Collateral presence and extent do not predict myocardial viability and ischemia in chronic total occlusions: A stress-CMR study.

BACKGROUND: Well-developed collaterals are assumed as a marker of viability and ischemia in chronic total occlusions (CTO). We aim to correlate viability and ischemia with collateral presence and extent in CTO patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: Multicentre study of 150 CTO patients undergoing stress-CMR, including adenosine if normal systolic function, high-dose-dobutamine for patients with akinetic/>2 hypokinetic segments and EF ≥35%, otherwise low-dose-dobutamine (LDD); all patients underwent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Viability was defined as mean LGE transmurality ≤50% for adenosine, as functional improvement for dobutamine-stress-test, ischemia as ≥1.5 segments with perfusion defects outside the scar zone. RESULTS: Rentrop 3/CC 2 defined well-developed (WD, n = 74) vs poorly-developed collaterals (PD, n = 76). Viability was equally prevalent in WD vs PD: normo-functional myocardium with ≤50% LGE in 52% vs 58% segments, p = 0.76, functional improvement by LDD in 48% vs 52%, p = 0.12. Segments with none, 1-25%,26-50%,51-75% LGE showed viability by LDD in 90%,84%,81%,61% of cases, whilst in 12% if 76-100% LGE (p < 0.01). There was no difference in WD vs PD for ischemia presence (74% vs 75%, p = 0.99) and extent (2.7 vs 2.8 segments, p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of CTO patients, presence and extent of collaterals did not predict viability and ischemia by stress-CMR. Scar extent up to 75% LGE was still associated with viability, whereas ischemia was undetectable in 25% of patients, suggesting that the assessment of CTO patients with CMR would lead to a more comprehensive evaluation of viability and ischemia to guide revascularization.

Sex differences in treatment strategy for coronary artery aneurysms: Insights from the international Coronary Artery Aneurysm Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Sex disparities exist in coronary artery disease (CAD) in terms of risk profile, clinical management and outcome. It is unclear if differences are also present in coronary aneurysms, a rare variant of CAD. METHODS: Patients were selected from the international Coronary Artery Aneurysm Registry (CAAR; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02563626), and differences between groups were analysed according to sex. The CAAR database is a prospective multicentre registry of 1565 patients with coronary aneurysms (336 females). Kaplan-Meier method was used for event-free survival analysis for death, major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite endpoint of death, heart failure and acute coronary syndrome) and bleeding. RESULTS: Female patients were older, were more often hypertensive and less frequently smoker. They were treated conservatively more often compared to male patients and received significantly less frequently aspirin (92% vs 88%, p = 0.002) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (67% vs 58%, p = 0.001) at discharge. Median DAPT duration was also shorter (3 vs 9 months, p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no sex differences in death, MACE or bleeding during a median follow-up duration of 37 months, although male patients did experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) more often during follow-up (15% vs 10%, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: These CAAR findings showed a comparable high-risk cardiovascular risk profile for both sexes. Female patients were treated conservatively more often and received DAPT less often at discharge, with a shorter DAPT duration. ACS was more prevalent among male patients; however, overall clinical outcome was not different between male and female patients during follow-up.

Cardiac magnetic resonance for ischaemia and viability detection. Guiding patient selection to revascularization in coronary chronic total occlusions: The CARISMA_CTO study design.

BACKGROUND: It is debated whether percutaneous revascularization (PCI) of total coronary chronic occlusion (CTO) is superior to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in improving symptoms, left ventricular (LV) function and major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Furthermore, CTO-PCI is a challenging technique, with lower success rate than in other settings. A systematic analysis of baseline LV function, infarction extent and ischaemic burden to predict response to revascularization has never been performed. PURPOSES: To establish a CMR protocol to identify patients (pts) who can benefit most from CTO-PCI. Myocardial viability/ischaemia retains high biological plausibility as predictors of response to revascularization. Therefore, baseline viability (necrotic tissue extent, response to inotropic stimulation) and ischaemia (perfusion defect, wall motion abnormality during stress) will be studied as potential predictors of mechanical LV segmental improvement and ischaemic burden reduction in CTO territory (primary endpoint), LV remodelling and global function, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, and MACCE improvement (secondary endpoints) in the follow-up. METHODS: Pts with CTO suitable for PCI undergo stress-CMR for viability/ischaemia assessment. Pts with normal LV function undergo adenosine, those with moderately-reduced ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion abnormalities high-dose dobutamine, pts with EF <35% low-dose dobutamine. All pts undergo late gadolinium enhancement and repeat the same scan at 12 ±â€¯3 months, regardless of PCI success or decision for OMT. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-parameter CMR protocol tailored on pts characteristics to study viability/ischaemia could help in identifying responders in terms of LV function, ischaemic burden and clinical outcome among pts suitable for CTO-PCI, improving selection of best candidates to percutaneous revascularization.

Patient selection and percutaneous technique of unprotected left main revascularization.

Increasing evidence suggests that percutaneous coronary intervention with newer generation drug-eluting stents may be an acceptable alternative, or even preferred in selected cases to the surgical approach, in patients with left main disease. This review will discuss the anatomic factors, the clinical variables, and the procedural strategies to consider, including physiology assessment and imaging guidance, in order to optimize outcomes.

Appraising failure of surgical and percutaneous revascularization: long term outcomes from an observational registry.

AIM: Many randomized trials have compared coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in terms of efficacy, but data comparing outcomes of patients in which these two techniques have failed are lacking. METHODS: We included patients undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and December 2004. Subjects were distinguished in 2 groups: those with at least one occluded or stenotic saphenous vein graft (CABG failure), and those with at least one stent with angiographically documented restenosis (PCI failure). The primary endpoint was the long-term rate of major adverse clinical events. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirthy four patients were included, with a medium follow up of 61±13 months; 134 were assigned to the CABG failure group, and 104 to the PCI failure group, sharing high rates of baseline risk factors. At long term rates of death were higher in post CABG group (22.1% vs. 9.9%; P=0.015, RR 2.24 C.I. 95% 1.14-4.40) while death rates in patients with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (24.0% vs. 23.5%; P=0.969, RR 1.020 C.I. 95% 0.38-2.74) were not different CONCLUSION: PCI can be safely offered to both these kinds of patients: as recently demonstrated post CABG outcomes seem to be more favorable in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Incidence and very long- term outcomes of stent thrombosis after bare-metal or drug-eluting stent implantation: a retrospective analysis.

AIM: Stent thrombosis is a major safety issue after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation and it is associated with major early and mid-term complications. However, its long-term impact has been incompletely described. We thus aimed to appraise incidence, predictors and very long-term outlook of stent thrombosis after bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We identified all patients undergoing PCI with BMS or DES at our center between July 2002 and June 2004. For the purpose of this study, we employed a composite definition of stent thrombosis including any Academic Research Consortium stent thromboses (definite, probable, or possible). We adjudicated the following clinical events: death, myocardial infarction (stent thrombosis related), repeated revascularization, and the composite of these events (i.e., major adverse cardiac events, MACE). RESULTS: A total of 1112 patients were included, 854 (76.8%) treated with BMS and 258 (23.2%) treated with DES. At a median follow-up of 61.2 (11.03) months the incidence of stent thrombosis was 20 (1.8%), with 14 (1.3%) definite, 4 (0.4%) probable, and 2 (0.1%) possible according to the American Research Consortium statement. Patients developing stent thrombosis were more likely to have more complex angiographic features at baseline (including angiographically evident thrombus, 4 [20%] vs. 73 [6.6%], P=0.02) and a saphenous vein graft as target vessel (2 [10%] vs. 28 [2.5%], P=0.04). Conversely, being treated with a BMS or a DES did not confer any significant decrease or increase in the risk of stent thrombosis, as 7 [35%] of those with stent thrombosis had received at least a DES vs. 251 [22.9%] of those without stent thrombosis, P=0.28). Early clinical outcomes (at 30 days) distinguishing those with stent thrombosis versus those without were as follows: death in four (20%) vs. 2 (0.2%, P<0.001), myocardial infarction in 1 (5%) vs. 7 (0.6%, P=0.02), revascularization in 5 (25%) vs. 43 (3.9%, P<0.001), and MACE in 8 (40%) vs. 53 (4.8%, P<0.001). After more than 60 months of clinical follow-up, outcomes were as follows: death in 7 (35%) vs. 147 (13.5%, P=0.057), myocardial infarction in 6 (30%) vs. 40 (3.6%, P<0.001), revascularization in 15 (75%) vs. 317 (29%, P<0.001), and MACE in 19 (95%) vs. 453 (41.5%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This long-term registry shows that stent thrombosis remains a major safety issue after PCI with stent implantation, with a significant prognostic impact. However, in the present work the risk of stent thrombosis was similar with either DES or BMS, suggesting thus that DES are not associated with any increase in long-term thrombotic risk in comparison to BMS.

Very long-term outcome of peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: a retrospective analysis.

AIM: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is a well known risk factor leading to an increased rates of stroke, cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction. Anyway there are few data on very-long term outcome (more than 1 year follow up) of PAD after stent implantation. We thus aimed to evaluate the influence of PAD on very long-term outcome of our PCI-population. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation at our center between July 2002 and June 2004, and thus eligible for at least 4 years of follow-up. For the purpose of this study, we considered a diagnosis of PAD based on clinical evaluation and/or angiographic documentation. We adjudicated the following clinical events: death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and their composite (i.e. major adverse cardiac events, MACE). RESULTS; A total of 1008 patients were included, 109 with PAD and 899 Without PAD. Those with had more often diabetes (35% vs. 25%, P=0.002), hypertension (83% vs. 68%, P=0.001) and unfavorable basal clinical condition at the start of this study: past-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (30% vs. 22%, P=0.005), past-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) (24% vs. 14%, P=0.001), ejection fraction (EF) <35% (14% vs. 7%, P=0.02) and chronic renal failure (CRF) (15% vs. 6%, P=0.002). In addiction patient with PAD were more likely to have chronic total occlusion (CTO) (36% vs. 25%, p=0.02) and unprotected left main (16% vs. 8%,P=0.01). Clinical outcome at the time of follow-up (4,42 ± 1,66 years) was as follow: Revascularization (53% vs. 37%, P=0.002), Cardiac death (21% vs. 13%, P=0.04), MACE (69% vs. 49%, p<.001). Independent predictors of MACE according to our survival analysis were: PAD (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.01-1.69), Age >75 (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1-1.51), Chronic heart failure (HR1.72; 95% CI 1.19-2.5), Unprotected left main (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.12-1.96). CONCLUSION: This long-term registry shows that PAD remains an important clinical condition that negatively influences the outcome of patients undergoing PCI with stent implantation in a very long-term follow-up period.

Short and long term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent and bare metal stent in patients with chronic kidney disease.

AIM: Coronary artery disease represents the most important cause of mortality and morbidity in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite continuous improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CKD is still associated with more adverse events after PCI. We performed a retrospective study to compare bare metal stents (BMS) versus drug eluting stents (DES) in CKD. METHODS: We included consecutively all patients undergoing PCI at our Centre from July 2002 to December 2005 with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min. Patients who received only DES were compared to those who received only BMS. The primary end-point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. the composite of death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization). RESULTS: We included a total of 219 patients with CKD out of a total of 2354 patients, with 164 receiving BMS and 55 DES. After a mean follow up of 48 months, the MACE rate was significantly higher in BMS group (71% versus 38%, P<0.001). A similarly increased risk with BMS was found for death (45% versus 17%, P<0.001), whereas the rates for repeat coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were not significantly different. Multivariable analysis showed that BMS vs.. DES implantation was not statistically significant associated with MACE, death, myocardial infarction, rePTCA or stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Compared with BMS, use of DES in patients with CKD is safe and effective in reducing adverse outcomes. However, differences found between groups in clinical end-point could be ascribed to selection bias and confounding factors.

Percutaneous drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients: short and long term outcomes from an observational study.

AIM: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has markedly improved mid-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetics. However, it is unclear whether the risk-benefit balance of DES in diabetics is maintained also at long-term and in insulin-requiring patients. We thus aimed to appraise long-term outcomes of diabetic patients treated with PCI with DES, stratifying according to insulin therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected baseline, procedural and outcome data from all patients undergoing PCI with DES from July 2002 to June 2004 at our center. We distinguished three groups: insulin-requiring diabetics, non-insulin-requiring diabetics and patients without diabetes. The primary end-point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). We also considered stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium Definition. RESULTS: We included a total of 1266 patients, with 3% of insulin-requiring diabetes, 22% with non-insulin-requiring diabetes, and 75% without diabetes. There were significant differences across groups in prevalence of male gender (respectively, 32.4%, 74.6% and 81%, P<0.001), and DES usage (54.1%, 34%, and 30.4%, P=0.007). Thirty-day MACE occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (8.1%, 7.3% and 6.3%, P=0.78), with death in 3%, 2%, and 1.4% (P=0.71) and myocardial infarction in 5.4%, 1.8% and 0.8% (P=0.02). After a median follow-up period of 58 months, MACE occurred in 59.5% of patients with insulin-requiring diabetes, in 50.6% of non-insulin-requiring diabetics and in 38.9% of non-diabetics (P<0.001). Death occurred in 24.3%, 17.5% and 8.5%, (P<0.001), myocardial infarction in 10.8%, 6.6%, and 5.1% (P=0.25), repeat revascularization in 46%, 31.6%, and 30% (P=0.11), and definite stent thrombosis in 0%, 1.1%, and 1.3% (P=0.78). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the high risk profile of diabetic patients, especially when ischemic disease it is known. In this setting, diabetic and comorbidities fix the price not only in term of need of further revascularization, but mainly in survival decrease. It can be concluded that not only revascularization but also ­ and especially ­ comorbidities treatment plays a determinant role reducing follow-up events. Further research on additional pharmacologic treatments or hybrid revascularization strategies may mitigate the burden of morbidity and mortality.

Short and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft.

AIM: Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a sizable portion of those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): in many instances, it is unclear whether performing PCI on the bypass graft or in the native coronary vessels can offer the best risk-benefit balance. METHODS: We included patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and June 2004 and we distinguished them in three groups. Those in whom PCI was performed on stenotic saphenous vein graft (SVG group), those in whom PCI was performed on native vessels despite the presence of potentially treatable SVG disease (optional native group), and those in whom PCI had to be performed mandatorily in the native vessels because of chronic SVG occlusions or disease in non-bypassed segments (mandatory native group). The primary end-point was long-term rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). RESULTS: We identified 109 patients: 28 were in the SVG group, 25 in the optional native group, and 56 in the mandatory native group. Early major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (respectively, 9.1%, 0% and 5.7%, P=0.35). After more than three years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 39.3% vs. 28 and 39.4% (P=0.59), death occurred in 27.2 vs. 24.0% vs. 13.5% (P=0.30), and TVR in 27.3% vs. 8.0% vs. 28.8% (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, PCI of native coronary vessels despite the presence of apparently treatable SVG lesions can be envisioned.

Impact of multivessel coronary disease on long-term outcome after percutaneous recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions.

AIM: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) is common even with concomitant multivessel disease. We aimed to investigate the impact of multivessel disease on long-term outcome after PCI for CTO. METHODS: We collected baseline, procedural and follow-up data on patients undergoing successful PCI with stenting for CTO. We divided our population into three groups: patients with 1 vessel disease (1VD), those with 2-vessel disease (2VD) and subjects with 3-vessel disease (3VD). The primary end-point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), i.e. death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were included: 24 (21%) in group 1VD, 28 (25%) in group 2VD, and 59 (53%) in group 3VD. Clinical follow-up was available in 109 (98%) of them after a median of 27 months (range 6-68), yielding MACE rates of 1 (4%) in group 1VD, 5 (18%) in group 2VD, and 17 (29%) in group 3VD, respectively (P=0.03). No statistically significant difference was found comparing the 3 groups for the individual rates of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization (all P>0.05). No case of definite or probable stent thrombosis was adjudicated, despite use of DES in 99 (89%) patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with diffuse coronary disease undergoing PCI for a CTO fare a significantly worse prognosis. Nonetheless, despite liberal use of DES, stent thrombosis is rare in this setting, without differences according to the initial severity of disease, thus supporting the long-term safety of DES, even if used in this "off-label" context.

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement in two cases at high surgical risk: procedural details and implications for patient selection.

The morbidity and mortality burden of heart valve disease is increasing in the developing world, especially among the elderly. Whereas surgery remains the standard of care in fit patients with degenerative aortic stenosis, percutaneous aortic valve replacement could become an effective alternative to surgery in selected higher risk patients. The authors report on two women with aortic stenosis, both at high surgical risk (an 81-year-old female with coronary artery and cerebro-vascular disease, and a 70-year-old female with end-stage cirrhosis), in whom percutaneous valve replacement was effectively performed by means of transfemoral access and retrograde CoreValve Re-valving System implantation. Two major post-procedural complications occurred, both effectively managed, in the second patient: a third degree atrio-ventricular block (requiring permanent pace-maker implantation) and bleeding from the right femoral artery access (requiring implantation of two covered stents and blood transfusion). Despite the increased baseline risk, both patients were discharged asymptomatic, the first twelve days and the other three weeks after admission. In the authors' experience percutaneous aortic valve replacement can be performed with reasonable safety in patient with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk.