Whole-body MR angiography: first experiences with the new TimCT technology with single contrast injection.

PURPOSE: To assess image quality, presence of artifacts, arterial stenosis, and interobserver agreement of Tim-CT in assessment of the arterial system using contrast-enhanced whole-body-MRA (CE-Wb-MRA) with a single contrast-medium injection in patients with arteriosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 18 patients (mean age, 68 years). A total of 468 arteries were evaluated. CE-Wb-MRA was performed using Tim-CT technology on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI after injecting a single dose of Vasovist. Evaluations were independently performed by two radiologists. The arterial system was divided into seven anatomic locations. Each radiologist assessed the image quality, degree of artifacts, and arterial stenosis in different locations. RESULTS: All Wb-MRA examinations were technically successful. Image quality: 28.42% arteries were excellent, 29.17% were good, 22.54% were satisfactory, 9.40% were poor, and 5.13% of insufficient quality. Occurrence of artifacts: 37.25% were free of artifacts, 49.44% minimal artifacts not affecting diagnosis, and 13.31% strong artifacts not permitting a diagnosis. A total of 60.00% arteries showed no stenosis, 8.76% were ≤50% stenotic, 5.17% were 51-75% stenotic, 4.38% were 76-99%, and 8.54% total occlusion. The interobserver agreement was good for supra-aortic, pelvic, and upper and lower leg regions. CONCLUSION: CE-Wb-MRA using the TimCT technology and with a single contrast injection is a feasible tool for whole-body MRA.

[Students in Training to Become Biology Teachers - a controlled phase II trial (NCT01567267)]. / Evaluation eines Lehrkonzepts in EbM für Lehramtsstudierende der Biologie - eine kontrollierte Phase-II-Studie (NCT01567267).

BACKGROUND: Consumers increasingly demand to take part in healthcare decisions as described by the concept of shared decision making. In order to ensure this happens the patient must be able to critically appraise the healthcare information provided, which is called critical health literacy. Critical health literacy can be taught to patients at the onset of their disease to enable them to obtain information about interventions and alternatives. For the primary prevention of common diseases like hypertension or diabetes mellitus, though, it is necessary to empower consumers to critically appraise medical information since this information is routinely presented in the mass media. This might be achieved through educational intervention programmes at school. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective controlled trial with students in training to become biology teachers at Siegen University (Germany). The intervention group received a short-term educational intervention (24 units) in human biology based on the principles of Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) and Good Scientific Practice (GSP) combined with elements of problem-based learning. The control group received a short-term intervention in human biology of equal duration, but without the elements of EbM and GSP. Knowledge and skills were evaluated by validated questionnaires and case studies in a pre-, interim, and post-interventional test in both groups. In addition, biology trainee teachers in the intervention group also planned and conducted a one-hour problem-based learning session with high school students, which was evaluated by video. RESULTS: The increase in knowledge (7.9±3.8 points vs. 2.7±2.5 points, p≤0.001) and appraisal skills (24.1±6.7 points vs. 14.6±6.3, p≤0.001) after the intervention was relevant and significant compared to baseline results and also compared to the control group that did not show any significant progress in knowledge (3.9±2.4 points vs. 2.7±1.7) and appraisal skills (16.2±5.9 points vs. 14.4±5.6). All the participants in the intervention group passed both the preparation and the conduction of their problem-based learning session with high school students with at least 50 % of the maximum number of points. Satisfaction among students in training to become biology teachers (median grade of 2 [good] in the German grading system) and students (89 % of students agreed this to be an interesting method) were high in the intervention group. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This preliminary study showed a relevant increase in knowledge about EbM and skills in critically appraising interventional studies. Participating students were able to conduct problem-based learning sessions for high school students about the principles of EbM and GSP. The results justify a larger randomised controlled trial to evaluate both effects and applicability to different school settings.

The risk for cross-reactions after a cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to heparin preparations is independent of their molecular weight: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Heparins are a widely used class of drugs known to cause delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions. Recent publications indicate that the incidence of these may be higher than previously thought. To date, patient-related but no drug-related risk factors for the development of DTH reactions to heparins have been identified, although molecular weight is discussed as a potentially relevant parameter. OBJECTIVES: To address this, a systematic review was conducted on the frequency of cross-reactions after DTH reactions to heparin preparations. METHODS: We electronically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE, hand-searched selected journals and references, and contacted experts for unpublished data. RESULTS: Sixty-six publications and unpublished data of 14 patients resulted in 198 patients with 1084 tests for cross-reactivity. The primary causative agents were mostly unfractionated heparin (50%) and low molecular weight heparins (49.5%). Cross-reactions were more likely after an initial DTH reaction to unfractionated heparin than after an initial DTH reaction to low molecular weight heparin. Our findings also indicate that molecular weight does not correlate with the risk for cross-reactivity, which is in line with recent observations, indicating that different heparins have to be individually considered. CONCLUSIONS: The available data demonstrated the lowest overall risk for cross-reactions for pentosan polysulfate (36.4%) and fondaparinux (10.4%). In the clinical context, fondaparinux is recommended as the current best alternative when a DTH reaction occurs.