The PICOTS-ComTeC Framework for Defining Digital Health Interventions: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.

OBJECTIVES: Digital health definitions are abundant, but often lack clarity and precision. We aimed to develop a minimum information framework to define patient-facing digital health interventions (DHIs) for outcomes research. METHODS: Definitions of digital-health-related terms (DHTs) were systematically reviewed, followed by a content analysis using frameworks, including PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting), Shannon-Weaver Model of Communication, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Measures, and the World Health Organization's Classification of Digital Health Interventions. Subsequently, we conducted an online Delphi study to establish a minimum information framework, which was pilot tested by 5 experts using hypothetical examples. RESULTS: After screening 2610 records and 545 full-text articles, we identified 101 unique definitions of 67 secondary DHTs in 76 articles, resulting in 95 different patterns of concepts among the definitions. World Health Organization system (84.5%), message (75.7%), intervention (58.3%), and technology (52.4%) were the most frequently covered concepts. For the Delphi survey, we invited 47 members of the ISPOR Digital Health Special Interest Group, 18 of whom became the Delphi panel. The first, second, and third survey rounds were completed by 18, 11, and 10 respondents, respectively. After consolidating results, the PICOTS-ComTeC acronym emerged, involving 9 domains (population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, setting, communication, technology, and context) and 32 optional subcategories. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-facing DHIs can be specified using PICOTS-ComTeC that facilitates identification of appropriate interventions and comparators for a given decision. PICOTS-ComTeC is a flexible and versatile tool, intended to assist authors in designing and reporting primary studies and evidence syntheses, yielding actionable results for clinicians and other decision makers.

Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) of direct-to-angiography pathway for acute ischemic stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion.

INTRODUCTION: Direct-to-angiography (DTA) is a novel care pathway for endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) that has been shown to reduce time-to-treatment and improve clinical outcomes for EVT-eligible patients. The institutional costs of adopting the DTA pathway and the many factors affecting costs have not been studied. In this study, we assess the costs and main cost drivers associated with the DTA pathway compared to the conventional CT pathway for patients presenting with AIS and suspected LVO in the anterior circulation. METHODS: Time driven activity based costing (TDABC) model was used to compare costs of DTA and conventional pathways from the healthcare institution perspective. Process mapping was used to outline all activities and resources (personnel, equipment, materials) needed for each step in both pathways. The cost model was developed using our institutional patient database and average New York state wages for personnel costs. Total, incremental and proportional costs were calculated based on institutional and patient factors affecting the pathways. RESULTS: DTA pathway accrued additional $82,583.61 (9%) in total costs compared to the conventional approach for all AIS patients. For EVT-ineligible patients, the DTA pathway incurred additional $82,964.37 (76%) in total costs compared to the CT pathway. For EVT eligible patients, the total and per-patient costs were greater in the CT pathway by $380.76 (0.04%) and $5.60 (0.04%) respectively. CONCLUSION: As the DTA pathway incurred additional $82,964.37 for EVT-ineligible patients, appropriate patient selection criteria are needed to avoid transferring EVT-ineligible patients to the angiography suite.

Cost-effectiveness of remote robotic mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment are highly time sensitive. Remote robotic (RR)-EVT systems may be capable of mitigating time delays in patient transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive/thrombectomy-capable stroke center. However, health economic evidence is needed to assess the costs and benefits of an RR-EVT system. Therefore, the authors of this study aimed to determine whether performing RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC as opposed to standard of care might translate to cost-effectiveness over a lifetime. METHODS: An economic evaluation study was performed from a US healthcare perspective, combining decision analysis and Markov modeling methods over a lifetime horizon to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RR-EVT in suspected AIS patients at a PSC compared to the standard-of-care approach. Total expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. RESULTS: In the cost-effectiveness analysis, RR-EVT yielded greater effectiveness per patient (4.05 vs 3.88 QALYs) and lower costs (US$321,269 vs US$321,397) than the standard-of-care approach. Owing to these lower costs and greater health benefits, RR-EVT was the dominant cost-effective strategy. After initiation of an RR-EVT system, the average costs per year were similar (or slightly reduced), according to this simulation. Sensitivity analyses revealed that RR-EVT remains cost-effective in a wide variety of time delays and cost assumptions. In a one-way sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT remained the most cost-effective strategy when time delays were greater than 2.5 minutes, its complication rate did not exceed 37%, and costs were lower than $54,081. When the cost of the RR-EVT strategy ranged from $19,340 to $54,081 and its complication rate varied from 15% to 37%, the RR-EVT strategy remained the most cost-effective throughout the two ranges. RR-EVT was also the most cost-effective strategy even when its cost doubled (to approximately $40,000) and time delays exceeded 20 minutes. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RR-EVT was the long-term cost-effective strategy in 89.8% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that RR-EVT as an innovative solution to expedite EVT is cost-effective. An RR-EVT system could potentially extend access to care in underserved communities and rural areas, as well as improve care for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations affected by health inequities.

How Useful Are Digital Health Terms for Outcomes Research? An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review definitions of digital health and understand their relevance for health outcomes research. Four umbrella terms (digital health, electronic health, mobile health, and telehealth/telemedicine) were summarized in this article. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and EconLit were searched from January 2015 to May 2020 for systematic reviews containing key Medical Subject Headings terms for digital health (n = 38) and synonyms of "definition." Independent pairs of reviewers performed each stage of the review, with reconciliation by a third reviewer if required. A single reviewer consolidated each definition for consistency. We performed text analysis via word clouds and computed document frequency-and inverse corpus frequency scores. RESULTS: The search retrieved 2610 records with 545 articles (20.9%) taken forward for full-text review. Of these, 39.3% (214 of 545) were eligible for data extraction, of which 134 full-text articles were retained for this analysis containing 142 unique definitions of umbrella terms (digital health [n = 4], electronic health [n = 36], mobile health [n = 50], and telehealth/telemedicine [n = 52]). Seminal definitions exist but have increasingly been adapted over time and new definitions were created. Nevertheless, the most characteristic words extracted from the definitions via the text analyses still showed considerable overlap between the 4 umbrella terms. CONCLUSIONS: To focus evidence summaries for outcomes research purposes, umbrella terms should be accompanied by Medical Subject Headings terms reflecting population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting. Ultimately a functional classification system is needed to create standardized terminology for digital health interventions denoting the domains of patient-level effects and outcomes.

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury in acute ischemic stroke patients following multi-dose iodinated contrast.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: lthough intravenous contrast in neuroimaging has become increasingly important in selecting patients for stroke treatment, clinical concerns remain regarding contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI). Given the increasing utilization of CT angiography and/or perfusion coupled with cerebral angiography, the purpose of this study was to assess the association of CA-AKI and multi-dose iodinated contrast in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: etrospective review of AIS patients at a comprehensive stroke center was performed from January 2018 to December 2019. Data collection included patient demographics, stroke risk factors, stroke severity, discharge disposition, modified Rankin Scale, contrast type/volume, and creatinine levels (baseline, 48-72 h). CA-AKI was defined as creatinine increase ≥ 25 % from baseline. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were implemented to compare AIS patients with multi-dose and single-dose contrast. RESULTS: Of 440 AIS patients, 215 (48.9 %) were exposed to a single-dose contrast, and 225 (51.1 %) received multi-dose. In single-dose patients, CA-AKI at 48/72 h was 9.7 %/10.2 % compared to 8.0 %/8.9 % in multi-dose patients. Multi-dose patients were significantly more likely to receive a higher volume of contrast (mean 142.1 mL versus 80.8 mL; p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in their creatinine levels or CA-AKI. NIHSS score (OR=1.08, 95 % CI=[1.04,1.13]), and patient transfer from another hospital (OR=3.84, 95 % CI=[1.94,7.62]) were significantly associated with multi-dose contrast. CONCLUSIONS: No significant association between multi-dose iodinated contrast and CA-AKI was seen in AIS patients. Concerns of CA-AKI should not deter physicians from pursuing timely and appropriate contrast-enhanced neuroimaging that may optimize treatment outcomes in AIS patients.

Neuroimaging in acute ischemic stroke: Trends, disparities, and clinical impact.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical studies over the past decade expanded the eligibility criteria for endovascular therapy, with advanced imaging selection and new devices leading to higher rates of good outcomes. Herein, we explore the current trends in neuroimaging, associated factors, and impact on treatment and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients, admitted to a comprehensive stroke center from 2016 to 2020. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, race, arrival method, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and last known well to arrival time; imaging and treatment utilization; and discharge outcome by modified Rankin Scale and disposition were extracted from medical records. Trend and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and trends were stratified by patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of 4,125 acute ischemic stroke episodes, 15.1% received intravenous thrombolysis only, and 7.5% received endovascular thrombectomy from 2016 to 2020. Neuroimaging utilization trends significantly increased for computed tomography angiography (CTA) (48.7% to 75.2%, p < 0.001) and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) (0.26% to 32.9%, p < 0.001), and decreased for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (43.2% to 24.7%, p < 0.001). These trends held after adjusting for patient characteristics. Endovascular thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis were significantly more common in patients with CTA and CTP (p < 0.0001), and these treatments were associated with good clinical outcomes after controlling for patient characteristics. CONCLUSION: We found significantly increased trends in CTA and CTP imaging, which were associated with endovascular thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis utilization, in acute ischemic stroke patients from 2016 to 2020.

Updated Trends, Disparities, and Clinical Impact of Neuroimaging Utilization in Ischemic Stroke in the Medicare Population: 2012 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to update trends, investigate sociodemographic disparities, and evaluate the impact on mortality of stroke neuroimaging across the United States from 2012 to 2019. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using CMS Medicare 5% Research Identifiable Files, representing consecutive ischemic stroke emergency department or hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years. A total of 85,547 stroke episodes with demographic and clinical information were analyzed using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and logistic regression. Outcome measures were neuroimaging (CT angiography [CTA], CT perfusion [CTP], MRI, MR angiography [MRA]) utilization, acute treatment (endovascular thrombectomy [EVT] and intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]), and mortality while in the hospital and at 30 days and 1 year post discharge. RESULTS: Significantly increasing utilization trends for CTA (250%), CTP (428%) and MRI (18%), and a decreasing trend for MRA (-33%) were observed from 2012 to 2019 (P < .0001). Controlling for covariates in the logistic regression models, CTA and CTP were significantly associated with higher EVT and IVT utilization. Although CTA, MRI, and MRA were associated with lower mortality, CTP was associated with higher mortality post discharge. Less neuroimaging was performed in rural patients; older patients (≥80 years) had lower utilization of CTA, MRI, and MRA; female patients had lower rates of CTA; and Black patients had lower utilization of CTA and CTP. CONCLUSIONS: CTA and CTP utilization increased in the Medicare ischemic stroke population from 2012 to 2019 and both were associated with greater EVT and IVT use. However, disparities exist in neuroimaging utilization across all demographic groups, and further understanding of the root causes of these disparities will be crucial to achieving equity in stroke care.

Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent stroke patients suffer significant morbidity and mortality, representing almost 30% of the stroke population. Our objective was to determine the clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent ischemic stroke (recurrent-IS). METHODS: Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020192709). Following PRISMA guidelines, our medical librarian conducted a search in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL (last performed on August 25, 2020). INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Studies reporting clinical outcomes and/or costs of recurrent-IS; (2) Original research published in English in year 2010 or later; (3) Study participants aged ≥18 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) Case reports/studies, abstracts/posters, Editorial letters/reviews; (2) Studies analyzing interventions other than intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Four independent reviewers selected studies with review of titles/abstracts and full-text, and performed data extraction. Discrepancies were resolved by a senior independent arbitrator. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Initial search yielded 20,428 studies. Based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, 9 studies were selected, consisting of 24,499 recurrent-IS patients. In 5 studies, recurrent-IS ranged from 4.4-56.8% of the ischemic stroke cohorts at 3 or 12 months, or undefined follow-up. Mean age was 60-80 years and female proportions were 38.5-61.1%. Clinical outcomes included mortality 11.6-25.9% for in-hospital, 30-days, or 4-years (3 studies). In one study from the U.S., mean in-hospital costs were $17,121(SD-$53,693) and 1-year disability costs were $34,639(SD-$76,586) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the paucity of data on clinical outcomes and costs of recurrent-IS and identifies gaps in existing literature to direct future research.

Striving for Socioeconomic Equity in Ischemic Stroke Care: Imaging and Acute Treatment Utilization From a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

PURPOSE: Prior studies have shown socioeconomic disparities in advanced neuroimaging and acute treatment utilization in patients with ischemic stroke. The authors analyzed whether socioeconomic factors were associated with stroke neuroimaging and acute treatment utilization at a comprehensive stroke center. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive acute ischemic stroke discharges from 2012 to 2020 at a comprehensive stroke center was performed. Differences in neuroimaging (CT angiography [CTA], CT perfusion, MRI, and MR angiography [MRA]) and acute treatment (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] and endovascular thrombectomy [EVT]) utilization were evaluated on the basis of socioeconomic factors of age, sex, race, insurance type, and neighborhood-level median household income. Chi-square tests were used for bivariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations between socioeconomic factors and neuroimaging or treatment utilization while controlling for stroke-specific factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 6,140 ischemic stroke discharges, race and insurance type were not significantly associated with lower utilization of neuroimaging (CTA, CT perfusion, MRI, and MRA) or acute stroke treatment (IVT and EVT) after controlling for stroke-specific factors and comorbidities. However, median household income < $80,000/year was associated with lower IVT use (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.87). In addition, age ≥ 80 years had lower CTA (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.75) and EVT (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.73) utilization, and female sex had lower CTA (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93) utilization. Significantly higher utilization was observed for MRI in Asian (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) and uninsured (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.07-2.50) patients and for MRA (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49) and EVT (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20-2.20) in privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Once access to a comprehensive stroke center is achieved, socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of health care resources, particularly advanced neuroimaging and acute treatment, may be improved in patients with ischemic stroke.

Evaluation of direct-to-angiography suite (DTAS) and conventional clinical pathways in stroke care: a simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid time to reperfusion is essential to minimize morbidity and mortality in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). We aimed to evaluate the workflow times when utilizing a direct-to-angiography suite (DTAS) pathway for patients with suspected stroke presenting at a comprehensive stroke center compared with a conventional CT pathway. METHODS: We developed a discrete-event simulation (DES) model to evaluate DTAS workflow timelines compared with a conventional CT pathway, varying the admission NIHSS score treatment eligibility criteria. Model parameters were estimated based on 2 year observational data from our institution. Sensitivity analyses of simulation parameters were performed to assess the impact of patient volume and baseline utilization of angiography suites on workflow times utilizing DTAS. RESULTS: Simulation modeling of stroke patients (SimStroke) demonstrated door-to-reperfusion time savings of 0.2-3.5 min (p=0.05) for a range of DTAS eligibility criteria (ie, last known well to arrival <6 hours and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥6-11), when compared with the conventional stroke care pathway. Sensitivity analyses revealed that DTAS time savings is highly dependent on baseline utilization of angiography suites. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the SimStroke model showed comparable time intervals for door-to-reperfusion for DTAS compared with a conventional stroke care pathway. However, the DTAS pathway was very sensitive to baseline angiography suite utilization, with even a 10% increase eliminating the advantages of DTAS compared with the conventional pathway. Given the minimal time savings modeled here, further investigation of implementing the DTAS pathway in clinical care is warranted.

Cost-Consequence Analysis of Advanced Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to illustrate the potential costs and health consequences of implementing advanced CT angiography and perfusion (CTAP) as the initial imaging in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) symptoms at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Methods: A decision-simulation model based on the American Heart Association's recommendations for AIS care pathways was developed to assess imaging strategies for a 5-year period from the institutional perspective. The following strategies were compared: (1) advanced CTAP imaging: NCCT + CTA + CT perfusion at the time of presentation; (2) standard-of-care: non-contrast CT (NCCT) at the time of presentation, with CT angiography (CTA) ± CT perfusion only in select patients (initial imaging to exclude hemorrhage and extensive ischemia) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) evaluation. Model parameters were defined with evidence-based data. Cost-consequence and sensitivity analyses were performed. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days was used as the outcome measure. Results: The decision-simulation modeling revealed that adoption of the advanced CTAP imaging increased per-patient imaging costs by 1.19% ($9.28/$779.72), increased per-patient treatment costs by 33.25% ($729.96/$2,195.24), and decreased other per-patient acute care costs by 0.7% (-$114.12/$16,285.85). The large increase in treatment costs was caused by higher proportion of patients being treated. However, improved outcomes lowered the other per-patient acute care costs. Over the five-year period, advanced CTAP imaging led to 1.63% (66/4,040) more patients with good outcomes (90-day mRS 0-2), 2.23% (66/2,960) fewer patients with poor outcomes (90-day mRS 3-5), and no change in mortality (90-day mRS 6). Our CT equipment utilization analysis showed that the demand for CT equipment in terms of scanner time (minutes) was 24% lower in the advanced CTAP imaging strategy compared to the standard-of-care strategy. The number of EVT procedures performed at the CSC may increase by 50%. Conclusions: Our study reveals that adoption of advanced CTAP imaging at presentation increases the demand for treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients as more patients are diagnosed within the treatment time window compared to standard-of-care imaging. Advanced imaging also leads to more patients with good functional outcomes and fewer patients with dependent functional status.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Ischemic Stroke Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic last year. While a clear impact of COVID-19 on the declining stroke volume has been reported, its overall impact on stroke presentation and clinical outcomes has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes at comprehensive stroke centers. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke from the Get With The Guidelines database was performed from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2020. The following time periods were defined: Pre-COVID (January/February), Peak-COVID (March/April), and Post-COVID (May/June). Bivariate analyses were performed comparing the 2020 and 2019 time periods to determine differences in stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: Stroke volumes were significantly lower during the Peak-COVID period in 2020 compared to that in 2019, with an absolute decline of 49.5% (P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to present after 24 hours from last known well during the 2020 Peak-COVID period (P = 0.03). However, there was not a significant difference in the rate of treatment with either the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or mechanical thrombectomy during the Peak-COVID period. Interestingly, relative treatment rates increased during the 2020 Post-COVID period to 11.4% (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The overall ischemic stroke volume decreased during the pandemic, and patients had a tendency to present later, beyond eligible treatment windows. However, rates of treatment, patient demographics, and stroke outcomes did not significantly change when compared to the prior year.

Recovery of outpatient imaging utilization during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Radiology practices experienced marked reductions in outpatient imaging volumes. Our purpose was to evaluate the timing, rate, and degree of recovery of outpatient imaging during the first wave of the pandemic. We also sought to ascertain the relationship of outpatient imaging recovery to the incidence of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: Retrospective study of outpatient imaging volumes in a large healthcare system was performed from January 1, 2019-August 25, 2020. Dataset was split to compare Pre-COVID (weeks 1-9), Peak-COVID (weeks 10-15) and Recovery-COVID (weeks 16-34) periods. Chi-square and Independent-samples t-tests compared weekly outpatient imaging volumes in 2020 and 2019. Regression analyses assessed the rate of decline and recovery in Peak-COVID and Recovery-COVID periods, respectively. RESULTS: Total outpatient imaging volume in 2020 (weeks 1-34) was 327,738 exams, compared to 440,314 in 2019. The 2020 mean weekly imaging volumes were significantly decreased in Peak-COVID (p = 0.0148) and Recovery-COVID (p = 0.0003) periods. Mean weekly decline rate was -2580 exams/week and recovery rate was +617 exams/week. The 2020 Post-COVID (weeks 10-34) period had an average decrease of 36.5% (4813.4/13,178.6) imaging exams/week and total estimated decrease of 120,335 exams. Significant inverse correlation (-0.8338, p < 0.0001) was seen between positive-tested COVID-19 cases and imaging utilization with 1-week lag during Post-COVID (weeks 10-34) period. CONCLUSION: Recovery of outpatient imaging volume during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic showed a gradual return to pre-pandemic levels over the course of 3-4 months. The rate of imaging utilization was inversely associated with new positive-tested COVID-19 cases with a 1-week lag.

Early Thrombectomy Outcomes in Transfer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal patient transportation destination of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive variables that determine stroke outcomes depending on the patient transportation destination. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using an AIS database consisting of patients who underwent thrombectomy admitted to our institution from November 1, 2011, through October 1, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were included in the statistical analysis; 42.1% (72/171) of patients were in the mothership group (directly admitted) and 57.9% (99/171) in the drip-and-ship group (transferred). Multivariable logistic regression revealed the predictive factors for favorable outcomes were driving distance (expressed in miles) between the patient's home and a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.99; P = .035), absence of diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.60; 95% CI, 1.20-10.82; P = .022), lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission (OR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = .003), and shorter symptom onset to CSC arrival time (expressed in hours) (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that a shorter driving distance between the patient's home and CSC, absence of diabetes, lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and shorter onset to hospital arrival time positively impacted the outcomes of endovascularly treated AIS patients.

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Initial Imaging Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care.

PURPOSE: National guidelines recommend prompt identification of candidates for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment, requiring timely neuroimaging with CT and/or MRI. CT is often preferred because of its widespread availability and rapid acquisition. Despite higher diagnostic accuracy of MRI, it commonly involves complex workflows that could potentially cause treatment time delays. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact on outcomes of imaging utilization before treatment decisions at comprehensive stroke centers for patients presenting with suspected AIS in the anterior circulation with last-known-well-to-arrival time 0 to 24 hours. METHODS: A decision simulation model based on the American Heart Association's recommendations for AIS care pathways was developed from a health care perspective to compare initial imaging strategies: (1) stepwise-CT: noncontrast CT (NCCT) at the time of presentation, with CT angiography (CTA) ± CT perfusion (CTP) only in select patients (initial imaging to exclude hemorrhage and extensive ischemia) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) evaluation; (2) stepwise-hybrid: NCCT at the time of presentation, with MR angiography (MRA) ± MR perfusion (MRP) only for MT evaluation; (3) stepwise-advanced: NCCT + CTA at presentation, with MR diffusion-weighted imaging (MR DWI) + MRP only for MT evaluation; (4) comprehensive-CT: NCCT + CTA + CTP at the time of presentation; and (5) comprehensive-MR: MR DWI + MRA + MRP at the time of presentation. Model parameters were defined using evidence-based data. Cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness analyses revealed that comprehensive-CT and comprehensive-MR yield the highest lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (4.81 and 4.82, respectively). However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of comprehensive-MR is $233,000/QALY compared with comprehensive-CT. Stepwise-CT, stepwise-hybrid, and stepwise-advanced strategies are dominated, yielding lower QALYs and higher costs compared with comprehensive-CT. CONCLUSIONS: Performing comprehensive-CT at presentation is the most cost-effective initial imaging strategy at comprehensive stroke centers.

Imaging Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights Socioeconomic Health Disparities.

OBJECTIVE: The devastating impact from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlights long-standing socioeconomic health disparities in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate socioeconomic factors related to imaging utilization during the pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive imaging examinations was performed from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020, across all service locations (inpatient, emergency, outpatient). Patient level data were provided for socioeconomic factors (age, sex, race, insurance status, residential zip code). Residential zip code was used to assign median income level. The weekly total imaging volumes in 2020 and 2019 were plotted from January 1 to May 31 stratified by socioeconomic factors to demonstrate the trends during the pre-COVID-19 (January 1 to February 28) and post-COVID-19 (March 1 to May 31) periods. Independent-samples t tests were used to statistically compare the 2020 and 2019 socioeconomic groups. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, the 2020 total imaging volume in the post-COVID-19 period revealed statistically significant increased imaging utilization in patients who are aged 60 to 79 years (P = .0025), are male (P < .0001), are non-White (Black, Asian, other, unknown; P < .05), are covered by Medicaid or uninsured (P < .05), and have income below $80,000 (P < .05). However, there was a significant decrease in imaging utilization among patients who are younger (<18 years old; P < .0001), are female (P < .0001), are White (P = .0003), are commercially insured (P < .0001), and have income ≥$80,000 (P < .05). DISCUSSION: During the pandemic, there was a significant change in imaging utilization varying by socioeconomic factors, consistent with the known health disparities observed in the prevalence of COVID-19. These findings could have significant implications in directing utilization of resources during the pandemic and subsequent recovery.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on imaging utilization across practice settings. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in the composition of inpatient imaging volumes for modality types and Current Procedural Terminology-coded groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective study of inpatient imaging volumes in a large health care system was performed, analyzing weekly imaging volumes by modality types (radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine) in years 2020 and 2019. The data set was split to compare pre-COVID-19 (weeks 1-9) and post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-16) periods. Further subanalyses compared early post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-13) and late post-COVID-19 (weeks 14-16) periods. Statistical comparisons were performed using χ2 and independent-samples t tests. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, total inpatient imaging volume in 2020 post-COVID-19, early and late post-COVID-19 periods, declined by 13.6% (from 78,902 to 68,168), 16.6% (from 45,221 to 37,732), and 9.6% (from 33,681 to 30,436), respectively. By week 16, inpatient imaging volume rebounded and was only down 4.2% (from 11,003 to 10,546). However, a statistically significant shift (P < .0001) in the 2020 composition mix was observed largely comprised of radiography (74.3%), followed by CT (12.7%), ultrasound (8%), MRI (2.4%), interventional radiology (2.3%), and nuclear medicine (0.4%). Although the vast majority of imaging studies declined, few Current Procedural Terminology-coded groups showed increased trends in imaging volumes in the late post-COVID-19 period, including CT angiography chest, radiography chest, and ultrasound venous duplex. DISCUSSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a decrease in inpatient imaging volumes accompanied by a shift away from cross-sectional imaging toward radiography. These findings could have significant implications in planning for a potential resurgence.

Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Imaging Case Volumes.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had significant economic impact on radiology with markedly decreased imaging case volumes. The purpose of this study was to quantify the imaging volumes during the COVID-19 pandemic across patient service locations and imaging modality types. METHODS: Imaging case volumes in a large health care system were retrospectively studied, analyzing weekly imaging volumes by patient service locations (emergency department, inpatient, outpatient) and modality types (x-ray, mammography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine) in years 2020 and 2019. The data set was split to compare pre-COVID-19 (weeks 1-9) and post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-16) periods. Independent-samples t tests compared the mean weekly volumes in 2020 and 2019. RESULTS: Total imaging volume in 2020 (weeks 1-16) declined by 12.29% (from 522,645 to 458,438) compared with 2019. Post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-16) revealed a greater decrease (28.10%) in imaging volumes across all patient service locations (range 13.60%-56.59%) and modality types (range 14.22%-58.42%). Total mean weekly volume in 2020 post-COVID-19 (24,383 [95% confidence interval 19,478-29,288]) was statistically reduced (P = .003) compared with 33,913 [95% confidence interval 33,429-34,396] in 2019 across all patient service locations and modality types. The greatest decline in 2020 was seen at week 16 specifically for outpatient imaging (88%) affecting all modality types: mammography (94%), nuclear medicine (85%), MRI (74%), ultrasound (64%), interventional (56%), CT (46%), and x-ray (22%). DISCUSSION: Because the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain, these results may assist in guiding short- and long-term practice decisions based on the magnitude of imaging volume decline across different patient service locations and specific imaging modality types.