Trends in adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant chemoradiation (TNT), an accepted strategy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), was first included in guidelines in 2018. We aimed to describe trends in, and factors associated with TNT receipt. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LARC was performed using the national cancer database (2012-2020). TNT status was determined, and temporal trends analyzed. Factors associated with TNT receipt were identified by stage. RESULTS: A total of 51,407 patients were identified; 57.3 â€‹% received TNT. Increasing age and comorbidities were associated with higher rates of TNT receipt. Patients with stage III disease were more likely to receive TNT (stage II OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.96). Patients were 38 â€‹% more likely to get TNT after guideline inclusion (OR1.38, 95%CI 1.31-1.46). CONCLUSION: Rates of TNT were consistently above 50 â€‹% and rose after inclusion in the NCCN guidelines. This study establishes baseline patterns in rates of TNT for future benchmarking.

Adherence Disparities and Utilization Trends of Oncotype Dx Assay: A National Cancer Database Study.

INTRODUCTION: Oncotype Dx (ODX) is a genetic assay that analyzes tumor recurrence risk and provides chemotherapy recommendations for T1-T2 stage, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-negative, and nodal-negative breast cancer patients. Despite its established validity, the utilization of this assay is suboptimal. The study aims to evaluate factors that are associated with adherence rate with the testing guidelines and examine changes in utilization trends. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, utilizing data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2017. Patients who met the ODX testing guidelines were first evaluated for testing adherence. Secondly, all patients who underwent ODX testing were assessed to evaluate the trend in ODX utilization. RESULTS: A total of 429,648 patients met the criteria for ODX, and 43.4% of this population underwent testing. Advanced age, racial minorities, low-income status, well-differentiated tumor grade, uninsured status, and treatment at community cancer centers were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving ODX in eligible patients. Additionally, a notable amount of testing was performed on patients who did not meet the ODX testing criteria. Among the 295,326 patients that underwent ODX testing, 16.6% of patients were node-positive and 1.8% had T3 or T4 stage tumors. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of patients who were eligible for ODX did not receive it, indicating potential barriers to care and disparities in breast cancer treatment. ODX usage has been expanded to broader patient populations, indicating more research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the assay in these patient groups.

Short-term Outcomes of Emergent Versus Elective Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and in the United States, and can present emergently with upper GI hemorrhage, obstruction, or perforation. Few large studies have examined how emergency surgery for gastric cancer affects patient outcomes. METHODS: All patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program with gastric adenocarcinoma from 2005 to 2017 were examined retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis of patient factors and perioperative outcomes was performed. P-values < .05 were significant. RESULTS: Of 4663 total patients, 115 had emergency surgery and 4548 had elective surgery. Emergency surgery patients were more likely to be non-white, underweight, higher ASA class, require a preoperative blood transfusion, and were less likely to be functionally independent. Multivariate analysis demonstrates an increased likelihood of unplanned intubation, prolonged ventilation, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). DISCUSSION: There are no significant differences in mortality, reoperation, or infection when comparing emergent surgery for gastric cancer and elective surgery; however, there is an increased risk of reintubation, prolonged intubation, and DVT in patients undergoing emergent surgery. Patients requiring emergent surgery have more comorbidities, higher blood transfusion requirements, and worse preoperative functional status, and this study demonstrates that they also have worse perioperative outcomes. Previous studies have shown that long-term oncologic outcomes are worse for patients undergoing urgent surgery, and this study shows that perioperative outcomes are also somewhat worse. Thus, definitive surgery performed on a patient who presents emergently with gastric cancer should be considered but may come at the cost of increased perioperative respiratory complications, DVTs, and worse oncologic outcomes.

Clinical T2N0M0 Esophageal Cancer-Is Treatment Pathway Associated With Overall Survival?

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal cancer therapy is commonly multimodal. The CROSS trial demonstrated a survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus surgery alone in T1N1 or T2-3N0-1 patients. Theoretically, chemoradiation should be most beneficial to patients with advanced disease. Treating the intermediary stage, T2N0M0, is challenging as national guidelines offer multiple options. This study aims to compare survival outcomes and associated factors in clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer via treatment modality and compare clinical to pathological stage. The authors conclude that neoadjuvant therapy use has increased; however, there is no associated survival benefit, which may be due to over- or under-staging. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the National Cancer Database (2006-2016). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (NCRT + ESOPH) were compared to patients who underwent esophagectomy first (ESOPH). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with treatment pathway. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests at 1-, 3-, and 5-y post-treatment. Additionally, a multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with adjuvant therapy in ESOPH patients. RESULTS: There were 1662 patients (NCRT + ESOPH: 904 [54.4%], ESOPH: 758 [45.6%]). There was no difference in 5-y survival between NCRT + ESOPH and ESOPH patients. Despite this, NCRT + ESOPH treatment rates rose from 33% to 74% between 2006 and 2016. Patients who received NCRT + ESOPH were younger and more commonly had no Charlson-Deyo comorbidities. Notably, 41% of patients were over-staged (T1 or lower), and 32.8% were under-staged (N ≥ 1). CONCLUSIONS: T2N0M0 remains difficult to characterize, and pathological staging corresponds poorly to clinical staging. Neoadjuvant therapy use has increased; however, the lack of a significant survival benefit to correlate with such may be secondary to over- or under-staging.

Identifying Outlier Hospitals in Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Yield Using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) yield is a key quality indicator that is associated with improved staging in surgically resected gastric cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends a yield of ≥15 LNs for proper staging, yet most facilities in the United States fail to achieve this number. The present study aimed to identify factors that could affect LN yield on a facility level and identify outlier hospitals. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of adults (aged ≥18 y) with gastric cancer (Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stages I-III) who underwent gastrectomy. Data were analyzed from the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Multivariate analysis identified patient and tumor characteristics, whereas an observed-to-expected ratio of identified outlier hospitals. Facility factors were compared between high and low outliers. RESULTS: A total of 26,590 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, only 50.3% had an LN yield ≥15. The multivariate model of patient and tumor characteristics demonstrated a concordance index was 0.684. A total of 1245 facilities were included. There were 198 low outlier LN yield hospitals and 135 high outlier LN yield hospitals (observed-to-expected ratio of 0.42 ± 0.24 versus 1.38 ± 0.19, P < 0.0001). There was a difference in facility type between low and high outliers (P < 0.0001). High LN yield hospitals had a larger surgical volume than low LN yield hospitals (median 8.4 [4.9, 13.5] versus 3.5 [2.4, 5.2]; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of the population exhibited low compliance to National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Facility-level disparities exist as high yearly surgical volume and academic facility status distinguished high-performing outlier hospitals.

Predicting Positive Margins in Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Investigating Disparities in Quality Care Using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: In pancreatic cancer, surgical resection with neoadjuvant therapy improves survival, but survival relies significantly on the margin status of the resected tissue. This study aimed to develop a model that predicts margin positivity, and then to identify facility-specific factors that influence the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio for positive margins among facilities. METHODS: This retrospective review analyzed patients in the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma [tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage 1 or 2] who received neoadjuvant therapy for a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Logistic regression was used to develop a model that predicts margin positivity. This model then was used to identify outlier facilities with regard to the O/E ratio. Hospital volume was defined as the total number of pancreaticoduodenectomies per year. RESULTS: The study enrolled 4085 patients, and 16.8% of these patients had positive margins. Most of the patients (64%) had a tumor size of 2 to 4 cm, and approximately 51% of the patients did not have positive lymph nodes at resection. A logistic regression model showed that the predictors of positive margins after resection with neoadjuvant therapy were male sex, larger tumor size, and positive lymph nodes. This model was validated to yield a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.632. The study calculated O/E ratios with the model, identifying 12 low- and 17 high O/E-ratio outlier facilities among 401 studied hospitals. The outlier hospitals did not differ in facility type (i.e., academic vs integrated network), but did differ significantly in terms of yearly hospital volume (low outlier of 20.6 vs high outlier of 10.7; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: An association of lower-volume facilities with higher than expected rates of positive margins was found to indicate a disparity in care. This disparity was identified via an O/E ratio as a quality indicator for facilities. Facilities can gauge the efficiency of their own practices by referencing their O/E ratios, and they also can improve their practices by analyzing the framework of low O/E-ratio facilities.

Use and Outcomes of Epidural Analgesia in Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Resections.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia (EA) is an appealing adjunct for esophageal and gastric cancer patients. It remains unclear whether EA usage affects postoperative outcomes. There are no national data on the trends of EA utilization for these procedures. This study aims to use the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to study the utilization and outcomes of EA in open upper GI tract cancer resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of NSQIP was performed for patients undergoing open elective esophagectomies and gastrectomies for nonmetastatic cancer between 2014 and 2017. An Armitage trend test was performed. The population was propensity matched and assessed. RESULTS: There were 4802 esophagectomies performed. Twenty-nine percent of patients received EA. Of 2599 gastrectomies, 18% of patients received EA. The recent trends of EA use for esophagectomies (EA range [26.9%, 30.3%] P = 0.6535) and gastrectomies (EA [16.9%, 18.4%], P = 0.7797) remain stable. Propensity matching was performed, and the groups with and without EA were compared. For esophagectomies, EA was associated with blood transfusions (EA 14% versus No EA 10.8%, P = 0.0156). For gastrectomies, EA was associated with longer length of stay (LOS) (EA median [IQR] 8 [7,11] versus No EA 7 [6,11], P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the current opioid epidemic, the recent trends of EA for esophageal and gastric cancer patients remain stable. EA was associated with blood transfusions for esophagectomies and with a longer LOS for gastrectomies. Therefore, EA should be carefully considered, and its analgesic efficacy in this population should be investigated closely in future studies.

Quality Improvement for Surgical Resection of Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma : Hospital and Surgeon Predictors of Higher Than Expected R1 Resection Using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: The mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection; however, positive surgical margins remain commonplace. We identified hospitals with higher than predicted rates of positive margins and isolated factors that caused this discordance. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with head of the pancreas adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. A nomogram was used to calculate the observed to expected positive margin rates (O/E) for facilities. If the O/E differed significantly (P < .05), it was considered an outlier. RESULTS: Among a total of 19 968 patients, 24.3% had positive margins. Among hospitals with lower than expected positive margin rates, 73.6% were academic or research programs, 17% were comprehensive community cancer programs, and none were community cancer programs (P = .0002). Within the group with higher than expected positive margin rates, 47% were comprehensive community cancer programs and 38.6% were academic or research programs (P = .0002). The mean hospital volume was higher in the low positive margin group (110.4 vs 48.8, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Facility type and hospital volume can predict improvement in the O/E ratio for margin positivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection. Surgeons should consider referral to academic or research facilities with higher case volumes for improved surgical resection.

Outcomes of Open Retro-Rectus Hernia Repair With Mesh in Obesity Class III.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall hernias continue to be one of the most common general surgery pathologies. Patients with an elevated body mass index (BMI) are routinely counseled about weight loss before elective repair. However, a definitive BMI "cutoff" has not been established. Here, we report our experience with open retro-rectus hernia repair (ORRHR) with mesh in patients with a BMI over 40 kg/m2, and we attempt to determine if a BMI "cutoff" can be established. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing ORRHR with mesh at Geisinger Medical Center from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, were collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Cohorts were composed of 2 groups, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 (n = 117) and BMI < 40 kg/m2 (n = 90). All patients underwent an elective ORRHR with mesh. Operative time increased significantly as the patient's BMI increased (P ≤ .01). Patients in the higher BMI group had a significantly higher rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) (8.55% vs. 1.1%, P = .018). Higher BMI did not translate to a higher recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ORRHR with mesh who had a BMI over 40 kg/m2 had an increased risk of SSI and longer operative time, possibly suggesting a potential association other than SSI and BMI. More studies are needed to determine if BMI is indeed correlated with hernia recurrence and if BMI should influence the decision to undergo repair.

Urgent Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Study of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and, in the United States, can present emergently with upper GI hemorrhage, obstruction, or perforation. No large studies have examined how urgent surgery affects patient outcomes. This study examines the outcomes of urgent versus elective surgery for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 were examined retrospectively. Patients with metastatic disease or incomplete data were excluded. Urgent surgery was defined as definitive surgery within 3 d of diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis of patient factors, surgical outcomes, and oncologic data was performed. P-values <0.05 were statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 26,116 total patients, 2964 had urgent surgery and 23,468 had elective surgery. Urgent surgery patients were significantly older, were female, were nonwhite, had higher pathologic stage, and were treated at a low-volume center. Urgent surgery was associated with decreased quality lymph node harvest (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 95% confidence interval {CI} [0.62, 0.74]), increased positive surgical margin (OR 1.48, 95% CI [1.32, 1.65]), increased 30-d mortality (OR 1.38, 95% CI [1.16, 1.65]), increased 90-d mortality (OR 1.30, 95% CI [1.14, 1.49]), and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI [1.15, 1.27]). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent surgery for gastric cancer is associated with significantly worse outcomes than elective surgery. Stable patients requiring urgent surgical resection for gastric cancer may benefit from referral to a high-volume center for resection by an experienced surgeon. Patients undergoing urgent resection for gastric cancer should be referred to surgical and medical oncologists to ensure they receive appropriate adjuvant therapy and surveillance.

MAGIC versus MacDonald treatment regimens for gastric cancer: Trends and predictors of multimodal therapy for gastric cancer using the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy is beneficial in gastric cancer, however this practice is not universal. This study examines trends, identifies associative factors, and examines overall survival (OS) benefit from multimodal therapy in gastric cancer. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients staged IB-III from 2005 to 2014, identified using the National Cancer Database, were categorized by treatment: surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemoradiation. Groups were analyzed to identify associative factors of perioperative therapy. RESULTS: We examined 9243 patients, with the majority receiving multimodal therapy (57%). The proportion of those receiving perioperative chemotherapy rose dramatically from 7.5% in 2006 to 46% in 2013. Academic center treatment was strongly associated with perioperative over adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). An OS advantage was clearly seen in those receiving multimodal therapy versus surgery alone (p < 0.0001), with no difference between perioperative and adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of gastric cancer with multimodal therapy has risen significantly since 2005, largely due to increasing use of perioperative chemotherapy. As perioperative therapy becomes more prevalent, more patients will have the opportunity for the improved survival benefit of multimodal therapy.

Outcomes of Endoscopic and Surgical Pancreatic Necrosectomy: A Single Institution Experience.

Pancreatic necrosis can be managed conservatively; however, infection of pancreatic necrosis usually dictates more aggressive management. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of open pancreatic necrosectomy (OPN) and endoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy (EPN) in a single center. Data from patients undergoing pancreatic necrosectomy at the Geisinger Medical Center from January 1, 2007, to April 25, 2016, were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Cohorts were composed of EPN (n = 22) and OPN (n = 34) groups. The prevalence of preoperative respiratory failure, septic shock, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome was higher in the OPN group. The OPN group presented with a higher Bedside Index Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score. Postoperative abscess, persistent kidney dysfunction, and death were more frequent in the OPN group. The EPN group had a higher readmission rate. The results of the univariate analysis for complication and mortality demonstrated that higher mortality and persistent kidney dysfunction were associated with the procedure type, specifically OPN and with a higher Bedside Index Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score. Patients who presented with higher severity of disease underwent an OPN, whereas EPN often was performed successfully in a more benign clinical setting. However, patients with infected necrosis are served best in a tertiary medical facility where multiple treatment modalities are available.

Disparities in Care: Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Pancreatic Surgery: Exploring the National Cancer Database.

Studies have shown high-volume institutions have decreased mortality and increased survival for pancreatectomy. However, not all patients can travel to high-volume centers. Socioeconomic factors may influence treatment decisions. The goal of this study is to examine socioeconomic factors that determine where a patient is treated and how that location affects outcome. This is a retrospective study of the National Cancer Database of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 2004 to 2014. The primary outcome was to examine socioeconomic factors that predicted where a patient underwent their pancreatectomy. Patients treated at academic programs (APs) had to travel a mean distance of 80.9 miles, whereas patients treated at community programs (CPs) had to travel 31.7 miles (P < 0.0001). Spanish and Hispanic patients were less likely to travel to an AP (69% had surgery at an AP versus 76% of non-Hispanic patients, P < 0.001). Patients with higher comorbidities were also more likely to have care at CPs. Patients who had pancreatic cancer surgery at CPs were more likely to be Hispanic or with higher medical comorbidities. Those who had surgery at AP traveled further distances but had better perioperative outcomes and had an improvement in overall survival.

Lymph Node Harvest as a Measure of Quality and Effect on Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer: A National Cancer Database Assessment.

Surgical therapy for esophageal cancer is the cornerstone of treatment, and the highest quality operation should lead to the highest cure rate. Evaluated lymph node (ELN) count is one quality measure that has been championed. The objective of this study was to explore ELN in esophagectomy, examine predictors of harvesting ≥12 nodes, and determine whether higher ELN improves overall survival (OS). ELN was examined in patients with resected esophageal cancer using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2013. In this study, 41,746 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-two per cent of patients had 12 or more nodes harvested. Academic programs were most likely to harvest ≥12 nodes (58% of cases) compared with other programs (43-56% of cases). Seventy per cent of cases with ≥12 nodes harvested were performed at high-volume centers. Preoperative radiation or preoperative chemoradiation led to lower ELN (46% and 48%) versus preoperative chemotherapy alone (66%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had ≥12 nodes removed had better OS (Hazard Ratio 0.843 [95 confidence interval 0.820-0.867]). In addition, care at a high-volume facility, care at an academic facility, private insurance, and income ≥$63,000 were all associated with improved OS. Higher ELN count is associated with OS in patients with esophageal cancer. Patients who receive care at high-volume centers and academic centers are more likely to undergo more extensive lymphadenectomy. All centers should strive to examine at least 12 nodes to provide a quality esophagectomy.

Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: a review of the national inpatient sample.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard treatment of adrenal lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) has become an option, however, short-term outcomes for RA have not been well studied and benefits over LA are debatable. The aim of this study was to explore differences in short-term outcomes between LA and RA using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database. METHODS: Patient data were collected from the NIS. All patients undergoing LA or RA from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. Univariate analysis and propensity matching were performed to look for differences between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 1006 patients (66.4% in LA group and 33.6% in RA group) were identified. Patient age group, gender, race, risk of mortality, severity of illness or indication for adrenalectomy did not differ significantly between the LA or RA cohorts. Insurance type predicted procedure type (45% of medicare patients underwent RA versus 29% of patients with private insurance, p < 0.0001). Patients living in the highest income areas were more likely to receive the laparoscopic approach (31.7 versus 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Hospital volume, bed size and teaching status of the hospital were not significant factors in the decision of RA versus LA. There was no difference in complication and conversion rates between RA versus LA. The mean length of stay was shorter in the RA group (2.2 versus 1.9 days, p = 0.03). Total charges were higher in the RA group ($42,659 versus $33,748, p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend towards more adrenalectomies being performed robotic assisted by year. Only 22% of adrenalectomies were performed robotic-assisted in 2009 compared with 48% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: The overall benefit for RA remains small and higher total charges for RA may currently outweigh the benefits. These findings may change as more cases are performed robotically assisted and robotic technology improves.

Cancel that PICC line order; cholecystostomy tube and short course of antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not specifically address optimal antibiotic duration following cholecystostomy. This study compares outcomes for short-course (<7 days) and long-course (≥7 days) antibiotics post-cholecystostomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of cholecystostomy patients (≥18 years) admitted (1/1/2007-12/31/2017) to one healthcare system. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients were studied. Demographics were similar, except short-course patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001). There were no intergroup differences in tachycardia (22.5%[short-course] vs 23.3%[long-course]) or leukocytosis (67.1%[short-course] vs 64.4%[long-course]) at drain placement nor time to normalization for pulse, temperature or leukocytosis. There were no differences regarding Clostridium Difficile infection (5.0%[short-course] vs 1.6%[long-course]) or cholecystitis recurrence (8.8%[short-course] vs 10.9%[long-course]). No differences were observed regarding gallbladder-related unplanned readmissions (30-day:18.8%[short-course] vs 17.2%[long-course]; 90-day: 20.0%[short-course] vs 25.8%[long-course]). There were no 30- or 90-day mortality differences (overall mortality: 18.3%). CONCLUSION: Post-cholecystostomy outcomes were comparable between short-course and long-course antibiotics, consistent with emerging literature supporting short-course antibiotics for intra-abdominal infection with source control.

Sarcopenia predicts poor outcomes in urgent exploratory laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Emergent laparotomies are associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Recent studies suggest sarcopenia predicts worse outcomes in elective operations. The purpose of this study is to examine outcomes following urgent exploratory laparotomy in sarcopenic patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients in a rural tertiary care facility between 2010 and 2014. Patients underwent a laparotomy within 72 h of admission and had an abdomen/pelvis CT scan were included. Primary outcomes were predictors of morbidity and mortality. Sarcopenia is the lowest quartile cross sectional area of the psoas muscles. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of 967 patients found that sarcopenic patients had higher mortality, complication rate, were less likely to be discharged home, were more likely to undergo unplanned re-operation, and had a longer length of stay. Increasing abdominal wall fat has favorable outcomes in mortality, discharge destination, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is measured from CT scans, making it an accessible outcome predictor. In urgent laparotomies, sarcopenia was associated with higher morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and worse discharge destination.