Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in trials of diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review.

AIMS: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of the patient's health status that come directly from the patient without interpretation by the clinician or anyone else. They are increasingly used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In this systematic review we identified RCTs conducted in women with diabetes in pregnancy which included PROs in their primary or secondary outcomes. We then evaluated the quality of PRO reporting against an internationally accepted reporting framework (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT-PRO) guidelines). METHODS: We searched online databases for studies published 2013-2021 using a combination of keywords. Two authors reviewed all abstracts independently. Data on study characteristics and the quality of PRO reporting were extracted from relevant studies. We conducted a multiple regression analysis to identify factors associated with high quality reporting. RESULTS: We identified 7122 citations. Thirty-five articles were included for review. Only 17% of RCTs included a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome. Out of a maximum score of 100 the median score was 46, indicating sub-optimal reporting. A multiple regression analysis did not reveal any factors associated with high quality reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should be mindful of the importance of PRO inclusion and reporting and include reliable PROs in trials.

A core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes: an international consensus study.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a core outcome set (COS) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). DESIGN: A consensus developmental study. SETTING: International. POPULATION: Two hundred and five stakeholders completed the first round. METHODS: The study consisted of three components. (1) A systematic review of the literature to produce a list of outcomes reported in RCTs assessing the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. (2) A three-round, online eDelphi survey to prioritise these outcomes by international stakeholders (including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with PGDM). (3) A consensus meeting where stakeholders from each group decided on the final COS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All outcomes were extracted from the literature. RESULTS: We extracted 131 unique outcomes from 67 records meeting the full inclusion criteria. Of the 205 stakeholders who completed the first round, 174/205 (85%) and 165/174 (95%) completed rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Participants at the subsequent consensus meeting chose 19 outcomes for inclusion into the COS: trimester-specific haemoglobin A1c, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, severe maternal hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, miscarriage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, maternal death, birthweight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational age at birth, preterm birth, mode of birth, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, congenital malformations, stillbirth and neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: This COS will enable better comparison between RCTs to produce robust evidence synthesis, improve trial reporting and optimise research efficiency in studies assessing treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: 165 key stakeholders have developed #Treatment #CoreOutcomes in pregnant women with #diabetes existing before pregnancy.

A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies assessing interventions to improve maternal and infant outcomes have increased exponentially over recent years. Several outcomes in this field of maternal diabetes are rare, making it difficult to synthesise evidence. OBJECTIVES: To collect outcomes reported in studies assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM. SEARCH STRATEGY: CENTRAL, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until 27 January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised controlled trial assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM reported in English. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles and retrieved the data. Outcomes extracted from the literature were broadly categorised into maternal, fetal/infant or other outcomes by the study advisory group. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-seven of the 1475 studies identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of outcomes reported per study was 15 (range 1-46). The majority of studies were from North America and Europe. Insulin and metformin were the most commonly investigated pharmacological interventions. Glucose monitoring was the most assessed technological intervention. In all, 131 unique outcomes were extracted: maternal (n = 69), fetal/infant (n = 61) and other (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome reporting in treatment interventions trials of pregnant women with PGDM is varied, making it difficult to synthesise evidence, especially for rare outcomes. Systems are needed to standardise outcome reporting in future clinical trials and so facilitate evidence synthesis in this area of maternal diabetes. REGISTRATION: The systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Registration number CRD42020173549). TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Outcome reporting is heterogeneous in intervention trials of pregnant women with diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Early gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with worse pregnancy outcomes compared with GDM diagnosed at 24-28 weeks gestation despite early treatment.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated+ with adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with women with normal glucose tolerance in pregnancy. The WHO recommends screening at 24-28 weeks gestation for GDM. Women who are diagnosed before 24-28 weeks gestation have a longer intervention period which may impact positively on pregnancy outcomes. AIM: This study aimed to examine pregnancy outcomes of women with GDM diagnosed <24 weeks gestation compared with those diagnosed at 24-28 weeks in a large Irish cohort. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1471 pregnancies in women with GDM diagnosed using IADPSG criteria between September 2012 and April 2016 was conducted. At GDM diagnosis, women were classified as early GDM <24 weeks or standard GDM 24-28 weeks gestation. RESULTS: Women with early GDM had a significantly greater risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (12.4% vs. 5.3%; P < 0.05), post-partum haemorrhage (8.7% vs. 2.4%; P < 0.05) and post-partum glucose abnormalities (32% vs. 15.6%; P < 0.05). Their offspring had a greater risk of pre-maturity (10.9% vs. 6.6%; P < 0.05), stillbirth (1.4% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.05), large for gestational age (19.1% vs. 13.4% P < 0.05) and need neonatal intensive care (30.7% vs. 22.1%; P < 0.05) compared with offspring of women with standard GDM. Rates of C-section and pre-maturity were still higher in the early GDM group when the two groups where compared based on their post-natal OGTT. CONCLUSION: Early GDM women and their offspring are at greater risk of an adverse pregnancy outcome compared with those diagnosed at 24-28 weeks. In view of the abnormal post-natal glucose findings, early GDM may reflect a more advanced state in diabetes pathogenesis.

Plasma glycated CD59 (gCD59), a novel biomarker for the diagnosis, management and follow up of women with Gestational Diabetes (GDM) - protocol for prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Gestational Diabetes (GDM) is rising and with it the number of mothers and children at risk of adverse outcomes. As treatment has been shown to reduce adverse events, it is imperative that we identify all at-risk pregnant women. In Ireland, the national standard of care is selective screening with a 2-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Aiming for universal screening is of utmost importance but this is difficult given the length, the unfeasibility and impracticability of the OGTT. We aim to assess if the novel biomarker glycated CD59 (gCD59) is a suitable contender for the OGTT in identifying women with GDM. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the study participants will be consecutive pregnant women at Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. Samples for the plasma gCD59 biomarker will be taken together with routine bloods at the first antenatal visit, at weeks 24-28 at the time of routine 75 g OGTT, in trimester 3- and 12-weeks post-partum for women with GDM while having their routine post-partum 75 g OGTT. The constructed database will contain baseline information on each study participant, baseline laboratory data, follow-up laboratory data and pregnancy related outcomes. We aim to recruit a total of 2,000 participants over the project period and with a national GDM prevalence of 12-13%, we will have 240-260 subjects who meet OGTT criteria for GDM. Following regional prevalence, we expect to have 34-37 women who will develop either diabetes or pre-diabetes in the early post-partum period. The sensitivity and specificity of plasma gCD59 to predict the results of the OGTT will be assessed using nonparametric estimates of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and respective area under the ROC curve (AUROC). DISCUSSION: A body of clinical and experimental evidence supports a link between the complement system, complement regulatory proteins, and the pathogenesis of diabetes complications. Building on this research, our study plans to look at the plasma gCD59 capacity to classify pregnant women with normal or abnormal glucose tolerance but also to assess if plasma gCD59 can be used as an early predictor for GDM, for adverse pregnancy outcomes and/or post-partum glucose intolerance.

A Rare Case of Infertility: SRY Positive 46, XX Testicular Disorder of Sexual Differentiation.

Aim To highlight the complexity of infertility causes by describing the rare case of a man with a testicular disorder of sexual differentiation. Diagnosis A 33 years old Caucasian male presented with a 3-year-old history of primary infertility. His investigations revealed a low testosterone and a raised LH and FSH levels. A sample sent for sperm analysis revealed azoospermia. Chromosomal analysis and karyotyping revealed a 46 XX SRY positive karyotype. Treatment The patient was initiated on testosterone replacement and on calcium/vitamin D supplements. Conclusion Fertility evaluation requires complex assessments and a broad knowledge of possible causes.

Endocrinopathies and renal outcomes in lithium therapy: impact of lithium toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Lithium is the mainstay of treatment for bipolar disorder, mania and an augmentation therapy in patients with treatment resistant depression. It has a narrow therapeutic index, with recognized adverse multi-system and endocrine side effects. AIM: To assess the impact of lithium therapy, in particular lithium toxicity, on the development of endocrine and renal disorders in a cohort of patients in a single tertiary referral centre in Ireland. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was performed of the prevalence of lithium toxicity and renal, thyroid and parathyroid dysfunction in our study population. METHODS: We collected laboratory data from the Clinical Chemistry department of the Adelaide and Meath Hospital incorporating the National Children's Hospital (AMNCH), Dublin, Ireland. Our study population included all patients who had at least one serum lithium measurement from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2014 inclusive. RESULTS: A total of 580 patients were included in the study. Among our study group, 70 patients (12.1%) had 1 toxic lithium measurement (lithium level >1.2 mmol/l). 27.8% (n > 161) of patients developed stage 3 Chronic kidney Disease (CKD) or higher, which was commoner in those patients who developed toxic lithium levels (P < 0.0001) and in those who developed hypernatraemia (P > 0.0001). 16.2% of patients (n > 94) had one serum sodium >145 mmol/l during follow up. 60 patients(10.3%) had a TSH >10 mU/l, while complete suppression of TSH (<0.05 mU/l) was observed in 22 patients (3.8%) during follow-up. 4% (n > 37) of the study population had ≥1 serum corrected calcium level > 2.55 mmol/l, and 4 patients had biochemical confirmation of primary hyperparathyroidism but PTH levels were only performed in 2.8% (n > 16) of the studypopulation. CONCLUSION: Stage 3 CKD is common in patients receiving lithium therapy. Lithium toxicity is associated with CKD and hypernatraemia. Thyroid dysfunction and hypercalcaemia are common in patients receiving lithium therapy. Patients receiving lithium therapy require surveillance of renal, thyroid and bone biochemistry.