Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 115(33): E7863-E7870, 2018 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30072434

RESUMEN

The idea that noncrop habitat enhances pest control and represents a win-win opportunity to conserve biodiversity and bolster yields has emerged as an agroecological paradigm. However, while noncrop habitat in landscapes surrounding farms sometimes benefits pest predators, natural enemy responses remain heterogeneous across studies and effects on pests are inconclusive. The observed heterogeneity in species responses to noncrop habitat may be biological in origin or could result from variation in how habitat and biocontrol are measured. Here, we use a pest-control database encompassing 132 studies and 6,759 sites worldwide to model natural enemy and pest abundances, predation rates, and crop damage as a function of landscape composition. Our results showed that although landscape composition explained significant variation within studies, pest and enemy abundances, predation rates, crop damage, and yields each exhibited different responses across studies, sometimes increasing and sometimes decreasing in landscapes with more noncrop habitat but overall showing no consistent trend. Thus, models that used landscape-composition variables to predict pest-control dynamics demonstrated little potential to explain variation across studies, though prediction did improve when comparing studies with similar crop and landscape features. Overall, our work shows that surrounding noncrop habitat does not consistently improve pest management, meaning habitat conservation may bolster production in some systems and depress yields in others. Future efforts to develop tools that inform farmers when habitat conservation truly represents a win-win would benefit from increased understanding of how landscape effects are modulated by local farm management and the biology of pests and their enemies.


Asunto(s)
Productos Agrícolas , Ecosistema , Modelos Biológicos , Control Biológico de Vectores , Animales , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Productos Agrícolas/parasitología
2.
Environ Toxicol Chem ; 35(1): 144-51, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26184786

RESUMEN

Nearly 80% of all pesticides applied to row crops are herbicides, and these applications pose potentially significant ecotoxicological risks to nontarget plants and associated pollinators. In response to the widespread occurrence of weed species resistant to glyphosate, biotechnology companies have developed crops resistant to the synthetic-auxin herbicides dicamba and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D); and once commercialized, adoption of these crops is likely to change herbicide-use patterns. Despite current limited use, dicamba and 2,4-D are often responsible for injury to nontarget plants; but effects of these herbicides on insect communities are poorly understood. To understand the influence of dicamba on pollinators, the authors applied several sublethal, drift-level rates of dicamba to alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Eupatorium perfoliatum L. and evaluated plant flowering and floral visitation by pollinators. The authors found that dicamba doses simulating particle drift (≈1% of the field application rate) delayed onset of flowering and reduced the number of flowers of each plant species; however, plants that did flower produced similar-quality pollen in terms of protein concentrations. Further, plants affected by particle drift rates were visited less often by pollinators. Because plants exposed to sublethal levels of dicamba may produce fewer floral resources and be less frequently visited by pollinators, use of dicamba or other synthetic-auxin herbicides with widespread planting of herbicide-resistant crops will need to be carefully stewarded to prevent potential disturbances of plant and beneficial insect communities in agricultural landscapes.


Asunto(s)
Dicamba/toxicidad , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Insectos/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas/efectos de los fármacos , Polinización/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Abejas , Eupatorium , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Medicago sativa , Polen/química , Polen/ultraestructura
3.
Pest Manag Sci ; 70(11): 1711-9, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24338991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates that some populations of European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), have declined to historic lows owing to widespread adoption of Bt corn hybrids. To understand current ECB populations in Pennsylvania field corn, the authors assessed larval damage in Bt and non-Bt corn hybrids at 29 sites over 3 years. The influence of Bt adoption rates, land cover types and moth activity on levels of ECB damage was also considered. RESULTS: Bt hybrids reduced ECB damage when compared with non-Bt, but these differences inconsistently translated to higher yields and, because of higher seed costs, rarely improved profits. No relationships were detected between land use or Bt adoption and ECB damage rates, but positive relationships were found between plant damage and captures of Z-race ECB moths in pheromone traps in the PestWatch network. CONCLUSIONS: ECB damage levels were generally low and appear to be declining across Pennsylvania. In many locations, farmers may gain greater profits by planting competitive non-Bt hybrids; however, Bt hybrids remain valuable control options, particularly in the parts of Pennsylvania where ECB populations persist. Moth captures from PestWatch appear to provide insight into where Bt hybrids are most valuable.


Asunto(s)
Mariposas Nocturnas/fisiología , Control Biológico de Vectores/métodos , Zea mays/genética , Animales , Bacillus thuringiensis/genética , Conducta Alimentaria , Larva/fisiología , Mariposas Nocturnas/genética , Pennsylvania , Control Biológico de Vectores/economía , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Zea mays/economía , Zea mays/crecimiento & desarrollo
4.
J Econ Entomol ; 106(3): 1250-9, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23865190

RESUMEN

Corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a polyphagous noctuid pest of agricultural crops across the United States that is gaining attention as a pest of field corn. Before the introduction of transgenic insect-resistant hybrids, this pest was largely ignored in field corn, but now many Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn hybrids have activity against corn earworm. However, the value of control in the northeastern United States is unclear because the risk posed by corn earworm to field corn has not been well characterized. To understand the threat from corn earworm and the value of Bt hybrids in field corn, we assessed corn earworm injury in Bt and non-Bt hybrids at 16 sites across four maturity zones throughout Pennsylvania in 2010, and 10 sites in 2011. We also used corn earworm captures from the PestWatch pheromone trapping network to relate moth activity to larval damage in field corn. Corn earworm damage was less than one kernel per ear at 21 of 26 sites over both years, and the percentage of ears damaged was generally < 15%, much lower than in the southern United States where damage can be up to 30 kernels per ear. At sites with the highest damage levels, Bt hybrids suppressed corn earworm damage relative to non-Bt hybrids, but we found no differences among Bt traits. Cumulative moth captures through July effectively predicted damage at the end of the season. Currently, the additional benefit of corn earworm control provided by Bt hybrids is typically less than US$4.00/ha in northeastern field corn.


Asunto(s)
Bacillus thuringiensis/genética , Mariposas Nocturnas/fisiología , Control Biológico de Vectores/métodos , Zea mays/genética , Animales , Cruzamientos Genéticos , Conducta Alimentaria , Larva/fisiología , Masculino , Pennsylvania , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/fisiología , Densidad de Población , Estaciones del Año , Zea mays/fisiología
5.
Environ Entomol ; 42(3): 586-94, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726069

RESUMEN

Herbicides are the most commonly applied pesticides in agroecosystems, and therefore pose potentially significant ecotoxicological risks to plants and insects. Glyphosate is the most common herbicide worldwide, and glyphosate-resistant weeds are quickly becoming serious challenges in some agroecosystems. Because of this resistance epidemic and the recent development of crops with resistance to dicamba or 2,4-D, herbicide-use patterns are likely to change. Presently, dicamba and 2,4-D cause most herbicide-drift damage to nontarget plants despite limited agricultural usage, but the effects of these synthetic auxin herbicides on insects have been poorly explored. To understand the influence of dicamba on insects, we applied several sublethal, drift-level rates of dicamba to soybean, Glycine max L., and Carduus thistle, and measured growth and survival of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and Vanessa cardui (L.) larvae, respectively. For thistle, we measured percent nitrogen content before and after dicamba application. We also performed direct toxicity bioassays on the two caterpillar species with several rates of dicamba. Dicamba was not directly toxic to larvae of either species, and H. zea showed no negative effects when feeding on soybeans dosed with dicamba. We did, however, detect significant negative, indirect effects of higher rates of dicamba on V. cardui larval and pupal mass, total nitrogen of thistles post application, and thistle biomass in the presence of V. cardui larvae. Notably, thistle biomass was not related to dicamba dose in absence of larvae. Our results indicate that dicamba can indirectly influence the performance of some caterpillar species, possibly by altering plant nutritional content.


Asunto(s)
Mariposas Diurnas/efectos de los fármacos , Dicamba/toxicidad , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Mariposas Nocturnas/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Mariposas Diurnas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Mariposas Diurnas/fisiología , Carduus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Carduus/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Larva/efectos de los fármacos , Larva/crecimiento & desarrollo , Larva/fisiología , Longevidad , Mariposas Nocturnas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Mariposas Nocturnas/fisiología , Glycine max/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glycine max/metabolismo
6.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(10): 1332-7, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21538805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of different types of commercial sex-pheromone- and kairomone-based lures for attracting codling moth adults may vary under different pest management practices. The attractiveness of four types of codling moth (CM) lures (CM L2 Long-Life(®), CM 10X Megalure(®), Pherocon CM DA(®) and Pherocon CM-DA Combo(®)) was evaluated in commercial apple orchards either treated with sex pheromone mating disruption (MD) or only conventional insecticides (non-MD) in Adams County, Pennsylvania, in 2006 and 2007. RESULTS: CM DA Combo lure was most effective in terms of mean seasonal weekly moth capture as well as mean cumulative moth capture in MD orchards. In both years, the CM L2 lure was as attractive to adult moths as the CM DA Combo lure in non-MD orchards. The CM DA and CM 10X lures caught significantly fewer moths in both MD and non-MD orchards compared with the CM DA Combo lure. CONCLUSIONS: ON the basis of mean seasonal weekly moth capture as well as mean cumulative moth capture, the CM DA Combo and CM L2 lures were found to be significantly more effective for monitoring CM adults in both MD and non-MD orchards. In contrast, the CM DA and CM 10X lures were not as effective in either type of orchard.


Asunto(s)
Control de Insectos/métodos , Mariposas Nocturnas , Control Biológico de Vectores , Atractivos Sexuales , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Malus/parasitología , Pennsylvania , Conducta Sexual Animal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...