Surgical management and outcomes following atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures - results from a matched-pair analysis of the registry for geriatric trauma of the German Trauma Society.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of patients with atypical subtrochanteric fractures (ASFs) remain unclear. Data from a large international geriatric trauma registry were analysed to examine the outcome of patients with ASFs compared to patients with typical osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures (TSFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie [DGU]) (ATR-DGU) were analysed. All patients treated surgically for ASFs or TSFs were included in this analysis. Across both fracture types, a paired matching approach was conducted, where statistical twins were formed based on background characteristics sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and walking ability. In-house mortality and mortality rates at the 120-day follow-up, as well as mobility at 7 and 120 days, the reoperation rate, hospital discharge management, the hospital readmission rate at the 120-day follow-up, health-related quality of life, type of surgical treatment and anti-osteoporotic therapy at 7 and 120 days, were assessed as outcome measures using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Amongst the 1,800 included patients, 1,781 had TSFs and 19 had ASFs. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with ASFs were more often treated with closed intramedullary nailing (RR = 3.59, p < 0.001) and had a higher probability of vitamin D supplementation as osteoporosis therapy at 120 days (RR = 0.88, p < 0.002). Patients with ASFs were also more likely to live at home after surgery (RR = 1.43, p < 0.001), and they also tended to continue living at home more often than patients with TSFs (RR = 1.33, p < 0.001). Accordingly, patients with TSFs had a higher relative risk of losing their self-sufficient living status, as indicated by increased rates of patients living at home preoperatively and being discharged to nursing homes (RR = 0.19, p < 0.001) or other hospitals (RR = 0.00, p < 0.001) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment of ASFs was marked by more frequent use of closed intramedullary fracture reduction. Furthermore, patients with ASFs were more likely to be discharged home and died significantly less often in the given timeframe. The rate of perioperative complications, as indicated by nonsignificant reoperation rates, as well as patient walking abilities during the follow-up period, remained unaffected.

Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) after revision arthroplasty following periprosthetic femoral fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 in geriatric trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome parameters of revision arthroplasties for periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF) with a particular attention to quality of life (QoL) and mobility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center study of PPFF with loose implants that underwent revision arthroplasty. Depending on individual patient characteristics, either an uncemented or cemented revision stem was chosen. Data collection included demographics, complications, clinical course and outcome parameters. Follow-up took place at least one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2016, 43 patients could be included. Most patients (63%) were able to walk independently or with a walking aid after one year and amongst the surveyed patients 77% were able to reside at home. Concerning the QoL assessment, a high index of 0.8 ± 0.1 has been reached after one year. Mortality pointed out to be 9% after one year and 28% in general. CONCLUSION: The treatment of PPFF remains challenging. Although complication rates and mortality are high in this frail collective of geriatric patients, revision arthroplasty leads to good postoperative results regarding mobility and quality of life.

[Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the course of geriatric trauma patients with proximal femoral fractures]. / Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie auf den Verlauf von alterstraumatologischen Patienten mit proximaler Femurfraktur.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic posed a major challenge to the healthcare system. The hypothesis is that the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 had an impact on the care of older adults with proximal femoral fractures due to resource scarcity, regardless of whether or not the patient was infected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study analyzed the data of 87 hospitals which entered 15,289 patients in the Geriatric Trauma Register ("AltersTraumaRegister DGU®", ATR-DGU) in Germany in 2019 and 2020. In this study we analyzed the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the inpatient treatment of hip fractures as well as the mid-term follow-up during the first 120 days. For the main analysis, we compared patients documented during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 (April-December) with a control group in 2019 (April-December). Additionally, we performed a subgroup analysis of the periods with high COVID-19 incidence rates. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2020 a total of 11,669 patients (2020: n = 6002 patients vs. 2019: n = 5667 patients) were included in this study. Only minor differences were found between the patients treated during the pandemic; however, when the COVID-19 incidence in Germany was greater than 50/100,000 residents, significantly fewer patients (p < 0.001) were discharged to a geriatric rehabilitation ward (27.2% vs. 36.3%) and an increased mortality rate during inpatient treatment was determined (8.4% vs. 4.6%) (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The healthcare system was able to respond to the pandemic and patients' clinical courses were not impaired as long as the incidences were low. Nevertheless, the healthcare system reached its limits in times of higher incidence, which was also directly reflected in the patient outcome, mortality and place of discharge.

Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiveness of CD and CD + CBG in patients with ARCO stage II FHN in terms of postoperative pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EuroQol 5D, and Short Form 36 Questionnaire), and disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 11 patients treated with CD alone 48.0 months (range, 26.3-68.5 months) postoperatively versus 11 patients treated with CD + CBG 69.2 months (range, 38.0-92.9 months) postoperatively. All patients were assessed according to a routine clinical protocol involving a clinical examination, questionnaires, and radiological imaging (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). RESULTS: The clinical and radiological results showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both interventions demonstrated equal results according to clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our data may encourage application of the less invasive technique of CD alone without CBG, which is more surgically demanding. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the risk factors for therapy failure.

Liberal intraoperative fluid management leads to increased complication rates in geriatric patients with hip fracture.

PURPOSE: Fractures of the proximal femur in geriatric patients are life-changing and life-threatening events. Previous research has identified fluid volume as an independent factor contributing to trauma patients' complications. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of intraoperative fluid volume on outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study with data from the hospital information systems. Our study included patients aged 70 years or older who had sustained a proximal femur fracture. We excluded patients with pathologic, periprosthetic, or peri-implant fractures and those with missing data. Based on the fluids given, we divided patients into high-volume and low-volume groups. RESULTS: Patients with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and more comorbidities were more likely to receive more than 1500 ml of fluids. We observed significant differences in anesthesiologic management between the two groups, with a higher rate of invasive blood pressure management (IBP) and central venous catheter usage in the high-volume group. High-volume therapy was associated with a higher rate of complications (69.7% vs. 43.6%, p < 0.01), a higher transfusion rate (odds ratio 1.91 [1.26-2.91]), and an increased likelihood of patients being transferred to an intensive care unit (17.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.009). These findings were confirmed after adjusting for ASA grade, age, sex, type of fracture, Identification-of-Seniors-At-Risk (ISAR) score, and intraoperative blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that intraoperative fluid volume is a significant factor that impacts the outcome of hip fracture surgery in geriatric patients. High-volume therapy was associated with increased complications.

Spinal anesthesia with better outcome in geriatric hip fracture surgery - An analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

BACKGROUND: Literature shows conflicting results regarding spinal (SA) or general anesthesia (GA) and their influence on the outcome of elderly patients with hip fractures. We, therefore, conducted an analysis from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter registry study including patients aged 70 years or above with hip fractures requiring surgery from 131 Centers for Geriatric Trauma (AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®) from 2016 to 2021. Patients with SA or GA were compared using matched-pair analysis and linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 43,714 patients were included, of whom 3,242 received SA. The median age was 85 (SA) and 84 years (GA). Adjustments for the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, sex, age, additional injuries, and anticoagulation resulted in a higher in-hospital (odds ratio (OR) 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07 - 1.61, p = 0.009) and 120 days mortality (OR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.1 - 1.95, p = 0.009) in the GA group. GA had a significant negative influence on walking ability seven days after surgery and on the quality of life (QoL). The length of hospital stay (LoS) was significantly shorter in the SA group. CONCLUSIONS: SA is associated with a higher survival rate, a better walking ability seven days after surgery, a higher QoL, and a shorter LoS.

Surgical Management and Outcomes following Pathologic Hip Fracture-Results from a Propensity Matching Analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society.

Background and Objectives: The outcomes of patients with pathologic hip fractures remain unclear. Data from a large international geriatric trauma registry were analyzed to examine the outcomes of patients with pathologic hip fractures compared with patients with typical osteoporotic hip fractures. Materials and Methods: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)) (ATR-DGU) were analyzed. All patients treated surgically for osteoporotic or pathologic hip fractures were included in this analysis. Across both fracture types, a 2:1 optimal propensity score matching and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted. In-house mortality rate and mortality at the 120-day follow-up, as well as mobility after 7 and 120 days, reoperation rate, discharge management from the hospital and readmission rate to the hospital until the 120-day follow-up were analyzed as outcome parameters for the underlying fracture type-pathologic or osteoporotic. Results: A total of 29,541 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of the patients included, 29,330 suffered from osteoporotic fractures, and 211 suffered from pathologic fractures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed no differences between the two fracture types in terms of mortality during the acute hospital stay, reoperation during the initial acute hospital stay, walking ability after seven days and the likelihood of being discharged back home. Walking ability and hospital readmission remained insignificant at the 120-day follow-up as well. However, the odds of passing away within the first 120 days were significantly higher for patients suffering from pathologic hip fractures (OR: 3.07; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Surgical treatment of pathologic hip fractures was marked by a more frequent use of arthroplasty in per- and subtrochanteric fractures. Furthermore, the mortality rate among patients suffering from pathologic hip fractures was elevated in the midterm. The complication rate, as indicated by the rate of readmission to the hospital and the necessity for reoperation, remained unaffected.

Impact of 2 different posterior screw fixation techniques on primary stability in a cervical translational injury model: A biomechanical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: In case of injuries to the subaxial cervical spine, especially in osteoporotic bone, the question of the most stable operative technique arises. There are several techniques of screw fixation available regarding dorsal stabilization. This study investigates 2 techniques (lateral mass screws (LMS) vs cervical pedicle screws (CPS)) in the subaxial cervical spine regarding primary stability in a biomechanical testing using a translational injury model. METHODS: A total of 10 human formalin fixed and 10 human fresh-frozen specimens (C 4 - T 1) were investigated. Specimens were randomized in 2 groups. Fracture generation of a luxation injury between C 5 and C 6 was created by a transection of all ligamentous structures as well as the intervertebral disc and a resection of the facet joints.Dorsal stabilization of C 4/C 5 to C 6/C 7 was performed in group A by lateral mass screws, in group B by pedicle screws. In the biomechanical testing, the specimens were loaded at 2 N/s in translation direction until implant failure. RESULTS: Formalin fixed specimen: Mean load failure was 513.8 (±86.74) Newton (N) for group A (LMS) and 570.4 (±156.5) N for group B (CPS). There was no significant difference (P = .6905).Fresh frozen specimen: Mean load failure was 402.3 (±96.4) N for group A (LMS) and 500.7 (±190.3) N for group B (CPS). There was no significant difference (P = .4206). CONCLUSION: In our loading model respecting the translational injury pattern and a flexion movement we could not verify statistically significant differences between lateral mass screws and cervical pedicle screws. Mean loading failure was slightly higher in the CPS group though.

Is cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation with partially threaded screws superior to that with fully threaded screws concerning compression and pull-out force in fragility fractures of the sacrum? - a biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND: Providing a stable osteosynthesis in fragility fractures of the pelvis can be challenging. Cement augmentation increases screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. Generating interfragmentary compression by using a lag screw also improves the stability. However, it is not known if interfragmentary compression can be achieved in osteoporotic sacral bone by cement augmentation of lag screws. The purpose of this study was to compare cement-augmented sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis using partially versus fully threaded screws in osteoporotic hemipelvises concerning compression of fracture gap and pull-out force. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric pelvises with osteoporosis were used. In all specimens, one side was treated with an augmented fully threaded screw (group A), and the other side with an augmented partially threaded screw (group B) after generating a vertical osteotomy on both sides of each sacrum. Afterwards, first a compression test with fracture gap measurement after tightening of the screws was performed, followed by an axial pull-out test measuring the maximum pull-out force of the screws. RESULTS: The fracture gap was significantly wider in group A (mean: 1.90 mm; SD: 1.64) than in group B (mean: 0.91 mm; SD: 1.03; p = 0.028). Pull-out force was higher in group A (mean: 1696 N; SD: 1452) than in group B (mean: 1616 N; SD: 824), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.767). CONCLUSIONS: Cement augmentation of partially threaded screws in sacroiliac screw fixation allows narrowing of the fracture gap even in osteoporotic bone, while resistance against pull-out force is not significantly lower in partially threaded screws compared to fully threaded screws.

Which factors influence treatment decision in fragility fractures of the pelvis? - results of a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to describe specific characteristics of patients suffering from pelvic fragility fractures and evaluate factors that might influence treatment decisions which may optimize treatment pathways and patient mobility in the future. METHODS: A prospective study with patients suffering from fractures of the pelvis and aged 60 years or above was performed between 2012 and 2016. Data acquisition took place at admission, every day during hospitalization and at discharge. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients (mean age of 79.93 (± 7.67) years), predominantly female (84%), were included. Eighty-six patients were treated non-operatively. Forty-eight patients underwent a surgical procedure. The main fracture types were B2 fractures (52.24%) and FFP IIb fractures (39.55%). At the time of discharge, pain level (NRS) could be significantly reduced (p <  0.001). Patients who underwent a surgical procedure had a significantly higher pain level on day three and four compared to the non-operative group (p = 0.032 and p = 0.023, respectively). Significant differences were found in the mobility level: patients treated operatively on day four or later were not able to stand or walk on day three as compared to non-operatively treated patients. Regarding B2 fractures, a significantly higher mobility level difference between time of admission and discharge was found in patients treated with a surgical procedure compared to patients treated non-operatively (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Fracture type, mobility level and pain level influence the decision to proceed with surgical treatment. Especially patients suffering from B2 fractures benefitted in terms of mobility level at discharge when treated operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Early Surgery Does Not Improve Outcomes for Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Results from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society.

Background and Objectives: Appropriate timing of surgery for periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) in geriatric patients remains unclear. Data from a large international geriatric trauma register were analyzed to examine the outcome of patients with PFF with respect to the timing of surgical stabilization. Materials and Methods: The Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)) (ATR-DGU) was analyzed. Patients treated surgically for PFF were included in this analysis. As outcome parameters, in-house mortality rate and mortality at the 120-day follow-up as well as mobility, the EQ5D index score and reoperation rate were analyzed in relation to early (<48 h) or delayed (≥48 h) surgical stabilization. Results: A total of 1178 datasets met the inclusion criteria; 665 fractures were treated with osteosynthesis (56.4%), and 513 fractures were treated by implant change (43.5%). In contrast to the osteosynthesis group, the group with implant changes underwent delayed surgical treatment more often. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of mortality rate (p = 0.310), walking ability (p = 0.239) and EQ5D index after seven days (p = 0.812) revealed no significant differences between early (<48 h) and delayed (≥48 h) surgical stabilization. These items remained insignificant at the follow-up as well. However, the odds of requiring a reoperation within 120 days were significantly higher for delayed surgical treatment (OR: 1.86; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Early surgical treatment did not lead to decreased mortality rates in the acute phase or in the midterm. Except for the rate of reoperation, all other outcome parameters remained unaffected. Nevertheless, for most patients, early surgical treatment should be the goal, so as to achieve early mobilization and avoid secondary nonsurgical complications. If early stabilization is not possible, it can be assumed that orthogeriatric co-management will help protect these patients from further harm.

Pull-out strength evaluation of cement augmented iliac screws in osteoporotic spino-pelvic fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Spino-pelvic fixation has been widely accepted for surgical treatment of sacral tumor, scoliosis surgery and pelvic fractures. Cement augmentation of screws is an option to improve implant stability in osteoporotic bone quality. Aim of the present study is to compare iliac screw fixation without cement fixation and two cement application options in a biomechanical testing. HYPOTHESIS: Cement augmentation of iliac screws leads to superior pull-out strength. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty female and osteoporotic human iliac bones were used. Three operation treatment groups were generated: Screw fixation (cannulated screws) without cement augmentation [Operation treatment (OT) A], screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement (cannulated screws) (OT B) and screw fixation with perforated screws and cement augmentation after screw placement (OTC). Pull-out tests were performed with a rate of 6mm/min. A load versus displacement curve was generated. Maximum pull-out force (N) was measured in the load-displacement curve. RESULTS: Paired group 1 (OT A vs. OT B): Screw fixation without cement augmentation: 592.6N±335.07 and screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 996N±287.43 (p=0.0042). Paired group 2 (OT A vs. OT C): screw fixation without cement augmentation: 716.2N±385.86 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1324.88N±398.76 (p=0.0489). Paired group 3 (OT B vs. OT C): Screw fixation with cement augmentation before screw placement: 1077.2±486.66 and fenestrated screw fixation with cement augmentation after screw placement: 1298.2N±726.19 (p=0.3286). DISCUSSION: Regarding iliac screw fixation for spino-pelvic ostesynthesis in osteoporotic bone, cement augmentation is significantly superior to solid iliac screw fixation respecting pull-out-strength. Nevertheless, further biomechanical studies are needed to verify these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable; biomechanical cadaver study.

Team-based learning for teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound skills: a prospective randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective randomised trial was to assess the impact of the team-based learning approach on basic musculoskeletal ultrasound skills in comparison to both peer-assisted and conventional teaching and to examine the influence of gender and learning style on learning outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective randomised trial, we randomly assigned 88 students to 3 groups: team-based learning (n = 19), peer-assisted learning (n = 36) and conventional teaching (n = 33). Pre-existing knowledge was assessed using a multiple-choice (MC) exam. Student performance after completing the course was measured using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and a second MC exam. Students were asked to complete Kolb's Learning Style Inventory and to evaluate the course. RESULTS: There was a significant gain in theoretical knowledge for all students (p < 0.001). The team-based learning groups' performance proved to be significantly superior on the OSCE (p = 0.001). As gender had no significant effect on practical or theoretical performance, learning style was linked to differences in the practical outcome. An evaluation showed overall satisfaction with the course and with the respective teaching methods. CONCLUSION: Team-based learning proved to be superior to peer-assisted and conventional teaching of musculoskeletal ultrasound skills.

More than a reposition tool: additional wire cerclage leads to increased load to failure in plate osteosynthesis for supracondylar femoral shaft fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures can be challenging. An additional wire cerclage is a suggested way to facilitate fracture reduction prior to plate osteosynthesis. Denudation to the periosteum remains a problematic disadvantage of this procedure. This study analyzed the effect of an additional wire cerclage on the load to failure in plate osteosynthesis of oblique supracondylar femoral shaft fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On eight pairs of non-osteoporotic human femora (mean age 74 years; range 57-95 years), an unstable AO/OTA 32-A2.3 fracture was established. All specimens were treated with a polyaxially locking plate. One femur of each pair was randomly selected to receive an additional fracture fixation with a wire cerclage. A servohydraulic testing machine was used to perform an incremental cyclic axial load with a load to the failure mode. RESULTS: Specimens stabilized with solely plate osteosynthesis failed at a mean load of 2450 N (95% CI: 1996-2904 N). In the group with an additional wire cerclage, load to failure was at a mean of 3100 N (95% CI: 2662-3538 N) (p = 0.018). Compression deformation with shearing of the condyle region through cutting of screws out of the condylar bone was the most common reason for failure in both groups of specimens. Whereas axial stiffness was comparable between both groups (p = 0.208), plastic deformation of the osteosynthesis constructs differed significantly (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: An additional wire cerclage significantly increased the load to failure. Therefore, an additional cerclage represents more than just a repositioning aid. With appropriate fracture morphology, a cerclage can significantly improve the strength of the osteosynthesis.

Cement augmentation of an angular stable plate osteosynthesis for supracondylar femoral fractures - biomechanical investigation of a new fixation device.

BACKGROUND: Implant anchorage in highly osteoporotic bone is challenging, since it often leads to osteosynthesis failure in geriatric patients with supracondylar femoral fractures. Cementation of screws is presumed to prevent such osteosynthesis failure. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed, cementable fenestrated condylar screw for plate fixation in a biomechanical setting. METHODS: Eight pairs of osteoporotic cadaver femora with an average age of 77 years, ranging between 62 and 88 years, were randomly assigned to either an augmented or a non-augmented group. In both groups an instable 33-A3 fracture according to the AO / OTA classification was fixed with an angular stable locking plate. All right samples received a cement augmentation of their fenestrated condylar screws with calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC). Mechanical testing was performed at a load to failure mode by cyclic axial loading, using a servohydraulic testing machine. RESULTS: With a mean of 2475 N (95% CI: 1727-3223 N), the pressure forces resulting in osteosynthesis failure were significantly higher in specimen with cemented condylar screws as compared to non-cemented samples (1875 N (95% CI: 1320-2430 N)) (p = 0.024). In both groups the deformation of the constructs, with the distal screws cutting through the condylar bone, were the most frequent cause for failure. Analysis of axial stiffness (p = 0.889) and irreversible deformity of the specimens revealed no differences between the both groups (p = 0.161). No cement leakage through the joint line or the medial cortex was observed. CONCLUSION: Based on the present study results, the newly introduced, cementable condylar screw could be an encouraging feature for the fixation of supracondylar femoral fractures in patients with reduced bone quality in terms of load to failure accuracy of the cement application.

Short stems have lower load at failure than double-wedged stems in a cadaveric cementless fracture model.

OBJECTIVES: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) have a higher incidence with cementless stems. The highest incidence among various cementless stem types was observed with double-wedged stems. Short stems have been introduced as a bone-preserving alternative with a higher incidence of PFF in some studies. The purpose of this study was a direct load-to-failure comparison of a double-wedged cementless stem and a short cementless stem in a cadaveric fracture model. METHODS: Eight hips from four human cadaveric specimens (age mean 76 years (60 to 89)) and eight fourth-generation composite femurs were used. None of the cadaveric specimens had compromised quality (mean T value 0.4 (-1.0 to 5.7)). Each specimen from a pair randomly received either a double-wedged stem or a short stem. A materials testing machine was used for lateral load-to-failure test of up to a maximal load of 5000 N. RESULTS: Mean load at failure of the double-wedged stem was 2540 N (1845 to 2995) and 1867 N (1135 to 2345) for the short stem (p < 0.001). All specimens showed the same fracture pattern, consistent with a Vancouver B2 fracture. The double-wedged stem was able to sustain a higher load than its short-stemmed counterpart in all cases. Failure force was not correlated to the bone mineral density (p = 0.718). CONCLUSION: Short stems have a significantly lower primary load at failure compared with double-wedged stems in both cadaveric and composite specimens. Surgeons should consider this biomechanical property when deciding on the use of short femoral stem.Cite this article: A. Klasan, M. Bäumlein, P. Dworschak, C. Bliemel, T. Neri, M. D. Schofer, T. J. Heyse. Short stems have lower load at failure than double-wedged stems in a cadaveric cementless fracture model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:489-494. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0051.R1.

The Aachen Falls Prevention Scale: Multi-Study Evaluation and Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Fall risk assessment is a time-consuming and resource-intensive activity. Patient-driven self-assessment as a preventive measure might be a solution to reduce the number of patients undergoing a full clinical fall risk assessment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was (1) to analyze test accuracy of the Aachen Falls Prevention Scale (AFPS) and (2) to compare these results with established fall risk assessment measures identified by a review of systematic reviews. METHODS: Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating curves (ROC) of the AFPS were calculated based on data retrieved from 2 independent studies using the AFPS. Comparison with established fall risk assessment measures was made by conducting a review of systematic reviews and corresponding meta-analysis. Electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that reviewed fall risk assessment measures between the years 2000 and 2018. The review of systematic reviews was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. The Revised Assessment of Multiple SysTemAtic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) was used to assess the methodological quality of reviews. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC were extracted from each review and compared with the calculated values of the AFPS. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC of the AFPS were evaluated based on 2 studies including a total of 259 older adults. Regarding the primary outcome of the AFPS subjective risk of falling, pooled sensitivity is 57.0% (95% CI 0.467-0.669) and specificity is 76.7% (95% CI 0.694-0.831). If 1 out of the 3 subscales of the AFPS is used to predict a fall risk, pooled sensitivity could be increased up to 90.0% (95% CI 0.824-0.951), whereas mean specificity thereby decreases to 50.0% (95% CI 0.42-0.58). A systematic review for fall risk assessment measures produced 1478 articles during the study period, with 771 coming from PubMed, 530 from Web of Science, and 177 from EMBASE. After eliminating doublets and assessing full text, 8 reviews met the inclusion criteria. All were of sufficient methodological quality (R-AMSTAR score ≥22). A total number of 9 functional or multifactorial fall risk assessment measures were extracted from identified reviews, including Timed Up and Go test, Berg Balance Scale, Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, St Thomas's Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly, and Hendrich II Fall Risk Model. Comparison of these measures with pooled sensitivity and specificity of the AFPS revealed a sufficient quality of the AFPS in terms of a patient-driven self-assessment tool. CONCLUSIONS: It could be shown that the AFPS reaches a test accuracy comparable with that of the established methods in this initial investigation. However, it offers the advantage that the users can perform the self-assessment independently at home without involving trained health care professionals.

Development of the Barthel Index 5 years after hip fracture: Results of a prospective study.

AIM: The importance of proximal femoral fractures is increasing due to demographic change. Despite appropriate care, these are associated with poor results. We are still lagging behind, and require information on the long-term functional outcome of these patients and the predictive factors involved. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 402 patients aged >60 years with hip fractures were included in this prospective observational study. Patients were assessed with the Barthel Index before fracture, at discharge, and 6 months, 1 year and 5 years after surgery. In addition, a variety of parameters (sex, age, fracture type, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Mini-Mental State Examination, housing situation, occurrence of complications during inpatient stay and type of care) were collected to identify the possible independent predictive factors using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The lowest Barthel Index was found at discharge (66 ± 24) for patients from an acute hospital. The Barthel Index improved within the first 6 months (86 ± 21) and decreased afterwards. The factors associated with a significantly higher point loss of the Barthel Index in the multivariate analysis were age (P-value 0.020), pre-fracture Barthel Index, (P ≤ 0.001), Mini-Mental State Examination (P ≤ 0.001) and type II complications (P = 0.001). The other values showed no significant influence on the Barthel Index. CONCLUSIONS: The present results showed that patients after a hip fracture have a great rehabilitation potential within the first 6 months after the event. More attention should be paid to type II complications and the occurrence of cognitive impairment. Both seem to be a surrogate parameter for the frailty of the patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 809-814.

Cementing of the hip arthroplasty stem increases load-to-failure force: a cadaveric study.

Background and purpose - To date, there is not a single clinical or mechanical study directly comparing a cemented and a cementless version of the same stem. We investigated the load-to-failure force of a cementless and a cemented version of a double tapered stem. Material and methods - 10 femurs from 5 human cadaveric specimens, mean age 74 years (68-79) were extracted. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. None of the specimens had a compromised quality (average T value 0.0, -1.0 to 1.4). Each specimen from a pair randomly received a cemented or a cementless version of the same stem. A material testing machine was used for lateral load-to-failure test of up to a maximal load of 5.0 kN. Results - Average load-to-failure of the cemented stem was 2.8 kN (2.3-3.2) and 2.2 kN (1.8-2.8) for the cementless stem (p = 0.002). The cemented version of the stem sustained a higher load than its cementless counterpart in all cases. Failure force was not statistically significantly correlated to BMD (p = 0.07). Interpretation - Implanting a cemented version of the stem increases the load-to-failure force by 25%.

[A minimally invasive technique for removal of a firmly fixed Küntscher nail in primary hip arthroplasty]. / Eine minimalinvasive Technik zur Entfernung eines fest verklemmten Küntscher-Nagels in der primären Hüftendoprothetik.

This article reports the case of an 80-year-old male patient who presented to this hospital with symptomatic arthritis of the left hip. The special feature of this case was a Küntscher nail in the left femur that had been in situ for more than 50 years. Before implantation of the total hip arthroplasty the nail first had to be removed. As the Küntscher nail is a rarity nowadays there is no standardized procedure for the removal of such a nail. This case report describes a minimally invasive possibility to remove a Küntscher nail in total hip arthroplasty.