Strain differences in the disruption of prepulse inhibition of startle after systemic and intra-accumbens amphetamine administration.

BACKGROUND: Sprague Dawley (SD) rats are significantly more sensitive than Long Evans (LE) rats to the disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) by systemically-administered dopamine (DA) agonists. This strain difference is heritable and insensitive to cross-fostering. Inherited differences in the ability of elevated DA activity to disrupt PPI may be useful for understanding the neural basis for PPI deficits in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. METHODS: PPI was tested in male SD and LE rats after amphetamine (AMPH) was administered: 1) subcutaneously (sc), or intra-cerebrally (ic) into 2) the nucleus accumbens core (NACc; medial or lateral subregions) or the NAC shell; 3) the anteromedial striatum (AMS) or 4) the posterior striatum (PS). RESULTS: SD and LE rats had comparable PPI levels after sc vehicle injection. PPI was disrupted in SD but not LE rats after sc AMPH injection. LE insensitivity to AMPH was confirmed after sc injection into non-pigmented dermis, demonstrating that it did not reflect melanocyte sequestration of AMPH. PPI was also disrupted in SD rats after ic infusion into the NACc (medial core: p<0.005; lateral core: p<0.001); in LE rats, these effects only approached threshold levels (medial core: p<0.06; lateral core: p<0.051). In SD rats, the highest dose of AMPH (40 microg) tended to reduce PPI after infusion into the AMS or PS, while in LE rats, this dose potentiated PPI after PS infusion. Comparisons of PPI in SD vs. LE rats revealed significant main effects of strain (SD>LE) after vehicle infusions into the NACc subregions and the PS. Comparisons of pre-infusion "matching" data, data from the first infusion day, and data from separate rats in a "mock-infusion" paradigm is consistent with the possibility that SD>LE PPI after ic vehicle infusion reflects the impact of restraint stress on PPI in LE rats. CONCLUSIONS: PPI is disrupted by AMPH administered sc or into the NACc in SD but not LE rats. Reduced PPI after ic vehicle infusion in LE vs. SD rats may reflect greater PPI-reducing effects of restraint stress in LE rats. The differential impact of restraint on PPI in SD vs. LE rats complicates the interpretation of strain differences in the effects of ic manipulations, but may provide an avenue for investigating the basis for differences in vulnerability to the gating-disruptive effects of stress.

Separable noradrenergic and dopaminergic regulation of prepulse inhibition in rats: implications for predictive validity and Tourette Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Startle inhibition by lead stimuli (prepulse inhibition, "PPI"), and the disruption of this process by dopamine agonists and N-methyl-D: -aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, are used in predictive models for antipsychotic development. PPI is also disrupted by the norepinephrine alpha-1 agonist, cirazoline, and the PPI-disruptive effects of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine are opposed by the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, desipramine. The hypothesis that PPI may be regulated by norepinephrine, or by interactions between dopamine and norepinephrine substrates, was tested in a series of experiments with the alpha-2 agonist, clonidine, which is used clinically to treat Tourette Syndrome (TS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPI was measured in male Sprague-Dawley rats after pretreatment with clonidine or the D2 antagonist haloperidol, and treatment with cirazoline, amphetamine, the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine, or the NMDA antagonist, phencyclidine. RESULTS: PPI was disrupted by cirazoline; this effect was prevented by clonidine but not haloperidol. PPI was disrupted by apomorphine; this effect was prevented by haloperidol but not clonidine. Clonidine also failed to oppose the PPI-disruptive effects of amphetamine and augmented the PPI-disruptive effects of phencyclidine. Over a range of prepulse intervals, clonidine enhanced PPI at short intervals and opposed the PPI-disruptive effects of cirazoline at long intervals. CONCLUSIONS: PPI is regulated by both norepinephrine and dopamine substrates that are neurochemically separable. The PPI-protective effects of clonidine suggest that the noradrenergic regulation of PPI may have utility for predicting therapeutic benefit in TS for drugs other than antipsychotics. Clonidine's failure to prevent the PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine or phencyclidine further support the specificity of these PPI models for detecting drugs with antipsychotic properties.

Forebrain D1 function and sensorimotor gating in rats: effects of D1 blockade, frontal lesions and dopamine denervation.

Prefrontal D1 hypoactivity is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, and might contribute to sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia patients, based on evidence that D1 blockade in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) reduces prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) in animal models. PPI is disrupted by systemic and intra-MPFC infusion of the D1 antagonist, SCH23390. We investigated the role of the MPFC in the PPI-disruptive effects of systemic SCH23390 administration, and more generally, in the dopaminergic regulation of PPI. PPI was measured in rats after forebrain manipulations, including systemic administration of SCH23390, ibotenic acid lesions of the MPFC, and 6OHDA-induced dopamine (DA) depletion from MPFC or nucleus accumbens. Systemic SCH23390 disrupted PPI; these effects were not opposed by ibotenic acid lesions of the MPFC. PPI remained intact after MPFC DA depletion, but--as predicted by Bubser and Koch [M. Bubser, M. Koch, Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response of rats is reduced by 6 hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex, Psychopharmacology 113 (1994) 487-492]--a reduction in PPI from pre- to post-surgery correlated significantly with MPFC DA loss. The effects of systemic SCH23390 were not opposed by NAC DA depletion. D1 receptors regulate PPI in rats, but this effect does not appear to be mediated either by the MPFC or by increased mesolimbic DA activity.

Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of behavior in rats: relationship to D2-like receptor G-protein function.

We reported heritable differences between Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Long Evans (LE) rats in their sensitivity to the disruption of prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) by dopamine (DA) agonists, and in their basal levels and turnover of forebrain DA. In an effort to better understand these differences, we assessed strain patterns in the efficacy of D2-like receptor-G-protein coupling using [35S]GTPgammaS binding in brain regions that contribute to the dopaminergic regulation of PPI. Sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine (APO) was examined in SD, LE, and F1 (SD x LE) rats. Basal and DA-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding were then assessed in these rats using conditions that preferentially exclude Gs proteins to favor visualization of D2-like receptors. To explore the behavioral specificity of these strain differences, locomotor responses to APO and amphetamine (AMPH) were also assessed in SD, LE, and F1 rats. Strain differences were evident in the PPI-disruptive effects of APO (SD>F1>LE), and in the locomotor responses to AMPH (LE>F1>SD) and APO (SD exhibited motor suppression, LE exhibited motor activation). Compared to SD rats, LE rats exhibited greater DA-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in nucleus accumbens and caudatoputamen, while F1 progeny had intermediate levels. In conclusion, SD and LE rats exhibit heritable differences in D2-mediated behavioral and biochemical measures. Conceivably, genes that regulate heritable differences in forebrain D2 function may contribute to heritable differences in PPI in patients with specific neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and Tourette Syndrome.

Reduced startle gating after D1 blockade: effects of concurrent D2 blockade.

BACKGROUND: Prefrontal D1 systems have been implicated in the regulation of working memory and in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. D1 hypofunction might contribute to reduced sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia patients since D1 activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) regulates prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) in animal models. We studied the neurochemical basis for the D1 regulation of PPI in rats. METHODS: PPI to weak (1-5 dB over background) prepulses was measured after systemic or intra-MPFC administration of the D1 antagonist, SCH 23390, in rats pretreated systemically with the D2 antagonist, haloperidol (vehicle or 0.1 mg/kg). RESULTS: After vehicle pretreatment, systemic and intra-MPFC SCH 23390 disrupted PPI produced by weak prepulses. This effect was not significantly opposed by pretreatment with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg). In contrast, the PPI-disruptive effects of the DA agonist amphetamine were significantly opposed by this dose of haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: D1 blockade reduces PPI, but this effect does not appear to be mediated entirely via increased dopamine transmission at D2 receptors.

Neurochemical analysis of rat strain differences in the startle gating-disruptive effects of dopamine agonists.

The disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats by dopamine (DA) agonists is used to study the neural basis of strain differences in dopaminergic function. We reported that, compared to Long-Evans (LEH) rats, Sprague-Dawley (SDH) rats are more sensitive to the PPI-disruptive effects of the direct D1/D2 agonist apomorphine (APO) and the indirect DA agonist d-amphetamine (AMPH). This strain difference is heritable, with PPI drug sensitivity following a generational pattern (SDH>N2>F1>LEH) suggestive of additive effects of multiple genes. Here, we assessed the neurochemical bases for these heritable strain differences by measuring tissue levels of dopamine, serotonin (5HT) and their respective metabolites in several forebrain regions after vehicle, APO or AMPH administration. SDH rats were more sensitive than LEH rats to the PPI-disruptive effects of both APO (0.5 mg/kg) and AMPH (4.5 mg/kg). Several significant SDH vs. LEH strain differences in regional neurochemical levels were detected, as were drug effects on these chemicals. However, SDH, LEH and F1 rats did not exhibit differential drug sensitivity in any neurochemical indices measures. These findings suggest that inherited differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating do not likely reflect differences in presynaptic forebrain dopaminergic or serotonergic processes.