Herpes Simplex Virus Dacryoadenitis Preceding Skin Vesicles.

Herpes simplex virus involvement of the orbit is rare. We report the case of an immunocompetent patient who presented with preseptal edema, erythema, decreased vision, and dacryoadenitis prior to the appearance of vesicular skin lesions and in the absence of corneal dendrites. The patient's clinical picture failed to improve on empiric therapy with intravenous antibiotics. The patient subsequently developed skin vesicles and a nucleic acid amplification swab of the ocular surface was positive for herpes simplex virus-1. The patient demonstrated rapid clinical improvement after initiation of oral antivirals. This is an unusual case of presumed herpes simplex virus dacryoadenitis preceding skin vesicles in an immunocompetent patient.

Antibiotic utilization in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a multi-institutional study and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Utilization of antibiotics for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) is largely dependent on individual surgeon preference. This study aimed to investigate prescribing practices of pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics and effects on postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent endo-DCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of institutional data at two academic centers of endo-DCR cases from 2015-2020 was performed. Postoperative infection rates for patients who received pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics, individually or in combination, and those who did not, were compared via odds ratio and ANOVA linear regression. RESULTS: 331 endo-DCR cases were included; 22 cases (6.6%) had a postoperative infection. There was no significant difference in the infection rates between patients without an active preoperative dacryocystitis who received different permutations of peri- and postoperative antibiotics. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics within two weeks of surgery for preexisting acute dacryocystitis, but did not receive peri- or postoperative antibiotics, had a higher rate of postoperative infections (p = 008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest antibiotics may be beneficial only when patients have a recent or active dacryocystitis prior to surgery. Otherwise, our data do not support the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in endo-DCR.

In vivo analysis of endocanalicular light pipe transillumination in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Anatomic considerations and cautions for the transitioning.

PURPOSE: Localization of the lacrimal sac is a critical step during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR). A "light pipe" can be used to transilluminate the lacrimal sac endonasally. We hypothesized that this may misguide the surgeon learning endo-DCR to create an osteotomy mostly posterior to the maxillary line if only the bone overlying the transillumination was to be removed, as the thinner lacrimal bone will transmit light more readily than the thicker maxillary bone of the frontal process of the maxilla that forms the anterior lacrimal sac fossa. METHODS: The charts of 32 patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in whom a lighted system was used during endo-DCR at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from April 2015 through October 2016 were reviewed. Patients with prior history of lacrimal surgery or trauma directly to the lacrimal sac fossa were excluded. Location of the maximal point of transillumination in relation to the maxillary line was observed and noted intraoperatively. RESULTS: Of a total of 39 endo-DCR surgeries performed, the intraoperative transillumination point was entirely posterior to the maxillary line in 32 instances (82%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an endocanalicular light pipe preferentially illuminates posterior to the maxillary line endonasally. The anterior lacrimal sac fossa (maxillary line and anterior as visualized endonasally) is rarely transilluminated, likely due to thicker bone in that region. Surgeons learning how to perform endo-DCR using a light pipe should be aware of this phenomenon.

Unilateral Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: Clinical Profile and Pathology.

We report a case of a newborn with unilateral retinal detachment that could not be repaired. At examination under anesthesia, the retina was markedly abnormal and a presumptive diagnosis of retinal dysplasia was made. Several years later, the eye was enucleated because it was blind and painful. Final pathology was consistent with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). The literature describing unilateral retinal dysplasia is sparse. This case adds to the clinical spectrum of pathologic findings in FEVR.

Clinical Features Differentiating Benign From Malignant Conjunctival Tumors in Children.

IMPORTANCE: Conjunctival tumors in children are usually benign and rarely malignant. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical features of conjunctival tumors in children by comparing benign tumors with their malignant counterparts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series reviewed 806 cases of conjunctival tumor in children (aged <21 years) who were evaluated at a tertiary referral center between November 1, 1975, and July 1, 2015. This study included 262 children who were part of a published review. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Features of benign and malignant tumors were compared. Data were collected on patient demographics, tumor features, and specific diagnoses to determine findings related to each tumor. RESULTS: Among the 806 patients with conjunctival tumor, the top 5 diagnoses included nevus (492 [61%]), benign reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (BRLH) (38 [5%]), nodular conjunctivitis (31 [4%]), dermoid (30 [4%]), and primary acquired melanosis (27 [3%]). Overall, conjunctival tumors were benign (779 [97%]) or malignant (27 [3%]), including melanoma (18 [2.2%]) and lymphoma (9 [1.1%]). The mean age at detection was 11 years for benign tumors and 14 years for malignant tumors (P = .005), with mean difference of 3 years (95% CI, 1.2-4.6). The relative frequency of any malignancy (per all conjunctival tumors) by age bracket (0-5 years, >5-10 years, >10-15 years, and >15-<21 years) was 1%, 2%, 3%, and 7%, respectively. A comparison between nevus and melanoma found differences with melanoma in the 10 to 15 years age bracket (29% vs 61%; difference of 32% [95% CI, 10%-55%]; P = .006), mean tumor thickness (1.1 mm vs 1.5 mm; difference of 0.4 mm [95% CI, -0.29 mm to 1.12 mm]; P = .04), tumor base of 10 mm or greater (relative risk [RR] = 4.92; 95% CI, 1.73-13.97; P = .003), tumor hemorrhage (RR = 25.30; 95% CI, 11.91-53.78; P < .001), and lack of intrinsic cysts (RR = 5.06; 95% CI, 1.84-13.98; P = .002). A comparison between BRLH and lymphoma revealed lymphoma with a larger base (RR = 5.16; 95% CI, 1.19- 22.19; P = .002) and diffuse location (RR = 16.50; 95% CI, 4.31-63.22; P < .001) and inferior (RR = 12.38; 95% CI, 2.88-53.16; P < .001) or superior vs nasal (RR = 8.25; 95% CI, 1.56-43.51; P = .01). The small cohort of malignant lesions precluded determining if these features were independent of one another. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These data, from an ocular tertiary referral center, suggest that conjunctival tumors in children are nearly always benign. The few malignant tumors included melanoma and lymphoma. Melanoma, compared with nevus, was associated with older children (aged >10-15 years) with larger tumor, hemorrhage, and lack of cyst. Lymphoma, compared with BRLH, was associated with larger size and diffuse involvement.

Conjunctival Tumors in 5002 Cases. Comparative Analysis of Benign Versus Malignant Counterparts. The 2016 James D. Allen Lecture.

PURPOSE: To evaluate frequency of conjunctival tumors in all ages and compare benign vs malignant counterparts. DESIGN: Retrospective series. METHODS: setting: Tertiary referral center. STUDY POPULATION: Total of 5002 patients. OBSERVATION: Clinical features. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Differentiation of benign from malignant counterparts. RESULTS: The tumor was benign (52%), premalignant (18%), or malignant (30%). Malignant tumors included melanoma (12%), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (9%), lymphoma (7%), and others. Comparison of primary acquired melanosis vs melanoma revealed melanoma with greater median patient age (54 vs 61 years, P < .0001), male sex (35% vs 49%, P < .0001), location in fornix (2% vs 6%, P = .0016) and tarsus (1% vs 4%, P = .0018), larger median basal diameter (6 vs 8 mm, P < .0001) and thickness (<1 vs 1 mm, P < .0001), and intralesional cysts (0% vs 7%, P < .0001), feeder vessels (10% vs 48%, P < .0001), intrinsic vessels (4% vs 33%, P < .0001), and hemorrhage (<1% vs 3%, P = .0001). Comparison of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) vs SCC revealed SCC with greater diffuse involvement (1% vs 8%, P < .0001) and larger median basal diameter (7 vs 8 mm, P < .0001) and thickness (1 mm vs 2 mm, P < .0001). Comparison of benign reactive lymphoid hyperplasia vs lymphoma revealed lymphoma with greater median patient age (50 vs 61 years, P < .0001), fornix location (32% vs 54%, P < .0001), larger median basal diameter (10 vs 20 mm, P < .0001), and less involvement of nasal region (50% vs 23%, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In an ocular oncology practice, conjunctival tumors are benign (52%), premalignant (18%), or malignant (30%). Malignant tumors tend to occur in older patients and demonstrate greater basal diameter and thickness, compared with benign counterparts.