Real-world anti-seizure treatment and adverse events among individuals living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how people living with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) navigate through lines of antiseizure medications (ASM) and experience adverse events (AEs) in the real-world setting in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with medical chart data from clinical practices in the United States. Eligible adults had a confirmed diagnosis of DRE and initiated a third-line ASM therapy between January 2013 and January 2020 (i.e., the index date). Subjects must have medical history data available for ≥1 year prior to (the baseline) and ≥2 years after the index date (the follow-up). Treatment patterns were captured from first to fourth lines. After the emergence of drug resistance, time to ASM discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, AE experience and AE management were reported separately during third and fourth lines of treatment and beyond. RESULTS: The study included a total of 345 individuals, with an average (standard deviation) age of 23.9 (11.9) years at first diagnosis. All individuals had at least three lines of ASMs with first and second lines during baseline, and third line during follow-up. The first line for most individuals was monotherapy. As individuals progressed through additional lines of ASM therapy, they were more likely to receive polytherapy. The regimens were more individualized after meeting drug resistance criteria. The top reasons for discontinuing were uncontrolled seizure and/or intolerance/AEs for both third and subsequent lines. More than a third of individuals experienced at least one AE. Among those with at least one AE, many individuals had to manage these AEs with dose adjustment (39.4%), discontinuation of offending ASM (37.9%), de novo pharmacotherapy (25.8%), emergency room visit (13.6%), and hospitalization (12.1%). SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that individuals living with DRE experience significant AEs, and many of these AEs lead to treatment disruption and significant healthcare resource utilization. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study examined how individuals with focal epilepsy are treated across various clinics in United States and reported the adverse events these individuals experienced during treatment, along with the consequence associated with these adverse events. We found that as individuals progressed through additional treatments, they were more and more likely to receive more than one antiseizure medication, and a significant portion of individuals experienced at least one adverse event, often manifested as headache, somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.

Assessing the use of anti-PD1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy and determinants of treatment choice in stage III cutaneous melanoma in the US.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe real-world adjuvant therapy (AT) use by disease substage and assess determinants of treatment choice among patients with stage III melanoma. METHODS: This non-interventional retrospective study included survey responses and data from patient records provided by US medical oncologists. Survey responses, patient demographic/clinical characteristics, treatment utilization, and reasons for treatment were reported descriptively. The association between patient and disease characteristics and AT selection was assessed using logistic and multinomial regression models, overall and stratified by AJCC8 substage (IIIA vs. IIIB/C/D) and type of AT received (anti-PD1 monotherapy, BRAF/MEK, no AT), respectively. RESULTS: In total 152 medical oncologists completed the survey and reviewed the charts of 507 patients (168 stage IIIA; 339 stages IIIB/IIIC/IIID); 405 (79.9%) patients received AT (360/405 (88.9%) received anti-PD1 therapy; 45/405 (11.1%) received BRAF/MEK therapy). Physicians reported clinical guidelines (61.2%), treatment efficacy (37.5%), and ECOG performance status (31.6%) as drivers of AT prescription. Patient-level data confirmed that improving patient outcomes (79%) was the main reason for anti-PD1 prescription; expected limited treatment benefit (37%), patient refusal (36%), and toxicity concerns (30%) were reasons for not prescribing AT. In multivariable analyses stage IIIB/IIIC/IIID disease significantly increased the probability of receiving AT (odds ratio [OR] 1.74) and anti-PD1 therapy (OR 1.82); ECOG 2/3 and Medicaid/no insurance decreased the probability of AT receipt (OR 0.37 and 0.42, respectively) and anti-PD1 therapy (OR 0.41 and 0.42, respectively) among all patients and patients with stage IIIA disease. CONCLUSION: Most patients were given AT with a vast majority treated with an anti-PD1 therapy. Physician- and patient-level evidence confirmed the impact of disease substage on AT use, with stage IIIA patients, patients without adequate insurance coverage, and worse ECOG status having a lower probability of receiving AT.

Gastrointestinal manifestations in pediatric and adult patients with Rett syndrome: an analysis of US claims and physician survey data.

Aim: Patients with Rett syndrome (RTT) experience gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of GI manifestations and the associated medical costs in patients with RTT in the USA. Patients & Methods: The study combined an insurance claims database analysis with a survey of 100 physicians experienced in RTT management. Results: GI manifestations affected 43.0% of 5940 patients, with increased prevalence in pediatric patients (45.6%) relative to adult patients (40.2%). Annualized mean medical cost of managing GI manifestations was $4473. Only 5.9-8.2% of neurologists and pediatricians ranked GI symptom management among the five most important treatment goals. Conclusion: Patients with RTT experience a high burden of GI manifestations, which translate to considerable medical costs. Importantly, the prevalence of GI manifestations was likely underestimated in this study, as only those symptoms which resulted in a healthcare encounter were captured.

Real-world clinical management of individuals with Rett syndrome: a physician survey.

BACKGROUND: Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder. Management strategies are heterogeneous with no clear definition of success. This study describes physician decision-making regarding diagnosis, therapeutic goals, and management strategies to better understand RTT clinical management in the US. METHODS: This study was conducted among practicing physicians, specifically neurologists and pediatricians in the US with experience treating ≥2 individuals with RTT, including ≥1 individuals within the past two years. In-depth interviews with five physicians informed survey development. A cross-sectional survey was then conducted among 100 physicians. RESULTS: Neurologists had treated more individuals with RTT (median: 12 vs. 5, p < 0.001) than pediatricians throughout their career and were more likely to report being "very comfortable" managing RTT (31 vs. 4%, p < 0.001). Among physicians with experience diagnosing RTT (93%), most evaluated symptoms (91%) or used genetic testing (86%) for RTT diagnoses; neurologists used the 2010 consensus diagnostic criteria more than pediatricians (54 vs. 29%; p = 0.012). Improving the quality of life (QOL) of individuals with RTT was the most important therapeutic goal among physicians, followed by improving caregivers' QOL. Most physicians used clinical practice guidelines to monitor the progress of individuals with RTT, although neurologists relied more on clinical scales than pediatricians. Among all physicians, the most commonly treated symptoms included behavioral issues, epilepsy/seizures, and feeding issues. Management strategies varied by symptom, with referral to appropriate specialists being common across symptoms. A large proportion of physicians (37%) identified the lack of novel therapies and reliance on symptom-specific management as an unmet need. CONCLUSION: Although most physicians had experience and were comfortable diagnosing and treating individuals with RTT, better education and support among pediatricians is warranted. Additionally, novel treatments that target multiple symptoms associated with RTT could reduce the burden and improve the QOL of individuals with RTT and their caregivers.