Changing from preserved, to preservative-free cyclosporine 0.1% enhanced triple glaucoma therapy: impact on ocular surface disease-a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Halting and reversing glaucoma therapy-related ocular surface disease (GTR-OSD) will improve the success of long-term medical therapy, impacting millions of patients worldwide. METHODS: A single-centre, masked, prospective, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of 41 well-controlled open-angle glaucoma subjects with moderate to severe GTR-OSD on preserved latanoprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) therapy was conducted. Subjects were randomized to preservative-free (PF) tafluprost and DTFC with either placebo or cyclosporine 0.1% drops for 6 months and were then crossed over to the opposite therapy. Oxford score of ocular staining was the primary outcome; osmolarity, matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) testing, tear film break-up time (TFBUT), meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), punctum evaluation, adverse events and diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) comprised secondary outcomes. RESULTS: GTR-OSD findings improved with PF therapy. At 6 months the triple PF with placebo group showed improvement compared to baseline in mean Oxford score (mean difference [MD]:-3.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]:-4.74 to -2.77; p < 0.001), osmolarity (MD:-21.93; 95%CI:-27.61 to -16.24 mOsm/l; p < 0.001), punctum stenosis (p = 0.008) and conjunctival hyperaemia (p < 0.001). Similar improvements occurred in the cyclosporine enhanced period, which also provided greater improvement in MMP-9 positivity (24 vs 66%; p < 0.001) and TFBUT (p = 0.022). The cyclosporine group was superior vs placebo in mean Oxford score (MD:-0.78; 95%CI:-1.40 to -0.15); p < 0.001), itchiness and objective adverse events (p = 0.034). Cyclosporine elicited more stinging vs placebo (63 vs 24%; p < 0.001). Both PF regimens reduced mean diurnal IOP more than preserved therapy (14.7 vs 15.9 mmHg; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Changing from preserved to PF glaucoma medications improves ocular surface health and IOP control. Topical cyclosporine 0.1% further reverses GTR-OSD.

Emerging Treatment Modalities for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Overview.

INTRODUCTION: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) represents a leading cause of irreversible visual loss affecting the quality of life of millions of elderly patients worldwide. Although the introduction of intravitreal injections with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) agents has revolutionized the management of nAMD, their effectiveness and ultimate success are limited by several therapeutic challenges. Consequently, real-world efficacy appears significantly inferior to that reported by randomized controlled trials. Therefore, further innovative, long-term treatment options are essential to improve the prognosis and outcome of nAMD therapy. METHODS: Emerging pharmacological therapies for nAMD and those currently in clinical trials are reviewed and their mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy are discussed. The evidence presented herein has been collected from online databases PubMed, Cochrane library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov site. RESULTS: A number of promising technologies and novel anti-VEGF therapies are currently being tested and some have already reached phase III trials. Anti-VEGF agents with enhanced durability and possibly efficacy, gene therapy, angiogenic targets, alternative drug delivery routes such as sustained delivery implants, drug carriers, and encapsulated cell technology are currently being explored. We briefly discuss the potential value of these options. CONCLUSION: Several options may optimize future nAMD management. On the basis of current, albeit limited evidence, the most promising technology to reach clinical practice soon appears to be the sustained drug delivery options, which may improve visual outcome and reduce the socioeconomic burden of nAMD.

The treatment of glaucoma using topical preservative-free agents: an evaluation of safety and tolerability.

Introduction: Preservative-free (PF) medications represent a valuable treatment strategy in the lifelong management of glaucoma. By removing preservative toxicity, PF formulations provide tangible clinical benefits to glaucoma patients worldwide. They improve tolerability and adherence, leading to a positive impact in long-term intraocular pressure (IOP) control.Areas covered: A critical review of the subject is provided, including selected evidence on the safety and tolerability of currently available topical PF formulations. Cumulative evidence confirms that topical PF medications are at least equally efficacious to their preserved equivalents. There is convincing short-term evidence for superior tolerability and safety of PF formulations compared to preserved medications. The long-term benefits and success of PF therapy requires further elucidation.Expert opinion: Successful stepwise administration of medical therapy for glaucoma remains elusive. There is a greater risk for ocular toxicity and therapy failure with preserved topical glaucoma therapy. Currently available and emerging PF therapy options potentially optimize lifelong stepwise glaucoma therapy and may enhance outcome. To avert complications from preservatives leading to poor adherence, ideally, future antiglaucoma therapy should become 100% PF. There are still key aspects of PF therapy that warrant further investigation.

Correction to: 24-Hour Efficacy and Ocular Surface Health with Preservative-Free Tafluprost Alone and in Conjunction with Preservative-Free Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients Insufficiently Controlled with Preserved Latanoprost Monotherapy.

In the original article, the incorrect Open Access License type has been incuded.

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Everting Sutures with a Lateral Tarsal Strip for Involutional Lower Eyelid Entropion.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the anatomical and functional outcome and changes in the quality of life (QoL) over time of the lateral tarsal strip (LTS) versus the Quickert everting sutures (ES) for the repair of primary involutional lower eyelid entropion. METHODS: Forty-five patients (54 eyes) with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited in a prospective randomized clinical trial over 3-year period. Twenty-six eyes were randomized to the LTS technique and 28 to the ES procedure. Primary outcome was the anatomical correction of the eyelid at the final assessment in 1 year. Secondary outcomes were function and symptoms assessment with a QoL questionnaire at 6 months. Fisher's exact test was used for the statistical analysis of success rate and gender study and Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysis were used for age study. The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the analysis of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25). RESULTS: At the 6-month follow-up, 25 eyes (96.2%) of the LTS group and 20 (71.4%) of the ES group had favorable outcome (P = 0.025). There were one and eight eyes, respectively, with early recurrence. At the final 12-month evaluation, 23 eyes (88.5%) in the LTS group and 16 eyes (57.1%) in the ES group were successful. Three (11.5%) and 12 (42.9%) eyes respectively showed postoperative recurrence. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.015) for the primary outcome, whereas age and gender did not influence success. The NEI VFQ-25 showed statistically significant subjective improvement from baseline in most categories of the QoL. No significant difference between the two procedures was detected at 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the LTS procedure has a superior surgical success rate and reduction of symptoms compared with the ES for the repair of involutional lower eyelid entropion. Both procedures showed similar improvement of the postoperative QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identifier: ACTRN12616000620426.

Lack of Association of the rs11655081 ARSG Gene with Blepharospasm.

Blepharospasm (BSP) is a sub-phenotype of focal dystonia. A few genetic risk factors are considered to be implicated in the risk of developing BSP. There is recent evidence, based on results from GWAS and meta-analyses, to suggest that arylsulfatase G (ARSG), and more specifically rs11655081, is implicated in focal dystonia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of rs11655081 ARSG on BSP. A Greek cohort, which consisted of 206 BSP patients and an equal number of healthy controls, was genotyped for rs11655081. Only a marginal trend for the association between rs11655081 and the risk of BSP was found in the over-dominant model of inheritance [odds ratio, OR (95% confidence interval, CI): 0.64 (0.38-1.07), p = 0.088]. It is rather unlikely that rs11655081 across ARSG is a major genetic risk contributor for BSP.

BDNF rs6265 (Val66Met) Polymorphism as a Risk Factor for Blepharospasm.

A few genetic variants are implicated in the development of blepharospasm (BSP). The precise role of the rs6265 on the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene on BSP remains controversial. The effect of rs6265 on BSP was evaluated. 206 patients with BSP and 206 healthy controls were recruited and genotyped for the rs6265. We also performed a meta-analysis, by pooling our results with those from previous studies. A significant effect of rs6265 on the risk of BSP was found in the dominant model of inheritance [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52 (1.01-2.29), p = 0.044]. Mutational load analysis of rs6265 in the risk of BSP using the ORG revealed that higher load of the "A" allele of rs6265 denotes higher probability of a subject to develop BSP (ORG 1.48; 95% CI 1.00-2.19). Finally, pooled results from the meta-analysis revealed that the rs6265 is associated with an increased risk of BSP in the dominant model [OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.02-1.55, pz = 0.03]. Also, higher load of the "A" allele of rs6265 denotes higher probability of a subject to develop BSP (ORG 1.26; 95% CI 1.04-1.53). The present study provides additional evidence to the existing knowledge concerning the contribution of the rs6265 BDNF on the risk of developing BSP. While the pathophysiology and genetic susceptibility in BSP and focal dystonia are only partially understood, it seems that BDNF and rs6265 may constitute one essential risk factor that is heavily involved.

Evaluating the novel application of cyclosporine 0.1% in ocular surface disease.

INTRODUCTION: Ocular surface disease (OSD) is a highly prevalent symptomatic condition caused by dry eye disease (DED), intrinsic, environmental, or iatrogenic causes. It affects patient's visual function and quality of life. Its pathophysiology is centered on tear hyperosmolarity, inflammation, and epithelial damage. Current management is suboptimal and includes artificial tear supplementation and short-term use of topical steroids in severe cases. The recent approval of cyclosporine 0.1% has transformed management strategies of severe DED and moderate-to-severe OSD. Areas covered: This review summarizes existing information on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the new cyclosporine 0.1% formulation. Expert opinion: Topical cyclosporine A 0.1% represents a promising, novel medication for the management of DED, Meibomian gland dysfunction, and inflammatory OSD. It is primarily beneficial for those patients requiring topical immunomodulatory therapy. This topical formulation also has the potential to meaningfully improve the management of moderate-to-severe glaucoma therapy-related OSD. Currently there is limited published clinical data concerning the efficacy of topical cyclosporine. There are, however, theoretical advantages when comparing this cyclosporine formulation with other established commercial preparations. Future research is needed to delineate the precise role and value of this medication.

24-Hour Efficacy and Ocular Surface Health with Preservative-Free Tafluprost Alone and in Conjunction with Preservative-Free Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients Insufficiently Controlled with Preserved Latanoprost Monotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 24-h efficacy, tolerability, and ocular surface health with preservative-free (PF) tafluprost and a PF triple drug regimen comprising tafluprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in open-angle glaucoma patients who were insufficiently controlled with preserved branded or generic latanoprost monotherapy and who exhibited signs or symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD). METHODS: Prospective, observer-masked, crossover, comparison. Eligible consecutive open-angle glaucoma patients were randomized to either PF tafluprost or the triple PF regimen for 3 months. They were then crossed over to the opposite therapy for another 3 months. At the end of the latanoprost run-in period and after each PF treatment period, patients underwent habitual 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring with Goldmann tonometry in the sitting position (at 10:00, 14:00, 18:00, and 22:00) and Perkins tonometry in the supine position (at 02:00 and 06:00). Tolerability and selected ocular surface parameters were evaluated at baseline and the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Forty-three open-angle glaucoma patients completed the trial. Mean 24-h IOP on preserved latanoprost was 22.2 ± 3.9 mmHg. Compared with latanoprost monotherapy, PF tafluprost obtained a greater reduction in mean, peak, and fluctuation of 24-h IOP including the 02:00 and 06:00 time points (P < 0.05). With the exception of 24-h fluctuation, the triple PF regimen provided significantly lower IOP parameters than latanoprost or PF tafluprost (P < 0.001). Finally, PF tafluprost therapy displayed significantly improved tear film break-up times (6.7 vs 6.0 s), corneal staining (1.3 vs 2.2), and Schirmer I test results (9.1 vs 8.2 mm) compared with the preserved latanoprost baseline (all P < 0.01). The triple PF regimen demonstrated similar tear film break-up times (6.1 vs 6.0 s) and Schirmer I test results (8.2 vs 8.2 mm) to latanoprost, but revealed a significant improvement in the corneal stain test (1.7 vs 2.2; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial PF tafluprost therapy provided statistically greater 24-h efficacy and improved tolerability compared with preserved latanoprost. The combination of PF tafluprost and PF dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination was statistically and clinically more efficacious than both monotherapies and demonstrated similar ocular surface characteristics to preserved latanoprost monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02802137). FUNDING: Santen.

Critical Appraisal on Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review and Literature Search.

INTRODUCTION: Orbital decompression is the indicated procedure for addressing exophthalmos and compressive optic neuropathy in thyroid eye disease. There are an abundance of techniques for removal of orbital bone, fat, or a combination published in the scientific literature. The relative efficacy and complications of these interventions in relation to the specific indications remain as yet undocumented. We performed a systematic review of the current published evidence for the effectiveness of orbital decompression, possible complications, and impact on quality of life. METHODS: We searched the current databases for medical literature and controlled trials, oculoplastic textbooks, and conference proceedings to identify relevant data up to February 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more interventions for orbital decompression. RESULTS: We identified only two eligible RCTs for inclusion in the review. As a result of the significant variability between studies on decompression, i.e., methodology and outcome measures, we did not perform a meta-analysis. One study suggests that the transantral approach and endonasal technique had similar effects in reducing exophthalmos but the latter is safer. The second study provides evidence that intravenous steroids may be superior to primary surgical decompression in the management of compressive optic neuropathy requiring less secondary surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Most of the published literature on orbital decompression consists of retrospective, uncontrolled trials. There is evidence from those studies that removal of the medial and lateral wall (balanced) and the deep lateral wall decompression, with or without fat removal, may be the most effective surgical methods with only few complications. There is a clear unmet need for controlled trials evaluating the different techniques for orbital decompression. Ideally, future studies should address the effectiveness, possible complications, quality of life, and cost of each intervention.