images taken with the standard EPID were greater than those taken with the prototype EPID. CONCLUSIONS: A prototype EPID employing an array of PS fibers has been developed and the first experimental measurements are reported. The prototype EPID demonstrated a much morewater-equivalent dose response than the standard EPID. While the imaging performance of the standard EPID was superior to that of the prototype, the prototype EPID has many design characteristics that may be optimized to improve imaging performance. This investigation demonstrates the feasibility of a new detector design for simultaneous imaging and dosimetry treatment verification in radiotherapy.

Characterization of optical transport effects on EPID dosimetry using Geant4.

PURPOSE: Current amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) that are frequently used in radiotherapy applications employ a metal plate/phosphor screen configuration to optimize x-ray detection efficiency. The phosphor acts to convert x rays into an optical signal that is detected by an underlying photodiode array. The dosimetric response of EPIDs has been well characterized, in part through the development of computational models. Such models, however, have generally made simplifying assumptions with regards to the transport of optical photons within these detectors. The goal of this work was to develop and experimentally validate a new Monte Carlo (MC) model of an a-Si EPID that simulates both x-ray and optical photon transport in a self-contained manner. Using this model the authors establish a definitive characterization of the effects of optical transport on the dosimetric response of a-Si EPIDs employing gadolinium oxysulfide phosphor screens. METHODS: The Geant4 MC toolkit was used to develop a model of an a-Si EPID that employs standard electromagnetic and optical physics classes. The sensitivity of EPID response to uncertainties in optical transport parameters was evaluated by investigating their effects on the EPID point spread function (PSF). An optical blur kernel was also calculated to isolate the component of the PSF resulting purely from optical transport. A 6 MV photon source model was developed and integrated into the MC model to investigate EPID dosimetric response. Field size output factors and relative dose profiles were calculated for a set of open fields by separately scoring energy deposited in the phosphor and optical absorption events in the photodiode. These were then compared to quantify effects resulting from optical photon transport. The EPID model was validated against experimental measurements taken using a research EPID. RESULTS: Optical photon scatter within the phosphor screen noticeably broadened the PSF. Variations in optical transport parameters reported in the literature caused fluctuations in the PSF full width at half maximum (FWHM) and full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) of less than 3% and 5%, respectively, confirming model robustness. Greater deviations (up to 9.5% and 36% for FWHM and FWTM, respectively) were observed when optical parameters were largely different from reference values. When scoring energy deposition in the phosphor, measured and calculated output factors agreed within statistical uncertainties and at least 94% of the MC simulated profile data points passed 3%/3 mm γ-index criterion for all field sizes considered. Despite statistical uncertainties in optical simulations arising from computational limitations, no differences were observed between optical and energy deposition profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations demonstrated noticeable blurring of the EPID PSF when scoring optical absorption events in the photodiode relative to energy deposition in the phosphor. However, modeling the standard electromagnetic transport alone should suffice when using MC methods to predict EPID dose-response to static, open 6 MV fields with a standard a-Si photodiode array. Therefore, using energy deposition in the phosphor as a surrogate for EPID dose-response is a valid approach that should not require additional corrections for optical transport effects in current a-Si EPIDs employing phosphor screens.

Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and post-operative prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To quantify differences in treatment delivery efficiency and dosimetry between step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) for prostate treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five prostate cancer patients were selected retrospectively for this planning study. Treatment plans were generated for: prostate alone (n = 5), prostate + seminal vesicles (n = 5), prostate + seminal vesicles + pelvic lymph nodes (n = 5), prostate bed (n = 5), and prostate bed + pelvic lymph nodes (n = 5). Target coverage, dose homogeneity, integral dose, monitor units (MU), and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) were compared across techniques. Time required to deliver each plan was measured. RESULTS: The dosimetric quality of IMRT, VMAT, and HT plans were comparable for target coverage (planning target volume V95%, clinical target volume V100% all >98.7%) and sparing of organs at risk (OAR) for all treatment groups. Although HT resulted in a slightly higher integral dose and mean doses to the OAR, it yielded a lower maximum dose to all OAR examined. VMAT resulted in reductions in treatment times over IMRT (mean = 75%) and HT (mean = 70%). VMAT required 15-38% fewer monitor units than IMRT over all treatment volumes, with the reduction per fraction ranging from 100-423 MU from the smallest to largest volumes. CONCLUSIONS: VMAT improves efficiency of delivery for equivalent dosimetric quality as IMRT and HT across various prostate cancer treatment volumes in the intact and postoperative settings.