Endovascular Treatment for Acute Stroke in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.

Background and Purpose: We aimed to compare outcome of endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke in patients with and without cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Methods: We included patients with and without possible or probable CAA based on the modified Boston criteria from an observational multicenter cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke and endovascular thrombectomy, the German Stroke Registry Endovascular Treatment trial. We analyzed baseline characteristics, procedural parameters, and functional outcome after 90 days. Results: Twenty-eight (17.3%) of 162 acute ischemic stroke patients were diagnosed with CAA based on iron-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging performed before endovascular thrombectomy. CAA patients were less likely to have a good 90-day outcome (14.3 versus 37.8%). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; P<0.001), successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio 6.82; P=0.005), and CAA (adjusted odds ratio 0.28; P=0.049) were independent outcome predictors. Intravenous thrombolysis was associated with an increased rate of good outcome (36.3% versus 0%, P=0.031) in CAA. Conclusions: Endovascular thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis appears beneficial in acute ischemic stroke patients with possible or probable CAA, but is associated with a worse functional outcome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03356392.

Increase in liver stiffness after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is associated with inflammation and predicts mortality.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) efficiently treats complications of portal hypertension. Liver and spleen stiffness might predict clinically significant portal hypertension. This prospective study investigated liver stiffness in patients receiving TIPS regardless of indication. Of 83 included patients, 16 underwent transient elastography immediately before and 30 minutes after TIPS (acute group), while 67 received shear wave elastography of liver and spleen 1 day before and 7 days after TIPS (chronic group) and were followed further. In blood samples obtained before TIPS from cubital, portal, and hepatic veins, levels of several interleukins (IL1b, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL18) and interferon-gamma were analyzed. In 27 patients (5 acute, 22 chronic), it resulted in an increase in liver stiffness of >10%. In 56 patients, liver stiffness decreased or remained unchanged (<10%). Importantly, spleen stiffness measured by shear wave elastography decreased in all patients (chronic group). None of the clinical or laboratory parameters differed between patients with increase in liver stiffness and those without. Of note, patients with increased liver stiffness showed higher overall and/or hepatic venous levels of proinflammatory cytokines at TIPS and higher incidence of organ failure and worse survival after TIPS. C-reactive protein values and increase of >10% in liver stiffness after TIPS were the only independent predictors of mortality in these patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the presence of systemic inflammation predisposes patients to develop increased liver stiffness after TIPS, a predictor of organ failure and death. (NCT03072615) (Hepatology 2018;67:1472-1484).

Shear-wave elastography of the liver and spleen identifies clinically significant portal hypertension: A prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is associated with severe complications and decompensation of cirrhosis. Liver stiffness measured either by transient elastography (TE) or Shear-wave elastography (SWE) and spleen stiffness by TE might be helpful in the diagnosis of CSPH. We recently showed the algorithm to rule-out CSPH using sequential liver- (L-SWE) and spleen-Shear-wave elastography (S-SWE). This study investigated the diagnostic value of S-SWE for diagnosis of CSPH. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight cirrhotic patients with pressure gradient measurements were included into this prospective multicentre study. L-SWE was measured in 155 patients, S-SWE in 112 patients, and both in 109 patients. RESULTS: Liver-shear-wave elastography and S-SWE correlated with clinical events and decompensation. SWE of liver and spleen revealed strong correlations with the pressure gradient and to differentiate between patients with and without CSPH. The best cut-off values were 24.6 kPa:L-SWE and 26.3 kPa:S-SWE. L-SWE ≤16.0 kPa and S-SWE ≤21.7 kPa were able to rule-out CSPH. Cut-off values of L-SWE >29.5 kPa and S-SWE >35.6 kPa were able to rule-in CSPH (specificity >92%). Patients with a L-SWE >38.0 kPa had likely CSPH. In patients with L-SWE ≤38.0 kPa, a S-SWE >27.9 kPa ruled in CSPH. This algorithm has a sensitivity of 89.2% and a specificity of 91.4% to rule-in CSPH. Patients not fulfilling these criteria may undergo HVPG measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Liver and spleen SWE correlate with portal pressure and can both be used as a non-invasive method to investigate CSPH. Even though external validation is still missing, these algorithms to rule-out and rule-in CSPH using sequential SWE of liver and spleen might change the clinical practice.