The Aging Surgeon.

Everyone ages-some more gracefully than others. The changes associated with aging are well known but not often discussed. Age-related changes in surgeons may eventually lead to a need for the surgeon to stop operating or even retire. It may be difficult for the surgeon to recognize these changes, but there may be some telltale signs. If the surgeon is not able to interpret that it is time to retire, others may need to step in. Physician assessment of surgeons may be requested or required by employers or hospital credentialing committees. Although not widespread, such practices are becoming more popular. There are modern means of assessment, which include written screening examinations and actual personal professional assessment by a qualified physician evaluator. If retirement or career change is necessary, it must be carefully planned and executed for the surgeon to bow out gracefully.

The Atypical Patient With Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses May Be at Increased Risk for a Missed Contralateral Slip.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a commonly encountered hip disorder. The goal of this study was to describe the incidence of missed contra-lateral SCFE as well as to identify risk factors. The authors hypothesized that contralateral slips are more often missed in patients with severe involvement of the treated side. After institutional review board approval was obtained, a retrospective chart review was performed of all pediatric patients who were treated for sequential and bilateral SCFE at a single institution during an 18-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographic features and attending surgeon. Radiographs were reviewed for skeletal maturity, Klein's line, and severity of the treated slip. All radiographs were reviewed by 3 pediatric orthopedists. Contralateral SCFE was deemed present when consensus was achieved. Comparisons were made with Fisher's exact test, and P<.05 was considered significant. Of the records that were reviewed, 56 patients met the study criteria. Of these, 19 patients had bilateral involvement and 5 missed slips were identified (8.9%). The patients with missed disease tended to be younger (mean age, 10.8 vs 11.4 years), with a lower body mass index. Fellowship-trained pediatric surgeons were more likely to identify bilateral disease compared with orthopedists without pediatric training (P=.0065). A contralateral slip was more likely to be present in patients who had a positive finding for Klein's line (P<.0001). Severity of the treated slip did not increase the likelihood of missing a contralateral slip. Although Klein's line is a useful tool in the diagnosis of SCFE, a false-negative rate of 40% was observed. The authors recommend increased vigilance when an "atypical" patient with SCFE presents with unilateral disease. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(2):e114-e118.].

An Assessment of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, Codes Used to Describe Common Pediatric Orthopedic Conditions.

The diagnosis coding system for health care providers that is used in the United States recently converted from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). The authors are unaware of any studies specifically evaluating the utility and specificity of ICD-10-CM codes in the pediatric orthopedic literature. The authors chose 20 diagnoses that are commonly seen in general pediatric orthopedic practice. The study had two goals: (1) to evaluate the adequacy of these codes to describe the diagnoses and (2) to offer advice on the most appropriate code to use when the ideal code does not exist. A list of 20 diagnoses that are commonly seen in general pediatric orthopedic practice were chosen by 2 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Each author independently evaluated the appropriate ICD-10-CM code for each diagnosis. The authors came to a consensus regarding whether the codes were adequate and agreed on an appropriate alternate code when the ideal one did not exist. One common condition had no code (accessory navicular), necessitating the recommendation of a nonspecific code. Other seemingly dissimilar conditions were described by the same code (acetabular dysplasia/femoral anteversion, Osgood-Schlatter disease/Blount's disease). Numerous codes lacked specificity, and the option of laterality was not uniform. Compared with the ICD-9, the ICD-10-CM allows more diagnostic options for these 20 common pediatric orthopedic conditions. The authors identified several areas for improvement. Involvement of subspecialty societies could guide future endeavors to improve this new coding system. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(2):e87-e90.].

Football-Related Pediatric Extremity Fractures and Dislocations: Size Matters.

Football remains a popular sport in the United States despite sometimes significant injuries, such as fractures and dislocations, occurring. The objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric extremity fractures and dislocations related to football. A retrospective review was conducted at a level 1 pediatric trauma center to identify patients who were treated specifically for American football-related injuries (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code E007.0). All patients with football-related injuries presenting to the emergency department during a 6-year period (2007-2012) were reviewed for inclusion in the study. Patients with only fractures or dislocations involving the extremities were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included patients older than 18 years, non-football-related sports-related injuries, and patients presenting to non-emergency department health care facilities. Demographic information was collected in addition to type of injury, body mass index, and type of treatment. A total of 193 patients with 96 fractures and 7 dislocations were included. More than two-thirds of all fractures occurred in the lower extremities, with tibia (17.0%) and femoral shaft (14.2%) fractures being the most common. Thirty-five percent of the fractures and dislocations required operative treatment. No statistically significant correlations were identified pertaining to age, race, and timing of the injuries in the season. Regarding body mass index, underweight patients were associated with 3.6 times greater odds of sustaining a fracture when compared with patients who were not underweight (P=.006). Underweight patients may be at a higher risk for fractures or dislocations. Identifying at-risk children may result in improved patient and coach education, potentially leading to better preventive measures and fewer injuries. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):216-221.].

Hiring your next partner: AOA critical issues.

Hiring a new partner into an orthopaedic department or group can be a daunting task. A recent American Orthopedic Association symposium sought to address three major aspects of hiring that affect orthopaedic leaders: (1) when to hire-the chairperson's role; (2) generational issues that affect hiring; and (3) the development of an initial compensation package.How does the chairperson recruit new physicians? Hiring a new partner into the academic setting requires a good deal of foresight. There must be an established game plan. Advertising and interviews need to be orchestrated. Chairpersons can find information about candidates from many unique sources. Fit within the department and community is important and must be cultivated. Spouses and families need special attention. Research candidates have individual needs. Perhaps the most important aspect of recruitment is the development of a realistic business plan. This paper provides an overview of factors to consider in managing a new hire.Generational issues are intriguing. Should they affect our hiring practices? It seems clear to established physicians that the new generation of graduates is different from their predecessors. Is this really true? Most everyone is familiar with the terms "Silent Generation," "Baby Boomers," "Generation X," and "Generation Y." Is there anything to be gained by categorizing an applicant? Is it important to hire a replica of one's self? This paper provides a thoughtful overview of generational issues as they apply to hiring new partners.Most department chairpersons are not trained as negotiators. Some preparation and experience are helpful in guiding the process of making an initial offer to a candidate. It is not all about pay. The package includes the guarantee period, expectations for the new hire, mentorship, and resources. How much should new orthopaedic academic hires be paid? Recent benchmark data from the Academic Orthopaedic Consortium suggest a mean income of $282,667 for physicians who have just finished a fellowship. New hires are concerned about call frequency and available time free from work. How much work should be expected from an academic surgeon? Recent survey data from the American Orthopaedic Consortium suggest a mean of 9200 relative value units per year. This article offers some guidelines for the chairperson who needs to formulate an initial offer for a new hire.There is a lot involved in hiring a new partner, as times are changing. This paper offers considerable food for thought about hiring.

Treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.

Methods of treating pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures are dictated by patient age, fracture characteristics, and family social situation. The recent trend has been away from nonsurgical treatment and toward surgical stabilization. The clinical practice guideline on pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures was undertaken to determine the best evidence regarding a number of different options for surgical stabilization. The recommendations address treatments that include Pavlik harness, spica casts, flexible intramedullary nailing, rigid trochanteric entry nailing, submuscular plating, and pain management. The guideline authors conclude that controversy and lack of conclusive evidence remain regarding the different treatment options for pediatric femur fractures and that the quality of scientific evidence could be improved for the revised guideline.

Opinion survey regarding pediatric orthopaedic trauma call and emergency trauma management.

BACKGROUND: To determine the attitudes and practices of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons regarding on-call coverage and emergency fracture management. METHODS: A 32-question online survey was sent to all 597 active members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. There were 296 completed surveys, for a response rate of 49.6%. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 85.1% were male. The respondents ranged in age from 30 to older than 70 years, with 54% between 36 and 50 years of age, corresponding to an average of 15 years in practice. Seventy-seven percent of the respondents felt that taking trauma call is an integral aspect of being a pediatric orthopaedist. Of the respondents, 64.9% take call 1 to 9 times per month, 15.8% take 10 to 19 calls, 2.7% take 20 or more, and 16.6% take no call. The number of orthopaedists taking call per practice was fairly evenly distributed between 3 and 10. Call was shared equally in 32% of practices, and mandatory in 72%. Twenty-eight percent of the respondents were additionally compensated for taking calls, in amounts ranging from $100 to $2000 per night, with 1000 dollars the most common rate. One third of operative cases are done that night; one third, the next day; and one third, later in the week. Twenty-four percent of the respondents have dedicated operative block time on the day after the call. Forty-seven percent have a dedicated fracture clinic, of which 51% receive institutional support. CONCLUSIONS: Providing emergency trauma care for children is an integral aspect of pediatric orthopaedics. This survey provides information on the attitudes and strategies of practicing pediatric orthopaedic surgeons in the face of decreasing manpower and increasing demand for such services.

Traumatic dislocation of the hip in a high school football player.

BACKGROUND: Although traumatic dislocation of the hip often occurs as a result of automobile accidents, dislocations have been reported to occur during sports activities. OBJECTIVE: Using the experience in treating a 17-year-old high school football player with a posterior dislocation, complicated by involvement of the sciatic nerve, this case report provides background information on hip dislocations and provides a description of the immediate treatment by the physician, followed by 6 weeks of immobilization, and a detailed account of the 5-month intervention. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient was injured while making a tackle during a high school football game when another player fell on him from behind. The case report describes his plan of care after immediate hip reduction surgery and 6 weeks on crutches. Generally, the program utilized a progression of non-weight-bearing resistance training and stretching in the initial stages of intervention and progressed to weight-bearing activities (on land and in the pool) as the patient was able to tolerate more stress. In addition, the treatment of the sciatic nerve using electrical stimulation during treadmill walking is described. OUTCOMES: The patient was seen in an outpatient physical therapy clinic an average of 2 times per week for 5 months. At the end of 5 months, results of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) indicated that recreational and sporting activities were within normal limits, and the patient was able to return to playing on his high school football team the next year.

Comparison of radiolucent and fracture tables in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

A retrospective study was undertaken to see whether there was any difference in the time required and the accuracy of pin placement between slips pinned on a fracture table and those pinned on a radiolucent table. All patients were treated by single screw fixation of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), 36 on a fracture table and 29 on a radiolucent table. Mean operating room time on the fracture table (63 minutes) was greater than that on the radiolucent table (51.2 minutes) (P <0.05). Mean surgery time for the fracture table (38.55 minutes) was greater than that on the radiolucent table (24.8 minutes) (P <0.05). The deviation of screw placement from the ideal for the two tables was not significantly different in the anteroposterior or lateral planes. The use of the radiolucent table, with manipulation of the limb to obtain lateral images of the hip, is a useful alternative to use of the fracture table for pinning of SCFE.