Defining the characteristics of certified hernia centers in Italy: The Italian society of hernia and abdominal wall surgery workgroup consensus on systematic reviews of the best available evidences.

BACKGROUND: The terms "Hernia Center" (HC) and Hernia Surgeon" (HS) have gained more and more popularity in recent years. Nevertheless, there is lack of protocols and methods for certification of their activities and results. The Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery proposes a method for different levels of certification. METHODS: The national board created a commission, with the task to define principles and structure of an accreditation program. The discussion of each topic was preceded by a Systematic Review, according to PRISMA Guidelines and Methodology. In case of lack or inadequate data from literature, the parameter was fixed trough a Commission discussion. RESULTS: The Commission defined a certification process including: "FLC - First level Certification": restricted to single surgeon, it is given under request and proof of a formal completion of the learning curve process for the basic procedures and an adequate year volume of operations. "Second level certification": Referral Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure run by at least two already certified and confirmed FLC surgeons. "Third level certification": High Specialization Center for Abdominal Wall Surgery. It is a public or private structure, already confirmed as Referral Centers, run by at least three surgeons (two certified and confirmed with FLC and one research fellow in abdominal wall surgery). Both levels of certification have to meet the Surgical Requirements and facilities criteria fixed by the Commission. CONCLUSION: The creation of different types of Hernia Centers is directed to create two different entities offering the same surgical quality with separate mission: the Referral Center being more dedicated to clinical and surgical activity and High Specialization Centers being more directed to scientific tasks.

Chronic inguinal pain in children.

PURPOSE: To present our experience in the management of chronic groin pain in children. METHODS: We report 4 patients (age range 0-18 years old) who presented with history of chronic groin pain (April 2010 January 2017). After failure of all conservative treatments they underwent surgical management as ultima ratio. RESULTS: Currently, there is no consensus on treatment of 'Sportsman's Hernia' and literature on paediatric population is still poor. There are no appropriate randomised controlled trials supporting a standardized management of chronic groin pain. Initial approach should be conservative [Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) follow-up for 3-6 months] and surgical treatment proposed after failure of conservative therapies. It is advisable to consider surgery at least months after clinical onset. More recently, some studies suggested surgery as a first line treatment. Most of surgical cases manage to recover to full activity without pain, as reported in our experience. Surgical approach to the groin can be anterior (open) or posterior (laparoscopic), both these procedures have shown good results. Surgeons having different opinions on the aetiology of 'Sportsman's Hernia' may sustain the suitability of different surgical techniques. In our experience, pain was localized at the pubic tubercle therefore we preferred the 'open' approach ensuring a successful release of ilioinguinal and genitofemoral nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Children with chronic groin pain can benefit of surgical treatment. In our experience, surgery always proved to be successful for treating chronic groin pain in paediatric age. Further multicentric studies are needed to support these results. KEY WORDS: Bernhardt-Roth syndrome, Children, Chronic groin pain, Chronic inguinal pain, Meralgia Paraesthetic, Sportsman's Hernia.

Pneumatic positioning and mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair. New surgical technique and a new device.

AIM: To achieve full-surface contact of a prosthetic mesh with the abdominal wall (avoiding folds and wrinkles) in laparoscopic ventral/ incisional hernia repair (LVHR/ LIHR) and to fix the mesh with glue using a new surgical technique and a new device, developed for this specific procedure. MATERIAL OF STUDY: New surgical technique associated with a new surgical pneumatic device allows perfect positioning and extension of the intraperitoneal mesh and facilitates the glue application and mesh fixation. A polyester composite mesh is used for intraperitoneal placement, cyanoacrylate glue is used for mesh fixation. Pigs cadavers were used to test this new technique and the device*. RESULTS: With the help of a pneumatic device the intraperitoneal mesh can be well positioned and perfectly extended without folds, thus allowing an efficient and strong mesh glue fixation. CONCLUSION: Presented pneumatic positioning device is useful to achieve an ideal alignment of mesh with the abdominal wall and supports the fixation task. The proposed technique enables the glue application safely, by avoiding possible spillage over intestinal loops and offering the necessary time for the distribution of such fast polymerizing glue. This technique could also be applied with other types of glue or self-adhesive mesh.