RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A working group of six expert physicians convened to assess the spectrum of multiple myeloma relapse presentations, discussed the features that can define the disease as aggressive and not aggressive, and established whether this information could help in selecting treatment together with the characteristics of disease and of patients and type of prior therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The working group agreed that relapse should be distinguished between biochemical and clinical according to IMWG. Moreover, the expert panel defined "aggressive disease" as a clinical condition that requires therapy able to induce a rapid and as deep as possible response to release symptoms and to avoid impending danger of new events. According to this definition, relapse was considered aggressive if it presents with at least one of the following features: doubling of M protein rate over 2 months, renal insufficiency, hypercalcemia, extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, high plasma cell proliferative index, presence of plasma cells in peripheral blood, or skeletal-related complications. Moreover, the panel agreed that this classification can be useful to choose therapy in first relapse together with other patient, disease, and prior therapy characteristics. So, this item was included in a new therapeutic algorithm. The treatment choice in MM at relapse is wider than in the past with the availability of many new therapeutic regimens leading to increased diversity of approaches and relevant risk of inappropriate treatment decisions. A practical classification of relapses into aggressive or non-aggressive, included in a decisional algorithm on MM management at first relapse, could help to make the appropriate treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib alone or in combination with other agents is already one of the standard therapies for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients and produces impressive response rates in newly diagnosed MM as well. However, carfilzomib-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) - including hypertension (all grades: 12.2%; grade ≥3: 4.3%), heart failure (all grades: 4.1%; grade ≥3: 2.5%) and ischemic heart disease (all grades: 1.8%; grade ≥3: 0.8%) - may lead to treatment suspensions. At present, there are neither prospective studies nor expert consensus on the prevention, monitoring and treatment of CVAEs in myeloma patients treated with carfilzomib. METHODS: An expert panel of the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension and with the endorsement of the European Hematology Association aimed to provide recommendations to support health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for patients, considering the impact on outcome and the risk-benefit ratio of diagnostic and therapeutic tools, thereby achieving myeloma response with novel combination approaches whilst preventing CVAEs. RESULTS: Patients scheduled to receive carfilzomib need a careful cardiovascular evaluation before treatment and an accurate follow-up during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed clinical assessment before starting carfilzomib treatment is essential to identify patients at risk for CVAEs, and accurate monitoring of blood pressure and of early signs and symptoms suggestive of cardiac dysfunction remains pivotal to safely administer carfilzomib without treatment interruptions or dose reductions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication after allografting. We carried out an exploratory study to investigate a potential correlation of surface antigens on extracellular vesicles (EVs) and acute GVHD. EVs were extracted from serum samples from 41 multiple myeloma patients who underwent allografting. EVs were characterized by flow cytometry using a panel of 13 antibodies against specific membrane proteins that were reported to be predictive of acute GVHD. We observed a correlation between three potential biomarkers expressed on EV surface and acute GVHD onset by both logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard model. In our study, CD146 (MCAM-1) was correlated with an increased risk-by almost 60%-of developing GVHD, whereas CD31 and CD140-α (PECAM-1 and PDGFR-α) with a decreased risk-by almost 40 and 60%, respectively. These biomarkers also showed a significant change in signal level from baseline to the onset of acute GVHD. Our novel study encourages future investigations into the potential correlation between EVs and acute GVHD. Larger prospective multicenter studies are currently in progress.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/metabolismo , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Flow cytometry is a useful tool for diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) study of hematological diseases. Standard sample preparation protocols are characterized by stain-lyse-wash (SLW). To prevent nonspecific bindings and achieve high sensitivity in MRD studies, lyse-wash-stain-wash (LWSW) is required. To our knowledge, no comparison between the two methods has been performed. METHODS: We compared mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), stain index, signal-to-noise ratio, and percentage of positive cells of 104 antibodies and of 13 selected antibodies tested in 10 samples simultaneously prepared with the two methods. RESULTS: MFI and percentages of positive cells obtained by the two methods did not show significant differences and showed a very high correlation. Stain index and signal-to-noise ratio presented higher values for kappa and lambda surface chains in LWSW samples and a trend of higher values for the other antibodies in SLW samples. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest to use LWSW method also at diagnosis to obtain more comparable antibody intensity expressions when samples from the same patient are processed for MRD evaluation after bulk lysis. Moreover, LWSW can prevent nonspecific bindings, shows no differences in the identification and quantitation of the populations of interest, and reduces acquisition of cell debris.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/normasRESUMEN
This multicentre, open-label phase 1/2 trial determined safety and efficacy of weekly carfilzomib plus cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (wKCyd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients aged ⩾65 years or transplant ineligible. Patients received wKCyd for up to nine 28-day cycles, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib until progression/intolerance. The phase 1 portion used a 3+3 dose-escalation scheme to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly carfilzomib: 12 patients received wKCyd with carfilzomib doses of 45, 56 and 70 mg/m2. The recommended phase 2 dose was established at 70 mg/m2 and 54 patients (phase 1 and 2) received weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m2: 85% of them achieved ⩾partial response (PR), 66% ⩾very good PR, 30%⩾near-complete response (CR) and 15% CR. Responses improved in 40 patients who started maintenance: 98% achieved ⩾PR, including 29% CR and 10% stringent CR. After a median follow-up of 18 months, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 53.2% and 81%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-5 toxicities were neutropenia (22%) and cardiopulmonary adverse events (9%). This is the first study of weekly carfilzomib plus an alkylating agent in elderly patients with NDMM. wKCyd was effective, with an acceptable risk/benefit ratio, and thus can be a valid option in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
During the last few years, several new drugs have been introduced for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, which have significantly improved treatment outcome. All of these novel substances differ at least in part in their mode of action from similar drugs of the same drug class, or are representatives of new drugs classes, and as such present with very specific side effect profiles. In this review, we summarize these adverse events, provide information on their prevention, and give practical guidance for monitoring of patients and for management of adverse events.Leukemia accepted article preview online, 18 December 2017. doi:10.1038/leu.2017.353.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
In newly diagnosed myeloma patients, upfront autologous transplant (ASCT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) compared with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (CC+R). Salvage ASCT at first relapse may still effectively rescue patients who did not receive upfront ASCT. To evaluate the long-term benefit of upfront ASCT vs CC+R and the impact of salvage ASCT in patients who received upfront CC+R, we conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials (RV-MM-209 and EMN-441). Primary endpoints were PFS1, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS). A total of 268 patients were randomized to 2 courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT (MEL200-ASCT) and 261 to CC+R. Median follow-up was 46 months. MEL200-ASCT significantly improved PFS1 (median: 42 vs 24 months, HR 0.53; P<0.001), PFS2 (4 years: 71 vs 54%, HR 0.53, P<0.001) and OS (4 years: 84 vs 70%, HR 0.51, P<0.001) compared with CC+R. The advantage was noticed in good and bad prognosis patients. Only 53% of patients relapsing from CC+R received ASCT at first relapse. Upfront ASCT significantly reduced the risk of death (HR 0.51; P=0.007) in comparison with salvage ASCT. In conclusion, these data confirm the role of upfront ASCT as the standard approach for all young myeloma patients.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Terapia Recuperativa , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk models of chemotherapy-induced (CIN) and febrile neutropenia (FN) have to date focused on determinants measured at the start of chemotherapy. We extended this static approach with a dynamic approach of CIN/FN risk modeling at the start of each cycle. DESIGN: We applied predictive modeling using multivariate logistic regression to identify determinants of CIN/FN episodes and related hospitalizations and chemotherapy disturbances (CIN/FN consequences) in analyses at the patient ('ever' during the whole period of chemotherapy) and cycle-level (during a given chemotherapy cycle). Statistical dependence of cycle data being 'nested' under patients was managed using generalized estimation equations. Predictive performance of each model was evaluated using bootstrapped c concordance statistics. RESULTS: Static patient-level risk models of 'ever' experiencing CIN/FN adverse events and consequences during a planned chemotherapy regimen included predictors related to history, risk factors, and prophylaxis initiation and intensity. Dynamic cycle-level risk models of experiencing CIN/FN adverse events and consequences in an upcoming cycle included predictors related to history, risk factors, and prophylaxis initiation and intensity; as well as prophylaxis duration, CIN/FN in prior cycle, and treatment center characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These 'real-world evidence' models provide clinicians with the ability to anticipate CIN/FN adverse events and their consequences at the start of a chemotherapy line (static models); and, innovatively, to assess risk of CIN/FN adverse events and their consequences at the start of each cycle (dynamic models). This enables individualized patient treatment and is consistent with the EORTC recommendation to re-appraise CIN/FN risk at the start of each cycle. Prophylaxis intensity (under-, correctly-, or over-prophylacted relative to current EORTC guidelines) is a major determinant. Under-prophylaxis is clinically unsafe. Over-prophylaxis of patients administered chemotherapy with intermediate or low myelotoxicity levels may be beneficial, both in patients with and without risk factors, and must be validated in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Neutropenia Febril/patología , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/metabolismo , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
This phase 2 trial evaluated three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib-based treatments in patients ⩾75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received subcutaneous bortezomib plus oral prednisone (VP, N=51) or VP plus cyclophosphamide (VCP, N=51) or VP plus melphalan (VMP, N=50), followed by bortezomib maintenance, and half of the patients were frail. Response rate was 64% with VP, 67% with VCP and 86% with VMP, and very good partial response rate or better was 26%, 28.5% and 49%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 14.0, 15.2 and 17.1 months, and 2-year OS was 60%, 70% and 76% in VP, VCP, VMP, respectively. At least one drug-related grade ⩾3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) occurred in 22% of VP, 37% of VCP and 33% of VMP patients; the discontinuation rate for AEs was 12%, 14% and 20%, and the 6-month rate of toxicity-related deaths was 4%, 4% and 8%, respectively. The most common grade ⩾3 AEs included infections (8-20%), and constitutional (10-14%) and cardiovascular events (4-12%); peripheral neuropathy was limited (4-6%). Bortezomib maintenance was effective and feasible. VP, VCP and VMP regimens demonstrated no substantial difference. Yet, toxicity was higher with VMP, suggesting that a two-drug combination followed by maintenance should be preferred in frail patients.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ciclofosfamida , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Tasa de SupervivenciaAsunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Neoplasia Residual , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Recurrencia , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Immunophenotypic remission (IR) is a strong prognostic factor in myeloma patients. The combination of IR and conventional CR was retrospectively evaluated in 66 patients after allografting. IR was defined as the absence of monoclonal plasma cells in BM aspirates by multiparameter flow cytometry. Conditioning was non-myeloablative in 55 patients; reduced-intensity in 10 and myeloablative in 1 patient. The allograft was given upfront in 35/66 (53%) patients. After a median follow-up of 7.1 years, 24 patients achieved both CR and IR (CR/IR group), 21 achieved IR but not CR with persistence of a urine/serum M-component (no CR/IR group) and 21 did not achieve either CR or IR (no CR/no IR group). Median OS and EFS were 'not reached' and 59 months in the CR/IR group; 64 and 16 months in the no CR/IR; and 36 and 6 months in the no CR/no IR, respectively (P<0.001). Cumulative incidence of extramedullary disease was 4.4% in the CR/IR, 38.1% in the no CR/IR and 14.3% in the no CR/no IR groups, respectively, at 4 years (P<0.001). IR was a valid tool to monitor residual disease after allografting, and allowed definition of a cohort of patients at higher incidence of extramedullary relapse.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Incorporation of novel agents into auto-SCT for patients with multiple myeloma has led to improvement in their outcomes. However, the effects of new drugs, either single or combined, on PBSC mobilization have not been fully evaluated, particularly in phase 3 clinical studies. We analyzed the impact of two novel agent-based induction treatments in patients enrolled in the GIMEMA MMY-3006 study comparing bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) in preparation for double auto-SCT. Results showed that a short-term induction therapy with VTD did not adversely affect CD34(+) cell yields as compared with TD (9.75 vs 10.76 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, P=0.220). For poor mobilizers (<4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg), 5-year rates of time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter than for successful mobilizers (TTP:17 vs 48%, P<0.0001; PFS: 16 vs 46%, P<0.0001; OS: 50 vs 80%, P<0.0001). These differences were retained across patients randomized to the TD arm; conversely, no differences in outcomes were seen in patients treated with VTD, irrespective of the number of harvested CD34(+) cells. The number of collected PBSCs predicted better outcomes after auto-SCT and VTD overcame the negative impact of a poor stem cell mobilization.
Asunto(s)
Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Autoinjertos , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis is a useful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma (MM), although its long-term impact still needs to be addressed. This report presents the updated results of the GIMEMA-VEL-03-096 trial. Thirty-nine MM patients receiving bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone after autologous transplantation were monitored for MRD by both nested and real-time quantitative-PCR until relapse. Our data confirm the strong impact of MRD on survival: overall survival was 72% at 8 years median follow-up for patients in major MRD response versus 48% for those experiencing MRD persistence (P=0.041). In addition, MRD kinetics resulted predictive for relapse: indeed median remission duration was not reached for patients in major MRD response, 38 months for those experiencing MRD reappearance and 9 months for patients with MRD persistence (P<0.001). Moreover: (1) 26 patients achieving major MRD response (67%) benefit of excellent disease control (median TNT: 42 months); (2) MRD reappearance heralds relapse, with a TNT comparable to that of MRD persistence (9 versus 10 months, P=0.706); (3) the median lag between MRD reappearance and need for salvage treatment is 9 months. These results suggest the usefulness of a long-term MRD monitoring in MM patients and the need for maintenance or pre-emptive treatments ensuring durable responses.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Cadenas Pesadas de Inmunoglobulina/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Neoplasia Residual , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
We present a case of Trichoderma fungemia with pulmonary involvement in a multiple myeloma patient, who was severely immunocompromised and heavily treated with high-dose melphalan, and underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. This is the first report, to our knowledge, of proven Trichoderma fungemia, defined by published criteria, successfully treated with voriconazole.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Fungemia/microbiología , Micosis/microbiología , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Trichoderma/aislamiento & purificación , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trichoderma/clasificación , Voriconazol/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a non malignant plasma cell disorder with a relatively low risk of progression to Multiple Myeloma (MM) and to related Plasma cells disordes (lymphoplasmacellular neoplasms, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia or light chain amyloidosis). It is a quite common finding, especially in the population above the age of 50 and it can also present in association with many non malignant conditions. Differential diagnosis of symptomatic and asymptomatic forms is the determinant for starting therapy. Over the last few years many advances in the understanding of the biology of MGUS, together with large epidemiological studies, allowed to define risk models to estimate the risk of progression to MM according to MGUS isotype and, more recently, to peculiar flow cytometry findings. The goal of many recent studies aims at evaluating individual patients and their overall risk of progression, the detection of early signs of progression and the development of timely treatment strategies.