Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiofármacos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Radioisótopos de Itrio/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos de Itrio/efectos adversosRESUMEN
This case series describes a technique to protect nondiseased liver parenchyma during transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using microvascular plugs to occlude nontarget vessels temporarily and protect normal liver. This technique, defined as temporary vascular occlusion, was performed in 6 patients, with complete vessel occlusion obtained in 5 of the 6 patients and partial occlusion with flow reduction in 1 of the 6 patients. A statistically significant (P = .001) dose decrease of 5.7 ± 3.1 times was measured using postadministration yttrium-90 positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the protected zone compared with that in the treated zone.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Radioisótopos de Itrio/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether quantitative enhancement or perfusion measurements on preprocedure triphasic computed tomography (CT) can be used to predict response or overall survival after embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective review of 63 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with particle embolization between March 2009 and December 2014. Quantitative enhancement and perfusion measurements were performed on the target tumor and the background liver on the triphasic CT performed before treatment. Microvascular invasion (MVI) and degree of differentiation were determined from a core biopsy specimen. Quantitative enhancement and perfusion values were then correlated with pathology (two-tailed t test), response to embolization on modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (two-tailed t test), and overall survival after embolization (Cox proportional hazards model). RESULTS: Arterial enhancement did not predict immediate response or overall survival after embolization. The degree of differentiation or presence of MVI also did not predict immediate response or overall survival after embolization. However, high hepatic artery coefficient or low portal vein coefficient, both in the tumor (P = .011 and P = .004) and in the background liver (P = .015 and P = .009), were associated with worse survival. Hepatic artery coefficient, both in the tumor (P = .025) and in the background liver (P = .013), were independent predictors of survival in a multivariate model including the Child-Pugh score and the BCLC stage. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor and liver perfusion parameters estimated from preprocedure triphasic CT were predictive of survival after embolization. Arterial-phase enhancement and histology (degree of differentiation or MVI) did not predict immediate response or overall survival after particle embolization.