Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10807725

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the percent accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of periapical radiographic diagnosis of periapical inflammatory disease. METHOD: A total of 140 cases were reviewed under ideal viewing conditions by 6 observers. For each case, observers determined whether periapical disease was evident and rated the confidence of their interpretation. RESULTS: The mean percent accuracy was 70.2%. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 and 0.78, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intraobserver and interobserver reliability were 0.66 and 0.54, respectively. CONCLUSION: Specificity of periapical radiographic diagnosis is higher than sensitivity. These results support the current guideline for selective use of periapical views based on patient symptoms and clinical signs. Finally, dentists have a good degree of reliability on repeated evaluations, but only fair agreement when compared with other dentists reading the same radiograph.


Asunto(s)
Periodontitis Periapical/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Diente Premolar , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Diente Molar , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiografía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9768428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of radiographic findings on complete denture treatment and on the postdelivery course of those patients who had pretreatment radiographs (the screening group) and those who did not (the selection group). METHOD: In total, 375 cases were randomly selected by systematic sampling. Data collected included patient demographic information and denture history, predenture fabrication radiographic findings, and postdenture delivery complaints. RESULTS: Of the screening patients, 100% had pretreatment radiographs made; this compared with 13.5% of the selection patients. In the screening group, 68.3% of patients had one or more positive radiographic findings recorded. Of the screening patients, 8.3% received treatment before denture fabrication; this compared with 1.2% of the selection patients. Of the 375 cases, 2 screening patients had postdelivery complaints that required management other than denture adjustment. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there is weak scientific support for the guideline recommending routine pretreatment radiography for new denture patients.


Asunto(s)
Boca Edéntula/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dentadura Completa , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Boca Edéntula/rehabilitación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 64(1): 48-51, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9473877

RESUMEN

A polycystic lateral periodontal cyst was observed over a period of 25 months. The case history, a description of the natural history of this lesion and its diagnostic characteristics, and a review of the literature are presented.


Asunto(s)
Quiste Periodontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Quiste Periodontal/patología , Quiste Periodontal/fisiopatología , Quiste Periodontal/cirugía , Radiografía
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9159824

RESUMEN

The FDA Radiology Guideline for the new edentulous patient recommends an initial survey of the arches. In the process of developing this recommendation, the expert panel reviewed the available literature and concluded that there was sufficient evidence to warrant screening radiography rather than selective radiography, which is the principle on which all the other recommendations are based. Our evaluation of the literature used by the panel for the edentulous recommendation identifies critical errors in the analysis of the data. Factors such as a vague definition of abnormality and a geographically diverse sample population might have led the expert panel to suggest a very conservative recommendation for this group of patients. The recommendation failed to consider the treatment impact of findings and was based simply on the large number of observations, regardless of their treatment or pathologic significance. However, in studies in which treatment is considered, it is clear that screening radiography for new edentulous patients does not yield sufficient clinically relevant information to support the guideline.


Asunto(s)
Boca Edéntula/diagnóstico por imagen , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Food and Drug Administration , American Dental Association , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8653471

RESUMEN

A case of osteopathia striata, childhood cataracts, short stature, elbow deformity, and microdontia with rhizomicry in a white male is reported. The report includes a detailed analysis of dental changes. The relationship of this syndrome to other similar conditions including osteopathia striata with cranial base sclerosis and Rothmund-Thomson syndrome are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Desarrollo Óseo/patología , Enanismo/patología , Anomalías Dentarias/patología , Catarata , Preescolar , Articulación del Codo/anomalías , Humanos , Masculino , Odontometría , Síndrome , Raíz del Diente/anomalías , Diente Primario/anomalías
8.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 62(2): 151-2, 154, 157-8, 1996 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8820168

RESUMEN

Although the development and use of practice-related guidelines as educational aids has a long history in the health professions, scientific assessment indicates that they have had limited success in changing practice patterns. This is principally due to the exclusion of practitioners from the development process, and the lack of a credible scientific basis for many guidelines. Past failures have led to new methods of guideline development based on a critical analysis of scientific data. These methods, which involve legitimate professional organizations at all stages of the development process, are clearly a step in the right direction. Unfortunately, there are signs that current guideline developers still fail to recognize the critical nature of the new methods or the need for an open and inclusive development process. It is even more disquieting that the objective of some guideline developers, such as licensing bodies, is the formulation of standards or review criteria, particularly when there are very few therapeutic practices with a sufficient scientific basis to justify such a designation. National and provincial societies, as well as dental educators, need to assume a leadership role to ensure that if guidelines are required, they will be developed as credible aids for the improvement of patient care. In this paper, the authors recount why the "traditional process" of guideline development resulted in guidelines that were mistrusted by the profession and, as a result, ineffective. They also outline the widely-documented current methodology, which should be followed if guidelines are to be accepted by the profession. Finally, they discuss the critical issue of who should develop guidelines, and examine their role in dental practice and education.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Odontología/normas , Canadá , Humanos
9.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 61(11): 955-9, 1995 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8521323

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to determine the absorbed radiation doses to various structures within the head and neck as a result of routine mandibular and maxillary occlusal radiography. Five projections were investigated: the anterior mandibular; true mandibular; anterior maxillary; lateral maxillary; and maxillary vertex occlusal radiographic views. Standard thermoluminescent dosimetry methodology was employed using a humanoid phantom of the skull. Multiple exposures were done for each view to ensure adequate precision. The absorbed doses to various locations following a single occlusal exposure are presented in centiGray (cGy). It was found that the absorbed dose values for occlusal radiography observed in this study were similar in magnitude to previously reported absorbed dose values for other forms of dental radiography. Values ranged from 0.0014 cGy to 1.301 cGy. The highest absorbed doses were generally the skin entrance doses. The results of this study provide an accurate, concise summary of surface and internal absorbed radiation doses for five commonly used occlusal radiographs. They can be used in the calculation of risk estimates for dental radiography, and may assist dentists in their discussions with patients concerned about radiation exposure.


Asunto(s)
Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Absorción , Humanos , Registro de la Relación Maxilomandibular/métodos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía , Dosimetría Termoluminiscente
10.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 61(9): 785-91, 1995 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7585268

RESUMEN

Clinical decision making in dentistry involves some uncertainty and error, but in the absence of good clinical research it is often more of an art than a science. This article demonstrates a way in which clinicians can consistently and effectively base the diagnostic process on scientific evidence. The authors examine the selection and utility of supplemental diagnostic tests, describe the properties of these tests, and explain how test results can be used to augment clinical opinion. To aid the dental clinician in the decision making process, a step-by-step strategy is presented for the detection of squamous cell carcinoma using toluidine blue dye.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Bucal/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Colorantes , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suelo de la Boca , Neoplasias de la Boca/diagnóstico , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Cloruro de Tolonio
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7600230

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to assess the radiographic prescribing practices of a sample of general practitioners for the pediatric dental patients in relation to current guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaires were mailed to a sample of 963 dentists. The adjusted response was 80%. RESULTS: For the new patient under age 6, slightly more than two thirds of respondents reported the use of selective radiography. For ages 6 to 14 years, a slight majority chose a protocol of survey radiography. Of those who used a predetermined protocol, 69% chose "bite-wings only" for the child under 6 years, whereas for the child 6 to 14 years, the protocol of choice was a complete radiographic survey, predominantly the panoramic/bite-wing. For recall patients in both age groups, less than 1% of dentists used survey radiography. CONCLUSION: From our results, we concluded that the majority of dentists followed the guideline for children under 6 years. However, for children in the transitional dentition years, our respondents choices were divided between selective or survey radiography. The ambiguity in the wording or interpretation of the guideline for this age group may have contributed to this result.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Auxiliares Dentales , Odontólogos , Odontología General/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ontario , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7614217

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiographic practices of general dentists with emphasis on the influence of education on these practices. METHODS: Data were obtained from a mail survey of a stratified random sample of 963 general practitioners in Ontario, Canada, who graduated from the two provincial dental schools. Descriptive statistics were used, and associations were tested by Pearson's chi 2 analysis. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 80%. For the new patient, 62% of respondents chose a type of predetermined protocol with the panoramic/bite-wing survey as the predominant choice. Only 37% of respondents chose to prescribe selectively according to the patient's needs. For recall patients, 55% of dentists used selective radiography, and of those who chose a protocol, the vast majority preferred bite-wing radiographs only. CONCLUSIONS: Three influences on the dentists' choice of radiographic examination as suggested by the data were dental education, ownership of a panoramic unit, and who exposed the radiographs. These associations were statistically significant.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Auxiliares Dentales , Equipo Dental , Odontólogos , Educación en Odontología/tendencias , Humanos , Ontario , Propiedad , Radiografía de Mordida Lateral/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol ; 78(6): 806-10, 1994 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7898915

RESUMEN

A study of radiographic practices of general dentists was conducted by mail survey. Eighty percent of 963 dentists returned completed questionnaires. All participants resided in the province of Ontario, Canada, and were graduates of either of the two provincial dental schools. Fewer than one third of radiographs were taken by the dentist with only 10% of dentists taking three fourths or more of the radiographs in their practices. There was infrequent use of E speed film (11%) and rectangular collimation (8%). Automatic processing was used by 93% of dentists. Although the overwhelming majority of dentists used a film holder, 2% still have the patient hold the film. The type of film holder used was affected by dental school experience, whereas the use of E speed film was not.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Tecnología Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Filtración/instrumentación , Odontología General/educación , Humanos , Ontario , Radiografía Dental/instrumentación , Radiografía Panorámica/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Película para Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 60(9): 835-40, 1994 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7922804

RESUMEN

Recently, there has been growing concern regarding the biological effects of occupational exposure to weak time-varying magnetic fields, especially those in the extremely low-frequency range (0.1-100.0 Hz). This study examined some potential sources and intensities of 60 Hz magnetic fields produced in the dental environment. A random sample of general dental offices and selected specialty offices was visited, and the magnetic fields associated with ultrasonic scalers, amalgamators, composite light curing units, X-ray view boxes and chair lights were measured. The median 60 Hz field strengths measured at various running speeds (off, standby, low and high) and the distances from the equipment (0, 15 and 30 cm) ranged from 1.2 to 2,225 milligauss (mG). Field strengths fell off quickly with distance, but were less affected by the running speed of the equipment. They also varied among the five types of equipment tested. This was likely due to variations in the make, model and age of the equipment. The 60 Hz magnetic field strengths recorded in the dental operatory were comparable to those reported from measurements of common household appliances. However, in view of recent concerns with respect to the possible effects of magnetic fields, it is suggested that exposures be minimized and the concept of prudent avoidance be employed.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Dental , Consultorios Odontológicos , Campos Electromagnéticos , Análisis de Varianza , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
15.
J Can Dent Assoc ; 59(11): 931-4, 1993 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8252452

RESUMEN

A case of osteosarcoma misdiagnosed as fibrous dysplasia is presented to demonstrate the importance of an integrated diagnostic approach to oral lesions. The clinical and radiographic differences between fibrous dysplasia and osteosarcoma are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Displasia Fibrosa Monostótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteosarcoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía
16.
ASDC J Dent Child ; 59(5): 361-5, 1992.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1401409

RESUMEN

A case of bilateral paradental cysts affecting the first permanent molars is described. Radiographic characteristics and differential interpretations of the lesion are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Mandibulares , Diente Molar , Quistes Odontogénicos , Niño , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Mandibulares/patología , Diente Molar/patología , Quistes Odontogénicos/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...