Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Standard Medical Therapy on Exercise Capacity in HFrEF Patients.

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) reduces mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to enalapril. However, its effects on functional capacity remain uncertain; consequently, we sought to compare Sac/Val vs. standard medical therapy, in terms of effects on prognostically significant CPET parameters, in HFrEF patients during a long follow-up period. We conducted a single-center, observational study in an HF clinic; specifically, we retrospectively identified that 12 patients switched to Sac/Val and 13 patients that managed with standard, optimal medical therapy (control group). At each visit, baseline, and follow-up (median time: 16 months; IQ range: 11.5-22), we collected demographic information, medical history, vital signs, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, standard laboratory data, pharmacological treatment information, and echocardiographic parameters. The study's primary end-point was the change from baseline in peak VO2 (adjusted to body weight). We did not observe significant differences between the two study groups at baseline. Similarly, we did not observe any significant differences during the follow-up in mean values of peak VO2 corrected for body weight: Sac/Val baseline: 12.2 ± 4.6 and FU: 12.7 ± 3.3 vs. control group: 13.1 ± 4.2 and 13.0 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min; p = 0.49. No significant treatment differences were observed for changes in VE/VCO2 slope: Sac/Val baseline: 35.4 ± 7.4 and FU: 37.2 ± 13.1 vs. control group: 34.6 ± 9.1 and 34.0 ± 7.3; p = 0.49. In conclusion, after a median follow-up period of 16 months, there was no significant benefit of Sac/Val on peak VO2 and other measures of CPET compared with standard optimal therapy in patients with HFrEF.

Untargeted lipidomics reveals specific lipid profiles in COVID-19 patients with different severity from Campania region (Italy).

COVID-19 infection evokes various systemic alterations that push patients not only towards severe acute respiratory syndrome but causes an important metabolic dysregulation with following multi-organ alteration and potentially poor outcome. To discover novel potential biomarkers able to predict disease's severity and patient's outcome, in this study we applied untargeted lipidomics, by a reversed phase ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-trapped ion mobility mass spectrometry platform (RP-UHPLC-TIMS-MS), on blood samples collected at hospital admission in an Italian cohort of COVID-19 patients (45 mild, 54 severe, 21 controls). In a subset of patients, we also collected a second blood sample in correspondence of clinical phenotype modification (longitudinal population). Plasma lipid profiles revealed several lipids significantly modified in COVID-19 patients with respect to controls and able to discern between mild and severe clinical phenotype. Severe patients were characterized by a progressive decrease in the levels of LPCs, LPC-Os, PC-Os, and, on the contrary, an increase in overall TGs, PEs, and Ceramides. A machine learning model was built by using both the entire dataset and with a restricted lipid panel dataset, delivering comparable results in predicting severity (AUC= 0.777, CI: 0.639-0.904) and outcome (AUC= 0.789, CI: 0.658-0.910). Finally, re-building the model with 25 longitudinal (t1) samples, this resulted in 21 patients correctly classified. In conclusion, this study highlights specific lipid profiles that could be used monitor the possible trajectory of COVID-19 patients at hospital admission, which could be used in targeted approaches.

Clinical and echocardiographic benefit of Sacubitril/Valsartan in a real-world population with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters and outcomes in a real-world population with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This was a prospective observational study enrolling patients with HFrEF undergoing treatment with S/V. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death and HF rehospitalization at 12 months follow-up; secondary outcomes were all-cause death, cardiac death and the occurrence of rehospitalization for worsening HF. The clinical outcome was compared with a retrospective cohort of 90 HFrEF patients treated with standard medical therapy. The study included 90 patients (66.1 ± 11.7 years) treated with S/V. The adjusted regression analysis showed a significantly lower risk for the primary outcome (HR:0.31; 95%CI, 0.11-0.83; p = 0.019) and for HF rehospitalization (HR:0.27; 95%CI, 0.08-0.94; p = 0.039) in S/V patients as compared to the control group. A significant improvement in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end systolic volume and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure was observed up to 6 months. S/V did not affect negatively renal function and was associated with a significantly lower dose of furosemide dose prescribed at 6- and 12-month follow-up. In this study, S/V reduced the risk of HF rehospitalization and cardiac death at 1 year in patients with HFrEF. S/V improved NYHA class, echocardiographic parameters and need of furosemide, and preserved renal function.

Predictors of outcome in heart failure patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip treatment.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic predictors of outcome in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing MitraClip implantation (MCi) are still poorly known. The aim of our study is to identify the baseline predictors of outcome in FMR patients candidate to MCi. METHODS: All patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe or severe FMR undergoing MCi at our institution were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. Baseline clinical and instrumental data were collected. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of cardiac death; secondary endpoints were all-cause death and the composite of cardiac death or rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: 74 patients (mean 71.6 ±â€¯8.3 years) were enrolled. During follow-up (median 416.0 days), the primary endpoint occurred in 15 (20.3%), all-cause death in 26 (35.1%) and the composite endpoint in 25 (33.8%). At multivariate analysis, the left atrial volume index (LAVi; HR:1.02; P = 0.048) and the low peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2; HR:0.73; P = 0.018) increased the risk of cardiac death at follow-up; atrial fibrillation (AF; HR:2.69; P = 0.027) was independently associated to all-cause death and the low level of peak VO2 was an independent predictor of overall mortality (HR:0.70; P < 0.001) as well as of the composite endpoint (HR:0.73; P < 0.001). The ROC analysis identified a peak VO2 cut-off of 10.0 mL/kg/min as the best predictor for the three study endpoints; the best LAVi cut-off for cardiac death was 67 mL/m2. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the individual and combined outcome predictors confirmed their significant stratification ability during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Peak VO2, along with LAVi and AF, identify FMR patients with the worst prognosis after MCi.